We all have our favorites, this 964 Carrera 4 is ours. Find us on your TV @ www.motorweek.o...
Пікірлер: 211
@theKevronHarris6 жыл бұрын
"It's a collection of curves that makes Saturday afternoon washing and waxing into an R-rated experience."
@tomhertz16146 жыл бұрын
Kevron Harris JOHN was a well known EXHAUST HUMPER .
@theKevronHarris6 жыл бұрын
@@tomhertz1614 😂😂😂😂😂
@kize325 жыл бұрын
Beat that line Top Gear
@jeremyb44935 ай бұрын
And he says it with such a deadpan delivery😄
@teamsalvation6 жыл бұрын
$69,500 in 89 = $142,252 today .... WOWZERS!!
@3.2Carrera Жыл бұрын
The air cooled cars were great. The 964 is a bit more complex than the previous 911's, but you still have a chance to maintain this car yourself 30 years later as this was baked into the design philosophy. Simply amazing cars then and now.
@ryanpatterson95264 жыл бұрын
That thing was STUPID QUICK for 1989! It's still competitive today!
@coletrickle5815 жыл бұрын
One of the main car mags had the Carrera 4 0-60 at 4.8. Yes it was that quick.
@johnsmith-xw4ez5 жыл бұрын
The new 964 Carrera 4.
@kramarenkomaksym3 жыл бұрын
Hmm, why my Porsche Carrera 4s 2006 is slower for 0-60 mph than the old one?
@ke2286 жыл бұрын
That 0-60 time was mind blowing back then. Still impressive today!
@JDMHaze6 жыл бұрын
Keith especially for 247hp
@blairwilliams1366 жыл бұрын
@@JDMHaze my thoughts exactly, that's quick man !
@JDMHaze6 жыл бұрын
Blair Williams it likely had more
@LynxStarAuto5 жыл бұрын
They were misquoted. This vehicles 0-60 were more in the low 5s.
@coletrickle5815 жыл бұрын
@@LynxStarAuto Not for the C4 it wasn't.
@mworld26116 жыл бұрын
0 to 60 in 4.5 seconds in 1989, very impressive!
@JDMHaze6 жыл бұрын
Micheal Micheal and with 247hp at that!!
@mk2mister26 жыл бұрын
Power has to be underrated. 247 seems way too low for it to put out those numbers with that kind of curb weight.
@JDMHaze6 жыл бұрын
Michael Nakis i agree
@nickmotsarsky43826 жыл бұрын
I think it's due to the engine being over the rear axle and great traction.
@R34GTRR356 жыл бұрын
S
@OnTheReelFishing6 жыл бұрын
Way faster than I would have imagined for having 247 horsepower. Cars are too bloated these days.
@Ferraridude136 жыл бұрын
OnTheReelFishing that's the truth. All the collusion protection systems and unnecessary technology weigh cars down. It's crazy by how much
@theKevronHarris6 жыл бұрын
I positively agree. Some cars need a huge weight loss diet plan for better performance and handling.
@kevins97856 жыл бұрын
Well despite what you think, you only have your own age group to blame. CAFE standards have been In place since the early 2000’s. Shall we rally the troops and blame the millennials for this one too?
@jameswillard16 жыл бұрын
Kevin S yeah, probably should
@perpelle6 жыл бұрын
247hp and 0-60 in 4,5 is impressive as hell. For example, my 944 s2 with a little bit less weight then standard and aprox 230hp makes it to 60 in high 5's. RWD though but way slower.
@badopinion6 жыл бұрын
247hp and did the quarter in 13.3! Damn that’s good. Favorite Porsche body style ever.
@JakeFromLateFarm6 жыл бұрын
Many wish that cars were still produced like this. I for one wish that MotorWeek episodes were still produced like this. That intro was deep.
@nessuno54036 жыл бұрын
Jake from State Farm the closest thing are the Singer 911s
@christianbeevers49376 жыл бұрын
I love motorweek, one of the best TV shows for car people.
@rebelusa65852 жыл бұрын
Ive watch motorweek since year 1992. Other car show host come and go. But john davis still here, he original and best.
@34FenwayPark6 жыл бұрын
Over $70000 in 1989-90 is crazy. Today thats almost 150k. Thats starting to get into GT3 territory.
@LynxStarAuto5 жыл бұрын
34FenwayPark it's a Porsche. Not exactly competing in the Toyota Celica price point here.
