2014 Audi A6 2.0T Premium Review - TEST/DRIVE

Matt Farah reviews the 2014 Audi A6 2.0T Premium.
Scored by all TEST/DRIVE hosts.

[@FIFAracer]

You got speedlimits, but you say, 211 hp isn't enough?

[@musa12456]

I'm really enjoying these test/drive videos that you guys are putting out these days. They have the perfect blend of showmanship and facts. Keep up the good work!

[@Jillaroo79]

This car looks so classy.

[@DerGigaUser]

The Car is also aviable with Full LED headlights, thats looks much better. ;) Sry for my Bad English. ^^

[@darwandoo]

Matt we need more reviews like this. Simple concise to the point. We'll done

[@shadowgunner69]

We tried the A6 with the 3.0 supercharged engine. It was quick, but it just didn't sing to us. It was the previous generation A6 and we just didn't warm up to it. We retired our 2000 A6 2.7t Quattro after 16 years. We found almost the exact same car in the test; only a 2013 CPO at a local dealer. Couldn't be happier. Most everything that Matt said about the car was right on point. Before I bought it I even compared the hp & torque curves of this engine vs the 2.7T. Almost exactly the same in the most common rpm ranges. Of course the 2.7T would pull like a train at the higher end; but this car has been just fine for our primary car. It has plenty of zip when needed and is a quiet tourer. The Grapvine in Southern Cal is always a good test; and this car doesn't even blink. Even on the uphill sections I had to slow it down. This is our 6th Audi; we tried comparable Passats and some other competitors and there just wasn't the same subjective feel to them. We have taken care of our Audis and they have taken care of us. My 86 5000CS Quattro even gave it's life for my youngest son; when he was forced into a k rail at 70 mph.

[@DreamCarGarage1]

There's a pattern developing with these new TEST/DRIVE reviews. Look back through all the reviews and here what they say. All the conclusions, all the filming, it's all the same. If you took out the actual name of the car itself then the 'exact' same commentary used in this video could just as easily be used for every single TEST/DRIVE video put out so far this year! I'm not hating on this channel, it's one of my favourites but these videos, as I said in a previous post, just seem like adverts paid for by the big car companies with an agreement that nothing really negative is allowed to be said. Disappointing! As for the car, in this guise at least, it seems very underwhelming.

[@JasonBordeaux]

/Dream Car Garage 1 (DCG1) Its not a pattern developing, it has been built in from the start. It has been clearly stated and a known fact that all 28 cars shot for this initial run of the TEST /DRIVE series were filmed in a less than a 48 hour period one weekend. This explains why there is a pattern to all of the videos. These videos are not meant so much for enthusiasts but for your everyday run-of-the-mill consumer. Each car was driven by 2-5 /DRIVE hosts and rated. Their ratings were then averaged and that is the rating we see. All of the cars were press cars and not one of the manufacturers paid /DRIVE for anything (filmed, said, or not said). And with their 4-5 minute average run time, there is only so much that can be covered. These were meant to be quick and concise, which they are. Obviously, these are not everyones cup of tea. But, this was a business decision to help bolster viewership and generate additional ad-revenue income to keep the "halo" content that you have come to love, enjoy, & expect from /DRIVE, free and continuous for the future.

[@DreamCarGarage1]

Ah I see. Thanks Jason. That makes sense.

[@DreamCarGarage1]

...but even so are they obliged to say they 'like everything'?!!!

[@JasonBordeaux]

/Dream Car Garage 1 (DCG1) They don't and they won't. I know one of the worst of the reviewed cars was the 370Z which earns the "avoid like the plague" rating. So far there have only been a few of "must haves" which I think of the true "likes". So far the cars reviewed have been from manufacturers that put out a decent product regardless whether you like the brand or not. So, you can't fault them for that. Also, we are what, 10 cars total into their review base. So in the current context, most of the review appear positive. But, I am sure once we see all 28 (and eventually even more), there will be a significantly higher spectrum and range of good and bad cars reviewed.

