2019 ROLEX Yacht-Master 42 Ref. 226659 and 2015 ROLEX Yacht-Master 40 Ref. 116655 | DavidSW

A brief overview of the 2015 Yacht-Master 40 in Everose gold and the all-new Yacht-Master 42 in white gold released in Baselworld 2019.
Rolex: Yacht-Master 40
Reference: 116655
Released: Baselworld 2015
Material: 18-carat Everose gold
Diameter: 40mm
Movement: Calibre 3135
Rolex: Yacht-Master 42
Reference: 226659
Released: Baselworld 2019
Material: 18-carat white gold
Diameter: 42mm
Movement: Calibre 3235
Shop online at www.DavidSW.com

[@closer71]

The 42 mm really does the job. Luxurious and easy to read in foul weather.

[@BobbyDazzler888]

I prefer the original rose. The first rolex ever to come with rubber.

[@TheBogeySmalls]

I just said David SW three times after watching this video… should be getting my 42 here in the next week - can’t wait!

[@albertopagan5715]

Perfect video,direct and to the point awesome 👍🏼

[@oppoandroidf1174]

I preferred 40,👌👌😍👍

[@josephamendola5881]

Great video ! I prefer the 42mm a classy and modest looking watch. Only watch enthusiasts will truly appreciate this watch at a glance.

[@Prophet293]

nice video production!

[@BrawndoQC]

I've Tiny wrists and I'm not to pale so I prefer the 116655 40mm. (I've one and love it, it's my grail)

[@vincenzostr4488]

42mm is better it leaves more space for the date window. On 40mm the dial looks too busy

[@tora3032]

I love my 42” but rose gold looks great also.

[@michaelbendixen3290]

42 mm - LOVE IT!

[@meone8949]

The Rose Gold version is so much nicer. The White Gold version looks bland. They should have @ least added the red text.

[@TimG--]

Well done mate !

[@ivanorozco801]

Perfect

[@Anonymous-or4ru]

David, you might want to rethink your online association with Paul Pluta. He's a ticking timebomb.

[@philipmcritchie7309]

not normali know

[@ernestogarcia7931]

Paul pluta is a selfish greedy bipolar asshole can't stand him what a circus clown

[@TrendyStone]

Both are great but I feel uncomfortable wearing yellow gold. The 42mm version is perfect for me, both for the size and the more subtle white gold.

[@BrawndoQC]

116655 is rose gold. not yellow.

[@TrendyStone]

Brawndo oh yea, you are correct sir.

[@charlestillery4279]

I have a yatchmaster ll white gold,it's ok but hard to read and set,for me.i wanted something different so I ordered white,the yellow gold is really nice.

[@davidsw4265]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/oYC4iHmagreDnsk

[@justpassing6280]

Lug width?

[@user-sh9jq2hs3y]

❤❤❤

[@RaulRodriguez-ky3xi]

40 mm Rose Gold is more elegant. Look much bette r

[@Michel-ql1ng]

Prefer the 42 mm ...because i own one :-)

[@ZCT808]

Unfortunately, what I really want doesn't yet exist. I absolutely love the specs on the 42mm. I just wish they did that in an Everrose, with the matte dial and color options. But since that isn't an option yet, I guess either the white or yellow gold 42mm would be my choice. It's a great looking watch. My only concern would be how easily the bezel picks up fingerprints, and how easily the rubber picks up lint, dust and other debris that would not be so obvious on a metal bracelet.

[@user-sg8kd9vn2m]

42 of course with rose gold😂

[@philipmcritchie7309]

id prostitute myself for the 116655