2 men & 2 gardens. Why does the Quran mention them? Eisa NOT blamed here! Palm trees in Surah Kahf?

Surah Al-Kahf presents the 'masal' / example of two rajul and two janatain.
In this video, two main questions are addressed:
1) What is the takeaway message in ayaat 18:32-44?
2) Is Rasul Eisa ibn Maryam blamed by the Quran in this pasage? (hint: NO!)
This is a Quran student's research and as such reflects the presenter's current fahm of the mushaf.
#quran
#surahalkahf
#tafsir
#jesus

[@shafarumar6091]

responding to marvellous Quran. dr,hany atchan ... whatever the case, this new error of islamic scholarship of toiling exclusively on the Quran promises a better future. ALLAH knows best

[@hazrathalim6757]

شکر ہے آگئے بڑا انتظار تھا ❤

[@avastamin]

I was desperately looking for alternative explanation because my heat isn't satisfied with traditional tafsir.

[@Quranmessages404]

see www.youtube.com/@Quranmessages404

[@Truthandjusticeforever]

Very intellectual discussion indeed! Thank you.

[@edinkarajic1883]

After having known about serious accusations of EIM linked with this quranic story, your approach was a refreshing experience. Thank you for that.

[@rabbitvee321]

thank you for sharing brother, salamun alaykum ❤

[@fai6702]

wow... this one was a tough one. good job, brother! :)

[@unlearning_is_chalange]

Excellent effort and thanks for standing against the claims, please keep sharing your hard work. Considering it Essa made me to step back from his thoughts.

[@edlinyusof8344]

Stay with the light. Save everybody❤

[@chachawaseem8156]

In sha Allah as usual session will be informative and clear misconception misinterpretation of Quraan and Deen e islam

[@tiaratiarasam1886]

Shukran fo adding another point of view.

[@awaisrizwani502]

Please allot numbers to your videos which will facilitate in searching a particular sura or lecture.

[@ashrafmiha3002]

Musa Bhai صوم/الصیام پہ video banayein

[@dare2chaseaamirspeed]

Salaam bhai jaan … I’ve been watching and learning a lot from your videos. You’re always on the spot. You quoted from Quran that this is the last and final revelation. I want to ask, why didn’t Allah reveal His name in his previous revelations? And if He did, please mention. Duniya ke aadhe fasaad khatam ho jaenge. Regards Aamir India

[@ryugaff557]

Salam moses, what's your take on dr qamar zaman's and aastana interpretation of islam? In my case, it's the most logical and sensible interpretation I've come across.

[@tanveeralis]

Salamun Alaikum. Please make this video in urdu/hindi.

[@GBL3092]

I'm having a hard time on grasping why : صَبِيًّۭا Sabiyan , غُلَـٰمًۭا Ghulam , ٱبْنُ Ibn , and وَلَدٍۢ ۖ Walad ; in that methodology , can mean the same thing by just tweaking the usage. in some parts it says son , young man , young boy , boy. why can't they observe the morphemes like : صَبِيًّۭا (SaBYan) could be related to صَبّ (SaBb) or صَبِيّ (SaBiY) or أَصْبُ (aSbu) or even صابِئ (SaBY). I think following the dictionary might be another trap. Because the subverters deceive through definitions.

[@Shajmina]

Hello, i have humble request , can u do a research on Surah Al muzzammil ?

[@lifeofmuhammadsawshorts6999]

❤ surah Bakra ayat 106 explain please

[@idrissk6002]

Hello Al Moses One question, how do you research the meaning of the Quran, personally I do not understand Arabic and have trouble doing my research. Thanks.

[@mminternational157]

Salamun alaikum, can you explain Riba in the holy Quran.

[@fihtah8243]

wonder how his companion knew about the creation process. the way the verse is laid out it sounds he is very firm in his knowledge of the stages of human development. is he a scientist? what is turab and nutfa?

[@zulfiqarahmad7536]

Salam. Do you have ay study on what is nafs and its relation with God?