@spavatch5 жыл бұрын
There's a simple explaination for that. It offered state of the art 4 wheel drive system not many cars could offer at that time, let alone match its sophistication. Today's Carrera 4, however, is just another 4WD sports car. A Porsche it may be, yet just a sports car nevertheless.
@dr.lyleevans69153 жыл бұрын
@@LynxStarAuto He was comparing it to not only a modern Porsche (not Toyota Celica), but a 911 GT3, which is the fastest/most expensive naturally aspirated model available (except for the GT3RS)
@4406bbldb6 жыл бұрын
I was in the gray market back then a imported lots of 930, 911,928s and you know who made up my customer list, mostly US fighter pilots.
@DownassMusic6 жыл бұрын
Everybody take a drink when John makes a comment about an oil pressure gauge and another one for Volt meter 🤣
@aidanwallington97185 жыл бұрын
I have a 1990
@henrysheppard34336 жыл бұрын
Still faster than 90% of cars on the road Respect
@peteranderson45516 жыл бұрын
Still have it in the garage (guards red not gramma beige) and it won't do 0-60 in 4.5. Low to mid 5 sec. Range is more like it as I know its for sure slower than a c5 vette. Porsche was nearly broke at the time and almost discontinued the 911. Hard to believe today. Won't part with the car as the tactile connection with the driver cannot be replicated by more modern cars.
@suttonsplash146 жыл бұрын
Retro Reviews RULE
@fatoputso73756 жыл бұрын
Porsche is always 10+ yrs ahead of the game
@CountryCarReviews5 жыл бұрын
fato putso oh yes the 944 dash and instrument cluster used up until 1995 button like the ones for the seats used up until 1998.
@matthews8526 жыл бұрын
964 Carreras are the best looking 911s imo, followed closely by 993s.
@a.f.s.30045 жыл бұрын
13.30 back in 1989 would have destroyed a C4 Corvette and the Grand National.
@CammieGee5 жыл бұрын
I can't get enough of these retro reviews
@marcscordato43856 жыл бұрын
I miss air cooled porches. They are old school hard core kind of cars. New ones are better and more refined but I think the old ones were more fun.
@jameswillard16 жыл бұрын
As a huge fanboy of the Japanese “supercars” of this era (Supra Twin Turbo, 300ZX TT, FD RX-7, NSX, and even 3000GT VR4) this car always used to piss me off at what it was able to do with so little🤔 Very impressive.....a Corvette ZR1 of this era with significantly more power was barely any quicker
@aaronbays46 жыл бұрын
The ZR1 might not take this car off the line, but it would leave it once the speeds got past 70-80mph.
@jameswillard16 жыл бұрын
Aaron Bays I don’t disagree with you
@231mac6 жыл бұрын
jameswillard1 The 1990 ZR1 did 0-60 in 4.3 and the quarter in 12.6, all while weighing almost 300 lbs more and not benefiting from any traction control. Not sure where you're getting this 'barely' from. Also, ONLY Mototweek has this car's 0-60 at 4.5, everyone else has this car at 5.4, or slower. I think Motorweek goofed, lol.
@moneyparhar6 жыл бұрын
U called datsun Toyota and Mitsubishi supercar smfh
@jameswillard16 жыл бұрын
231mac never saw those times you are quoting for a ZR1. 🤔
@aaronbays46 жыл бұрын
I kind of wonder if Motorweek got a "ringer". Aka a tweaked press car. I don't remember 911's of this era being that fast, at least non-turbo ones. Anyways, those are IMPRESSIVE numbers for 1989. Also this was the first 911 to offer AWD as an option.
@NSXTypeRGTRLM6 жыл бұрын
Wow, even with inflation it really isn't that much more expensive today. Plus that 0-60 time is pretty darn impressive even back then. All that 959 DNA.
@raymondlugo99606 жыл бұрын
Yes this a review of the 1990 model. It's the first year with airbags. A book about the 1989 model tells about the 959 technology incorporated in the Carrera 4. It's not as quick as the 1990 but I've never driven a car that felt so flat around turns. It's grip is amazing.
@generaloranger61506 жыл бұрын
Could you guys post the 80's Pontiac Bonneville SSE review?
@jimw88084 жыл бұрын
I remember watching this back when it came out & wanted a red 911 C4 in May of 1999 I found a1994 Wide Body 911 Carrera 4 red & it still turns heads & I still love it almost 21 years later.
