2023's Biggest Breakthroughs in Physics

[@OculusGame]

I could watch these discoveries literally non-stop, what a blessing it is to have been born in such a fascinating timeline.

[@fuwe]

​@@Davethreshold the speed of light isn't a limit that can be broken, its literally just the speed particles travel when they dont have rest mass

[@farisadel12]

As a famous researcher often says "What a time to be alive!!"

[@TheMR-777]

MissMinutes vibes there :)

[@Lordell]

ok boomer

[@anmolagrawal5358]

Indeed, it is too good to be true in a sense. For all of human history and millions of years, we were born in arguably the most exciting stretch of all time. Of course things might get exponentially more interesting going forward still but to witness this transition as it is unfolding is truly a marvel in its own right

[@chucknorris777]

We are living in times that in a few centuries will be seen as crucial for humanity

[@thaRealShady1]

Actually not. Progress is self accelerating. Hence, the progress made in the next ten years will dwarf everything we have achieved in the last ten years.

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

1900s will be considered as the dumb ages. One where mechanics and technicians out ran logical interpretations

[@bladeprincess]

i really like that.

[@ElementUup511]

not really. we will be considered the confused age. as long as science thinks light and gravity are two different things that don't interact.

[@parlarsson5724]

Hope so.

[@john.omeara]

There was a small mistake at 1:30. The speaker said "you have to go to much much lower wavelengths" However, in the video, it pans to bigger wavelengths. The speaker probably meant to say lower frequency, as frequency and wavelength are inversely correlated. Great video nonetheless!

[@LBTennis]

Non of us were confused

[@TheMajorpickle01]

@@LBTennis I guarantee you one out of the 62k people who watched this video was.

[@roshan00778]

​@@TheMajorpickle01Indeed, i was like wtf😂

[@vectoralphaSec]

Yeah i was so confused about that.

[@Ma1ne2]

Me too lol, just listened to that part and directly went into the comments to find out if I am dumm or that was a mistake in the video 😂

[@egeonursen5698]

Love that I can get up to date physics information like this

[@prifes7364]

I'd also recommend Anton Petrov if you're interested in such news. His videos can feel very raw, but he gives information on almost every discovery that happens and he does so very quickly.

[@ResetAll-ni4dp]

Science and technology are progressing in every field, religion also supports science. Islam gives importance to science. There is science in the Quran, for example, the moon and the sun move in an orbit, all the stars and the moon exist at a certain point and it is Allah Almighty who does this.

[@calicoesblue4703]

@@ResetAll-ni4dp It is actually the Lord Jesus Christ who does all of this.

[@paulmeyer1756]

This is all so exciting to an old guy like me who earned his physics degree in 1978! Thanks for sharing and explaining the physics so well!

[@Showboatberger]

Is pyhsics fun?

[@Emma-eq8pm]

@@Showboatbergeryes it is! I’m a physics major as my university! To do the kind of stuff shown in this video would be my dream. I love physics and chemistry. My two favorite subjects in the world. If you like math (or can work to learn to like it) and you like learning and understanding the world, physics is the way to go.

[@Emma-eq8pm]

I get my degree in physics with a minor in chemistry in 2027! So exciting to hear from people from the past who were in this field as well. I hope you thought your degree was worth it. Such a wonderful industry, learning for the sake of learning and pushing technology.

[@Stonedme]

Not even in his 50s…

[@aditihiremath9020]

@@StonedmeWouldn’t he be in his 70’s?

[@jamesbuckley6875]

The animations in this video were fantastic. Props to whoever made those.

[@artificialcode]

The quantum energy teleportation is mind blowing!!!

[@rodrigoviverosphoto]

I need to undestand more from this... where can I learn?

[@QuesoGr7]

@@rodrigoviverosphoto Same, bro lol

[@williamgidrewicz4775]

Maybe that quantum transference operates through the super ethers, which are less dense and much finer.😊

[@nessiecz2006]

@@rodrigoviverosphoto its called quantum entanglement. (Its not really teleportation. If you and your friend have one tomato and one strawberry but dont know who has which, when you look what you have, you find out what the other person has as well, even if theyre far away.)

[@neerbon9417]

​@@williamgidrewicz4775babe wake up new boson dropped

[@GeoDasher704]

I like how y'all keep up with the modern standards. Less and less people are now reading magazines and the such but these videos are the perfect evolution to that. I love them!

