Chevorlet Impala SS idle, revving, Burnout. 303hp 5.3L V8. Yes it is FWD, yes that is wack, Thanks for viewing, rating and commenting. Visit YourWhip.Com and show off your better car.
Пікірлер: 368
@fadedfutures14 жыл бұрын
It'll still happen. I've seen them do it. And you can keep it going, it just requires some pedaling. As long as it doesn't shift, it will burn them till you hit metal.
@quecent13 жыл бұрын
I like how he showed of the car first before he stole it
@xxx03914 жыл бұрын
this has to be the most powerful front wheel drive car ever made in production! 5.3 v8 FWD! nice
@rt11107 жыл бұрын
I don't care what anyone says, Impalas are sports sedans, lol. GM does the best work
@furretthefuzzynoodle38965 жыл бұрын
R T on sport sedans no way. Impalas aren’t really sport sedans they were originally muscle cars. I love gm but not THAT much
@ryanralph74944 жыл бұрын
They made it fwd. No, i still love the impala. But the V8 should've been rwd. Thats why they always have trans issues
@lateloop15 жыл бұрын
i love how you can hear the old-person floor-mounted emergency brake ratcheting into position.
@ClassicGBodyGarage16 жыл бұрын
The G8 is a sweet car. This Front Drive Impala SS is pretty sweet though. I would take one.
@RobNttBob12 жыл бұрын
That burnout wasn't wack man, it was pretty alright.
@Chowbizful10 жыл бұрын
dafaaq it's a FWD V8 ???
@rellharlem7 жыл бұрын
Chowbizful lolollolooooolllllolololoolllll
@cemsengul166 жыл бұрын
Abomination!!
@ryanralph74944 жыл бұрын
Yep chevy really fucked up the newer impala ss
@Streetspeed-om5fy4 жыл бұрын
Wtf was Chevy thinking 🤣
@tunerimpala56582 жыл бұрын
@@ryanralph7494 don’t act like fwd v8 isn’t the ultimate sleeper
@joemaimaron270111 ай бұрын
I remember seeing this video as a kid 15 years ago now I have an 07
@dilliot2k16 жыл бұрын
Cool, now I feel better about considering a cobalt ss. Do you think the malibu LTZ has any merrit, or is it just a good lookin car ?
@dilliot2k16 жыл бұрын
I will say that a SS impala can get a stock cobalt on the top in, but I don't think it can beat it on the initial acceleration.
@ChevyImpalaMan9016 жыл бұрын
nice Impala. I own a '96 SS and I love it. I'm hoping they decide to give the 09's rear wheel drive.
@silvercoke13 жыл бұрын
5.3L/0.016387064 = 323.4258 so a normal 5.3L is 323ci. Sometimes auto manufacturers round up to a certain number. Back in the old days Ford used to make 5.8L engines because 5.7L engines weren't exactly 350ci (they were 347ci, but 350 when rounded). The 5.8L engines translated to 354ci (rounded). A 327ci block is actually 5.35L which they would have rounded to 5.4L. GM's official rating is 325ci/5.325L (325.1ci/5.328 L) for the SS.
@TheTheconcious115 жыл бұрын
If you want a drag racer, this is not the car for you but if you want a nice sports/family sedan then this is the car. I just bought a 08 Impala LS, its only a v-6 but its powerful and will roll.
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
trust me, i totally agree with everyone when they say that rwd is better for racing purposes/sporty driving. i just like fwd cause i can drive mine whenever; good or bad weather. also, i usually don't turn corners at 90 mph so the ebrake thing doesn't apply to me lol :) but for someone who is oober into drag racing, than it does...
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
if you do have a gto, think about what ur comparing: 6.0L vs 5.3L 400hp vs 303hp 5/6 speed vs 4speed rwd/fwd End Result 4.8sec vs 5.6sec The fact that the impala does only .8 sec slower than a gto isn't bad considering what it's up against...
@codydakota9513 жыл бұрын
At one time I thought a FWD V8 was stupid, then I drove and bought a cadillac, and later bought my '08 SS Impala. I prefer it to a RWD any day, its all about preference...
@PistonAvatarGuy14 жыл бұрын
@Membrane556 It doesn't really matter where an engine makes it's power, it just matters how much and over how wide of an rpm range. The Nissan Altima 3.5 SE is a low 14 second car and it doesn't even make 300 hp. The V6 powered Accord, Camry, etc are also 14 second cars.
@RealBron0312 жыл бұрын
I miss this car
@DystruktoBoi114 жыл бұрын
@xxx039 Grand Prix GXP was FWD and had an LS4 V8, I think it matched the power in these Impalas right up until Pontiac got canned. 5.3L V8 as well.
