2 Timothy

This lesson is part 23 in a verse by verse study through 2 Timothy titled: Profane and Vain Babblings.
Find the outline here: graceambassado...
Grace Ambassadors Bible Fellowship - May 31st, 2022

[@hubertmichael1595]

Justin is the best teacher I have ever encountered.

[@royalflush8173]

Justin is an extremely amazing teacher, his high intellect is displayed in his teachings. He is so precise right and exact.

[@rickorider]

Totally agree yet he is a very humble man and never shares anything about himself or his own experiences but exalts the Lord and the Word. A blessing to us all. His ministry is much appreciated here in the UK.

[@geraldritchey6382]

I can tie him in knots. He doesn't know what he is talking about. Nobody in the account of the New Testament church was ever saved like he suggests.

[@rickorider]

@@geraldritchey6382 With respect its obvious you are not reading or studying your Bible very clearly. We have all been where you are and then we looked what the Bible actually says in context and not what traditions teach. Then the light comes on and you suddenly see scripture in a way you have never seen it before. The key is understanding the revelation of the mystery that Christ gave to Paul from heaven. Something that was hidden is now made known in Acts 9 onwards that was not known in Matthew Mark Luke and John and early Acts. For years I had never seen this or even thought about it. I used to think all the 4 gospels were to us and early Acts and got totally confused. That was because I was trying to take what Christ gave to Paul and put it in the 4 gospels and Acts 2 and 3. But I overlooked it had been hidden in God until Christ gave it to Paul at the very earliest in Acts 9. Paul preached Christ according to the revelation of the mystery that had been hidden since the world began. Peter preached Christ according to prophesy spoken since the world began. What is hidden cannot be what is spoken. What is spoken cannot be what is hidden. Your reaction to Justin is the same as mine was. The very fact you are on their KZbin channel clearly indicates you are searching and it's making you question what you believe. The truth is all there in scripture. Its no longer hidden and I do not need a theological degree to understand what it says. Paul tells us to rightly divide the word of God. That's why it's important to divide the mystery from prophesy and the body of Christ from Isreal and Jesus earthly ministry to Isreal and his heavenly ministry to the body of Christ. Also to divide Peters ministry from Paul's. Peter got his ministry from Christ on earth. Paul got his mission from Christ in heaven. They were different instructions. Otherwise we get confusion and not understanding the gospel that saves us today. We are saved today without Isreal, without baptism, keeping the law, being obedient but by grace alone through faith. This is the teaching in Paul's epistals to the Romans.

[@geraldritchey6382]

@@rickorider Absolutely and positively not. Jude 3 says to contend for the faith ONCE delivered unto the saints. That's the faith in Acts 2. Paul said in Galatians 1:23 he preached the same faith he once destroyed. The one he destroyed was the one in early Acts. Acts 2. You are deceived right now. Paul got his mission when he was knocked down and blinded on the road to Damascus in Acts 9. He was water baptized in the name of Jesus and received the Holy Ghost. That's how he was saved.

[@rickorider]

