2023 Hyundai Elantra N 6MT - MPG Test | Real-world Highway Fuel Economy and Range

[@hapazaz]

Ive done 680 miles on my drive home from picking my 2023 Elantra N DCT up in SC. I drove on average between 70 and 80 MPH, thru heavy rain, strong headwind, and some hilly terrain, and i averaged a calculated 30.4 MPG, including a few moments of wide open throttle in N mode. On the contrary, driving in the city im getting below the advertised 20 MPG, but thats a less controlled environement so its whatever. At least this car takes 87 octane and not premium only

[@psewgobind]

My consumption got significantly better with 18' all-weather tires.

[@bucknut2000]

what was the change and what tires. like 2 mpg or 5 ? michelins etc..?

[@LilGrimey5Star]

My Hyundai Elantra Limited 2017 gets 21 MPG on average, only was for me to get 30MPG is to put it on cruise and drive for 2 hours minimum on the parkway When I use sports mode it drops even lower to around 14-16 MPG I love my car but I hate that this happens and idk why

[@roberthayden-ck6sh]

Does the 2023 have adaptive cruise control

[@velocityvibezzz]

Wow way better than wrx's

[@Eugen-E]

This is not AWD.

[@Courtesyflush52]

WRX has an always-on AWD system. The MPG is worse than the Elantra N, Golf GTI, Golf R, Civic Type R, GR Corolla, etc

[@EBKFiXXY]

Who cares about awd not going off-roading are we …

[@Eugen-E]

@@Courtesyflush52 Check his MPG tests, the WRX doesn't have worse MPG than the Golf R or Corolla GR 🙂 Elantra N with the manual gearbox is not very efficient too.

[@zalcan3620]

​@@Eugen-ELOL

[@alfontana6242]

Thanks for your video. There was a time when a manual transmission gave you better mpg's but this is no longer the case.

[@bucknut2000]

I think it depends on how you drive it and the car. If you drive in a high gear you can usually beat it. In my GTI ive usually avg 34 to 36 combined just for daily driving. Its rated for 34 hwy. I drove from ohio to florida and back and it was just 36 goin arounf 80 .

[@gladdy02]

Can someone explain why car makers don't put larger tanks in cars that get worse fuel economy then thier non sporty variant? 🤔

[@parispierre10]

Preach🤟

[@dillontking]

Packaging limitations or just avoiding extra weight? Just spitballing

[@parispierre10]

Cost- cuz they may need to adjust the car’s chassis?

[@MukisaSS]

Probably due to weight and overall car dynamics

[@mrmyagi6710]

Extra weight decreases fuel efficiency.

[@sethkang4410]

my best is 36+ when i go eco 60-70 but mid 20's if only N mode for city and highway

[@MrCheesypuf]

I've gotten as high as 38 MPG, but my average is usually 25 MPG. Mind you my car is tuned, but the stock fuel efficiency was only marginally worse.

[@TopGear759]

I get 35.5 on mine DCT regularly on HWY. Now In the city 19-20.

[@tylerhann4117]

Mpg test in a challenger R/T auto

[@SaintMecha]

It's freaking crazy that Hyundai make Elantra face left already when this is not even a one year old design. Now people will just wait for the N facelift. Really stupid move from Hyundai.

[@velocityvibezzz]

It's been 3 years already for the base Elantra. Its just a mid-cycle refresh.

[@ericharrison619]

Every two or three years on average...Any competitive auto maker will revise a current platform with the exception of it's Work/Fleet vehicles. It's nothing new and it keeps things interesting. Just think of the savings on these unwanted 2022 models 😃

[@mharro88]

It came out in 2020 . It's almost 4 years

[@mharro88]

​@@ericharrison619they won't drop in price much at all considering the 22 models look better than the expected refresh

[@Choob1]

@@mharro88 thats all subjective

[@philippem5695]

Pâle copie d'une série 4 BMW

[@Khaled-eo9mr]

Well Albert Biermann worked at Hyundai to create this car