2022 Tecnica Cochise 130 & 120 Ski Boot Review with SkiEssentials.com

We're pleased to share our first ever long-form ski boot review! Tecnica dropped these off last fall and Bob's been putting the Cochise 120 and 130 to the test over the past month at Stowe!
Written Review: www.skiessentials.com/Chairli...

[@privatepyle6555]

More boot reviews please, and yes we know there is subjectiveness to it - that's why we watch them! Also, Jeff doesn't need to be so sensitive to slightly critical remarks from Bob. I appreciate the honesty from time to time, instead of constantly trying to spin everything in a positive way or claiming that everything is 100% subjective. Ski gear technology is still improving. Tell us what you really think!

[@SkiEssentials]

I'm just optimistic to a fault sometimes! Appreciate the feedback. We'll say more bad things about more stuff ;)

[@michaelperez81583]

I’ve met Jeff at Stratton a few times for demo days and yes he’s just a really nice guy. I’m from Jersey where the assholes live and his bias is pure

[@craigf667]

Would love to see more boot reviews. You guys provide the most useful ski gear reviews available on the web. Keep up the good work.

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks Craig! We're planning on doing more of these throughout the season.

[@spencershaberman1964]

Great review guys. Thank you. I have been on the 120’s for a couple of seasons in Australia and in Japan. These are the best hybrid boots I have used. When I was a younger fella and worked in ski resorts I loved 130 stiff boots. I was much fitter and lighter then. My ski day was usually a short 2-3 hours then off to work so a stiff boot was perfect. Now I’m in my late 50’s my ski vacation days are longer and much more leisurely. So a 120 flex and all day comfort are much more important. But these boots still perform awesome for those hero runs putting in big GS turns and getting the skis up on the edge. Perfect for short tours and bootpacking also. Great walk mode. My only concern is getting them on and off when the shells are cold. That shell plastic gets super hard to open. Definitely don’t leave them in the car overnight.

[@SkiEssentials]

Ha! Good advice on the car. And yes, these lighter plastics do seem to be a bit more temperature sensitive when it comes to stiffness

[@chazbickel4518]

The info you guys have and the clips of putting the products to use makes for a great video. Thanks ! We need snorkels out here on the left coast.....its deep!

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks Chaz! We keep seeing photos and reports from out there. Crazy!!

[@hypnocoachJuan]

I've loved my 2017 and 2020 Cochise 130s from day one. Likely will go with the same for next pair. Thanks for all the reviews guys!

[@SkiEssentials]

You're welcome!

[@BigTee612]

Best boot discussion I have ever seen. Top shelf presentation guys. No doubt boots are more of a personal fit choice vs. skis but it is nice to hear the different intricacies of each boot to try to match one's personal skiing "personality." Keep 'em coming.

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks! I could talk about boots all day.

[@crtzmo]

Excellent format -- thank you for this. I have already made my major seasonal purchase (Atomic Hawx Prime 120S GW), partially with the help of Bob's short-form boot intros a couple months ago. Even though I have bought boots, I see these as an excellent source of industry knowledge / base research (just like the ski comparisons)- keep it up, please! And, two SLOW signs means Bob's Ridge is imminent, go Bob!

[@SkiEssentials]

It's nice to know the dips and twists of the trail for sure. Thanks for the kind words!

[@sebastianjo752]

Really good video as always, I pulled the trigger on a pair of cochise lights today and I am so stoked to go on my first tour with them.

[@SkiEssentials]

Enjoy! I'm sure you'll love them.

[@sking3571]

Definitely more Boot Review/Info video's. the boot is the most important thing to a skier for control and how long you can hit the slopes on a given day. When I travel my skis get checked but my boots get carried on with me. More information means when you see a fitter you already are better informed as to what is what and not gadget or color affected.

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks for the feedback, Steve! Appreciate your thoughts.

[@imrael496]

Very informative thanks. I have a new pair of 120's I'm looking forward to skiing them.

[@cdwallace9818]

Watched this video twice before going out and buying both boots to test - really love that you guys have made these vids! Keep it up. I’m 6 foot and 185 lbs and out skied the 120’s once I pointed them downhill. Great in the bumps and trees but too soft for me when the speed went up. The 130 was amazing!!! Still super springy in the bumps and steeps and amazeballs on the straight line bombers and on Mach fast icey groomers! The 130 is so worth it! Thought it was going to be a little too stiff after skiing a 130 K2 Recon (alpine boot) that was a truly stiff boot.