[@TheSmokingTire]

/Dream Car Garage 1 (DCG1) We didn't seek out any cars that are known to be terrible. We seeked out cars that are commonly seen around major cities being driven by "normal" people. Some cars we got based on availability, other cars we got because we'd heard good things about, and other cars we got as replacements for cars that became unavailable at the last minute. There is, quite literally, no motivation to say good things vs. bad things about any given car. There is no money in positive opinions from us.

[@MrOrangeRunner]

These reviews are amazing, the way a car review should be done!

[@douglasman100]

The first thing you said is just perfect! That is the exact person this car is for!

[@wangonguy62]

I'd like to see more reviews of regular cars from this channel. You guys do an excellent job. Maybe even more inexpensive cars.

[@SaimonZ69]

Really love the all new ranking scale. Well done!

[@RaufZero]

I would say 3.0 TFSI fit perfectly in this class. Nice shortview.

[@Draggis92]

We own an Audi A6 Allroad 3.0 TDI and its great! Absolutely love it

[@roosri]

I have to admit, this is a really 'upscale' review video. I like the direction TEST/DRIVE is going.

[@assassin72]

Matt Farah seems to be more suited to these kind of reviews

[@HesteBremse]

He seams to be suited for a lot of different reviews, which is why he is a good car reviewer - He has the ability to understand various needs, situations and appreciate various cars for what they are and what they are intended for. And btw he has a good voice.

[@snarwars]

The people who say the A6 looks less appealing than an E class probably havnt seen many A6's in person. They are really eye catching especially the curvaceous rear end! Pictures may prove otherwise though.

[@ConstantineJoseph]

Wait till you sit inside the Audi. It feels superb the interior is so balanced and well crafted

[@MrBsquared13]

is there a way you guys can get a hold of the new 2015 WRX?

[@Emitremmus29]

Just wondering what the top tested speed of the AMG was? I drive a Renntech ecu swapped Merc C300S with a dyno tested 263bhp and it touches 173mph (Canadian market C300 Sport 6-spd, delimited due to ECU swap). How bloody fast must the 580ish hp E63 AMG S be?

[@Toxxic88]

New E classes are beautiful.. the model it just replaced though I agree wasn't the looker

[@AKhellbindeR]

Get it remapped, then you are probably looking at 260 hp at all 4 wheels and 300nm. I got the older engine, the 1.8T instead in an A3 chassis, remapped to 220 hp. That is plenty of power for an 1100 kilo daily driver 2 door hatchback, with reasonable fuel economy. But get it remapped, it really makes the engine come to life. Great review btw Matt

[@cvillalobos27]

What is the problem with the brakes you just gave them a 3? Thanks

[@zeus_anoxia]

I love these reviews but I'm wondering if you guys could look into some more "down-to-earth" cars. I don't know how many people who are thinking of buying a 50k+ E-Class, A6 or 5-series will search for youtube reviews before deciding. Thanks for the work you put into this channel.

[@JasonBordeaux]

zeus anoxia I don't know the whole line up. I know there are 28 cars that they reviewed for this series. One would hope/expect that there might be a few "down-to-earth" cars in there.

[@PoliteCheese1414]

I'd like to see them review the BRZ/FRS twins.

[@Dragonrockstar88]

Wouldn't the Jaguar XF also be in this class? How do the comparisons change when a 4th car is added?

[@ucanseemyweiner]

I actually like the interior in the 5-series more. The three germans always seems like great cars so just go for the one you like the most.

[@RMAGEDN740]

i can't believe you said the a6 looks better than the e-class!

[@TheSmokingTire]

I really don't like what they did with the nose on the newest model. If it was a 2012 E-Class, I would have not made that statement.

[@MrZetChannel]

Of course it looks better. Avant has the best look in class. Its unfair we cant get quattro with basic engines in Europe. I have to buy at least 2.8 FSI (75k $) or 3.0 TDI (79k $) to get all wheel drive.

[@RMAGEDN740]

TheSmokingTire each has his own opinion and i respect yours (that's why i watch all of your shows). to me , the new front hood and grill design for mercedes is the highlight of the car. it seems other manufacturers think so as well, since they are "evolving" their design to mimic it.

[@lsevent]

The new E-Class is pretty hideous. Specifically the front.