@@geraldritchey6382 Hi. Its clearly obvious that you have not read Paul's epistal to Timothy. He says in 1 Tim 1 v 16 ...I obtained mercy, that in me FIRST Jesus Christ might shew forth all long-suffering, for a pattern to them which should HEREAFTER belive on him to eternal life" If Paul was the first to be shown long-suffering that means there was no one before him. He was a pattern to those who hereafter (or from this time onward) to those who on Christ to everlasting life. Paul was the first one to be shown this long-suffering. It was not shown to Peter Paul is the pattern. A pattern is made of an object so that it can be reproduced exactly as the pattern. Paul is that pattern for those who from hereafter, from when after the pattern is made to those who belive on Christ. Paul did not works for salvation. His epistal to the Romans is all about grace and how we are not under the law. Clearly Christ gave a message to Paul that was not known by Peter. He also says to the Corinthians "last of all he appeared unto me" meaning Paul was the last one Christ appeared to and gave him information that the Peter and the didn't have. If Peter knew the mystery in Acts 2 then Paul would not be the first to receive this grace and he would not be the pattern from that time onwards to those who believe. All you have to do is compare what Peter preached against what Paul preached. Ask what is the content of the message? Faith in Christ is what Paul tried to destroy. We still preached faith in Christ but its understanding the new information and revelation that Christ gave to Paul is so important other wise we diminish what we have in Christ. Isreal are promised a future salvation...we have salvation now. Peter says in Acts 2 v 19 " Repent ye therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord and he shall send Jesus Christ..." Their sins are not blotted out until the future when the times of refreshing shall come. We have our sins forgiven now through the blood of Christ. It's so clear that Peter was preaching different to what Paul preached that a child can understand. When we read Romans there is nothing about having our sins blotted out in the future when the time of refreshing comes. We have salvation now. That is what the mystery revealed is all about and when you understand it it the joy of realising what we have in Christ now and what Isreal has that Peter preached for their future is no comparison. We are baptised into the body of Christ by the Holy Spirit. No water required. Someone who is about to die can trust the finished work of Christ for salvation and be saved without going into water. If you add baptism for salvation you are adding works. It was required for Isreal for cleansing but not for us. Yes Paul was baptised but remember it was a transition from law to grace. John the Baptist preached repentance and baptism for remission of sins but Jesus had not died so it could not have been a picture of death burial and resurrection. Peter continues what John the Baptist preached in Acts 2 "repent and be baptised for the remission of sins". It was nothing new only that they would receive the Holy Spirit as prophesied. Peter is still under law in Acts 10. He says to Cornelius "our law does not allow us to associate with gentiles" God had to give him the sheet vision because gentiles could come into the kingdom but there is zero mention of the body of Christ and the new creature where there is no jew or gentile but one in Christ. That is Pauline teaching alone. He offers forgiveness through the name of Christ. We have forgivness now through the blood of Christ.

[@dkgrace6743]

Awesome. Rightly dividing the WORDS is profitable and not vain. Thank you JJ.

[@ryanfox7529]

I started seeing how the church I was going to was twisting the scripture. I started studying on my own. And was rightly dividing. Found this channel it agrees with what I found in the kjb! That makes me relieved!

[@BishopAnthonyMUtsey]

Awesome Teaching..

[@hubertmichael1595]

The most detailed, brightest, and best teacher I have ever experienced. I am continually backing up the video, that I may hear again what he just said that it may penetrate the almost impregnable heresies I have been taught all my life until I found Right Division, and great teachers like this one. Thank You most Gracious, Father.

[@vernonsteinkamp1088]

Ditto, this teaching is pretty heavy considering many pastors/teachers are not dividing rightly and teaching things of the past which is not for today.

[@thelastgirlyouknow]

Hi friend 👋 Mid Acts Pauline Dispensationalism asks valid questions, but provides heretical answers. There are biblical answers to the questions raised by this doctrine, but this teaching ultimately points to two separate gospels which makes it heresy. Ask what this doctrine teaches about why Jesus was crucified, and see that it takes away from Jesus as Lord and King over all.. I encourage the reading of Colossians in its entirety as a place to start. I hope you continue questioning and prodding and searching ❤ the grace of Jesus be with you ❤

[@vernonsteinkamp1088]

@@thelastgirlyouknow how do you explain Peter taught the gospel of the circumcision and Paul taught the gospel of the uncircumcision?

[@thelastgirlyouknow]

@@vernonsteinkamp1088Hello there! This is a GREAT question, thank you!! So, we have the following verses that are often taken out of their context: Galatians 2:7-8; Roman's 16:25; Ephesians 3:3-7; 1 Corinthians 2: 6-8 Each of these Scriptures, again, are taken out of context and used to "explain" away this doctrine. Yet when you look into each book as a whole, and study these verses in context, you would never draw the conclusion that the gospel Paul preaches is separate from the rest of the gospel taught. If you prefer a more concise read and would rather not read each book in its entirety, I would like to recommend as well reading through Colossians in its entirety. This false doctrine is quickly unravelled. A couple more key notes: - Mark was written to Gentile Roman Christians - This teaching is heresy for many reasons. However, the main question to ask as you are scrutinizing this doctrine is, "What does this doctrine teach about the reason for Christ's death on the cross." You will find that Jesus and His atoning work; instituting the New Covenant by his blood, and purchasing one People to Himself, is not what this doctrine teaches. Furthermore, it trivializes Christ's redemptive work on the cross, rather than understanding that He is the focal point of all history, see Colossians 1:13-20

[@pepi8433]

@@thelastgirlyouknow they're many gospels

[@martybeazley3306]

You have helped me so much. I love your videos, and appreciate your efforts. Truth is my desire.