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks for sharing, great feedback!

[@nomadtrails]

Something to add is that especially out West, a lot of ski areas have backcountry gates up top where you can access a summit or bowls via a short tour or bootpack. Something like a Cochise / PT Duke combo is ideal for that. Even if you still have your standard alpine bindings, the Gripwalk sole and walk mode here is going to improve your bootpack. For me, this is why traditional alpine boots are just out of the question. But having options like the Cochise is amazing compared to true light touring boots.

[@sketchyAnalogies]

This is exactly why I'm interested in the Cochise. As I progress from intermediate to advanced and purchase my first boot with growth in mind, this seems like a comfortable boot that I can take nearly anywhere. Even if I'm not bootpacking soon, it gives me the option and a hike mode for not much more money.

[@charbelibrahim7670]

Thank you guys for this in depth review! I'd like you to review the head kore 1 and 2 boots as well as the K2 mindbender boots.

[@SkiEssentials]

Will try!

[@bstrac77]

Great review guys. I recently got myself a pair of Cochise 130s and everything you've said is spot on. While I've only skied them twice, I can tell right away that they are probably providing me with 80-90% of the performance I get out of my 2014-15 Mach 1 130s. My biggest gripes are the buckles and that they are harder to get on and off. Glad that I got them and will ski them exclusively this year, as my other boots are packed out. However, I wouldn't rule out getting a Mach 1 130 and skiing a two boot quiver in the future.

[@SkiEssentials]

Yeah, I put the buckles in the "mildly annoying" category. I do think if you tour a lot, you'll wear the liner out, so having that second set for longevity makes sense.

[@sketchyAnalogies]

Thanks! I'm looking at buying my first boot pair. I'm looking at getting a versatile boot that I can do almost anything with (as a quickly progressing intermediate to advanced skier). These seem to fit the bill nicely. Almost a pure alpine boot but with tech bindings and a walk mode. Opens up hike to terrain without much sacrifice. Given they will last me years, I'm hoping to have room to grow in terms of skill and I think these give me that.

[@db8556]

Like the format and depth. You might also talk about ease of putting on / taking off each model you review. Like to see one on Lange RX offering soon.

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks Dave!

[@treeflip7]

Definitely do more of these.

[@SkiEssentials]

Okay! We're discussing future boot vids as we type!

[@src248]

Got a pair of the new 130s this season, really liking them so far. They ski well, they hike well, and they're very comfortable. You didn't mention probably my favourite thing about them, the floating tongue on the liner! Being able to get them just roomy enough with no heel lift by adjusting a bit of velcro is so nice

[@SkiEssentials]

As a high instep skier, I actually really value that as well--totally spaced on it in the video! It's amazing how many parts and details there are to discuss, and that one totally slipped my mind. I have it on my Nordica boots as well, and it's pretty necessary, but I also found it very difficult to un-velcro the tab!

[@jglads21]

Loving the new boot review! I just got Nordica Promachine 130 and love them. Would love to hear your guy's thoughts on them and how they compare to others.

[@SkiEssentials]

Jeff skis a Promachine 130 and he really likes it. He also has a Speedmachine 120, but his flexible ankles make him appreciate the stiffer 130. Even though I have about 50 pounds on Jeff and with more leverage, I still prefer the 120 flex simply because I like to flex my ankles. The 130 stacks up well against a Lange RX 130 LV, or the Tecnica Mach1 130 LV for sure--just some small intricacies in fit that set them apart, but very similar performance.

[@alexwipe]

I ski in the 120 every day. 50% touring 50% resort. Its a perfect all mountain boot

[@SkiEssentials]

Agree 100%

[@grimaldus2444]

Very nice video thank you guys, I think the whole boot section is the must underrated category in the skiing sport. Pls do more stuff like that. What maby would be interesting how would you compare it to other Boots in this category, especially to the Atomic Hawx Ultra/Prime XTD Line? Both have kind of the same locking mechanism but the atomic line is much lighter. Where is the compromise if there is one? Best regards Chris

[@SkiEssentials]

It's all about fit, Chris. If the boot does not fit, then it doesn't matter about the weight or walk mode. I do not fit into the Atomics at all while I was able to put my foot into the Tecnica and ski on day one. Lighter boots can also get deflected easier on the downhills in more rugged conditions and terrain, so that's another consideration, is how much resort/alpine skiing you're planning on doing, perhaps that weight isn't such an issue then?