[@5damndamn]

MrZet Thats why u got to go BMW :-D 520dx or 528ix ;)

[@HBSanta]

It's crazy that people think this car looks boring. The A6 is a stunner! I saw one a few days ago in red and it was a serious eye-catcher.

[@TheMeanmarine13]

agreed, I love the front. I seen a black one coming down my road and the grill looked so pimp.

[@Timmypd]

its a great car, but it does look boring, plain jane like

[@MasterChief37]

Timothy Duncan I have an Avant, it looks even better than the sedan.

[@danielbraguita]

What about the Jaguar XF!? It's also in the same category

[@CraigMische]

A very helpful review.

[@hockeynpolo1]

My 2014 Audi A4 has a 220hp 2.0 T but the same year and heavier A6 gets the old 211hp engine? You might want to go to Audi USA and look up a base model premium again. I think you'd want to change your HP figures.

[@TheBucketOfTruth]

Where are the scores for exterior styling in these reviews? Am I missing something?

[@HorribleStain69]

I see it as an upgraded Passat, i have one and love it

[@nHeroGo]

DRIVE is making great reviews nowadays.

[@sampochin]

That intro just summed up everything

[@fore4kicks]

Doesn't the 5 series start at just under 50k?

[@ivekloft5319]

somebody give me a hint why i should not choose bmw or mercedes benz over audi a6 2.0?

[@TheBathulk10]

what about the new cts, I know its not the best, but its at least comparable

[@Quiz6556]

There is still the option for the supercharged v6 if more power is necessary and milage won't be so horribly diminished.

[@frankr4116]

How is it possible this car receives 9 for economy? Do you not get the TDI's over in the states? 28mpg scores a 9??

[@Schaltza]

OK let's set one thing straight. Drag coefficient number carries absolutely no information unless it comes together with the area it is calculated to. Is there a industry wide standard to which this coefficient is always referred to?

[@ClowchTech]

this car is ALOT better with the 3.0T

[@ahpadt]

Sure, if you live somewhere with really cheap petrol.

[@ClowchTech]

if you dont have money for gas, your not buying an audi in the first place....

[@1amadeo]

bullshit

[@modzona]

Would love it when you are talking about mils pr gallon it pop'd up in some sort of metric form. So that we that have no clue about gallons and mils can understand what you mean by good and bad fuel economy.

[@z00h]

So the V8 E Klasse is only 2 points better than a 4 pot VAG? I'm struggling to comprehend that.

[@AnujPatel31]

How can you not mention the Lexus GS350? It's a much closer competitor than the 5 series or E class which are much more expensive.

[@TheSmokingTire]

Honestly, because lexus does a terrible job marketing it and I didn't even think of it at the time.

[@mosakoe_0693]

I gonna buy the vw golf r32 its so great I live in geramny in abig city so its the perfect car

[@G00S3Y23]

I wish composite car bodies caught on outside of the motorsport and supercar world.

[@MonsterApology]

what about this car compared to the e250 diesel. Theyre about the same price

[@nbehar89]

Forgot to mention the CTS in its class. Matt Farah- Would you have the A6 over the new CTS?

[@kilove1]

thats what i like about matt...very honest well rounded review..well done ..oh yes @ A72 ..i agree that matt is better then Chris..in this regard...

I like how there s a lexus right there, behind matt, and he doesnt give a fuck about putting Lexus GS as a possible contender. Dunno if it actually is, its just funny.

[@danny-rp3on]

Señor carro el confort que tiene un audi lo hace único belleza de auto

[@fthyme87]

Go try out the big 3.0 diesel Matt, that thing has got some grunt to it and it sounds great for a diesel ;)

[@TheSmokingTire]

I really like Audi's Diesel V6. My mom has one in her Q7. Great motor. We're testing the A8 TDI on TST in a few weeks.

[@MrArt69]

Is it really AWD ? AWD Audis ussually say Quattro somewhere...

[@bottomlayer]

Audi should offer the 2.0L TDI on the A6, and also bring back the wagons. 40 mpg and seating for 7 in a luxury car is awesome if they can up their reliability. Can you guys test/drive a sub-30k car?

[@hellomoto170]

hmm this may be cheaper and have better interior but surely the 5 series is worth the extra in most other departments? But I do like this A6.

