2.7 turbo dragy times + 2.7 shootout

The 716carguys play with a 2021 2.7 liter turbo Chevy Silverado and a 2019 f150 eco boost then they put the Silverado to the dragy test to see what kind of times that little motor in that big truck can put down.

[@Yung_Hefty]

Hey 2.7L F150 owner here, and you wanna launch at 2500rpm it’s the sweet spot. If you just keep it on the gas as much as you possibly can without moving you’ll 1) not have enough boost (cause it’ll just open the waste gate) 2) you’ll burn down the motor. Gettin too hot.

[@clam741]

This is cute , Chevy guys were making fun of ford putting a turbo 6 in a full size truck yet here they are with a turbo 4 cyl lol

[@716carguys4]

It’s crazy the power they can make with small motors now

[@RW-zh7kl]

Strangely GM always seems to do what Ford does a year or two after

[@victor714ps3]

whats up with that? I get it with the sound but why is everything that is not a v8 being put down? Is it because the little engines are being engineered to be comparable with v8 engines?

[@jdp0316]

4wd slows it down a little bit at the top end they actually launch pretty well in 2wd

[@kristoforstewart995]

A 2015 F150 2.7 (325HP, 375lb*ft) Supercab XL 4x4 with a 3.55 differential and 6 speed ZF transmission runs 6.1s 0-60 and a 14.7 quarter mile.

[@SirtubalotTX]

The CT4 with the 2.7t is running even better numbers and it's an impressive engine. Any tunes out for this motor yet?

[@gavindrewry8652]

AFE has the scorcher blue but no actual tunes yet.

[@SirtubalotTX]

@@gavindrewry8652 I'll check it out.

[@dragracer455]

When I last looked not really

[@Mark-xw4ek]

@716CarGuys Will you keep us posted if you find a tune for the 2.7l turbo 4 cylinder Silverado??

[@716carguys4]

Absolutely!!!! I wanna do a compare and contrast with different tunes

[@716carguys4]

Absolutely!!!! I wanna do a compare and contrast with different tunes

[@marcharris4176]

Chevy guys talking about how great the 4 banger turbo when the Ecoboost came out they laughed.

[@716carguys4]

I never did……I knew the concept wasn’t stupid buick made it work pretty well in the 80s

[@alicepooper8562]

Put that 4 banger in the Colorado 🚀

[@dragracer455]

That be a fun truck actually ha

[@rocketcowboy6462]

That’s what they are going to do, they went away from the Diesel engines and will be putting those bad boys in the colorado, at least that’s what I read

[@MeatloafMelvin]

They did. And i can say that 310hp amd 430tq in a ZR2 colorado is a blast.

[@ARAM619s]

Awesome video! I have a 2.7 silverado also... im wondering how much better adding an straight thru exhaust and a kn air filter will do? Stock exhaust is really restrictive.

[@dragracer455]

Oh that would absolutely wake it up

[@yolosolonorthwest6282]

Do a video on with a dyno run with 0-60 times

[@1964summit]

straight exhaust will sound horrible so leave it stock or add a dynomax turbo muffler.

[@JKZ103]

Before you spend your money on that stuff get a tune. Best hp for dollar. You are nowhere near the limits of your stock exhaust right now. I promise

[@GodDid94]

Same. I’m curious on ways to improve performance.

[@fscottgray9784]

I wonder how the 2022 GM 2.7 would do now that it has 80 more ft. lbs. of torque? I just bought a regular cab short bed 4x4 GMC with the 2.7 and 3.42 gears. Really impressed with it so far.

[@716carguys4]

Right its surprising

[@stonks2171]

2022 gmc 2.7l turbo does about 6-7 sec I bought the refresh

[@ericj810]

Ya the high output version is better. And the tricifica chevy 2.7 is 357hp 488lbs or tourqe. Try that one next time.

[@nahs3195]

You should be thanking ford for it 😂😂😂

[@Simracing25]

exobeast for the win

[@kona6451]

Interested in the new Hurricane 3.0 straight 6 twin turbo from Ram coming.

