2020 VW Polo VI 1.0 (80 HP) TEST DRIVE

[@sofianelmoussaoui2926]

7:17 It s incredible how similar the front of the polo is compare to golf 7 from this angle

[@thepilot4578]

It's slower than the TSI version, but much more durable, reliable and cheaper to maintain.

[@davidcasas3862]

I always love these little engines. As a second car I would have one for sure.....good test!!!!

[@davidcasas3862]

@@dragospahontu Small engines are more balanced between performances/consum/maintenance than for example a 2 l. Engine. A 2 l. 115 CV, Golf GTI MK3 is more pleasant to drive than my Pulsar 1.2 115 CV. May be because of its lower weight but in the same way, highway at 120 km/h 350 km of distance, the consum difference is high ( 8,1 l. Golf vs 5.8 Pulsar). The new engines are much more efficient and that's why I like all those engines of 0,9-1,5 l of nowadays.

[@davidcasas3862]

@@dragospahontu Now tell me the cost of annual insurance, city taxes consum and maintenance cost of these two cars ( I LOVE Mazda) against their rivals of 1.6 l turbocharged. And don't compare hybrid vs not hybrid. Normal vs normal, hybrid vs hybrid. And about reliability, in my last work we had a Focus 1.0 125 Cv used for a lot of different drivers with a lot of different ways of driving and it had 220.000 and no breakdowns....I don't know if this is reliability for you but for me yes....

[@yasinbektas638]

polo or ibiza which one is better according to price and performance ?

[@sebastianp4023]

genau das Video nach dem ich gesucht habe

[@mrrcccccc]

can't wait to get mine in a few days

[@BillCipher1337]

7:10 ein kleiner tipp wie ihr bessere "rolling shots" machen könnt. und zwar nehmt ihr ton und video getrennt auf, heißt ihr filmt mit offen Fenster und nehmt den ton getrennt im 2. wagen auf. so habt ihr ein sauberes bild und dennoch guten ton.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

Gute idee, mal sehen ob wir bei nächste auto video sowas mache 😊

[@otosaigon]

WOW...Great car, sedan B

[@jellemarona]

Looking at the specs the 80 mpi reaches max power at 6200rpm, so maybe it will be a little less slow if you change gear between 6200 and 6500 rpm

[@ychurf4391]

Puterea maximă la 5500 rpm, citește pe autodata, asta de 80 cp mpi, aia de 75 cp atingea la 6200 rpm, asta de 80 cp are soft din fabrica de aia atinge la 5500 puterea maximă

[@itomic009]

That fuel consumption is almost, should I say, too good? :)

[@palusisko]

Still gorgeous hatch, even with 1.0 MPI!

[@Indoholl]

any wind noise leaking into the cabin?

[@Eduulopez]

joder que buen video god video!

[@shpetimhuqi7021]

Grande polo 👌👍

[@princesitaliana8388]

Estoy en duda si comprar este de 95cv o el de 110cv cual me aconsejas mejor? Hay mucha diferencia? Se nota en subir cuestas? Un saludo y gracias de antemano 💋

[@dobrien757]

110 is better, has a 6th gear

[@Jana-qz3yb]

MARc

[@Jana-qz3yb]

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️💋

[@cristianoandreoni3540]

Opel Corsa 1.2 turbo 100cv much more beautiful than the polo also on an aesthetic level....Great video!!!!

[@Eduulopez]

que feo un opel💩... mil veces wv polo!!!

[@RiccardoGrossi-s3h]

È questione di gusti la corsa non è assolutamente brutta però preferisco la polo

[@abhishekmahajan2470]

Is this CNG variant ???

[@ik8vwa]

Do you recommend this engine? We tested today the 95 hp but it costs 850 euros more than the 80 hp. What do you think? Turbocharged are usually less reliable that's why we tend to buy the 80 hp but your opinion is much appreciated.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

80 hp is not for fun, just normal driving, but 95 hp is really much faster and better than 80 hp :) i would recommend 95 hp

[@ik8vwa]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK thanks, I am very cautious and don't drive fast, today I tried the 95 hp but I had asked for the 80 hp. I hope the dealer will find one for test.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

@@ik8vwa do you live in area with lots hill or mountains? If yes then 80 hp is bad for steep road etc

[@ik8vwa]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK we are in the Padana plain, so all flat terrain. Sometimes we go into hilly terrains but that's not frequently.