@cmacbrown16 жыл бұрын
the cobalt ss is a good car .. theyre fucking fast. keep up with this car.
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
The .77g is for the Cobalt LS; the one i thought u were comparing. If ur talking about the Cobalt SS then yeah. The Impala SS and Cobalt SS have almost identical 0-60 and 1/4 mile times.
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
Awesome! lol my friend is getting a gto in a year or two i can't wait to ride in it! i've heard they're really badass!
@KnievelFats13 жыл бұрын
@worldofwilfred They only did it so it wouldn't suck in the winter time, they still want the impala to be practical for the regular people, its not a muscle car by any means so it doesnt need rwd.
@sideburns200916 жыл бұрын
They almost the same. The LS4 has an aluminum block and has ls6 heads and a slightly shorter crankshaft because the engine was modded for transversal mount.Maybe the ls4 won't have LIM gasket problems as the vortec 5.3 are prone to have.
@TILLA2X10 жыл бұрын
0-60 in 5.3 and a quarter mile in 14.2 with good tires, actually faster than I thought it would be especially since it's so heavy, even faster than the new Maxima, base Charger, base Camaro, and Scion/Subaru FR-S/BRZ.
@Membrane55614 жыл бұрын
@idontcare80 Where in the power band the engine makes power is just as important as how much power it makes. An engine that has a lot of low end of torque and a wide power band will generally out perform an engine in a car of the same mass with similar output but with a narrow high rpm power band. These run mid 14's stock not bad for a FWD car with an automatic. It does not take much to get one down to 12s which means be able beat 370Zs.
@firefoxmoz13 жыл бұрын
That looks like it's a pain in the ass to work on, then again everything anyone comes out with today looks like a pain in the ass to work on
@TheCarArchives9613 жыл бұрын
the 2006-present Chevrolet Impala is assembled in Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
@bigradke1716 жыл бұрын
yea its nasty expensive to upgrade and shit but well worth it ive put about 7k into mine and i have 502 hp and started with 350 so not to bad
@dilliot2k16 жыл бұрын
The camaro I would pay for, aint out yet.
@darkeyce0213 жыл бұрын
@turbocountry its doesnt matter, wet or dry its still a burnout. my old reliant k has 90hp and will do it dry. this car would be just fine
@toxicmatrix133714 жыл бұрын
ok its fwd but that means you can drive it in the snow, unlike any rwd sports car. Yet the car can go 0-60 in under 6 seconds. fwd make its a year round car, but you still get to screw with it. its better than buying 2 cars, especially when you live in new england
@LDPKEV14 жыл бұрын
Yeahh I Got a Chevy Impala 07 mine is a 3.5 L tough Great Cars !!
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
it's funny how people complain about fwd when it's the fastest stock impala ever created...
@yahanwiwi14 жыл бұрын
You got a sleeping devil in your Impala. I bet you have fun driving down country roads.
@alwaysopen797014 жыл бұрын
@jwippel Ha Ha - the same holds true for a .44 mag. The only real difference between mags and specials is the length of the empty shells. The mags are app 1-2 mm taller ergo more powder. And kick. .380 is a 9mm in a shorter shell. 10mm is .40.
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
i usually don't race people either, i just like having a car that is pretty much faster than most cars out on the road. lol everyone in a while i'll take someone off the line tho :P
@jvillalobos51414 жыл бұрын
@aNINJApie for future reference there is 61 cubic inches per liter
@flattoprulez13 жыл бұрын
If only Impala's looked like they did back in the day.
@john20071515 жыл бұрын
The Impala is keeping the same platform until 2012, the RWD Impala is questionable whether it will happen or not.
@silvercoke13 жыл бұрын
@azfiandazfar The 3.4L won't do a good burnout, but if you turn the trac off and punch it, it will squeal the tires a bit. I do it in my 04 with a 3.4L, especially at the Autocross events. You can probably apply a bit of brake, and try to get it to make some smoke, but the 3.4L isn't as powerful as the other engines GM put in the Impalas.
@jvillalobos51414 жыл бұрын
@troubleshooterg23 its just got a little bit of torque steer, just got to adjust. Gots good throttle response though
@alwaysopen797014 жыл бұрын
@Toxicmatrix You have explained the reason the model exists. Who would want a FWD v8 for year round seasonal use? All policing agencies throughout the country in any capacity, including federal. Large FWD cars ride nice and a light v8 puts more zip into it. It is the only other car made for that niche - the Ford Crown Vic is the other. Cadillac has made big FWD v8 cars for years.
@cheezgrated13 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I don't understand what the BFD about RWD vs. FWD is for a daily driver. You still have to be smart with the gas pedal if you have a powerful engine hooked up to either. Otherwise, you're still hitting that lamp post. The only difference is whether you're caving in the hood or the rear doors.