[@NegerKim]

The A6 is obviously just an A4 XL (and an A8 is an A4 XXL), WTF would you choose this over the E-class if you're using looks as an argument? Yeah, looks are a matter of taste and whatever, but we're talking about pricey cars here and the A6 looks like a fucking A4 and presence is at least half of it when it comes to a segment like this.

[@7crb7]

first 25secs is like guidelines on how not to end up XD

[@herumgeRasing]

Hey /DRIVE, how about testing older cars with that scale at the end? Mercedes W201, W124, BMW E34, E30, old Opel models and so on ;)

[@JasonBordeaux]

Hansi Maier It isn't out of the question (in the future), but the aim and goal of TEST /DRIVE is current market cars which has the biggest effect on generating the viewership and ad-revenue income needed to allow /DRIVE to keep make the great content that the viewers expect. I asked JF the same thing.

[@herumgeRasing]

yeah, just wait this year and new cars are not needed anymore, because there is war

[@alexandersenna3532]

audi a6 2.0 comes with Front Wheel Drive (FWD) standard which is what that one is. the one used in this particular video is not Quattro or all wheel drive .

[@PeytonB]

Alexander Senna It has a quattro badge stuck to the wood on the interior... 1:53

[@JakeBullingtonTV]

awesome review! Wish I had 50 grand right about now!

[@JnBckr]

I like these reviews, they fit cars like the A6, ML or Range Rover. I don't need to Chris Harris punching these cars around the track but I hope the new reviews don't completely replace Chris Harris On Cars.

[@JasonBordeaux]

JnBckr TEST /DRIVE is purely "in addition too" content. None of the other "halo" shows (such as CHOC) has been changed or replaced. Nothing to worry about.

[@moumny]

Jason Bordeaux i just hope they were more in depth or contained a bit more fun/testing. For exemple some off road testing for RRSport could have been fun to watch. If its really a boring car then have comparison instead (here 5series vs E vs A6) and maybe split it in two or three parts for viewership. But then if 28 cars were reviewed in 48h i guess the goal is really to just make us click(and yes we will) but it lowers the overall quality... just my humble opinion :)

[@JasonBordeaux]

Younes Moumni I do agree with you. But, I also understand why JF has made this decision. While there are lots of great reviews on the market, there was a hole in the availability of quick & concise reviews. I don't think there is a lack of quality over their normal content (because I know the time and dedication they put forth regardless of runtime or subject matter), but to many (myself included sometimes) there is somewhat a lack of enough information. Again, what an enthusiast expects out of a review does differ than what a consumer is looking for in the same time. And I get that.

[@Shift4g]

Jason Bordeaux " Again, what an enthusiast expects out of a review does differ than what a consumer is looking for in the same time." So I guess a lot of enthusiasts watching this channel are just really daft.

[@JasonBordeaux]

Shift4g when the intention and goal of what this series is suppose to be and who it is for is known from the get go and yet many people don't get it. It does beg to question if someone is being daft...

[@mtnman1984]

You can chip this car, right?

[@selcukozturk4216]

Now i have to buy one s line for sure

[@Sj1bby]

5 for turnk, does that mean you van fit 5 people (or bodies) in there? ;P

[@5bagsofpopcorn]

This is a great car!! From me, as a european, the mileage would be a reason why i would choose the 2.0T over the 3.0.... and 200 hp are still enough to drive silly fast, which americans cant do, so why would u rather take the car that costs you more.... and why would u take a a6 out to the track? then youd need to have a the rs6 or s6 at least.

[@jimmyhoffa9]

Rick Cosmo Yes it is. For what it is, it's quite competitive compared to say the BMW, and probably Mercedes too. Not to much compared to the Jaguar XF, but those aren't the most reliable beasts around. Now you can argue Cadillac makes a cheaper car, which they do. But then there cars are cheaper for a reason.