[@716carguys4]

Whaaaaa I didn’t know about that !!! Sounds badass

[@kona6451]

@@716carguys4 ya look it up. will also have a high output version with all forged insides. Mega power

[@TriedTrue]

So should I trade in my 5.3 for the 2.7 turbo? I feel like the 5.3 has way more too end.

[@716carguys4]

My 5.3 trucks always get beat ecoboosts 😞

[@stroln]

Hat on backwards and sun glasses, funny

[@JKZ103]

The little 4 bangers just can't hang with the fords... Ford is on top right now with the trucks. Good little budget motor for the guys that don't want to spend alot of money but it's not a race motor. It has its place in the market. Fyi the ford 2.7 v6 gets 18- 24 mpg. Surprise by how bad the chevy motor mpg is?

[@716carguys4]

I drive with a heavy foot but with that being said yea still not what I thought it would be

[@brenthass5876]

Which big block engine was in the 91 Chevy pickup?

[@716carguys4]

454

[@kirbyfrost9082]

A peanut head 454, very poor flowing heads.

[@kevinkelley3657]

I have no experience with the Chevy, but I do have a 2018 f150 with the 2.7......with a tank of 93 octane, my truck feels like a magic carpet, all you have to do is almost think about accelerating, and the truck just goes and goes. With a tank of 87 octane, the truck will go, but you have to use more pedal, and it almost feels like you have to push the truck to make it go fast. The difference is "Night and Day".

[@716carguys4]

I’m really starting to like the eco boost trucks i get the gm discount but damn those trucks are cool

[@RussellLicata]

Believe it or not that is a very close time we got on our truck at Lancaster speedway in New York. It’s a 1/8 mile track. With 2 people best time 9.69 @ 71mph

[@Bceltics112288]

Press and hold traction control to take off stability control as well

[@dragracer455]

Yes wayyyy ahead of ya thanks though

[@dwightneisler3844]

I have a 2021 GMC 2.7L. Traded in my 2017 GMC 5.3L lease. They had no V8's on the lot so I took the 2.7. I love this truck.

[@716carguys4]

Right !!! I understand how truck guys don’t like the idea of a 4 cylinder but it’s surprisingly a powerful little motor tows fine gets out of it own way

[@Oddman1980]

Probably faster than my NA 3.7 in my F150. 🤣 I'm interested to see how these small displacement turbo truck engines do over the years, because it's pretty wild what they are capable of.

[@716carguys4]

Yesssssss the test of time

[@edpenkalski8937]

Any forced induction motors gonna see a bit better performance with higher octane .. a good high flow air filter will help a lot ... I believe Diablo sport makes a tuner for that vehicle that will most likely put you in higher 8s flat 9s if the info draggy provided is accurate

[@dragracer455]

Ha that be pretty wild for just a 2.7

[@edpenkalski8937]

Yea adding boost is a fun thing and pretty easy just remember if you up the boost you have to up the fuel too on my 2.5 I'm running 700 cc Injectors and making about 20 psi out of a 54 mm turbo ... The Diablo tuner is the key to running it efficient and it gives you control over pretty much everything spark advance boost pressure fuel presser it'll also depending on the model you get work as a boost and fuel gage

[@dragracer455]

@@edpenkalski8937 oh no shit this is a whole new world for me

[@edpenkalski8937]

Yea when I got my first turbo I was lost... Then everything got really easy then I encounter new problems like boost leaks and over boost... But if you keep it mild you can still have a shit ton of fun and embarrass V8 guys

[@okiedokie3845]

@@edpenkalski8937 that's gotta be a fun ride ya got going!

[@samirbudic]

2.7 t silverado is no joke they have it in caddilac and it's crazy 2022 silverado 2.7 t has 420tq monster

[@furians601]

By what I seen here chevys 2.7 is an absolute joke

[@keithrankin6113]

I bought a 2022 2.7 Silverado after the AFM destroyed my 5.3 in my 2018 Silverado. Honestly am really impressed with the little truck engine. The low end torque is very diesel like. I did take the 2.7 ecoboost for a ride and yes it is much faster. To me it came down to value and towing capability. The ford had a 3:15 rear ratio and a 6500 pound towing capacity. The little 4 had a 9000 pound towing capacity which fits my camper much better. With the truck shortage you can only get what’s on the lot.