@sideburns200916 жыл бұрын
I was saying the same thing. I wouldn't want a V8 FWD and this car looks nice but it doesnt have the mean V8 look to it. Thats why I'd prefer a challenger srt8 with a trimec6060and 6.1 hemi. They look very mean.
@hcaughy13 жыл бұрын
@rjhoughton1 ...was Oldsmobile...huge boat...good looking car with mega torque steer!
@josh05313 жыл бұрын
@worldofwilfred Not to mention fords 3.7 v6 is 305 hp...gm seems to have managed less out of 2 extra liters. Good going GM!
@bendover151412 жыл бұрын
with a front wheel drive car all you have to do is put on the e break which locks the back wheels and you can go mayham on the cars
@TheCarArchives9612 жыл бұрын
the engine on the 2006-present Chevrolet Impala Engine 3.5 L LZE V6 3.6 L LFX V6 3.9 L LZ9 or LZG V6 5.3 L LS4 V8
@john20071515 жыл бұрын
Haha they aren't that bad to call them a shitty Corvair, plus that wouldn't totally work since Corvairs were coupes. I totally agree with you on the FWD bs. 1996 was the last year of the true SuperSport.
@dlfranklin14 жыл бұрын
@sgrunsick I believe it is 325 cubic inches, atleast that's what chevy says. But yeah, used to be the old famed 327 from the 60s and 70s.
@josephtan181817 жыл бұрын
since ford bought volvo cars, their v8 version s80 did place their engine like that, including xc90 suv
@alwaysopen797014 жыл бұрын
@Joseph9536 "E" as in emergency/parking brake? You can't do a burnout with the parking brake on as it basically locks your rear brakes, the ones that are doing the burnout. Most people power brake, which is holding the brakes while holding the gas down. The best burnouts are done using line locks but that's a lot of trouble to go through just to make tire smoke. The real way to do it is to have enough horsepower to turn the tires with the gas pedal only.
@boredtroll21967 жыл бұрын
I have 2016 "old body style" LTZ, v6. I wanna throw some as emblems on mine just for klos
@bobfromlogistics14 жыл бұрын
@alwaysopen 5.3L = 323 CI. Just keep in mind that a 5.7 = 350 CI. Thats usually how I manage to do the math.
@DarkLinkAD16 жыл бұрын
Sorry, that was a typo, G8GXP is 0-60 in 4.9 1/4 mile in 12.9. Well, the LS4 is actually newer then the LS1 but either way there both LS series. Ofcourse the interior in the G8 or 4 door GTO whatever you want to call it happens to be better quality than the Impala, Impala in comparison to its Rivals isnt behind, Impala in comparison with its own company GM which has recently raised the bar, is behind.
@jvillalobos51414 жыл бұрын
@alwaysopen the 5.3L is 323 cubic inches
@alwaysopen797014 жыл бұрын
@tperr63 Look up the numbers listed for a lot of engines over the years and you will see them rounded out to a number that looks more appealing to the consumer.
@ascalia16 жыл бұрын
So, for all those people who want to "piss all over the FWD V8", 1) if a PORSCHE uses an "over the drive wheels" engine design, why is this Impala sooo much different? Just because its over the BACK wheels (which, by the way, causes an EXTREMELY DANGEROUS "pendulum" effect if you break the car loose), and 2)Because the weight distribution for the Impala is 62/38 front-to-rear, as opposed to the Porsche's more "50-50" design, doesn't the weight over the front steering-wheels make the car safer?
@dilliot2k16 жыл бұрын
LOL to samuel. Nah, I pull it off on dry tarmac. I do want that super sport though. Think that'll be a cooler expereince then the new now malibu ltz? thats the only one you can shift gears "manualy"
@TheRam01011 жыл бұрын
Sick ass burnout! How did you get the tires to spin like that?
@user-bmxjolly Жыл бұрын
Jam the parking break before you punch it
@kIokwerk14 жыл бұрын
@juneya23 There's a 2011 Caprice going to be available as a police vehicle only.
@go4itgb13 жыл бұрын
I bought the 06 SS, purposely for inclement weather in the North West, not every where is a rear wheel drive better. Try one in Wet conditions or Snow, then you will find out if you made the right decisions!
@greeleykid14 жыл бұрын
@troubleshooterg23 suspension mods will fix the whole "bad handling" problem
@kIokwerk14 жыл бұрын
@raptor750r Baby steps here, the v8 is back, let's hope for RWD next.
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
Wait, what? i'm sorry, i don't quite understand everything you said. lol ur right, even if it had the same horsepower, it still wouldn't be as fast because it still has fwd a 4speed and a smaller engine. btw, do u have a gto?
@Membrane55614 жыл бұрын
I didn't even know they offered a V8 in these. Bet it's real good for humiliating ricers.