[@5bagsofpopcorn]

***** I think mercedes without awd is still more expensive than this one. And i dont think bmw even builds the small 3-series with awd. And why even bother comparing cadillac to bmw, mercedes and audi? lol

[@jimmyhoffa9]

Masterlostfreaky BMW has xdrive for the 3 series and has had for a few years on limited markets, and only then with left hand drive. The new F30 is available with AWD in both left and right hand drive, but the 5 series still only left hand drive. Audi can undercut both companies by using the shared chassis's from VW, so their regular cars are a decent amount less than the equivalent BMW/Merc usually. Obviously Audi doesn't offer "drivers" cars, but then most of the 5 series/Merc's I see are 2.0 diesel company cars, the Merc's being nearly exclusively automatic, so it's not like BMW/Merc owners are having more fun, very few do any kind of canyon road driving and what not.

[@5bagsofpopcorn]

***** Yeah i just looked it up, i wasnt sure if they offered the small Motors with xdrive. The 316 doesnt get xdrive but from the 320 on they have it but im not sure if you can get the xdrive with a Manual. And yeah thats the Problem with Mercedes that theyre just putting in stupid Autos. its annoying as fuck because their old Manuals were just amazing, my dad has a w211 with a v6 and a Manual and that car is freaking amazing.

[@srbjbt]

i have this one now, had A6 TDI before, have to say it is much better, will never buy diesel again. i wanted 3.0T but the problem in Ireland is taxes are too high for bigger engines and car difficult to sell as used when engine above 2 litre. 2.0 TFSI is just perfect, quiet and economic but powerful enough, fast enough, it is strongly recommended if you dont like diesel!

[@goatmonkey2112]

The 3.0T version has the same engine as the S4 minus 23hp. The 8 speed auto is probably a little bit slower than the 7 speed DCT and the A6 has some more weight. But still that 3.0T engine would really liven up this car.

[@2Fast4Mellow]

goatmonkey2112 It depends whether you have the multitronic or the tiptronic gearbox for the 2.0T. The multitronic is a CVT gearbox meaning it doesn't have actual gears. It has two pulleys that 'simulate' 8 gears. Because there isn't actual gear shifting the multitronic is faster than the dual clutch tiptronic, but the multitronic gearbox is not available for quattro drive. You can even tune the multitronic gearbox. I've changed mine that it is very efficient in normal drive, but when I put it in sport mode, the full 260HP keeps going. Gasoline is pretty pricey in Europe compared to the states. In Holland a gallon (3.8 liters) gasoline costs currently about 6.10 euro (6.80 US$). Prices are a bit lower in Germany, but it's the main reason why Audi spends soo much time on a 2.0T engine. It is the most common engine size. The VAG group now has a EA211 engine which produces 270HP using a 3 cylinder 1.0 liter engine. But I do have to admit that I sometimes miss the the raw power sound of my E46 M3 car which I had before my current A6. However the fuel efficiency of the Audi is better than the 520L. Where the Audi got a energy class A label, the BMW got stock with a B label meaning you have to pay a higher income tax on the BMW than the Audi meaning that for the same lease price you can outfit the Audi with some more exotic features..

[@jennyfromjapan]

yeahhh i'd still rather have my boys harris and farrah review the cars we dream of, than fade into the obscurity of the average and the everyday selection of cars.

[@drive]

Have no fear, these reviews are in addition to the usual programming on /DRIVE.

[@TheSmokingTire]

I did a film less than 24 hours ago with a 900 horsepower evo.

[@jennyfromjapan]

TheSmokingTire yeah, and the whole panama series was really, really great - you guys always do great work. i only meant that, as a fan of everything /drive has done so far, i'd prefer to keep your talents and personalities focused on the cars that give us the warm fuzzies in our tummies. forgive me for being a 'purist' i guess...when i see [chris harris] i want to see ferrari f40 or porsche gt3rs, always bringing us that driver's perspective and making the legends relevant again. [matt farrah], you're like the anthony bourdain of our car culture - you always take us on an adventure to highlight the guys who tune their cars and make their dreams a reality, including your own de lorean. what can i say, i love all of the guys at /drive for your talent, perspective, passion, and personality - and although you guys are doing a good job with these new /testdrives, it just seems like those qualities are almost "wasted" on "normal cars".

[@TheEryk03]

Awesome car but to this car better fit 3.0 TFSI.

[@Samykill]

only 70%?