[@dragracer455]

Yea I really don’t mind the turbo 4 cylinder it’s been a great truck so far we’re definitely going to be towing videos and more stuff with it soon and yes the market is insane unfortunately

[@Samyouell11510]

The turbo 4 from gm is super impressive. Pretty excited to see how well the next iteration of it does with the improvements and numbers bumped up, sounds like it will be a beast. I have a 2.7 ecoboost f150 and my wife has a 2.3 ecoboost explorer and I can honestly say I’ll never go back to a NA engine.

[@Yung_Hefty]

Yeah it’s all about the gearing and tow packages and such. The motors from both GM and Ford are more than capable of towing but it’s all down the specifics. My 2.7 has 3.73 gears and a 11k towing capacity. I’ve got the Texas edition with the luxury package and max towing all ordered special before Covid and such. But yeah in this day and age what’s there is basically all your options so I don’t blame you for picking the GM and it’s not a bad choice what so ever. Anyways my point is both motors are great. I’m really impressed with them and I think naturally aspirated v8’s are out dated.

[@chris1451]

And you bought another pigolet LOL

[@mscottlawrence2037]

@@Samyouell11510 what year f150

[@miked240]

Seems as though a re run with both using the same gas is in order. I’ve owned many forced induction vehicles factory or not and most are tuned to advance spark and with dohc even possibly phase the cams to maximize power and efficiency. The vehicle will advance until it gets knock and then retards back slightly(protecting the engine from detonation). Of course the knock is pushed further away the higher thE octane is (reluctance to burn/ resist knock). Why e85 makes most power cheapest if properly utilized.

[@dragracer455]

That’s what I’ve been reading I didn’t think it would make a difference but it can

[@JKZ103]

There's not enough octane in the world that would make that I4 beat any EcoBoost. It's a good motor but both trucks are stock so that's an apples-to-apples. If you tune them you would get the same result. It will use the high octane table until it sees the knock threshold then switch to the low octane table.

[@markweymouth6368]

BLUE OVAL 🏁☝️

[@edpenkalski8937]

Without the Diablo tune my car would run 10.2 to 10.0 with Diablo now it does 9.2

[@bpatterson308]

Man a tune on that truck could probably make some impressive gains

[@716carguys4]

Eventually that’ll happen I’m curious what that little 4 cylinder can do

[@sethbell5575]

I have a 2018 2.7 eco boost cts 3 edge evolution tune I have no times to give yet it’s unreal thoe

[@dragracer455]

Yea there quick for what they are

[@helgarussell9142]

He had the chevy launch at 3k plus RPM. Not bad for stock converter

[@JKZ103]

The lower the torque the higher the converter stall has to be. It has to have a high stall. The fords stall in the low 2000's because of the monster torque.

[@Jackknife-TV]

Wonder what a 2022 Silverado 2.7 turbo would do considering it now has 420 pound-feet of torque .

[@dbladsacker9946]

Would pull at the line than get hawked down on the big end.

[@02hreblue30]

still heavier than the Ford

[@foxwithshades7080]

For a four banger racing a V6 it ain't bad. Probably could get tons more power out of that Four pot tho.

[@dragracer455]

I’m tempted to have it tuned and messed with ha

[@Lorde360]

Can you guys test with 91 octane and see if it gets faster.

[@716carguys4]

I can do that I’ll toss that in the next video

[@MrAffable]

My stock 2020 2.7 RCSB the best I got was a 9.4 in 4hi at the 8th with a shit reaction time and with zero clue tf I was doing

[@dragracer455]

It’s probably a bit quicker if ya launch it 4wd but yea the fords are absolutely quicker for sure

[@isaias131982]

Ecoboost are beasts I still like the looks of the Silverado 🥲

[@716carguys4]

Yea ecoboosts are quick Trucks for what they are

[@patriot101101]

The only thing those Ecoboost trucks have so many limiters and when you push it a little too hard they go into limp mode with no codes. I had to disable more protections in my truck to keep it out of limp mode.