@dr.lyleevans69153 жыл бұрын
Wow. I saw your profile pic and was thinking “what a nice 964” before I even read your post. Were these going for cheap by the late 90’s/early 00’s, since there had not only been another air-cooled generation released in the 993, but also a completely new liquid-cooled 911 in the 996 (in which they ramped up production which would have notably increased the pool of available 911’s on the market). But then again, a 94’ model would have only been a 5 year old car. I had a 98’ silver C2 for about a year and a half, purchased in 04’. Traded it for an 02’ Corvette Z06
@jimw88083 жыл бұрын
@@dr.lyleevans6915 When I bought it I didn't know there were only about 250 made. I payed about 1/3 what I could get today have thought maybe I should sell it but just haven't tryed it sits there where it never gets below 50 & drive it 2 or 3 times a year..
@dr.lyleevans69153 жыл бұрын
@@jimw8808 Wow. Consider yourself lucky.
@JMartinni6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for uploading these old reviews, a great watch.
@mc3films4 жыл бұрын
Last night I dreamt I was ripping one of these around my hometown. I feel like I’ve been on happy juice all day long, as a result. Maybe one of these are in my future. They cost about the same now as they did when they were new, but considering that $70,000 in 1989 is about $150,000 in 2020, I’ll take the “discount.“
@Loachie906 жыл бұрын
Amazing how this design hasn’t aged
@DSC8002 жыл бұрын
To 60 in 4.5 seconds, that has to be wrong. 996 with 300 hp is 5.1 seconds and that was the fastest 911 ever.
@codyC4233 жыл бұрын
4.5 seconds to 60? Why is it so fast? That's what a 964 Turbo would run
@Porsche996driver6 жыл бұрын
Great car. No nonsense performance, braking, and awd handling with auto-sensing locking diff nice!
@Sebastian_Dinwiddie6 жыл бұрын
Porsche managed to wring a couple more years out of an ancient body. Mark my words, the car will be history by 1993.
@dr.lyleevans69153 жыл бұрын
Lucky it’s made it this far. The rear engine layout can never compete, much less succeed into the 21st century.
@MatrixDiscovery6 жыл бұрын
0-60 in 4.5 secs? WTF...that's quick for 2018
@arr0gant15 жыл бұрын
There is no way they got that car to 60 in 4.5
@Jason.W.6 жыл бұрын
Porsche always appears to make magic on their cars
@Bubblun16 жыл бұрын
Amazing numbers for the time. Also amazing: that Porsche would put a Camry beige model in the press fleet.
@chrisdooley64686 жыл бұрын
4.5 0-60 in 1990 w 247hp? Wow. Talk about Porsche understating their power figures I know it’s light but for comparison the Focus RS w AWD and 350hp does about 5.6sec or so from what I gather. I do love these old Porsches though. Shame prices are going nuts. Even the 924s are getting up there
@Dungzoo6 жыл бұрын
Agreed. I'm guessing it's about 300-320hp. What do you think?
@JDMHaze6 жыл бұрын
Dungzoo i agree
@davecom36 жыл бұрын
Probably little to do with inaccurate power figures and more to do with gear ratios and off the line traction.
@JDMHaze6 жыл бұрын
David C Yes the AWD makes the launch alot easier
@davidg40266 жыл бұрын
Chris Dooley -- According to Motor Trend the Focus RS does 0-60 in 4.5 seconds. Car & Driver got 4.6 seconds 0-60 out of the RS. Still impressive that a 30-year-old Porsche can match those times!
@iAPX4325 жыл бұрын
I had a 964 (Carrera 4 not the 964-2 Carrera 2), and I am totally sure it should have been R Rated: enjoyment, pleasure, you could also do it alone, do it as a couple, invite one or 2 friends, have another one behind the wheel, do it faster on straight lines, enjoy the curves, feel the roads like I never had, high revs, hard breakings that don't stop the fun but prepare for another burst of sensations! In 1999 I had the choice of an used Boxster (recent one) with it's incredible balance, or and 90's 964 "old lady" really harder to driver for the same price, and I chose the MILF. It was tremendous! Either in Frenche Savoie goind and returning from ski station, sometimes driving on snow, quietly doing Paris - Albertville (600km) commuting, and also running on the Deutsche Autobahn with other Porscher, between 160 to 240 Km/h (100mph to 150mph).
@ryanpatterson95265 жыл бұрын
Damn, that's still respectably quick today!
@joshuamorehead61246 жыл бұрын
I love these retro reviews
@derrickwillie44496 жыл бұрын
4.5 0-60 isn’t correct!