[@seanhunter6802]

I have one and the bose sound system is amazing

[@RanvirMaharaj]

why cant drive do these videos again @/DRIVE

[@suomiauto]

In this class, Audi really is the best.

[@Veyronp87]

i think this is a great car. definitely the best in the class.

[@hectordjibaou4198]

Looks nice until the maintenance kicks in, lol. I dunno even if I had the $$$ for an A6 (talking about straight cash) I still wouldn't get it. Not sure if you guys/gals have seen the interior of the new Mazda 6, but I would take that over this Audi anyday; especially once that 2.5l diesel hits!! Hopefully it'll be AWD ...

[@SpyrosFougias]

If you make the right choices with this car, it can look VERY beautiful. Interior and exterior. Like an RS6!!! The engine can by tuned lightly and you will see an other car. Just think about it. I have a 2011 Audi A4 the 120hp version. I tuned it with ONLY a revo programm and it is now 230hp!!! I won an Audi TT 225hp and a peugeot 207 leman edition 180hp by 4 cars length... So believe me when I say that when you tune this thing just a little, it can be a hole different car in terms of speed

[@ryancrow2876]

nobody buys a 53k audi with a 2.0 to tune it lol. there is nothing that justifys purchasing this trash. engine is too small for such a big car. your a4 was quick after a tune because it probably weighs hundreds of pounds less than this. also which 2011 a4 has 120hp? the only one i can find is the diesel.

[@SpyrosFougias]

Ryan Partlow A4 1.8 TFSI Limited (B8 platform) and it is petrol not a diesel. The diesel you are talking about is a 2.0. My A4 is 1.8 2011 model. And a programm tune, is nothing. You only do it if you want something more!!! My A4 had only 0.2bar boost and now it has 0.9bar with 1.1over. This is the only difference. So what I'm saying is that if you want something more, you can tune it a little.

[@CarsFanTV]

If you want a true drivers car...audi will never beat BMW in that respect, thats a fact

[@SpyrosFougias]

CarsFan69 Dude, you are out off topic. A6 is about family, about all weather conditions. If I want a true drivers car and I have to pick an Audi or a BMW, I would choose the Audi R8 V10. BMW doesn't have something better for a true drivers car. But as I said, you are out off topic.

[@CarsFanTV]

Spyros Fougias you didnt get my point, ill be more specific...a bmw 5 series is better than an audi a6 if you are looking for a drivers car, in every respect. You dont have to buy an R8 to get a drivers car man, really.

[@thatdirtlife]

My sis has a 3.0t version because it is the premium plus

[@cren1676]

If I could afford something in this market. It would be a tough choice between this and the E-Class.

[@RoflOnMyWaffle.]

That Nav screen bothers me so much :(

[@MrPanohead]

Got to stay friendly with the sponsor. Better to leave these kinds of reviews to people that are more in tune with what exec car buyers want.

[@Wurzelzwerg1212]

"This is a very good car and we absolutely recommend it" Only 1% away from average. Just shows how stupid this rating system is.

[@JasonBordeaux]

Wurzelzwerg1212 faulty or not, it is the same system or rating applied to many things. Whether someone earns 100% or 90% scoring it is still an 'A' and that same logic is applied here. Even in the simplest rating system of pass/fail, the difference is generally 1% regardless where that point is on the scale. Although each of the cars are presented by one host in the video, each were driven by 2-5 /DRIVE hosts and they each scored the car individually. Then all of their scores were averaged and we are presented the averaged score. And instead of using the labels: A, B, C, D, & F for the rating, they have the phrasing we are shown. I am curious what is your better method for rating something?

[@RMAGEDN740]

i think the new ratings system is a good addition. i see what you mean by the percentages , but you must understand that the ratings are based on how the car stacks up against it's class competition. maybe they should change to a total point tally instead of a final percentage.

[@Wurzelzwerg1212]

Jason Bordeaux My point is that the score does not reflect what Matt said in the video. If he had said: "This is a good car and we recommend it", I would be fine with the 70% rating. Surely "very" and "absolutely" are not words to discribe a car that is only 1/100 away from average. The rating is absolutely unnecessary. Everybody understands what Matt is saying.