[@isaias131982]

@@patriot101101 I’ve noticed mine won’t go anything over 105 mph 🫤

[@RW-zh7kl]

Neither of these trucks in the video seem to launch as well as my 19 F150 2.7 does

[@jjames_1770]

Try the locked diff on the ford when in two wheel drive and launching, bet it would have done better on that run.

[@716carguys4]

His tires are pretty beat but yea he’s definitely quicker every which way

[@10rninjariderzx]

My 3.5 raptor will kill that junk

[@716carguys4]

Well I hope your 70 thousand dollar truck would stomp out a 4 cylinder 👍

[@johneary8874]

When you buy a Raptor, you need to work it into every conversation.

[@cfltitan]

Yeah you gotta bring something big to the plate for even a stock ecoboost. They’re nasty motors, even the baby 2.7. I think the 2.7 is underrated too because when my 3.5 was stock a stock 2.7 could hang door to door with me (identical 4wd crew cabs and both 10 speeds) until about 75mph then I’d slowly pull away. Anyways I’ve got a fully loaded 2017 3.5 ecoboost with the 10 speed. Bone stock I averaged 9.3 1/8 miles. I now have a 5 Star 93 octane tune and am in the high 7’s 1/8th mile. It’s beyond stupid fast now. 😂 Sooooooo much fun though.

[@dragracer455]

I had a hard time in my last two trucks (both were 5.3 trucks) they were close races but they pulled me

[@derekd8778]

@@dragracer455 close races my ass lmao! That ecoboost walk all-over your 5.3s... don't try and talk it up

[@dragracer455]

@@derekd8778 relax buddy ha….no both were decent races but like I said both ecoboosts pulled me

[@static7415]

@@derekd8778 a 2.7 does not walk a 5.3.

[@derekd8778]

@@static7415 they sure do. Just like my 3.5 ecoboost walks everything else diesels included. Come at me!

[@derekpate8786]

2022 Silverado 2.7 high output stock 9.76

[@stephanouellet3673]

I goes today to racetrack with my new Silverado 23 2.7 with just 3400km. 1.98@60' 7.63@71.50MPH and 15.08@90.32MPH with 1617DA

[@RDvisions]

Wonder how bad my 2001 Silverado 5.3 would smoke the Chevy 2.7 turbo

[@10rninjariderzx]

The 2.7 gm is not bad

[@716carguys4]

Really happy with it not power monster but tows no problem

[@Dylan-tk1nf]

My truck runs 8.1 at 88 mph with e85 in it I'd love to try and find a srt10 truck to race

[@dwaynesurratt]

My 1 wheel drive 2.7 ecoboost ran a 9.80 1/8 mile and a 14.88@ 96 mph

[@716carguys4]

Yea the ecoboosts are quick for what they are

[@FloridaCoastalGuy]

My stock 2018 F-150 2.7L SCSB FX4 turns 1/4 in 14.5 0-60 = 5.9 seconds on 93 octane

[@dankruger2890]

turbo engines are the only way to go

[@kona6451]

Dang I went and took a shower in the time it took that to get to 60.

[@716carguys4]

Haha yea man she’s definitely not an animal

[@mikeoverby2232]

You cannot run the cheap gas if you’re gonna run a turbo vehicle. I saw an article on car driver were they tested the Ford eco-boost trucks with cheap 91 gas in California versus good 93 gas from the East Coast. It was a noticeable difference in those two points. Let alone 5-6 points if you can get 93 versus 87. It was as significant as 2 to 3 tenths from the 0 to 60 up till like up to/over a half second in a quarter mile. remember that was just a difference from 91 to 93… These trucks are smart enough to instantly read the fuel and all the acting and retard the timing anytime I see that nation specially depending on if you’ve got crappy fuel winter blend is going to be worse than summer fuel anyways, there’s probably a considerable amount of performance to be gained in that Chevy by running premium fuel and adding an octane booster. Now mind you if you do the same thing in the Ford I believe the Ford truck is still gonna be faster I’m just trying to give you some tips on how to make your Chevy run better if that’s what you’re after. winter fuel 87 octane is probably the worst thing you can run in that truck with a turbo it probably detonates so early in making power that I love to see what it makes on the Dino versus what it’s advertised right now. I’m actually considerably under powered right now.