@chadbarbaro Жыл бұрын
more like 5.1
@derrickwillie4449 Жыл бұрын
@@chadbarbaro a 996 is 5.2. I’m guessing slower.
@sswcubes6 жыл бұрын
Its almost 2019 and i still afford this car that was built in 1989...
@rsrdan3 жыл бұрын
I had the exact same 89 911 C4 I use to take to RRR.
@c32amgftw6 жыл бұрын
Such a nice review, they used to do it right back in the day. It has everything, 1/4, 0-60, braking. Comparison to previous models, pros and cons. Now I have to listen to some pimple faced teenager burning through his dad's savings to tell me how he feels about how the car looks, without going through the performance figures.
@richdelgado34056 жыл бұрын
And today Porsche can get those impressive times...from their station wagon!
@ThatSlowJournalist6 жыл бұрын
I'd personally take the keys to the 993, but this is a matter of taste.
@magneto80026 жыл бұрын
I'm shocked at how fast this car was.
@orbits26 жыл бұрын
why ? Even 60--70, VW,s were the fastest off the line cars verse over weight US muscle cars back then Lic Driver Circa 1968
@dr.lyleevans69153 жыл бұрын
@@orbits2 Maybe 0-30 at best, and even that would be questionable without serious mods (especially against Shelby Cobras and the like). Put even semi-slicks on any late 60’s/early 70’s American muscle and a VW, or period Porsche for that matter wouldn’t have a chance. That said, in this case the rear weight bias does play a role in acceleration, as does the AWD system. The AWD system could potentially hurt acceleration times, however, as it not only adds quite a bit of weight, but also increases the parasitic drivetrain losses and whatnot. Weight is the real secret to this era 911’s primal acceleration. The boxer engine’s great power delivery also played a role, as does the exceptionally low drivetrain loss (for obvious packaging reasons). I suspect these engines were either underrated, these times weren’t accurate (Motorweek is typically slower than other publications), or this one was a ringer. 4.5 second 0-60 isn’t very realistic with this power to weight ratio.
@gdoyle0518 күн бұрын
I believe this is a 1990 C4. 1989 has no airbags, and no interior spoiler deployment. 1989 also only came as a coupe variant
@ErwinSchrodinger646 жыл бұрын
Wow! Almost 30 years later, and 5.0L Mustangs with 450 horsepower are now within this range of these performance figures. Hell, my 280 horsepower Honda Accord Coupe, with a 6-speed manual, can't even come close to this performance figures. One note, this car has a transverse engine, in the rear, allows for less parasitic horsepower loss, due to the drivetrain, to the wheels. Overall, I don't understand why more companies don't do a transverse layout, in the rear. Porsche horsepower is in a different performance league.
@Potaterfilms6 жыл бұрын
Companies probably don't do rr setups anymore because of a safety regulation, the fact that they might have to design a whole new chassis to fit the rr setup and because rr setups can be tricky to handle sometimes. Porsche is the exception to this as they have 60+ years of experience, fine tuning the rr setup so that its manageable. VW also has similar experience but the beetle was manageable because it was slow, not because of a fine tuned chassis.
@DizzyMan246 жыл бұрын
A 2018 Mustang GT can do 0-60 in as low as 3.8 seconds and 1/4 miles as low as 11.8 at over 117mph. So, no, not in range, but far above. This Porsche was on par with the 3400lb, 300hp 2005 Ford Mustang GT, though. Let not forget, the Buick Grand National was as fast as this '89 Porsche in '87.
@ErwinSchrodinger646 жыл бұрын
Lucas, 2017 and below. Furthermore, Porshe's that come with 400 horsepower decimate Ford V8's.
@nessuno54036 жыл бұрын
Rear transverse is a silly point since this was AWD
@ErwinSchrodinger646 жыл бұрын
nes suno, you can't make a blanket statement like that. There are a series of automobiles that have odd trans-configurations. It's dependent on how it's engineered. Looking at the specs of the Nissan GT-R's complex AWD, I would of never thought their layout would create a car with such capable performance. Furthermore, your statement is completely contradicting. Porsche's, in general, including this 911, when it comes to acceleration are some of the fastest accelerating cars in the market.
@JoJoJoker10 ай бұрын
The 964 Carrera 4 is a gem. AWD in a 1960s performance car with an air cooled engine. Even in 1952 auto enthusiasts were bemoaning how the new cars lack true driver involvement!