[@oot-n-aboot]

Great form, guys! I’ve got the 2019-2020 season 120s and love them. How do the ‘22s compare? I’ve always wondered if my version still allows a bit too much flex with the little walk-ski switch they have. Is the stiffness *and* walkability of the 2022 of the 120s that much improved than my year? And would you say that they importantly lighter with that new upper? Thanks!

[@SkiEssentials]

I think the new boots are noticeably more efficient in power transfer. Just a step up in performance overall to be honest. The boots you have are great, these just take it to another level and have that much more precision in their performance. They do feel a little lighter as well. Hope that helps!

[@russhowison4215]

Really appreciate the thorough review. Believe it or not I’m still skiing on the original 2011 Cochise with the funky powerstap 4th buckle! They have served me very well but it’s time for a replacement. I was thinking I would go with the 130 flex this time but after this review it sounds like the new 120 would be considerably stiffer in feel than my old 120s? If that’s the case the new 120 should be plenty. I’m 5’10” and 160 lbs and looking for an all mountain setup that can ski bumps inbounds or drop big backcountry peaks. Thanks for your help 🙏!

[@SkiEssentials]

Hey Russ! Based off what you're coming off and your size, I think that 120 should be plenty too. The difference Bob felt between the 120 and 130 was significant, and I think at your weight the 120 will be more than sufficient, and a little more forgiving for big landings and stuff like that. Go for it.

[@russhowison4215]

Thanks for the feedback. How would you say the Cochise 120 compares to the Dalbello lupo ax hd? I just found those locally in my size at a great price. They felt pretty good in the shop. Thanks again for the help.

[@CurriedBat]

I sure liked that Speed Machine as well.

[@SkiEssentials]

It's a sweet boot as well. I did/do find more similarities between Mach and Cochise versus Speed Machine and Strider, if that helps your unasked question...

[@joshuaweinstein1228]

Fantastic review. This clears up a lot of my questions about this boot. I’m curious, what’s your take on how this boot compares to the Zero G Pro Tour? A lot appears to be shared between the two offerings from Tecnica. Both have four buckles and a power strap, similar walk mechanisms, and similar flex ratings (on paper). Is the skiing experience that much better on the Cochise? Do they feel the same when touring (weight difference aside)? Can see some overlap in the customer for both boots, yet to find a good comparison between the two.

[@SkiEssentials]

I would say yes, the skiing experience is noticeably better on the Cochise. It's hard to take weight out of the equation when thinking about touring, but I'd say they feel relatively similar. There's definitely some overlap there, but I think there's also a distinct application for both, or at least an ideal application. The Zero G I would recommend to someone who is touring a lot. Exploring new zones, touring a lot, maybe you're even touring every day. The Cochise to me feels like a boot for someone who is skiing in the resort most of the time, and will tour occasionally. Maybe a season will go by when you don't even tour once, but still want the capability to do so. So, yeah, skiing performance is noticeably better on Cochise, but I do still see a little overlap. I think the overlap is for a really specific customer, but that skier does exist.

[@markingles5194]

I've just bought the Zero G, it fits my foot very well, much better than the old Cochise 2018. Can you confirm Bob that the latest version as reviewed here is the same fit as the Zero Gs as I'm very tempted to get the latest Cochise 120, but now only on line to purchase.

[@connordirks4043]

Could you do the k2 mind bender 120s ? I just bought a pair today and the Cochise are my second choice if I do choose to return them before the 90 days. I bought the liberty origin 96s last year of your reviews and love them, completely transformed my skiing. Thanks guys!

[@SkiEssentials]

Boots are not as readily available to review like skis are--it may take more time and planning to get there than you want, it sounds. If the K2 fits and you can flex it, I'd say ski it! Glad you like the Origin--super fun ski!

[@harrisonholt8242]

I recently bought the Crochise 120s and have really liked them so far my one complaint is getting them on if it’s a really cold day and I haven’t had them next to the heater in the car the can be very difficult to get on but other that that I really like them.

[@SkiEssentials]

That's a pretty common issue with really any overlap style boot. Manufacturers are definitely getting better at solving that problem, but yeah, I hear ya. My Promachines and Speedmachines from Nordica are the same. If it's cold and they haven't been under heat, they're tough to get on. vEven toughter to get off.

[@alextrip2169]

More boots reviews please we see tour program from SPAIN.and web realy liket,thanks for given us all this good imformatins

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks Alex! We have more boot videos planned soon.

[@brook61]

Go Wayne, go Garth, party on!

