2018-10-20 Daniel 11 Afternoon Sessions Part 2

[@TheWatchman1888]

Except for Norman McNulty's talk, the rest of the presenters pontificated about several of the chapters in Daniel. If I had to understand what they presented, I would give up studying the book of Daniel and Revelation. As John said in his comments, the books of Daniel and Revelation should be simple to understand

[@KesilRising]

Pretty easy to understand if you take it all literal kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZ3WZYd6q5Z5rMU

[@johnsamsonjr6170]

Are you serious???!!!! brother Frank, and you expect common folk to A) understand the Bible including the prophecies? B) non-Adventists to follow this jargon that even I don't understand? I got lost at about 1:47. Brother, the Bible is so simple including the prophecies. Common plowmen should understand. What you're trying to tell us that we need a rocket science degree to understand the prophecies. I suggest to get back to the basics. Try Uriah Smith's book i.e. Daniel and Revelation. I have masters in Computer Engineering and I can't follow your logic. However, that old book which by the way has been endorsed by sister White makes it plain and simple. Isn't what the Lord's intention is for "all" to understand? Simple 'just as it reads'. I'm not sure whether William Miller's rules of Biblical interpretations should be suggested here. These suggest to me that you don't need Greek nor Hebrew to understand the Bible. Once again, plain and simple and guess what, there are only 14 rules that a village guy could follow and understand the Bible.