2022's Most Notable Airworthiness Directives

  Рет қаралды 15,135

Simple Flying

Simple Flying

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер
@TheFlyingBusman
@TheFlyingBusman 2 жыл бұрын
They are only as good as their implementation. Ultimately, better design and making things as simple and user friendly as possible goes a long way.
@jeffssaunders
@jeffssaunders 2 жыл бұрын
Didn't hear the word "Boeing" once.
@hantastic932
@hantastic932 2 жыл бұрын
Is that a good thing or a bad thing? 🤔
@jeffssaunders
@jeffssaunders 2 жыл бұрын
@@hantastic932 Considering the level of scrutiny they've (rightly) received in recent years, I see it as a VERY good thing.
@hantastic932
@hantastic932 2 жыл бұрын
@@jeffssaunders True, but i’m not sure which one is worse. A problem unotinced and waiting to cause an accident or a problem discovered and fixed with a directive. The problem with the MCAS for example wasn’t evident until 2 fatal accidents and only after tragedy Boeing started working on it.
@dewiz9596
@dewiz9596 2 жыл бұрын
@@hantastic932 : you’re borrowing trouble
@SwordQuake2
@SwordQuake2 2 жыл бұрын
@@jeffssaunders lol "good thing". They're hiding issues as always
@wbrown5091
@wbrown5091 2 жыл бұрын
Any updates on BA2263 to kingston jamaica on Friday, diverted to Dublin but ended up back at Gatwick over 4 hours later
@cabottaxi
@cabottaxi 2 жыл бұрын
Makes you wonder just how safe these aircraft are flying about Russia.
@baylinkdashyt
@baylinkdashyt 2 жыл бұрын
If I'm not mistaken, that "wrong firmware" one, #2?, amounts to "we the manufacturer shipped the wrong code, properly signed, and it could fail the airplane and kill all the people". How is that not a) an EAD, and b) something which forces a regulatory review of how the manufacturer manages that process?
@tomstravels520
@tomstravels520 2 жыл бұрын
It is slightly over exaggerated and talking about the worst possible scenario which was still unlikely to occur. Even if the PRIM’s all failed most of the controls can still be operated by the 1 of 3 SEC’s. The main reason it had to be brought up was because if the aircraft dispatched with one SEC inoperative (sometimes allowed) then a failure of the PRIM could mean loss of redundancy
@baylinkdashyt
@baylinkdashyt 2 жыл бұрын
@@tomstravels520 Got it. Thx.
@dewiz9596
@dewiz9596 2 жыл бұрын
Airworthiness Directives strike terror into the hearts of any aircraft owner. . .
@baylinkdashyt
@baylinkdashyt 2 жыл бұрын
Especially EADs, which, as I understand it, amount to "do not perform another takeoff with passengers in the specified type". Or: "go position another plane to take over connecting flight passengers, NOW NOW NOW."
@levi4979
@levi4979 Жыл бұрын
​@@baylinkdashyt although in the case of the slide EAD it was probably just a few minutes of inspection and removing the pin if necessary. Can't imagine it caused a lot of delays.
@baylinkdashyt
@baylinkdashyt Жыл бұрын
@@levi4979 yeah, but it would have to be done by a licensed A&P, right? Do they still keep those laying around at every station?
@eamonahern7495
@eamonahern7495 2 жыл бұрын
What would a winglet detachment do to the controllability of an Embraer?
@explorenaked
@explorenaked 2 жыл бұрын
Nothing really. The avionics/pilots would adjust for the loss. However, someone on the ground might not have a good day.
@Alb410
@Alb410 2 жыл бұрын
Nothing, the problem is if it hits someone on the ground.
@paulshields2220
@paulshields2220 2 жыл бұрын
If it’s a longer flight and it happens early on and they have minimal extra fuel they would have to land early as fuel economy could suffer and autopilot or the crew would adjust for the increase drag on that side wing. It’s highly unlikely that it would effect the actual wing structure to crash the plane.
@destoryerofworlds657
@destoryerofworlds657 2 жыл бұрын
Airbus airbus airbus Embraer airbus! Where's the Boeing jets?
@SwordQuake2
@SwordQuake2 2 жыл бұрын
Bias of the video...
@danharold3087
@danharold3087 2 жыл бұрын
You might find them if you look for NOTAMs as opposed for ADs. I have not know Simple Flying to show a pro Boeing Bias.
@wadehiggins1114
@wadehiggins1114 2 жыл бұрын
That's a killing machine, too dangerous
@zaijiancelis
@zaijiancelis 2 жыл бұрын