@landyachtfan796 жыл бұрын
This is actually from '90, not '89.
@nessuno54036 жыл бұрын
landyachtfan79 based on MY coding? If so they're always from a year prior...
@landyachtfan796 жыл бұрын
John says "Welcome to MotorWeek '90" in the intro.
@matthews8526 жыл бұрын
It’s still the same car from 89’
@dr.lyleevans69154 жыл бұрын
89’ didn’t have the airbags like this 90’ had. 90’ had more power too iirc
@georgetown89862 жыл бұрын
Looks better than the 993.
@neilanderson891 Жыл бұрын
At 3:20, Motor Week tries to describe *Lift-Throttle-Oversteer* but doesn't do a good job of it. Let me give it a try: When your *911 C2* is in a tight-turn at speed, and you make the rookie-mistake of lifting-off the throttle, which creates engine-braking, which affects only the rear wheels, which makes the rear-end lift-up a bit, which allows the rear wheels to lose contact with the road, which can cause the rear-end to spin-out of the tight-turn, then is when you're in a Lift-Throttle-Oversteer situation. However - When your *911 C4* is in a tight-turn at speed, and you make the rookie-mistake of lifting-off the throttle, which creates engine-braking, which affects ALL FOUR wheels, which PREVENTS the rear-end from lifting-up significantly, which PREVENTS the rear wheels from losing contact with the road, which PREVENTS the rear-end from spinning-out of the tight-turn, then is when you're using technology to look like a better driver than you really are. (Yeah, I've always been one of the tech-loving rookies.)
@gojackets48942 жыл бұрын
I was watching this one video on KZbin that showed a 1987 911 with manual transmission and convertible top could not break 8.5 seconds to 60 mph. The quarter mile was done between 18 and 19 seconds at just over 80 mph. Pathetic. It lost a lot of power over the years. I still like the car though.
@destructoidx994 жыл бұрын
my honda s2000 is 2800lbs 3000 with me in it and the same 247hp, this carrera is 3250lbs with prob an adult 200lb male which is now 3450lbs my car does 0-60 in 5.4-5.6 secs how the hell does this 911 carrera clock 4.5 seconds dang it 5.0 mustang with 440hp clock 4.5 seconds with the same weight as the porsche what the hellll
@sideshowbob325 жыл бұрын
4.5 0-60 Christ didn't know these were that quick, very impressive for the time and power
@josemontano77674 жыл бұрын
What a beautiful car
@paul_k_73514 ай бұрын
I didn’t know a convertible was that much more expensive than the coupe! Look at the prices now haha.
@ronaldderooij17742 жыл бұрын
Here, the "true" 911 started to die. A 911 is a car that you are glad you survived. Especially in the wet. This car was just, well... too good.
@gvi3419846 жыл бұрын
This was the beginning of the overcomplicated Porsche with its airbags.
@nicholasmaher91756 жыл бұрын
Toyota had the Turbo All Wheel Drive Celica, in 1988.
@pete55345 ай бұрын
And that’s the colour the PR folk at Porsche chose to promote the Carrera 4 to their largest market?
@R34GTRR356 жыл бұрын
the older 911s had a terrible driving position , love the rev gauge in the centre , speedo to the side
@ExplorationOfAI6 жыл бұрын
And it still is the king of the road. The 964 generation and older ones i mean 😁
@Vegasclaw4 жыл бұрын
So this thing has the same 0-60 of a manual 370z nismo and mustang bullitt 🙈
@grandizer45316 жыл бұрын
Street legal gokart.
@calidronelife15726 жыл бұрын
$69,500 = $144,708.07 in 2018
@xavierwarren97992 жыл бұрын
Yep agree with all that sensual stuff
@peterbradshaw80186 жыл бұрын
Love the shape.
@ianfrench15773 жыл бұрын
A day or so ago I watched the 1992 Porsche 911 turbo Motorweek review and that car had a 0-60mph time of 4.8 seconds. This 1989 Carrera 4 has a 0-60mph time of 4.5 seconds, and to the best of my knowledge, the Carrera is supposed to be the base model and normally aspirated. The turbo model is supposed to be the top of the range. Based upon this observation, it appears the basic model is quicker than the top model, and in 3 years, the car became slightly slower.
@youbian5 жыл бұрын
Ah... simpler times. Before every KZbin jockey with a car fetish christened themselves auto journalists.