[@mirzajee366]

Is it available in urdu version

[@fihtah8243]

i have a question. are your understanding in-line with dr.hany's interpretation of iblees? im fairly new to both your's and his channel and i have alot of un-learning to do. i've been pondering on the ayats of quran and im trying to navigate through it on my own. my understanding of iblees right now is, if there're "angels" (instead of angels they can be referred to as controllers, architects, celestial beings, seeders or engineers as in the movie prometheus) then why not another species or a band of angels who have fallen. the bible says the dragon casted its tail and 1/3 of the stars fell. what if we're the fallen stars and earth is our redemption, our only ticket back into home?. i like to think the reason why we're all here is because of a coup d'etat in the higher worlds and all who fell are sent to earth. All of us carry that seed of rebellion which can be referred to as iblees within us. listening to dr. hany was confusing but confusing is good imo. makes me want to dig more. its sounds abit like a hollywood plot but what doesnt in life. in this vid you mentioned you'd cover jinn soon and im looking forward to it. very interesting work you have here. i find it very admirable that you're exploring on your own instead of sitting in your comfort zone. a quote i keep in mind alot "follow the man who seeks the truth, run from the one whose found it".

[@rabbi619]

Yes maybe there is teleportation in quran.

[@merajunisa7525]

Aslkm bhai humarabi qayal Karo plz speak in urdu ya hindi 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@techyrony]

Hi Moses, do you have any blog where i can read.

[@AlMosesPhD]

no

[@omarsalim9562]

but u dint tell us where did u come with jahaha as garden

[@mohdaakil8807]

How to connect with you

[@khattastudio4259]

Please correct your caption it is 18:32-44 not 19. 19 is sura maryam

[@idrissk6002]

Hello Al Moses I have been a fan of this channel for quite some time, indeed thanks for all your works. I was wondering if you could make a video revealing the topic of prophet Muhammad marrying the ex wife of Zayd (prophets adopted son) Personally I did not understand the wisdom behind this I believe it to possibly be misunderstood. If this is no bother for you please could you discuss this topic, I do not understand it well and I wonder could I be wrong? I do not know Arabic so it's difficult relying on translations. Peace.

[@AlMosesPhD]

If you speak Urdu, I've already covered this. In short, there is no Zaynab and no marriage to one's daughter in law in the Quran.

[@idrissk6002]

@@AlMosesPhD thank you for your reply. I do not speak urdu, but i am glad that you agree with me on this topic for i found it deeply disturbing. If it is no bother for you could you release this video in english? otherwise thank you very much for your works and efforts.

[@mustafamohammad3081]

Salamun alayk brother, u are doing a great job to help us understand the Qur'aan but still there is a possibility that the mathal is referring to two individuals . It seems u are trying to refute the interpretation of that paragraph from marvelous Qur'aan . In aayah 18:4_5 , it's likely referring to Eesaa ibn Mar'yam because he is one of the people whom some claimed that Allah as taken as "walad" . In 18:5 , we see this phrase "ما لهم به من علم" which occurs in 4:157 in relation to EIM . whatever interpretation u give to 18:4_5 , u can't exclude EIM . There is a strong possibility that the Qur'aan in that portion is referring to him I watched your videos about Loot , and u refer to markings to link different parts of the Qur'aan and even in this segment, u try to link certain portions of soorah 18 to soorah 72 , but however you seem not ok with the link of Mar'yam to jannah in soorah 23 and soorah 2 . Do you think EIM is not mentioned in soorah 18 even indirectly despite the indications from the opening paragraph ? Yes , the marvelous Qur'aan team has arrived a conclusion that EIM mess up the message he was task to deliver and they have justify that with plenty of evidence . Do you think he is above doing that ? It's very possible . Maybe that's why Allah questioned him as mentioned in the last part of soorah 5 . In soorah 7 , Allah tell us about someone who deviate from the right path .

[@AlMosesPhD]

SA brother, I believe I've covered these points in the video. In the end, it's okay to disagree based on what evidence you sincerely find more credible.