[@dickcheese663]

At least it's quattro, i've been seeing waay too many FWD A6's lately.The rear end looks meh. The front doesn't tickle my fancy anymore. The wood is ghetto, but it's ok overall. long live OPPO!!!! :]

[@edwardwright1507]

"worlds best AWD system" bold statement there?

[@TheSmokingTire]

maybe, but also true.

[@5damndamn]

TheSmokingTire Well... For example Audis quattro system can only shift 85% of the power to the back wheels if needed or 70% to the front. BMW's X-drive can shift 100% to the back or the front wheels, depending on where the power is needed. So, a bold statement indeed.

[@moumny]

TheSmokingTire Idea for next video ? 4matic vs Quattro vs xDrive ;)

[@edwardwright1507]

what about symetrical AWD as well?

[@ScottPC]

Just orded a 3.0 Tdi Bi Turbo A6 black :)

[@madant7777]

Sweet. I must say I just adore the A6 Allroad, white with 3.0 TDI ;)

[@ScottPC]

Meh... No offence but I cant see the point of the allroad! Why did you choose it over the same spec non allroad?

[@madant7777]

XscXps3 Search youtube for "audi allroad bob flavin", it's the first one. I like the meaner look and the added capability. And in white it reminds me of a Storm Trooper ;-)

[@ScottPC]

Fair enough haha

[@torsten6203]

wait 211 hp for 53k ...

[@MrSailaS_]

Audi A6 > Bmw 5.... that's my opinion, and i dont want to look at your percentages. But thats just me, what do u think guys?

[@Eametsa]

3.0 turbo diesel should be standard on this.

[@o3tomas]

Still waiting for 'Avoid like the plague' car.

[@TheSmokingTire]

By far the worst car we tested was the 370Z, so you'll enjoy that one.

[@o3tomas]

Yep, just watched that one. Maybe you haven't tested really bad cars yet? Get a Lada somewhere and test it - after that your scoreboard will only consist of highly-recommended cars.

[@thelarry383]

I would never choose a fancy passat over a e class or 5 series

[@jayfulf]

Mathew Farah how can you honestly think "the E-class is not very pretty"? I believe Chris Harris mentioned he liked the E550 over the respective Audi but hey, to each their own.

[@fishtankfreak]

"Absolutely recommend it" - But it only scored 1 percent over average?

[@TheSmokingTire]

Remember, the numerical score is the average of ALL the drive hosts, and my voice is just my opinion.

[@fishtankfreak]

Oh, I did not know that! Thank you! I appreciate the feedback and nice review!

[@lop8828]

260 ft. Lbs is not shabby by all means off a 2000cc engine.

[@brucec43]

28mpg city? Really?

[@tdm1995]

he definitely misspoke on that... it's 20 MPG city. Maybe the TDI gets 28 city - but that's not what he's driving... i kinda want to wait till prices on used 2016 2.0T come down a bit -- that one has a lot more HP and - well, 22 city 32 highway. BMW 528i is still better on the MPG front. Decisions decisions...

[@veritasfiliatemporis387]

i find the e-class not very attractive too, the 5 series is nice but the audi a6 is the nicest

[@AOCreatrix]

50,000 with only 211hp is insane

[@shirke01]

With that price Audi should include V6

[@sly715091]

When I saw this video in my "what to watch" list, I thought it was the old video of A4 and that KZbin was going wonky! Lol! Smh, Almost all Audi cars look the same. Same grill, same head lights, tail lights, front/back bonnet etc. Good car, good engine and good quality but bit boring and dull IMO. I would choose the E class and 5 series over this.

[@sacha7905]

I'd get a Merc. Audi's are overprived Volkswagens with poor reliabilty and BMW has lost its way.

[@aeremi]

In my opinion, the exterior looks boring but the interior looks SEXY!!

[@niclacoste]

2.0T is pretty weak for a full size sedan. I would rather get the 3.0T model for better performance. Audi should make 3.0T standard for all their cars instead of having to pay extra.

[@kingkerr3]

The 2.0t just isn’t worth it to me for the price.. might as well get 3.0 supercharged engine to really get the feel