[@716carguys4]

Wow no shit That makes sense maybe I’ll make a video of running the truck like that cool idea

[@wrotenwasp]

THat's cruisin for a heavy ass tank and a 4 Cyl. I have a 05 Impala SS with the dinosaur pushrod 3.8 iron block/iron heads , antiquated Eaton M90 Gen 3 supercharger with a 3.5" pulley, it only weighs 3600 pounds and it does 8.70s at 81mph in the 1/8th. My 96 standard cab, 2WD silverado with the old vortec 350 does low 7s 0-60, probably not as quick as this 4 cyl turbo.

[@derekaldrich330]

If the Chevy 2.7 is anything like Ford's EB engines, the ECU will definitely retard the timing with 87 octane.

[@davetrepse83]

RAM 2014 5.7 hemi just exhaust 15.091 1/4mile Cadillac srx2014 stock 15.001 1/4mile

[@ppvracing5597]

I don't have a draggy but at Empire my 2007 Escalade went like 9.8 in the 1/8 I believe (I'll have to find the time slip) So I'm impressed with the lil 4 banger, and now a lil scared to run one 😂

[@dragracer455]

Damn that’s quick for an Escalade tho ha

[@Clutch_Kick187]

oh bullshit.. Unless you have a built motor with cam and heads, or nitrous, that escalade takes over 7sec to get to 60mph.. Lets not get off our feet.. A stock 07 escalade doesn't even make 300whp..

[@ppvracing5597]

@@Clutch_Kick187 Wrong

[@chadbullock6326]

@@Clutch_Kick187 07 was the first year if the 6.2 like 400hp stock

[@codymartin6704]

​@@Clutch_Kick187 8th mile not quarter.. It's not very fast

[@gnd111]

My stock 2001, 5.3 4x4 double cab ran 10.2...lol

[@robertschwark8]

I've had a 2018 f150 2.7 Ecoboost and now a 2020 3.5 Ecoboost and you really should use 91 octane or higher turbos do not like cheap gas also you should get better gas mileage

[@dragracer455]

I’m definitely gonna run 93 when I do the track video I’ve been seeing a lot of people say that

[@briannoke4880]

The Ford took you to gapplebees

[@716carguys4]

Indeed😕

[@1obscura]

4cy are for civics. 6cy are for sedans and small trucks. Turbos are added to help add power. A 4cy turbo in a truck is guna burn out

[@716carguys4]

How do you mean burnout ?

[@1obscura]

@@716carguys4 does a canyon weigh more than a civic? Unless 4cy have changed, they really don't produce enough power. Which is why a turbo is needed. If the truck weighs more I'd think the constant pressure engine is under a long with turbos constantly working would produce more wear on engine than a civic with a turbo would. Plus a 4sounds like crap. I drive a soul. Loud and annoying. Can only imagine the sound of these trucks. But hey. Just my opinion. I'm not a mechanic. I mean I drive a 2010 soul. 😂.

[@GyroPyro121212]

Definitely a 1/4 tank of 93 with nothing but yourself in the cab would give you your best results from 0-60 but it will definitely not beat the 2.7 Ecoboost no matter what. The torque difference is too much to overcome.

[@dragracer455]

Oh yea I know that now I figured but I had to try ha

[@SirtubalotTX]

The 'refresh' Silverado 2022 2.7t is rated at 420 ft/lb torque so it appears there is much overhead in the conservative, stock tune so I wouldn't say that. It will be interesting to see how tuning develops for this motor. No hate on Fords 2.7t v6 but Chevy has done something interesting here. Good thing we have it as an option until the lifter issues get ironed out for the 5.3 and 6.2

[@GyroPyro121212]

@@SirtubalotTX We’ll see how it goes. 420-430 lb-ft (claimed) at 1,500 rpm from a 4 cylinder is impressive. But the 2.7 Ecoboost in a supercrew can consistently pull 5.9 seconds 0-60. That’s a tough number to beat. Plus, the 2.7 Ecoboost has had the same hp/torque since 2018. It’s only a matter of time before for upgrades it again.