[@mt000mp]

Isn't that just how tafseel works? it syntactically segmented existing lexicon within itself for itself to holistically define itself in consistency? I mean don't we all have catch phrases? 53:28 وَمَا لَهُم بِهِۦ مِنْ عِلْمٍ ۖ إِن يَتَّبِعُونَ إِلَّا ٱلظَّنَّ ۖ وَإِنَّ ٱلظَّنَّ لَا يُغْنِى مِنَ ٱلْحَقِّ شَيْـًۭٔا And yet, they have no knowledge about it (the labeling used in the divine lexicon). They follow but the guessing, and indeed, the guessing does not provide a substitute for the truth. the interpretation in 2021: 18:4 وَيُنذِرَ ٱلَّذِينَ قَالُوا۟ ٱتَّخَذَ ٱللَّهُ وَلَدًۭا Warning those who claim that Allah has taken an intermediary as a son. 18:5 مَّا لَهُم بِهِۦ مِنْ عِلْمٍۢ وَلَا لِـَٔابَآئِهِمْ ۚ كَبُرَتْ كَلِمَةًۭ تَخْرُجُ مِنْ أَفْوَٰهِهِمْ ۚ إِن يَقُولُونَ إِلَّا كَذِبًۭا They have no knowledge about him (Ɛīssā), and neither did their forefathers. Conceited is that word that comes out of their mouths. Everything they say is but lies. in 2023: 18:4 وَيُنذِرَ ٱلَّذِينَ قَالُوا۟ ٱتَّخَذَ ٱللَّهُ وَلَدًۭا And he (the wayfarer, Muhammad) warns those who claimed that Allah has taken a proxy. 18:5 مَّا لَهُم بِهِۦ مِنْ عِلْمٍۢ وَلَا لِـَٔابَآئِهِمْ ۚ كَبُرَتْ كَلِمَةًۭ تَخْرُجُ مِنْ أَفْوَٰهِهِمْ ۚ إِن يَقُولُونَ إِلَّا كَذِبًۭا They have no knowledge through him (the claimed proxy), and neither did their forefathers. Conceited is that word that comes out of their mouths. They claim nothing but lies! now , look at MQ's interpretation of 53:28 with 18:4-5 in the older and new version , you'll notice مَا لَهُم بِهِۦ مِنْ عِلْمٍ , does not always mean (Ɛīssā) and who are "They"? the Ones who did not "صَلَبُوهُ" him? or the so-called "Christians" right now or during Muhammad's time? because we could read in 4:157 , it reads (in MQ translation) : 4:157 وَقَوْلِهِمْ إِنَّا قَتَلْنَا ٱلْمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ٱبْنَ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولَ ٱللَّهِ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَٰكِن شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ وَإِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱخْتَلَفُوا۟ فِيهِ لَفِى شَكٍّ مِّنْهُ مَا لَهُم بِهِۦ مِنْ عِلْمٍ إِلَّا ٱتِّبَاعَ ٱلظَّنِّ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ يَقِينًۢا And their claim, "We have slayed , [[Ɛīssā]], son of [[Maryam]], the messenger of Allah." And they did not slay him, and they did not identify his biological lineage, but it (the affair about [[Ɛīssā]]) was made confusing for them. And indeed, those who have disagreed about him are in great doubt about him: , except following the guesses! And they have not destroyed it (his knowledge of [[Kitāb]]), for sure! if it was the Ones who did not "صَلَبُوهُ" him , then how can their forefathers even know that Ɛīssā even exist when they themselves are already dead? if you want to go there , then you should question yourself : a) "is Ɛīssā even a real person? was he once a real historical entity that exist on earth?". b) "how can I relate to this in a general-universal way if its just a 'they' (christian-jew) problem?" c) "do I have my own Ɛīssā"

[@mustafamohammad3081]

@@mt000mp what am saying is that , regardless what interpretation u came up for soorah 18 as a whole, I see no way to exclude EIM from verse 18:4_5 . Even in 53:28 , the marvelous Qur'aan interpreted it as referring to Eesaa ibn Mar'yam . So all 3 occurrences of "ما لهم به من علم" are referring to EIM . If u question wether or not someone called EIM ever existed , then that's a different story all together . The same can be said about any character mentioned in the Qur'aan including "Muhammmad" . so the interpretation of the two rajul in soorah 18 that you offer is not necessarily wrong or even correct but you focus mainly on what the marvelous Qur'aan says about that paragraph and u attempted to refute some of their points . I don't see you getting the correct understanding of the phrase "وهو يحاوره" . Does the Qur'aan at times in a midst of a story pause the story and include enjointments to it first recipient ? If the answer is yes, then what you said about the middle portion of that "مثل" could be wrong because you deny it being a message to Muhammmad to say to his Qareen , while in Qur'aan 43:45, Muhammmad was commanded to question at least one of the rasools who were sent before him .