[@planetruth414]

Excellent and very helpful teaching! Thank you!!!

[@michaelpeters4387]

Thank you!

[@SarasotaFl]

Awesome ❤😊

[@williamearl7837]

Proverbs 19:1 Better is the poor that walketh in his integrity, than he that is perverse in his lips, and is a fool. 2 Also, that the soul be without knowledge, it is not good; and he that hasteth with his feet sinneth. 3 The foolishness of man perverteth his way: and his heart fretteth against the LORD. Main emphasis is verse two. Be careful about being hasty. II Peter 2:18 For when they speak great swelling wordsof vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error. Be careful to have a heart of obedience to God(Bible). Now, I will continue listening.

[@ishiftfocus7295]

It's amazing how dull of hearing the average churchgoer is.

[@joint-heirwithchrist5241]

Then again not much truth to hear there either.

[@bobvadney7240]

The last time I heard a bible teacher...speaking on the importance of the " Right Division..." Principle..was, way back in the early '70,s...Ha ha ha..little did I realize my Bible Prof, Dr. MARK G. CAMBRON..Was teaching us how to teach ourselves the word of God...& in English...no less!!!!...Why??? Acts 2:6-8 has NEVER been rescinded by God...Why do I mention this??? bc the Prez, of Washington Capitol Seminary...Mr Homer Heater..told us in chapel..." you can't really know the word of God ...UNLESS..you know the Greek..." what he should of said was..." UNLESS you know & understand the Right Division Principle..as found in 2Tim.2:15,16"...@ least he wouldn't have been LYING....oh & by the way....that Seminary is Roman Catholic Reformed d Calvinist...to the core!!! Something he failed to mention....in his " Greek" spiel trying to recruit students.....anyway I thank you sooooo very much....for your ministry....& this...Right Division Principle..is just one of the 18 Divine principles of Revelation...Given to us by God & design to #1...keep our Sectarian bias out of the saved d text of Holy Writ..& #2... they are RULES of Interpretation...that helps to avoid these Sectarian Groups...that have Christians @ each other,s throats...& in the case of Catholic Calvinism....for well over 500 yrs..with no end in sight...the other two groups are.the Arminians..." saved & lost.." assurance of Salvation...based upon CONDUCT...Not the CROSS!!! the last group are the Lordship...boys..." persevere or lost" again assurance..of Salvation..based upon CONDUCT...Not the CROSS...!!! REFUTED by 2Pet 2:7-9 AV/ KJV..Why??? Nothing,s MISSING...REVISED....OMITTED....DELETED...ERASED....ELIMINATED....OR EXPUNGED...!!! THATS WHY...!!!again thx a ton for this wonderful & refreshing presentation of God,s word..about not only WHAT it says...but just as important...HOW..it works..God Bless !!

[@Dbgrasshopper33]

And the babbling in the Pentecostal/Charasmatics churches

[@suzanneholdbrook9972]

Micheal Keaton?

[@jeanthornton2441]

You cannot find the body of the son of God in any Christian church .

[@jameswarren180]

CHRISTIANITY WHO CAME UP WITH THE WORD YESHUA DID NOT CALL THEM THAT

[@tims.449]

Yeshua did not mininster to Christians. Romans 15 [8] Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, He ministered to Jews.

[@jameswarren180]

@@tims.449 THANKS FOR YOUR BRAVERY, CAN THE CLAY TELL THE POTER, ARE EUROPEAN THE CREATOR OR IS IT YESHUA, SO THE ROOT IS WHAT YESHUA SAID SALVATION IS OF THE JUDAH JEWS NOT EUROPEAN, THANKS HELP ME OUT

[@toddkeeran3479]

How about? Pray that our flight will not take place in winter or on the sabbath. Ask the Father if his teachings were spoken through Jesus. Then turn to Jesus and abide in him.