[@emilymaguire2601]

Any info you can give us on the women’s 105s? Same thoughts? I just purchased the Cochise DYN GW’s alongside my Ripstick 94’s (thanks to your reviews). Hoping to take this one-quiver set up backcountry now that I’m living out in Germany!

[@SkiEssentials]

HI Emily! As noted, it's got the same shell features as the 130 but the liner of the 120, so it's not quite as precise of a fit as the 130, but it's still wonderful. For both in and out of bounds skiing, I think you've got an ideal setup. The lock mechanism on the walk mode is great, and the combination of uphill efficiency and downhill performance is quite impressive. SE

[@tayloranderson456]

That was pretty interesting, didn't know that driving tips is considered old school now! Have you guys heard of any boot makers exploring the idea of widening the toe box, kind of like how Altra and others have done that with hiking shoes? I have a pretty low volume foot/calf but I love being able to spread my toes out wide and I haven't found a boot fitter that can really make that happen without hours and hours of work.

[@SkiEssentials]

Companies are certainly making it easier for boot fitters to stretch toe boxes with stuff like the Tecnica's C.A.S. zones in the boot, but nothing out of the box. Driving the tips, I guess I'm dating myself, but certainly more of a straight-ski style than a wider and deeper sidecut ski like the Enforcer 104 that I've been skiing.

[@scollyutube]

Do they still hurt a bit taking them off? I have last year's 4 buckle Cochise and the shell sides on top of your foot are quite sharp taking them off with the tongue pulled forward. Other than that the fit and feel are great. Also watching you ski those Enforcers in this video Bob, they definitely didn't look as dynamic and slick as your Enf 88 vids.

[@SkiEssentials]

The Quick Instep helps, but some people, like myself, have sensitive insteps. I haven't experienced pain in my 120's thus far. In relation to the Enforcer 88, it's certainly a different animal, being almost 20 mm narrower, with less taper and rocker plus more metal.

[@superboost1574]

I'd love to see more of these. A couple ideas: I think maybe having a controlled boot to compare all of the boots too throughout the year would be a good way to elaborate. I think it would help us understand where you guys are coming from. (Not all manufacturers are the same) and to compare it to previous models and generations, that would be also useful. For example I myself am on the 2020 cochise 130 myself ect. Dare I mention a boot wall 🤤

[@SkiEssentials]

Great ideas, I like it. We're definitely still conceptualizing how boot reviews/comparisons will work. It's not as easy as skis, but there's still something there for sure.

[@tylorlarson4032]

Some CU shots could really go a long way when you are talking about key featuers. I now it cost time but really brings up the production value on a video like this. Thanks for this video lots of helpful information.

[@SkiEssentials]

Good point!

[@loug4626]

Remember Bob ..re lots of boots.....happy wife, happy life. :-). Thanks for this great review. I am similar in size and weight as yourself (Bob). You did not mention aloud your preference 120 or the 130 as you stated Fit conquers the rest (think its the 120 from what I picked up in comments reviewed). Perfect timing in my on line search as just happened to try a pair of 120s yesterday (not a fan of the color though) after a wet day on the hill ended bit early as been contemplating touring but wanting something that covers resort 80 percent of time. I was told the bases can be change so could use on rest of quiver ie. Look Pivots etc. which makes it interesting?. So that said sking 80 percent of time would be resort would 130 stand up better or simply get a 2nd liner in event wear other one out in the 120. Thanks again and have a good weekend.

[@loug4626]

Rewatched yoru review. Was not listening close enough :-). Bob cancel request asfound your pervious written review on these boots and see your preference is the the 120 because of liner fit. Will still try to find a 130 and find out for myself re fit. Since you do not overski the 120 being same height, 200 lb range suspect same will apply to me. Thankyou.

[@SkiEssentials]

Ha! Probably one of the only ones that watched it twice! The color is not great, but at least it's not terribly offensive.

[@timothyworner6696]

Would love to see a Dalbello lineup video!

[@SkiEssentials]

We've done some short-form Dalbello boot walkthroughs, but nothing of this length/detail yet. Do you have a specific question about a particular boot?

[@StacyWilcox]

Are the 120's strong enough for Bob or do you think the 130's would be better for his size and ability? Thanks much

[@SkiEssentials]

He actually prefers the 120! So yeah, certainly strong enough for Bob. He's a very balanced skier, but still a good comparison for other skiers around his size.