[@tiaratiarasam1886]

My faham is that mt000mp is mq guy.

[@mustafamohammad3081]

@@AlMosesPhD thanks brother . but there is no way to exclude EIM from aayaats 18:4_5 of the Qur'aan . the markings between 18:5 and 4:157 are evidentiary hints that it's referring to EIM

[@zakariaazhar899]

موسیٰ بھائی اردو میں لیکچر کرو بڑی شدت سے انتظار کر رہا ہوں شکریہ

[@AlMosesPhD]

inshallah

[@abrarbashir2654]

Sura 18, not Sura 19 !

[@shukriyusof2104]

*"Marvelously"* done, my friend! 👍 _"One who has convinced himself that even when he loses, he wins!"_ How do we identify this person? #1. this person charges money to _"teach"_ you his version of the truth. #2. only he is right and for the last 1400years mankind was lost. peace to the world.

[@AlMosesPhD]

May we all become person / rajul B and keep correcting all the rajul A's we see (including ourselves).

[@tiaratiarasam1886]

Differing point of views. Good for those seeking guidance. Ɓetween parenthesis; the other guy is a very disciplined interpreter. He charges us for his knowledge but then Allah charges us too for redemption. Does that make Allah a false deity? Renungkan nusantaran.

[@shukriyusof2104]

@@tiaratiarasam1886 _"... Allah charges us too for redemption..."_ You poor lost misguided soul. The God of man-made religion charges their worshippers. And so do their _"disciplined interpreters"_ but the Allah of the Quran does not! And neither do the humans who help spread His message... 26:180 And I ask of you no wage for it; my wage is the concern only of the Lord of the Worlds. peace to the world.

[@tiaratiarasam1886]

@@shukriyusof2104 masha allah. Ur 26/180 proves my point. Read it again. Segment it. Tafseel it. God of the true quran charges us for redemption. And alhamdullilah my soul is in Allah hand.

[@shukriyusof2104]

@@tiaratiarasam1886 Instead of trying to misguide other people with your own version of _"disciplined interpretation"_ , might I suggest you enrol yourself in a decent English language class? Either your AQAL is lopsided or it is completely missing! peace to the world.

[@rabbi619]

Please explain what kaba is and jinn

[@user-zc5uq7fh9r]

Jinn and Jannah are from the same verb janana. Ibrahim is sitting in the middle of the night and is figuratively surrounded by the night (janana, from the root JNN) So people in Jannah are in a state of mind - surrounded in an environment of developing the mental abilities to receive satisfying insights from Allah. - So they are the actual divinely guided genius. (The English word “genius” has its origin in the Arabic root JNN). Al-Baqarah 2:265 وَمَثَلُ ٱلَّذِينَ يُنفِقُونَ أَمۡوَٰلَهُمُ ٱبۡتِغَآءَ مَرۡضَاتِ ٱللَّهِ وَتَثۡبِيتًا مِّنۡ أَنفُسِهِمۡ كَمَثَلِ جَنَّةٍۢ بِرَبۡوَةٍ أَصَابَهَا وَابِلٌ فَـَٔاتَتۡ أُكُلَهَا ضِعۡفَيۡنِ فَإِن لَّمۡ يُصِبۡهَا وَابِلٌ فَطَلٌّۗ وَٱللَّهُ بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ Here the Quran confirms that people are called figuratively Jannah. Jinn on the other hand are surrounded by the opposite. They are in a state of confusion and unable to reach satisfying insights or even receive them from Allah. Kaaba from Kawa-ib, is a way to elevate your understanding from a low understanding into a divinely guided, high understanding. Salaamun Alaykum.

[@rabbi619]

@@user-zc5uq7fh9r Thanks brother i do have two more questions if you could help one is that what was mohammad following was he a jew was he even a person or is it just a title for the last prophet or was he ismal i have too many confusins about this character as none of his practices matches with the quran as if he was following a different religion and injeel what is injeel according to you.