[@engineer775]

What are you saying or implying?

[@pepi8433]

Many believe that jesus was supposed to return in there lifetime but didnt.

[@pepi8433]

or that jesus already came in 70AD

[@williamearl7837]

I do not know who this man is, but he seems to believe the King James Bible and the Bible are synonymous.

[@vernonsteinkamp1088]

Yes, and?

[@williamearl7837]

@@vernonsteinkamp1088 I still have not finished listening. I need to think about what he is saying. This is the first time I have heard this scripture expounded upon in this manner. I have a little understanding of the word profane. Please don't make too many comments for the time being. If you want to reccomend other videos by this man, that would be appreciated.

[@pepi8433]

Justin Johnson from Indiana lol

[@gregbellins4189]

I hope and pray that this reaches you, JJ. I was burdened to share that you may somehow correct some flaws in your doctrine regarding “Rightly Dividing the Truth.” 1. The Lord made the gospel books, the first four books, a part of the New Testament writings because it is rightly so. It points to us who is the messiah, and what is expected of us, under a new dispensation that ended the Law. 2. The new dispensation is one of grace, established or put into effect/operation at the time of the crucifixion, known as the shedding of the blood of the new covenant; and not, as you preached, at the time of the ministry of Paul, as in Matt. 26:28; cf. Heb. 9:17. Such is the time of occurrence of the gospel, the finished work of Christ referred to in 1 Cor. 15;1-4 written in the four gospel books. Accordingly, from that time on, there is only one gospel, not two, in the book of Acts and up to this day. This is due to the nullification of the Covenant of Law, thereafter, no one can get away from the New Covenant of grace for salvation, and that goes even for the Jew who was circumcised at the time of the old dispensation. For how can one be justified with an agreement that was already been deemed obsolete; see Hebrews 8:13. 3. Paul referred to the gospel as the grace that saves thru faith, for man does not have any part in it, nor did he ask for it, therefore it is a gift, as in Ephesians 2:8-9. However, it is the way that the gift is received that reckons if the man is indeed living under the dispensation of grace. God says it has to be a living faith, not a dead faith, complete with works; otherwise, it is worthless, as in James 2:17. Abraham was called the father of faith (Romans 4) so that a standard may be prescribed to all those who believe (Jew or Gentile). For the same measure of faith by which righteousness was accounted to Abraham, (verse 11) shall also be measured to anyone who shall be credited with righteousness that comes from his faith (verse 12). This is the reason why the faith of Abraham was given to us as an example, as in James 2:20-26. 4. It is for freedom that we were called, hence we have free will under such calling from God under grace, therefore, anyone who received grace thru faith but later on chooses to depart from it, shall lose his/her salvation, as in Galatians 5:13-14. Here is The Catch, one gained it thru faith, so shall one lose it if he departs from that faith, as in Hebrews 6:4-6.

[@pepi8433]

There are many gospels

[@gregbellins4189]

@@pepi8433, there is only one gospel, you will find it in 1 Cor. 15:1-4. The first 4 books of the New Testament are narratives supporting each other leading to the gospel (synopsis) referred to above, which saves Jews and Gentiles by faith.

[@selahchunem8447]

There is only one gospel of Jesus tries but with 4 books of course. There might have been many Gospels preached, but they're probably false teaching.

[@jameswarren180]

JUDGE WOKE LEFT SO ARE YOU ON THE RIGHT LIKE SATAN IN THE LIGHT

[@gordoncrawley5826]

Please explain that.

[@jameswarren180]

@@gordoncrawley5826 IF YOU ARE A SON YOU ARE ON YOUR FATHERS SIDE BECAUSE HE IS ALWAYS RIGHT AND HE WANTS TO HELP THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT THERE IS NONE WHO DO GOOD NO NOT ONE SINCE YOU CHOSE THE RIGHT MEANS YOU LEFT YOUR FATHER FOR THE WORLD WHICH IS NO GOOD THERE IS ONLY ONE WHO IS GOOD YESHUA THANK YOU VERY MUCH

[@jameswarren180]

@@gordoncrawley5826 DO NOT BE CONFORM TO THIS WORLD DO NOT LET MAN SHAPE YOU YOUR FATHER ORDERS OR YOU CAN DISOBEY THANKS

[@martinvtodd9502]

Wow, vain babbling....sounds like a teaching on President Biden's language.