[@SirtubalotTX]

@@GyroPyro121212 Truth be told and if I ever got an F150, and wasn't going to keep it stock, it would be the 5.0. A properly boosted Coyote is very hard to beat by anything.

[@GyroPyro121212]

@@SirtubalotTX No doubt. I got the 2.7 because it was a leftover and I got a great deal on it. I wanted a 5.0 but I couldn’t pass it up. I fell in love with it after that. But a boosted 5.0 is a force to be reckoned with.

[@Fleen5027]

Well I have a 2021 RAM TRX so yeah no need for me to run an 8th mile. I was at a red-light yesterday on niagara falls Blvd and this kid wanted to race me " I don't want to embarrass you in front of your girlfriend"

[@dragracer455]

It’s always worth it to 8th or quarter

[@edpenkalski8937]

I hope you showed the kid Mopar or car is a real life choice lol

[@okiedokie3845]

TRX is no joke. Didn't realize that's what I was next to and was not happy reading the tailgate before I figured it out.

[@edpenkalski8937]

@@okiedokie3845 it happens to the best of us .... You should see the looks I get when people realize my pt cruiser has a 58 mm snail on it ... Usually at the next light if they catch up the idiots ask how I got an LS engine in it and I'm like it's the 2.4 liter the car came with ....

[@edpenkalski8937]

I got walked by an Audi allroad with twin 74 Borg's on it ..y wife loved it laughing at me like I guess you're not the only one who adds boost and fuel to station wagons lol 🤣😆

[@jasonmartin9393]

If it was gear higher it would probably do lot better like if it was a 5speed or 6speed manual transmission. Would be good I bet that Chevy thow pulling a load it would go faster then the ford pulling a trailer

[@JKZ103]

It would not. The i4 is a cool little budget motor but it just can't hang with the EcoBoost's. I am a lifelong gm guy that has 3 in the driveway and daily a 3.5 eb. If you haven't driven one it's hard to explain. But them both pulling trailers you would get the same results. Maybe a fbo tuned i4 vs a bone stock 2.7 ford. Then it would have a chance.

[@williamsteelejr1534]

Use 50% 91 or 93 octane and 50% ethanol.

[@716carguys4]

Really I’ll try that

[@williamsteelejr1534]

@@716carguys4 I notice using ethanol the reaction time is better.

[@bigcartoonyIIV]

One main question did the chevy win?

[@mattwagner8965]

Of course not Ford stands for first on race day

[@privilegedwhitemale306]

You didn't take Stabilitrak off

[@dragracer455]

I usually do I’m pretty sure I did in the vid

[@chrisgee7668]

I never run anything less than 93 in my 22 2.7 Silverado.

[@fl_atv_riders4455]

The 2.7 ford on paper has way more power then the chevy 2.7 but that's not the competition for the gm 2.7 ford's 3.3 na v6 is technically its competition. The 5.3 is the competition for fors 2.7.

[@hdsred7553]

Ford for the win!

[@Shipmenty]

Yeah fords the fastest for sure my g

[@williamsteelejr1534]

Ford trucks have a much more aggressive tune, Chevrolet is holding back.

[@716carguys4]

In wouldn’t kno I’ve thought about playing with the tune but I still don’t think this would take down an eco boost

[@nelsonvanvickle8862]

Just a grippier set of tires and a KN drop in filter would make a noticeable difference. I’m pretty sure the 2WD version with its lower curb weight puts down better 0-60 times. There is a video of a guy running a 6.4 sec in a 2WD 2.7t

[@dragracer455]

Omg that’s crazy this is my daily so I probably won’t mess with it to much

[@thedon5172]

Appreciate the shoutout once again bro. Like he said check out Rhinos and aliens podcast, and give us feedback on if you like the podcast or not all criticism is good criticism. kzbin.info

[@thegonz7833]

GM is selling the slowest of trucks,that just kills me,thanks Mary Barra.