[@user-zc5uq7fh9r]

@@rabbi619 The best way to answer these questions for you should be focusing on the reality of Allah (as the source of knowledge and guidance). Like all seekers of truth anywhere on this planet, Muhammad sought truth. Also Mussa and Ibrahim sought for truth. No way to deny that. It is part of this universe to be studiable, because its reality (behind the curtain of mundane experiences of a lifeless universe) communicates its insight with those who seek. This is a stage of communication that that is known as revelation. The universe’s true reality is mental and matter is just a conceptual expression of this mental reality. This is why revelation is a phenomena that opens for you the gates of different fields of knowledge, one of which is scripture as a reflection of this universe. If you observe the concealed nature of the universe and the concealed nature of the Quran, it’s impossible to deny that Allah communicates new ideas into evolutionary processes and in intellectual processes. Like the forces of the universe were made accessible for us in stages, like that the mental nature of the universe was and still is made accessible to us in stages. 1. The scripture of Nuh and the beginning of the Anbiyya 2. The revival of the scripture of Nuh called Suhuf Ibrahim/Mussa And it taught the basis of communication with Allah it lacked a system of teaching inside it. 3. Kitabu Mussa/At-Taurat and the beginning of the Nabiyoon It had the system of teaching from inside it, but was limited on milestones of insights send to the Nabiyoon. This Kitab lacked the necessary critical to find prooofs by yourself, which is why it is named “At-Taurat” : extensively concealed, like with thorny obstacles that prevent direct access without Nabiyoon; this meant that the justification for an interpretation had to be believed blindly: We hear and we obey, was their slogan as followers of the Nabiyoon. 4. Quran aka “the Rasul”. Muhammad was one of the Nabiyoon for the Taurat-System, but with the Quran the limit on “milestones” through Nabiyoon ended. Meaning: Allah gave for the first time a scripture to human with full respect towards their intellect. Every way to proof an interpretation is not given by Nabiyoon, but in the scriptural text itself. So that receiving knowledge from Allah (not from humans) with the study of the Quran is based on one’s own desire to connect with Allah. Every means to unravel the Hoor (the Ayah that like a JPG are packed with insights based on Sirat-al-Mustaqeem, the inner divine methodology of the Quran, by which its jargon and terminology is unraveled by Allah if you allow yourself to self-correct by the logic of the Quran and its composition that you study and inquire about by yourself. And the way to communicate with Allah is then made accessible to, like it was made to those who learned before from Nabiyeen. In a way the inner logic and composition of the Quran allows you to access truth - as a seeker of truth DIRECTLY, and not indirectly through any Nabiy. This restriction of the Taurat-System is over. Because the methods of unraveling the Ayat are all in the Quran and justifiable (mubeen) through the Qurans methods to teach them to you, if you pay attention to its hints and motifs. An-Nisa' 4:69 وَمَن يُطِعِ ٱللَّهَ وَٱلرَّسُولَ فَأُوْلَٰٓئِكَ مَعَ ٱلَّذِينَ أَنۡعَمَ ٱللَّهُ عَلَيۡهِم مِّنَ ٱلنَّبِيِّۦنَ وَٱلصِّدِّيقِينَ وَٱلشُّهَدَآءِ وَٱلصَّٰلِحِينَۚ وَحَسُنَ أُوْلَٰٓئِكَ رَفِيقًا Those who voluntarily obey Allah and the Rasul (not the Nabiy who is not with us anymore, but the Quran as the Rasul, which is still with us) shall be among those upon whom Allah bestowed His “Ne3ma” [- namely]: 1) [those upon whom it was bestowed] through { مِن } the Nabiyeen; meaning that the “Ne3ma” that they received, is now received by engaging the Quran as the Rasul, and not restricted on getting it, like they did it through the Nabiyeen; in a way the followers of the Quran as a Narrations says will be like the Nabiyoon of Bani-Israil; the will have the Ne3ma directly, without any indirection. 2) the ones who readily accept the truth (through communication with Allah and His Malaikah) 3) The witnesses of the truth (who also got to know the true insights to witness by Allah and His Malaikah) 4) Those who seek to extract the correct application of the Terminology (اَصْلَحَ); in Classical Arabic (مُصْطَلَحَ) directly from the Qurans inner divine collection of terminology (الصٰلِحَت) aka the “divine lexicon”; by the conditions of Sirat-al-Mustaqeem, do engage the Quran in the way of Allah with utmost discipline, to receive the evidence based knowledge (عِلْم) from Allah directly, to be a “Saleh” in the way of the scriptural engagement (عَمِل). This Ayah shows that the seekers of truth are LIBERATED, through the Quran from any of those restrictions to find the connection to the transcendental nature of the mental universe. So the Taurat is expired. Its limitations are not acceptable to this new stage of scriptural evolution, the Quran. Everything between the Taurat and the Quran is not of use anymore, but only the Quran. So don’t care about the Injeel. It’s not available to us anymore. The Injeel was just part of the Transition from the Taurat to the Quran. A brighting message from Limitations to Liberation ( in one of the readings of the Quran it says “Anjeel” which can mean Liberation); so it was a way to make it easy for Bani-Israil to prepare them for the new stage of mental Evolution through the Quran. Not a book by itself. So 3issa and Muhammad both were tasked to prepare Bani-Israil, with functions of “Injeel” which they both embodied as Nabiyoon, to get them out of the old System of the Taurat to become followers of a new System (in this transition named “Injeel), which is not part of the Quran-System to connect with Allah and the true mental universe to access its secrets and get intitiated (into Jannah) by Allah directly, instead through Nabiyeen. Which doesn’t mean that teachers are useless. It’s just at certain point of education you reach an independent state, by which you get initiated by Allah into Jannah - here on Earth, to receive all kinds of mental fruits of advanced insights. I hope this was easy to understand, despite the length of the text. Salaamun Alaykum.