@georgetown89862 жыл бұрын
Who would buy a gold/tan 911? Looks absolutely horrible.
@Ohyesbigboi Жыл бұрын
I love it it’s called Linen metallic 👍
@silweragentum7395 жыл бұрын
Had. A friend with a 90 Porcshe 911 but it was a Carrera2, nice car but some stuff seemed old inside. Even the 2wd was fast as the engine hang over the rear wheels. Good car.
@spavatch5 жыл бұрын
I find it hard to believe how this thing flies. It's not even a Turbo yet the almost twice as powerful 959 is hardly any better in straight line acceleration.
@furqantarique34844 жыл бұрын
Late 80s Porsche
@Anderson-ky6ps2 жыл бұрын
Porsche carreira é muito maravilhoso imagina como é a velocidade sensacional 👍👍😁
@E_tiBEAMERBOY6 жыл бұрын
Lmao funny how they say lift off oversteer made the rwd version a handful
@JDMHaze6 жыл бұрын
E36 BEAMERBOY lol ikr
@nickmotsarsky43826 жыл бұрын
Why?
@marklandgraf76674 жыл бұрын
Front boot = Froot
@rdjd62545 жыл бұрын
Nice but not fast .1993 Suzuki gsxr 1100 0 to60 2.9 second quarter miles..10.20 141 mph That's faster and way cheaper......
@jdolger66345 жыл бұрын
So what you're saying is motorcycles of a particular era are generally faster in a straight line than sports cars of the same era? Oh, and motorcycles are less expensive than sports cars? Thanks Captain Obvious. LOL.
@oibal605 жыл бұрын
The 964 is a nice model. The 993 is so gorgeous though.
@adrianniemiec86695 жыл бұрын
I want to see a video of a rear driven 911 , vs the NSX.
@eddiegray7936 жыл бұрын
Wow what a price tag.. new booster today
@Defender-Guy6 жыл бұрын
Great car, but the 993 was much better.
@glovedcop696 жыл бұрын
By today's standards those are great numbers!
@santosbarron37546 жыл бұрын
Looks very similar to a vw beetle.
@carlosraide48233 жыл бұрын
Que belleza de auto. 🌐🌎🌍🌏
@Flies2FLL6 жыл бұрын
13.3 @ 104 is HORSEHIT! In Ashburn, Virginia in 1993 I came to a stoplight with a 964. I was in my '92 Corrado SLC, and it was stock. I was 150 pounds, my passenger was 225, and the guy in the 964 was about 200+. We raced and it was neck and neck! My corrado pulled a 14.86 @ 94.25 at Orlando Speedway in Bithlo a few years later with only me and a Neuspeed cat back exhaust installed. The 964 wasn't a drag car, it was useful in curves if you knew what you were doing. But it was NO faster than a VR6 powered Volkswagen....
@chadbarbaro2 жыл бұрын
A corrado never won shit!..... Imsa.... LeMans......? Nope
@Flies2FLL2 жыл бұрын
@@chadbarbaro Whatever that means. Just watch out for that wonderful trailing throttle oversteer...
@nickma715 жыл бұрын
No weight
@randy25rhoads6 жыл бұрын
7:25 That panel gap tho. Still want one.
@feints77146 жыл бұрын
hand made...
@sc400gilliland6 жыл бұрын
You barely buy a truck for that price now smh
@LynxStarAuto5 жыл бұрын
James Gilliland arbitrary... this car's equivalent is well into the 100k today.
@bwxmoto5 жыл бұрын
It would actually be $141,000 in 2018
@pipetoloza53576 жыл бұрын
Better than a wrx with 30 hp less
@chrisdooley64686 жыл бұрын
It’s mind blowing right? I just made a similar statement above concerning the Focus RS w 100hp more.
@pipetoloza53576 жыл бұрын
Of course there amazing numbers from 90's cars,newer cars only have lots of horsepower but they are in the same or slower than the old sport cars
@Me-eb3wv6 жыл бұрын
first
@victorvictor85876 жыл бұрын
Odd body design looks like Something out of Cartoon .
@nessuno54036 жыл бұрын
Victor Victor it's a VW Beetle derivative 😉
@jakesmith29846 жыл бұрын
Lack of appreciation is your problem.
@OMGWTFLOLSMH6 жыл бұрын
Starts at 1:26 The 0-60 time stated as 4.5 is BS. Car & Driver measured it at 5.1, and the quarter in 13.6. I trust them more than I trust these milquetoasts.