[@alicepooper8562]

Been running 94 octane in my 2021 f150 with the 2.7 ecoboost it feels a lot quicker. Try running high octane in the chevy 2.7 you will notice a big difference

[@patriot101101]

Use Hp tuners on this truck and it will fly after you get it tuned right.

[@williamstout6378]

😅he doesnt sa y it but the chevy is 2 wheel drive, im not a ford guy but the 2.7 is impressive.

[@Michael.j130]

If you want fast for GM buy the 6.2 both the 5.3 and the 2.7 are decent motors but neither one are fast

[@716carguys4]

I agree with that they get out of there own way but that’s about it

[@johns818]

Why are you doing 0 to 60s with 3 people in the truck? smh

[@716carguys4]

I dunno 🤷🏼

[@716carguys4]

Just having fun with my truck when I first got it but your right ha

[@carribboy.7572]

u know racing with the windows down leads to drag....

[@716carguys4]

I think the first run windows were up but just messing around doing 8th mile pulls im not seeing it messing with the ETs that bad

[@pauldonnelly6691]

Try take your air filter out and race again see

[@philipjohnson882]

Try with the new 2.7 from gm. 430ft lbs torque

[@dragracer455]

That’s what this truck is

[@02hreblue30]

simply has more boost. thats it

[@02hreblue30]

F150 is lighter also

[@dankruger2890]

just got a 22' LT 2.7 and it would probably keep up with the ford now that they made the redesigned 2.7 chevy @ 420tq

[@bajaboy27]

1/8 mile? Lololololols! That's like 300 feet

[@716carguys4]

More like 660 feet…. but yea racing these two trucks to the quarter would have made a big difference 🙄

[@bajaboy27]

@@716carguys4 couldn't help to notice how much heavier the Silverado looks compared to the Ford. Also Chevy needs to step up their game, Ford has been taking them out for many years now, it's beginning to look embarrassing. 😭

[@GeorgeL.3]

The GM2.7 is a turd for sure

[@lylewheeler8915]

Ford owns

[@716carguys4]

The eco boosts are quick for what they are my 5.3 truck had a hard time with em too

[@thegonz7833]

SAF

[@jerrythor290]

ls v8 is unkillable, that 2.7 prob die after towing 8k lbs for 2 years

[@716carguys4]

I don’t tow with the truck that often and time will tell if these motors are junk or good

[@Bark3rd]

you lost me at 1/8 mile....

[@mcinteer19]

1/8 mile? That’s not a drag race! At least do a 1/4 or better yet 1 kilometer. 2020 F150 2.7, and I’ll take you in the 1/4!

[@716carguys4]

Racing these trucks in a quarter would make no difference man

[@user-tb7rn1il3q]

The updated GM 2.7 is faster since it has more low end torque. It’s an underrated engine.

[@02hreblue30]

simply more boost. zero other changes.

[@brianfisher2446]

Ford Power!!! Chevy is heavy and gutless.

[@jimmycline4778]

My Corollas touch screen is bigger than this silverados!

[@716carguys4]

Cool you still drive a Corolla……

[@SuspenseESCAPEremastered]

As usual, the Ford is faster.

[@dragracer455]

We’ll obviously the 6 cylinder was gonna beat the lil 4 ha but yea in my 5.3 truck I had a hard time with both eco boost trucks

[@mattwagner8965]

@@dragracer455 that's cuz the 5.3 is slow either Ecoboost engine gapplesauces that thing

[@dragracer455]

@@mattwagner8965 I got a buddy who is supposed to be picking up a new eco boost so hopefully we can have more fun with those trucks

[@joecobra4905]

I beat my brother in laws 2018 denali 6.2 with my stx 2.7. Those engines are no joke.

[@WoodLox]

@@mattwagner8965 5.3 will easy 400k with maintenance doing truck things

[@wafflesmartano]

Drag racing trucks is just silly.

[@716carguys4]

Silly….maybe……fun yes

[@thermionic8530]

Why 1/8th mile? Do 1/4 mile times and mph.

[@716carguys4]

No point the 2.7 Chevy isn’t gonna run down the v6 be worth it for the times tho