[@josephmichalakiii2274]

Bought Kendo 88's from you months ago to replace my 2012 Volkl RTM 80's, also need to update my 2013 Lange SuperBlaster 120's with Booster strap. Eyeballing the XT3's but friend that got me on the Kendo's also just went Cochise. Primarily front side mixing aggressive carving, bumps and trees. Would like the gripwalk and walkmode and potential to tour. Any direct compares of the 2 or suggestions?

[@SkiEssentials]

The Cochise seems more like an alpine boot with a tour mode versus the XT3 which has more touring influence. With a ski like the Kendo, I think the Cochise makes more sense.

[@mbal4052]

Hi, how do you like your kendo 88’s?

[@kauffmbe]

Coming out of the OG Cochise 130 Pro from 2012,which has done well with met head and nav punches and an Intuition Pro Wrap to stiffen it up a bunch, how would the fit on the newer gen Cochise compare ? Especially concerned about length as im borderline in length on my current right foot now and it looks like the BSL is 5mm less per size now .

[@SkiEssentials]

New 130 is less tight than that Pro, but feels more like a real alpine ski boot. The forefoot of that OG Cochise was really tight and narrow and I found the heel to be not as snug, while the new boot is more consistent overall. I don't think the length actually varies that much, as the plastic is now thinner, so they're able to shorten the boot overall without messing with the internal length.

[@reddottx]

@ 17:00 Jeff takes a shot at grip walk soles. Is that referring to Fischer's Ranger specifically? I was looking at those as well as the Cochise.

[@SkiEssentials]

Jeff's a notorious GripWalk curmudgeon.

[@OscarMay-jp5oq]

Hi team. Like Bob I too find myself with a high instep. Would you reccomend the Dalbello Lupo or the Cochise 120 for a high instep foot. Currently in the Hawx prime 130 and Rossi Alltrack 130 GW and am not getting enough clearnace over the top of the foot. Cheers!

[@SkiEssentials]

Lupo has a bit more room, but I fit pretty good in that Cochise. Unless you know you like the cabrio style of touring boot, I'd lean to the Cochise. SE/Bob

[@timothyworner6696]

I’m looking to upgrade my boots. New setup this year with qst 106 skis with warden 13 binding. After my first day on them I noticed my bindings really chewed up my old boots (7 year Dalbello low flex boot). I’m looking for all mountain, 100-120 flex boot, with walk mode or hybrid boot. Any suggestions to help me start my search?

[@SkiEssentials]

While your older boot may have softer plastic, I'd make sure to get a safety check, just in case. For a new boot, pretty much every company now makes a 100-120 flex boot with a walk mode, and most have them in a variety of volume fits. It's certainly best to try them on at a reputable shop if possible, but if you have an average-shaped foot, you can likely get away with a mid-volume fit (100mm forefoot last). Salomon Shift Pro 100/120 and these Cochise 120's are great too, so that's a good place to start.

[@SportNut1]

I usually spend my time on a black to double black on mountains like mammoth or lake louise and I never go backcountry hiking. However this 130 seems very versatile and it's cheaper. Do I need the Mach 1 instead for my style?

[@SkiEssentials]

Hey! Just replied to your other comment. If you like the idea of the Cochise, go for it! Its performance will be great for where you live. I spent a season in Mammoth and there aren't a ton of situations where you'd really appreciate having the Mach instead of the Cochise. Hope that helps!

[@ScottyInVancouver]

I'm looking into getting my first backcountry wide boots ! Do you recommend atomic XTD 110 Or COCHISE HV 110? I came from 110 atomic Hawk magna with shift 10 thank you !

[@SkiEssentials]

The Cochise has a bit more history to stand on in terms of the Mach 1 style having an HV fit. I'd think that'd be the safer overall choice.

[@munanxue5705]

Do you have any suggestions on hybrid touring boots for someone who uses the tecnica Mach 1 high volume? Seems like all the hybrid boots have at most mid volume lasts?

[@src248]

I have wide feet but the Cochise 130 fits me very well (have had them heat molded, nothing else). Also tried the Nordica Strider 130 and it was way too narrow, even though it's supposed to have a wider last. I'd at least give these a shot, if you can find somewhere to try them on

[@SkiEssentials]

Yup, pretty much all MV or narrower. The Tecnica's do have the C.A.S. material and it's pretty easy for a boot fitter to take care of some width in the forefoot. I have a pretty high volume foot and the 120 fits pretty darn good right out of the box.