[@user-zc5uq7fh9r]

@@rabbi619 basically the Injeel is a transitional state to prepare Bani-Israil to come out of the Taurat System, to be mentally prepared and able to accept the new liberating system of the Quran. Both 3issa and Muhammad were tasked in this role of transition to help Bani-Israil to let go of their biases and wrong notions of authority. With the revelation of the Quran the role of Injeel expired to the followers of the Quran and with the death of Muhammad this role of the Injeel is no longer accessible to anyone. There is only Allah and your intellectual and spiritual engagement with the liberating Quran. Salaamun Alaykum

[@rabbi619]

@@user-zc5uq7fh9r brother you avoided the first question it will be better if you say who or what was mohammad and why did he do these pratices he could have just followed the quran and we wouldnt have problems but no he was following something else and in quran does allah talk about the person muhammad or the quran called muhammad what is allah talking about.

[@alivekhan]

Salaam, kindly correct the chapter number to 18:32-44 in description

[@AlMosesPhD]

SA, thanks, done.

[@hinaakhtar9901]

موسی پلیز طلاق دینے کے طریقے پر ویڈیو بنائیں

[@obaidulhaque7687]

So, All those sentences spewing here , are feel like debunking dr hany .. #marvellous quran without given any Solution or Results of toilling

[@obaidulhaque7687]

Al moses phd is that person 🧍‍♂️ may be he have partnership with marvelous quran then diviated his own identity to open separate channel .

[@user-zc5uq7fh9r]

If your sense of 3ilm base on feelings, then everyone can debunk everything, because then 3ilm obviously looses to the feeling one has about it. So anything that Allah might want to teach future generations can be debunked by the feelings of Atheists too. Because the Quran teaches us to consider our feelings more important than competence in extracting 3ilm from the Zikr (Ahl-ul-Zikr). But I guess by my feelings that Allah did a mistake by calling it “Ahl”. It’s better to rely on feelings. That’s how our Ummah prospered the last 1400 years! Alhamdulillah!

[@thebeesnuts777]

​@@user-zc5uq7fh9r Our ummah prospered for last 1400 years ? Are you on drugs

[@mejamakan3054]

if this video as a comment to Dr. Hanny…. firstly the approach is wrong, you must first make comment about the methodology used by dr hanny to intrepreted the ayats…. by commenting directly the intrepretation of the 2 men by dr hanny it doesnt make any sense

[@Morenzoon]

And wen Allah ask jesus if hé said ..........

[@AlMosesPhD]

Where is 'Eisa' in this masal? Re-watch the vid brother 'without' pre-conceived notions of who these people are.

[@Morenzoon]

You do not know Oke

[@munzirkalimahmed2689]

Assalam o alikum how i can reach you plz give me contact information from which i can easily conversation with you JazakAllah!