@@wadehiggins1114 killing machine? How about i place you on a Russian jet and see how safe the MAX actually is?
@wadehiggins1114
@wadehiggins1114 2 жыл бұрын
@zaijiancelis3400 it's best if you travel on that, I'm sticking with Airbus!
@irokpe6977
@irokpe6977 2 жыл бұрын
This is why fleet commonality is a good idea for airlines. Just imagine owning various type of aircrafts and your company is given all these directives. It will be a nightmare to implement all of them.
@aerocoaster3252
@aerocoaster3252 2 жыл бұрын
Imagine owning one type of aircraft and it gets grounded due to safety problems and remains grounded for months/years (B737 Max, anyone?). Now you are out of business.
@irokpe6977
@irokpe6977 2 жыл бұрын
@@aerocoaster3252 You're right tho. But simplifying your fleet is a good cost cutting idea.
@Alb410
@Alb410 2 жыл бұрын
@@irokpe6977 And would you look at that. Large airlines have large, diverse fleets. Small cost cutters tend to try and only use 1 type of aeroplane;
@anishanikki4164
@anishanikki4164 2 жыл бұрын
Essential directives that need to be followed for safety reasons.....😇👍🏿
@markjarvis7637
@markjarvis7637 2 жыл бұрын
Airbus and Embreyer, open and fair, Boeing, not a sound, hiding any faults or problems, have they not learnt the lessons
@BPiperDude
@BPiperDude 2 жыл бұрын
ADs are issued by the regulatory agencies not manufacturers. It's just that the OP didn't list AD's issued to Boeing and yes there were a number of them.
@matthewwindisch9449
@matthewwindisch9449 2 жыл бұрын
How is Boeing going to stop airlines from reporting any potential safety issues to the appropriate authorities?
@wadehiggins1114
@wadehiggins1114 2 жыл бұрын
I know, right?
@sainnt
@sainnt Жыл бұрын
Boeing has a number of airworthiness directives too. These are just the latest ones, and they're related to Airbus and Embraer.
@AbcdEf-lz6oe
@AbcdEf-lz6oe Жыл бұрын
Lmao, this video just ignores the Boeing ones. 777 horizontal stabilizer AD, 747, 777 PW engines, etc, are all Boeing and FAA AD
@marnig9185
@marnig9185 2 жыл бұрын
It works:)
@captaingordon
@captaingordon 2 жыл бұрын
The absence of any Boeing AD’s leads to the suspicion they’re hiding more problems.
@sinada5444
@sinada5444 2 жыл бұрын
@@captaingordon No, there are a lot more Boeing ADs that haven't been mentioned in the video. 1- Boeing 787 AD equipment Water Leaks. 2- Boeing 747-8/777 AD 5G network causes radar altimeter interference. 3- Boeing 747-400/8F AD the horizontal stabilizer fuel tank issue. 4- Boeing 737 AD fuselage skin cracks. 5- Boeing 777 AD fuel system issue.
@careygrant8697
@careygrant8697 2 жыл бұрын
Well that's put me off flying if there are that many previously unknown faults
@danharold3087
@danharold3087 2 жыл бұрын
Yet you drive a car which can be deadly at highway speeds. Or maybe your a train or subway guy.
@NickyMitchell85
@NickyMitchell85 2 жыл бұрын
What about the Russian 🇷🇺 Invasion of Ukraine 🇺🇦? Did the closures of Russian 🇷🇺 & Ukrainian 🇺🇦 airspace(s) affect air travel ✈️?
@iuli007
@iuli007 2 жыл бұрын
No
@nurrizadjatmiko21
@nurrizadjatmiko21 2 жыл бұрын
OMG. That's quite a lot of warnings for aircraft manufacturers
@danharold3087
@danharold3087 2 жыл бұрын
These are issued by the dozens each day. Some are about quite simple stuff that is helpful for aircrews to know.
Do Pilots Prefer AIRBUS over BOEING?!
28:46
Mentour Now!
Рет қаралды 733 М.
Sigma Kid Mistake #funny #sigma
00:17
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
The 25 Biggest Megaprojects Completing in 2025
24:11
MegaBuilds
Рет қаралды 783 М.
Top 25 Construction Megaprojects of 2025
19:17
The B1M
Рет қаралды 490 М.
THIS Engine Flaw KILLS Airlines!
24:08
Mentour Now!
Рет қаралды 637 М.
Trump's New Air Force One Dreams Dashed By Boeing Delays
3:43
Simple Flying
Рет қаралды 43 М.
How OnlyFans Grew Its Revenue by 2000% in Just Four Years | WSJ The Economics Of
10:11
The Wall Street Journal
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
How Norway Produces "Superathletes"
10:59
Athletic Interest
Рет қаралды 184 М.
Why THIS Airplane Gives Boeing NIGHTMARES!
22:45
Mentour Now!
Рет қаралды 621 М.
The World’s 10 Longest Airbus A380 Flights
4:02
Simple Flying
Рет қаралды 227 М.
Sigma Kid Mistake #funny #sigma
00:17
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН