2020 Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDI (100 PS) TEST DRIVE

Amazon (DE)
GoPro: amzn.to/3eL7AdF
Camcorder: amzn.to/3cCB37o
Amazon (US)
GoPro: amzn.to/2SuPfb3
Camcorder: amzn.to/2VYLPzD
2020 Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDI
74 kW / 98 HP / 100 PS
1.0L Turbo Petrol Engine
998 cm3 / 60.9 CUI
3-Cylinder
172 Nm / 126 ft-lb
5-Speed Manual
TEST DRIVE by Michi
Interior & Cockpit Design
Exterior Design
Driving & Sound / POV
Computer & Entertaiment on Board
Light Night Design
Fuel Consumption from 80 to 180 kmh (50 to 112 mph)
Acceleration 0-180 kmh
Top Speed German Autobahn

[@eckiibanez3012]

Schön gemachter Clip 👍 Der Stonic ist ein ansprechend gestyltes Auto mit einem übersichtlichen Cockpit 😁 Relativ günstiger Preis und mit 7 Jahren Garantie - kauf ich 👍

[@debbiephylactou5198]

Love it, bought this two months ago after driving BMW 5, absolutely fantastic

[@ayrtonsoria6027]

How is going your car now, I just bought new one in Ecuador

[@debbiephylactou5198]

@@ayrtonsoria6027 it’s still fantastic!!! Love it to bits 🥰

[@JayGiuriati]

I absolutely love the design of this car. And I really like the driving experience too.

[@CristianP]

Nice little car with 7 years of warranty👌

[@Mr11ESSE111]

but you need to tow gas station with you if you drive over 120kmh or at max speeds on highways

[@CristianP]

Hello... This is a small CROSSOVER, taller with a bigger ground clearance. You can not compare with a B segment compact cars.

[@Mr11ESSE111]

@@CristianP you can if they are bigger just like you can compare it with SUV !! seat ateca ,škoda karog,and similar are bigger with similar engines but not so big fuel consumption !! after all kia rio consume similar

[@CristianP]

@@Mr11ESSE111 Go to sleep...

[@Mr11ESSE111]

@@CristianP go to barn with your stupid kia which drink more fuel then russian tank t-55 ,bWAHAHA

[@christofferloskold3511]

seems like a decent car actually.

[@w.tuckwong9079]

Any chance when you can get hold of the 120 PS DCT version? I drive one in Singapore and it is quite a sweet little car, with plenty of power for most overtaking moves. Kia declared a 0-100 time of 10,6 seconds for the 120 PS DCT Stonic but my butt feeling shows that it could be a second or so faster. I agree with the comments here, the fuel consumption is a little on the high side for a 1,0 3-Cylinder. A 30 minute drive with 90% highway smooth driving and not exceeding 95 km/h gets me 5,3 L/100 km with the official specs declaring 5,4 L/100 km COMBINED.

[@filipedanielcorreia4500]

Excellent video one more time! I personally reached the highway 203kmh with my car, is a Kia Rio 1.0 petrol Turbo-Gdi 100cv. +/- 1200kgs.

[@Mr11ESSE111]

with thst speed you will left without gas in around 1 hour or earlier!! consumption are over 20 liters then

[@filipedanielcorreia4500]

@@Mr11ESSE111 yes i'm talking about my Kia Rio and the Rio model is slightly lower and lighter than this car in the video which is the Kia Stonic. my Kia Rio also only takes 9 seconds from 0 to 100 km / h. it also depends on fuel quality, tread pattern and wind speed. greetings!

[@Mr11ESSE111]

@@filipedanielcorreia4500 so you will have 10% less consumption but still high

[@ВеликоБанов]

👍👍👍👍👍

[@kazimierznorejko5853]

👍

[@alexbirladeanu6679]

It is not the 2020 model, it is the 2017 one. The radio for MY20 has 8".

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

This is early 2020 model, the new one with new radio is since september 2020

[@alexbirladeanu6679]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK this is the 2017-2018 model.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

This car is since 2017 up to july 2020! Then facelift with new 6 speed manual and new radio is sinxe September 2020, so please check it exactly or google it!

[@alexbirladeanu6679]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK I know exactly the details for this car. I am a KIA dealer. The facelift Stonic PE was launched in Q3 2020. In the title, the year is wrong. No need to googled it, I have the official data! So, please correct the title.

[@alexbirladeanu6679]

6 speed manual gearbox was available only on the 120 HP engine. Now it is available also on the 100 HP engine.

[@userunit1]

Fuel mileage is bad... 15 L / 100KM

[@o00scorpion00o]

I've been driving EV since 2015, now driving Volkswagen ID.3 with 77 Kwh battery, had enough of it all, high depreciation, high cost to buy, electricity costs 3 times what it did in 2015, public DC chargers cost a lot of money and charging is inconvenient and slow and the infrastructure is poor. The VW id.3 for a 41 K car ( Ireland price ) is very bad, the Stonic looks a lot better, I hate everything controlled by the touch screen, it's dangerous and infuriating, Shame on VW for designing such shit. Anyway I'm going back to normal petrol car. Just curious, is 100 HP enough for this car ? Shame Kia don't make LPG cars.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

100 hp is enough for this car. However that will never make it fast. It is not meant for racing however. Most people will be fine with 100 HP in this vehicle. We do personally advise to buy more powerful bigger engines and automatic transmission though because in most cases it can make a car much more smooth and luxurious feeling. Some bigger engines also use the same or less fuel economy than turbocharged small engines. Especially at higher speeds.

[@o00scorpion00o]

There is only 1.0L turbo available in Ireland, I'd rather the manual to be honest, I miss changing gear after 9 years driving EV + Prius + Auto diesel Audi A4 which was CVT same as prius and hated those transmissions. Dual clutch is way better of course but I find all autos are better suited to higher power engines or they want to change gear too often due to the mapping because you press harder on the throttle it thinks it should drop a gear when you want it to hold the gear. But the Stonic starts at 24,400 Euros and the DCT is 28,200 so I wouldn't pay that much extra to be honest. Is there even a bigger engine available in the Stonic ?

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

@@o00scorpion00o there is many engine options - 1.25 MPI with 84 PS - 1.2 with 85 PS - 1.4 with 99 PS - 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS - 1.0 T-GDI 120 PS - 1.6 CRDi 110 PS - 1.6 CRDi 115 PS - 1.6 CRDi 136 PS

[@o00scorpion00o]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK Thanks for the info, wow, only the 1.0 Turbo is available here, no diesel, and strangely enough no 1.2 84 Hp, normally Ireland would have got the bottom of the range engines due to the tax. The 120 hp would have been sweet, however, if I went to the dealer they might actually tell me the 120 is available but probably not but worth a try. The Irish market is extremely small for cars so what some dealers do is they bulk buy the more popular engine and spec cars having better option to sell them.

[@o00scorpion00o]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK I test drive this car today, same 1.0L 3 cylinder engine, more than enough power, 3.5 L/100 km was pretty amazing with a new tight engine over 50 Kms. I wasn't going over 100 Km/hr but this is better than my old Prius...... This is the thing I don't get with hybrids ? if these engines are so good why bother with the complexity and big increase in price to the buyer ? The only thing hybrids offer is automatic, if you want that and maybe more power from the motor but honestly I was very impressed and it's very good Kia still make a normal simple honest car. The interior was nice, and nice analogue instrument cluster, nice easy to use climate controls but would have been nice to see dedicated radio controls. Still, I found it much nicer then my VW ID3 electric car, the Stonic is much lighter and you can immediately feel this on the road. One of the worst thins about my VW id.3 is the infotainment, there are no knobs, buttons and everything is done in menus on the touch screen and it drives me mad. Unfortunately the Kia dealer did not want to trade my EV so gave me a low 15,000 Euro trade in value, the car cost 41,000 new with government subsidies. VW offer me low 20s on a brand new EV. So depreciation is 1 reason I go back to petrol, the other reason range and recharge times, and the other, it was real fun driving a petrol manual car again !!!!! But the Stonic was very impressive !

[@Hjaneiro1]

Para que serve este teste se não é comentado vídeo inutil

[@Mr11ESSE111]

i will rather take dacia duster then this!! much lower consumption in duster and better performance

[@GGG-yk6wq]

@@scientist6879 🤣🤣🤣

[@Seba03111976]

@@scientist6879 Yes, this guy is always unhappy, no matter what car is presented. Always somehow other car is better.

[@Mr11ESSE111]

@@scientist6879 Dacia get you more power ,more speed and significally less consumption just like more space and actually looks food inside now

[@Mr11ESSE111]

@@Seba03111976 take tgen this junk and let it eat fuel like some 400hp car

[@CristianP]

Dacia "taliban" 😂

[@Mr11ESSE111]

THIS CAR ARE DEFINITELLY NOT FOR AUTOAbAHN!! 17 liter of fuel at 180kmh means more fuel eater then some SUV with 500+hp!! KIA made old Russian tank fuel eater

[@Mr11ESSE111]

too bigg fuel eater!!this engine dont fit into this vehicle with performance & consumption especially

[@CristianP]

Go to your "Dacia Logan 5000" and take care of your rust 😂

[@Mr11ESSE111]

@@CristianP This Kia are another Dacia but with terrible consumption and shitty performance!! after all Mercedes use same engines like Dacia so Dacia are better then this Kia shit which eats several liters more fuel !!

[@Mr11ESSE111]

@@CristianP dumbass it eats 17 liter fuel at 180kmh!! its more then any bigg SUV with 500+hp

[@CristianP]

@@Mr11ESSE111 "Taliban Dacia" and dumbass ... This is a small CROSSOVER, taller with a bigger ground clearance. You can not compare with a B segment compact cars. Your Dacia RUST can HURT you !!! 😂

[@Mr11ESSE111]

@@CristianP thst is even worse dumbass!! so it is small crossover but consume as biggest ones!!dacia duster are bigger and consume 5 liter less

[@pepikalinova1274]

👍