[@salimabene4761]

I bought this polo 80hp version, and it's clearly not enough if you drive a lot on highway ( not enough power if you want to overtake at 130km/h) It's the only bad point about this car. If I had to do it again, i'd buy it in 95hp :)

[@AK-lo4bd]

Den Polo habe ich mir gekauft Bj 2020 als Comfort Edition mit Navi als Gebrauchtwagen. War das ein fehler? Es sollen ja viele Fehler vorhanden sein

[@LoveStory-ng8gp]

Möchte ich auch haben. Überlege mir ob sich ein Polo aus 2014 mehr lohnt als der. Aber die sind dann auch wieder 10 jahre alt schon...

[@AK-lo4bd]

@@LoveStory-ng8gp Ich hab ihn jetzt seit 2 Wochen und bin zufrieden. Er muss nur nochmals in die Werkstatt wegen den Hauptnutzer werden.

[@aimanaiman6501]

It's my dream car... I hope this dream comes true ☹️☹️☹️☹️

[@cbats1888]

Error 404: torque not found. Just kidding, fuel consumption is really good. However if I imagine entering a highway in winter time with cold engine (Netherlands) I think this engine will wear out fast as you will have to floor it to reach 100kmh in time.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

Torque was really weak 😀

[@lennartl.445]

I think these engines reach a sufficient temperature within very little time after a cold start. So if you give it at least two minutes running at low rpm and load, it should be warm enough to deliver high power without suffering much.

[@vj8452]

@@lennartl.445 this thing is at a crisp 80C after 4 km

[@rodelpanganiban6599]

Im planning to have one but i’m wondering which engine is best 75 bhp mpi or 80 bhp evo?

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

I would say at least better 95 hp, with 80 or 75 hp i wasnt satisfied. If you want only city driving and slow country roads then is 75 and 80 hp version ok. But for highway or overtaking better 95 hp

[@dhel1608]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK Thanks it helps a lot.

[@deusdedithbatistarealjuniorrea]

AQUI NO BRASIL O POLO VEM SEM NADA ,TODO PELADOFEITO A FACÃO DEPOIS DESSE VIDEO EU VOU MUDAR DE MARCA FALTA DE RESPEITO

[@TheGamerTazz]

New model is even better with 100cv and digital cockpit

[@LawnMowersThingsThatMakeNoise]

95ps or 110ps (Turbo) 80ps non turbo. There is no 100ps version

[@k.r.028]

Wieso geht der Tacho bis 260 km/h? 😂🤔

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

Vielleicht haben die alle polo motorisierung gleiche tacho. Ich denke damit die wegen entwicklungs-/herstellungskosten sparen wollen

[@videojunkie01ify]

Wenn es steil bergab geht, erreicht der Sauger auch schon mal über 200 km/h. Einfach aus dem Flugzeug schmeissen....XD

[@fighterofthedreams1245]

How did it do worse acceleration time than the previous 75hp version, given the fact it's exactly the same model and has the same weight. You did 0-100 with a 1.0 75hp polo of the same generation(2017-...), in 13.95 secs if you remember.

[@nikolidakismanolis2609]

Easy answer on that. I was also confused by that on the early 90s when i was reading every magazine i would found about cars and was keeping records of the performance tests. I could not understand why the performance was never the same between two versions of the exact same model. Even worst, i soon realized that the performance was not the same even when the same specific car was tested by another magazine few weeks later, or even few days later. So the answer is that there are factors that differenciates the performance of a car and when it happens all these factors to be either on the positive or the negative side simultanouesly then this makes a huge difference on the performance. Here are some of those factors, but not all of them: 1) Actual power of the car: A car will very rare have the exact horsepower that is given by the manufacturer. The horepower given is an average and the actual engines will deliver a +/- 5% of it depends on small differences and imprefections of the various components of the engine. So an 80 horsepower engine can easily be found anywhere between 77-83 in reality. 2) Depends on the way the mechanical parts of the car are build, the real power that is delivered on the wheels will not be the same on each car even if their engines has the exact same horsepower. The power delivered on the wheels are always less then the engine's power and how much less it will be depends on the various transmition parts such as gearbox etc. 3) The road contitions are never gonna be the same. Even if the driver is using a private track or a closed section of road to do the performance tests in as much similar contitions each time, still he has no control over the other weather contitions such as air temperature, wind speed and more. This can make a great difference on the results that can easily make much more difference than just 5 hp would do. Now exactly because there are so many different factors that influences the final performance, it is very rare for all of them to be in favor of the one car. Usually they split and share between both under comparison cars so that the strongest one will still be faster, (given that we are talking about at least 10hp difference of course). Of course this effect has a limit and even if every single factor is in favor of one car and against the other, still there is a maximum amount of power gap that could be covered. This is why we notice this happening between cars with 5-10-20hp differences, but almost never on bigger differences.

[@giannos8154]

@@nikolidakismanolis2609 Very informative. Ωραίος

[@АлексейСаван]

Круто!😁

[@Eduulopez]

tu igual, tampoco sé qué coño has puesto, pero muy bien!

[@danielschmid9467]

sind 80ps ausreichend für dieses Fahrzeug

[@Jeffery99]

Ja

[@Pertev777]

Woah 181 kmh in a small hatch with a 80 hp and 93 NM engine

[@Sn4p_Fps]

80hp is ok the problem its the 1.0 if it was 1.1 or 1.2 was much better

[@Sn4p_Fps]

Imagine my Old clio 2012 whit 75cv 1.2 its faster , This Polo win only on max speed

[@Sn4p_Fps]

Ok i bought recently This polo , its really slow and i never hit 180kmh

[@Pertev777]

@@Sn4p_Fps Yesterday I only did 150 kmh I think you really need a fully clear and very long autobahn section to getting near the 180. Also the 1.0 MPI engine is only registered with a top speed of 171 kmh. Btw funny how I just checked this video 2 hours ago and you responded to me again

[@ik8vwa]

What's the fuel consumption at 130 km/h? Thanks for the video

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

Didnt you see the fuel consumption test at almost end of the video?

[@ik8vwa]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK I saw it but they were at 120, then 140. Was there the 130 too?

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

I do always 20 kmh step by step. If you want 130 kmh then just adding 120 and 140 kmh fuel consumption then divide by 2. Then come value out but not exact but nearest value

[@aliaskar3760]

İn turkey this car 147.000 turkish lira..and minimum wage is 2324 turkish lira..So turkish people have to work 63 months to get this car 😀

[@gobseck]

Go to Germany, sit on the neck of the German taxpayer, and you will get free an apartment and an allowance for idleness several times higher than Turkish wage. Give birth to 8 children and you will have such a car in 12-15 months. The white cuc kolds will pay for everything.

[@reyhanonart1059]

You rabbish

[@aliaskar3760]

Имя Фамилия Almost 5 million Turks live in Germany..and 80 percent of them are fans of erdoğan..According to the turkey's life is better than germany..and he says that the turkey is getting jealous 😀😀

[@aliaskar3760]

reyhan onart me ?

[@gobseck]

16.07.2020. Great Britain. An unemployed couple from Cameroon with 8 children has already received 44,000 pounds in grants. Each family member has a laptop and smartphone. Now they demand a six-room apartment and give interviews about how badly refugees from Africa are treated in Britain

[@dbzbudeaucaille2711]

Ich hab dieses Motor in einem Ibiza ausprobiert. Naja, ich mag überhaupt keine 3-Zylindern Motoren. Ich habe ein schlechtes Gefühl während die Beschleunigung, sowie eine Rauheit. Ich weiss nicht genau wie ich das beschreiben kann, aber für mich sind 4-Zylindern immer viel besser.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

Also sowie tiefe brummen beim gasgeben, als hätte auto v8 motor drin oder so 😅 das war ähnlich bei meine 5.7l v8 hemi motor aber nur brummem bei niedrige drehzahl beschleunigung

[@theobajerke]

Teste den mit Turbo 95/115 PS. Die sind sehr sehr gut, deswegen haben sie auch den 1.5 TSI 150ps raus genommen, weil die kleinen die gleichen Fahrleistungen erbringen. (außer Highspeed Autobahn). Ist mir auch schon beim Q2 aufgefallen, da hat mir der 115 PS tatsächlich besser gefallen als der 35TFSI

[@dbzbudeaucaille2711]

@@theobajerke Ja, ich soll vielleicht die Turbo-Version mal testen, aber ich hab schon den 1.2L Puretech 130ps in einem Peugeot 308 probiert und tja ... es ist viel besser als einem turbolos 3 Zylindern aber für eine gleiche Leistung finde ich 4 Zylindern immer viel besser. Ich fahre einen Golf 6 mit dem 1.4 TSI 122ps und trotz 8ps und 30Nm weniger gibt mir diesem Motor mehr Fahrspass als dem Puretech. Vielleicht ist den 1.0 TSI gut aber bis jetzt hat mir noch keine 3-Zylindern Motor gefallen. Ich habe vielleicht eine Allergie gegen 3 Zylindern. ^^

[@dbzbudeaucaille2711]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK 8 Zylindern hab ich leider noch nie getestet. ^^

[@Mr11ESSE111]

so still 7liter less consumption then kia stonic at highest speeds

[@florencegaubert1647]

Je n arrive pas lire ma clé USB polo ?

[@vecteurtech1019]

vous avez une 80 ch ? c'est pas trop lent ? niveau confort c'est comment ?

[@natiachdout2188]

Hallo aus Israel 🇮🇱! Ich mag deine Videos wirklich! :D

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

Danke sehr ☺️

[@vladimirart758]

From the new B class cars,Polo and Ibiza are the best. Ibiza its a little bit more good looking 😅

[@thealmightyme3988]

personnaly I'll take the opel corsa over these

[@aleejacopo]

I'd take a Sport or Highline polo any time

[@vladimirart758]

@@thealmightyme3988 yeah Corsa is great, with 3 doors previous model is number 1

[@vladimirart758]

@@aleejacopo ill take this and make it with LPG, for town GREAT.

[@Scania89Najlepsza]

1.0 mit turbo oder nichts???

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

Mit turbo wäre lieber, 95 ps ist schon gut, auch bei t-cross mit 95 ps war flott für mich

[@theobajerke]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK habe einen Ibiza FR 2020 (Interieur anderes Level als bei diesem Polo mit Leder und roten Ziernähten etc. Volldigitaler Tacho wie bei Audi) auch mit 95 PS , war erst skeptisch und traurig da ich unbedingt den 115ps wollte - aber der 95 zieht ab wie Sau.- Macht sogar echt laune in der Stadt und auf Landstraßen. Einzig auf der Autobahn geht ihm bei 160 langsam die Puste aus. Aber zum 160 oder 180 Tempomat fahren (auch bergauf) reichts. Fuel consumption ist ein Traum

[@onoff280]

80 hp :D

[@abdouben4399]

ما شاء الله

[@Eduulopez]

no sé qué dices, pero muy bien!

[@patricktruong6869]

RPM seems extremely high once you pass 140kmh. This cant be good for the engine in the long run 🤔

[@ik8vwa]

That's right, unfortunately they now produce only three cilinders cars in this segment.

[@andrewstones2921]

That’s right, fortunately they now produce three cylinder cars in this segment!

[@zsoltpapp3363]

Except Germany, you cant legally drive faster than 130 anywhere....more importantly, this is the base level Polo engine, and it supposed to be a mama-taxi suburbian (second) car, not an autobahn cruiser. For a 1 liter naturally aspirated engine it did just fine. I had a one liter 3 cylinder Corsa B back in the day, and you really needed a looong straight to even reach 130 with it...:) And that car was 2-300 kgs lighter than this.

[@tugrulacar5155]

Almost better than diesel

[@nameunavailable7099]

I wish this is not a Diesel... VW Diesel Scandal.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

This is not diesel

[@nameunavailable7099]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK ok😂😂

[@bmwf10lci]

I rented this car and it was sooo slow couldn’t overtake anything 😂

[@Thisfutureman]

The polo has 95hp not 80

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

It's 80 hp, it has 5 speed manual, 95 hp with 6 speed manual!

[@Thisfutureman]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK ok i did not know that !

[@videojunkie01ify]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK 80 hp and 95 hp both have a 5 speed manual. The 110 hp version comes with 6 speed manual.

[@Sn4p_Fps]

@@videojunkie01ify no the 95hp manual have 5 and auto have 6

[@apollojuniorProd]

my 6n2 60hp is way faster

[@Pvt.Joker64]

75hp

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

75 hp is old, go to "technik" at this link and you see technical data de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/VW_Polo_VI

[@awesomemike-4411]

Why do such engines exist? POINTLESS.