[@aronski353]

Hey can you also ski park like rails and bigger jumps with it? Not quite sure how's the absorption.. Looking forward to an answer! Cheers guys✌🏼

[@SkiEssentials]

It's fine, but keep in mind that the walk mode is a mechanism, and more likely to break than a riveted shell/cuff integration.

[@jdjsnwsh9674]

Hello, I cant decide between the 110 and 120 flex. Ive tried atomic hawk prime xtd 120 and it was abit soft for me so im wondering if 110 or 120 would be better for me. Im 6’1 and 180lbs advanced skier. I actually tried 110 cochise for alittle bit in the shop and felt like i could flex them fairly well but its obviously easy because im in the shop not outside in the cold. So how much of a flex difference would the 110 and 120 have?

[@SkiEssentials]

Keep in mind that there are more factors here. Ankle flexibility is a bit one. If you have flexible ankles, then a stiffer boot generally works better. If you're on the rigid side, and in between flexes, then I'd lean to the 110. Additionally, the 120 will be more responsive overall, not just in a fore/aft flex setting. Do you need/want more precision or are you looking for some more comfort?

[@mybadvideos]

Any comments on how the Cochise 130 compares directly to the Mach 1 130 fit wise? I have the MV from 3ish years ago... If I get another boot it seems like a no-brainer to get the Cochise 130.

[@SkiEssentials]

The lower shell is listed as 1mm narrower than the MV 130, so I think you're going to have a similar overall experience. I'd recommend cooking the liner if it feels too tight out of the box--there's a lot of room for customization with this boot. Have fun! SE

[@mybadvideos]

@@SkiEssentials I have a feeling what I'll end up doing is setting up my wider/powder skis (Cochise 108/Rustler 11 - the two I have touring bindings on) to use the Cochise and my narrower skis (Brahma 88/82) the Mach1. I'm guessing the boot sole length is just enough different that I won't be able to quite go back and forth without tweaking the forward pressure (?)

[@nathanpatino5931]

Hi Guys, I have the Technica Mach 1 MV 120 alpine boot. I was looking for a hybrid boot to start back country skiing. Would the Cochise 120 be a good comparison. Gday from Australia.

[@SkiEssentials]

Yup, that's the idea! Take a Mach 1 120 MV skier and put them into a Cochise for uphill and downhill skiing. Have fun! SE

[@Travelling_wm]

Predominately East Coast skier and I'd classify myself as an aggressive charger 80% of the time. 20% screwing around. I'm looking at HV's... Mach1 130 or Cochise 130?

[@SkiEssentials]

The performance level is very similar. If possible, get your feet in them to make sure you have the right size and volume.

[@africanjew1596]

How much are you all spending on your boots? And how customized?

[@SkiEssentials]

Retail, boots like this are around 650-750. If you buy them at a shop, they'll usually do customization included in that price. I put a custom foot bed in my boots, and usually stretch the forefoot just a bit.

[@phonemeunit1973]

Maybe a Hoji boot review next?

[@SkiEssentials]

Interested for sure! Availability likely an issue.

[@klauspeters7434]

Are you skiing the Brahma 88 in this video ? 😀

[@SkiEssentials]

Nope, on either a Bent Chetler 100 or a Nordica Enforcer 104 Unlimited

[@joakimMartinsson]

How big is the difference from the 20/21 version?

[@SkiEssentials]

I find the biggest difference is the new boot's support and power transfer. It feels more precise than the outgoing previous Cochise.

[@Wrgb1]

How would you compare this to the new Cochise light dyn gw?

[@SkiEssentials]

Looks like a lighter version of the same boot. Haven't skied the lighter one, but given it's the same specs and flex as the 130, I'd imagine it's a hair less stable on the downhills but a good improvement in uphill efficiency.

[@fernandog.aguirre2791]

Best ski boots review ! Great job guys! I'm tick to try the 115, yes the W model, I'm 175 and 5' 9" strong intermediate skier. I demoed the C 130 and too stiff for my skiing style, I'm always looking for pow, trees and soft snow. I ski nothing wider than 112 under foot. What do you guys think. Too low of calf?

[@SkiEssentials]

I'd say the 115 is right on the money for what you're looking to do. No calf issues with that boot, I think.

[@CurriedBat]

These boots took so long to come into stock I bought the Mach 1 instead. But now I still need a touring boot...

[@SkiEssentials]

If you already have the Mach1, you might like a more touring-specific boot like the ZeroG--all depends on how you're planning on touring and what percentage of your ski day is dedicated to that application.