[@geraldritchey6382]

There is no such thing as a "mystery gospel" given only to Paul. I can debunk this with both eyes shut.

[@vernonsteinkamp1088]

Go ahead.

[@geraldritchey6382]

@@vernonsteinkamp1088 Paul himself said the mystery is now revealed to the holy apostles and prophets. That means it was not revealed to Paul alone. It was revealed to Peter in Act 2 on the day of Pentecost. It was revealed to Paul on the road to Damascus. Everybody in the New Testament church got saved the same way, by obeying Acts 2:38. There is no separate "gospel of grace." Acts 2:38 is being saved by grace.

[@rickorider]

@@geraldritchey6382 Gospel of the circumcision and the gospel of the uncircumcision are different unless you do not understand how the English language works. Peter agreed with Paul that he would go to the Jew with the gospel of the circumcision and Paul would go to the heathen with the gospel of the uncircumcision. How you make them the same gospel is to ignore how we understand the English language.

[@rickorider]

That's odd. There is no record of Peter preaching the gospel of the grace of God at Pentecost. He accuses Isreal of murder. There are other apostals chosen by Christ other than the 12. Paul preached Christ according to the revelation of the mystery that was hidden since the world began. Pater preached Christ according to prophesy which was spoken since world began. Impossible for Peter to be preaching something that was still hidden in God in Acts 2 and don't forget in Acts 10 Peter is still under law and very reluctant to go to gentiles...something the mystery said opposite...its grace offered to all without Isreal but trusting Christ death burial and resurrection for salvation which Peter never offers. Paul gives us his "but now" telling us when it was revealed in Ephesians. May need to study your bible a bit more.

[@geraldritchey6382]

@@rickorider Absolutely not. The gospel Peter preached, Acts 2:38, IS the gospel of grace. There are not two gospels.

[@gregpierce9800]

Yes sir, believe what ya saying is truth. We are in the "mystery period". No doubt. Daniel 7:25; Amos 8:11, come true. Corn. Really? KJV? Corn? Prophesy does matter, because it's coming true as we watch. Is it who art thou or which art thou? Is it on earth, or in earth? Is it a wolf or a lamb? It it crush his head or just bruise? You will delete this, I'm sure. BUT You see. And your silent. Probably you justify to spread the message. I feel ya. Understand that. Stand by, CERN runs hard at the end of the year. Like way more than 2015. You are 99% sir. What is missing? KJV changes. Supernatural changes. Prophesied changes. Prophesy works even in the age of Grace. It has to. It doesn't stop. It's telling you what is to come. YOU can't say an artificial stop because it suits your itching ears. Lucifer was created a long time ago, perfect in beauty and wisdom. To underestimate that is not good. He asked God to be able to change times and laws. God said, YES, for a short time. Luciferians are like the magicians of Pharaohs of Egypt, with new science behind it. Not carefully cut rock on lay lines. No sir, With AI and Quantum Computing. Change man's DNA. The Mark. No forgiveness possible. Like in the days of Noah (not Noe). In your hand sir, not on. You almost there. He's hit the gas. Don't fall behind. The Rapture does have to happen before the wrath. But we ain't there yet. Has he changed secular time? YES! Has he changed the KJV? YES! And will continue to do so. Where are YOU at is the real question.

[@thelastgirlyouknow]

This teaching is heresy. This is incorrect handling of the Scriptures. You take one verse to tell you how to interpret all of scripture, instead of seeking that Scripture would help you understand scripture. To teach that there are two gospels is to spew heresy and lead people away from Christ. You claim to teach scripture in context, but yet you cherry pick verses and thereby change, misunderstand, and twist the meaning.

[@jamesgallagher618]

Gal 2:7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; Gal 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)

[@thelastgirlyouknow]

@@jamesgallagher618 hi there! Please read that in context. Read all of Galatians.

[@TheCableStrain]

Dispensational teachers can't help but lead themselves into the ditch, even when many brothers in the LORD have good understanding on many subjects, the Dispensational methodology is grievous error, so it's inevitable they will be in error.