@josephtan181817 жыл бұрын
I heard that ford also made v8 engined taurus too, the car was made in 1996 but also fwd
@ascalia16 жыл бұрын
So, then, please enlighten me as to whether or not it is in fact the 50/50 split that makes the difference (which is primarily for handling sake), *or* the fact that the engine can sit WHEREVER so long as you accommodate the weight distribution. As Porsche does.
@TheRealHatfield16 жыл бұрын
nice impala.... GM really needs to convert them to RWD and add a 6 speed manual transmission! At least they've upgraded from V6'S to V8's
@robertt774715 жыл бұрын
i was gonna buy this car until i found out they were FWD, gettin a 1996 Imp SS made RIGHT with RWD!
@platinumsalamander15 жыл бұрын
i'm from toronto and we get lots of snow and rain and that's why we mostly have FWD cars on the roads. BUT, impala ss should be about FUN, this thing, with FWD, and the soft design of the exterior is ruining impala's name.
@raptor750r15 жыл бұрын
the car industry is just so pitiful these days.. and how they actually go through the trouble of cramming a V8 into a FWD chasis like this. Its a disgrace to the impala name. Modern day people have lost appreciation for true American cars.
@misterjgl12 жыл бұрын
Nice car
@sasuke1kun013 жыл бұрын
@alwaysopen the ci on the 5.3L engine is 327
@sl0wm015 жыл бұрын
all they have to do is rebadge the discontinued Pontiac G8 platform as an impala and there you go you'd have a perfectly good RWD impala (then rename the G8GT to SS and so on). hopefully they'll change their minds and do that
@alwaysopen797014 жыл бұрын
@lHustonProductionsl You just put the facts here...The 2010 Camaro v6 makes 303 hp. Who really needs a v8 in this day and age of traffic jams?
@DNALI16 жыл бұрын
think u could stuff one of them 5.3's in a 3.8l engine bonnet. my 03 ls could use one of them. i was thinkin a northstar v8 but this seems like a much more reliable engine.
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
lol trust me i would LOVE them to be rwd again! but i gotta be happy with what i have :)
@pletcher1114 жыл бұрын
lol i own an 04 impala, with the 3.4 v6 i think, it can do a burn out except my emergency break needs tightened. it can do it on dry easy
@JasonK198211 жыл бұрын
325. 1/4mi is like 15sec. Depending on tire. And 1996 was final yr of rear wheel drive impala
@E-SHAP13 жыл бұрын
you are a god!!!
@wdkilla14 жыл бұрын
@Baker090909 Yea they do, the DTS is a v8 fwd
@slowchevy17 жыл бұрын
Nice ride! looks like you're from IL too.. Have you heard of the north american impala owner's association..? Google that, and click on the first result that comes up.. Join on up! We've got 2200 members nationwide , and are having alot of meet-ups very frequently for this site all around the country!
@DailyDriver.13 жыл бұрын
such a good looking car what mpg u get?
@darkeyce0213 жыл бұрын
@turbocountry its easier on the car, i would only do it wet, saves a little bit of tire too, makes more sense
@gotspeed121215 жыл бұрын
you don't need a front tag in every state if he doesn't he should remove it make it cleaner looking :)
@thirdrayle14 жыл бұрын
luv that car..mine is black
@alwaysopen797014 жыл бұрын
@alwaysopen Oops...I forgot this is a stupid FWD car and isn't a real car. The answer to your question is yes - how else did the rear wheels stay motionless for a short period of time?
@jmecrg14 жыл бұрын
@hardyea Cadilac has done it for years longtime
@John878512 жыл бұрын
@troubleshooterg23 ohh thanks a lot.
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
do you have a gto??? (based on ur vids) because of course a gto is faster! considering it's a 4speed, fwd, and weighs like 3800 lbs, 5.6 sec is pretty quick. they're faster than most cars out on the road today.
@DystruktoBoi114 жыл бұрын
@BaDoNkAdOnK16 Cadillac DTS. its a car, luxury sedan.
@RobNttBob12 жыл бұрын
My girl's V6 impala has an e-brake. You must have never seen the inside of one of these.
@SgtSellz10215 жыл бұрын
that would be a bad ass car if it was rwd
@89cadillacfleetwood13 жыл бұрын
i have a1989 cadillac that is fwd and i can do burn outs all day on dry roads, starting to get tired of buying tires
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
c/d tested them at 14.2 sec. however i have heard 13.9 sec is attainable.
@police84912 жыл бұрын
Plus it also matters about the driver not the car. it can have 400 horses but the better driver will win
@milo81416 жыл бұрын
the reason i was asking if you had a gto was because i was under the impression that you were comparing your car to the ss which i feel isn't a fair comparison.