[@AndreTJones]

I can’t wait to finish my degree in physics. As an undergrad. It seems a long way from now for me to be able to do research like this.

[@koktszfung]

Just ask the professors right now, you don’t need to be a graduate student to do research

[@AndreTJones]

@@koktszfung tbh. I haven’t taken physics just yet. Starting college at the age of 45

[@kashu7691]

it flies by !

[@OHHnoYOUdidntMAN]

keep on going, amazing job for dedicating yourself to the future

[@eqwerewrqwerqre]

@AndreTJones Ayy, hell yeah mate. I'm someone who's at the end of their physics degree after deciding to switch careers. I'm trying to go for a doctorate at this point. One thing to know is if you plan to go to grad school, start talking to professor about it right now. You wanna have all your essays done at least a year before you graduate because their application deadlines are waaayy too early, just something i wish i had known going in. But also, physics is amazing. If you're going in blind i think the best thing you could do to prepare is learn algebra and calculus. Almost everything in undergrad physics can be expressed in calculus and already having experience in the underlying math is incredibly useful for easily understanding the physics. Anyways, i wish you luck mate! It's a fun ride.

[@saimaddali6208]

I look forward to these every year and its one of my favorite things to do during Christmas

[@JuliusKhoo]

God bless these channels. Please never stop with these. They are unendingly fascinating and tells us the continuing story of humanity.

[@Excalibur32]

I love these year-end summaries, keep up the great content

[@Am33304]

Feynman speculated once that maths might not end up being the language in which to articulate a theory of everything. I took that quote seriously and ended up overwhelmed. It’s a picture of the universe in terms of concepts, analogy and primarily inductive science. But the key to studying it is not letting bulls*t into your calculations, which is exactly what Physicists have to do all day, too.

[@asatorftw]

Videos like this give me hope. Even though I can't grasp any of the underlying principles (as a non physicist) its great to see we are having some progress in the eternal search for answers.

[@grimaffiliations3671]

That second story should be a way bigger deal

[@ItsNullAndVoid]

Two reasons why this might be the case: 1) It's statistically unlikely to happen with macroscopic particles. If we could get it to work with macroscopic particles we could get other quantum properties to work which would completely overshadow quantum teleportation. 2) It's not classical teleportation. As the object is not teleported but the information of the object is, and that information can only be extracted through the classical communication of the original measurement which is slower than light.

[@gianni_ivi]

beautiful the second almost made me cry for the playful inventivness the third made me remember how beautiful science is the first made me ohm

[@InXLsisDeo]

Quanta Magazine, you are doing a much needed scientific journalism that is accessible enough for the layman. While other channels do a great job. at explaining some major concepts of science, few inform us with the latest research. You fill that gap and we are grateful for that.

[@Demaga1234]

Great video. Thank you for Breakthroughs series

[@stromboli183]

0:05 Low-Frequency Gravitational Waves 4:20 Quantum Energy Teleportation 8:44 Discoveries from the James Webb Space Telescope

[@trashman6417]

Im so happy i found this video since im currently working on a research paper on gravitational waves, so this is great to get the sparks going

[@momothain]

Forgetting how cool we’re finding our universe to be, this video, the teaching, and the visuals are all so amazing thank you

[@maiteshmoo]

Just discovered this channel, what a treat!

[@FortniteWithMyMom]

What an amazing video! I love how the astrophysicist, Erica Nelson, gets emotional talking about the information we can get with the JWST now. When she talks about early times having something weird going on in terms of how objects are forming, you can see it hits her hard. Awesome stuff!

[@alinabaish]

stunning animation!

[@MoosesValley]

When LIGO was turn on, I thought they were dreaming ... that they had virtually no hope of working at the insanely small scales they needed to find gravity waves in amongst the noise from traffic on roads, vibrations caused by the the heating and cooling of surrounding earth, far off volcanic activity, and many other sources of noise ... but they did it. Absolutely amazing work ! And now the pulsar work and JWST results are just incredible. I'm a mathematician / computer scientist, but at heart I love physics and cosmology ... would love to be working with these teams to write the software to analyse the data, prove or disprove theories, and discover who knows what.

[@bbkintanar]

It's already 2 years since James Webb Telescope was launched??? It still feels like yesterday to me!

[@ishanrawat5308]

The "Speed limit 186000 miles per second" poster on Scott Ransom's desk was hilarious! Great video

[@cheetahgoldenfire]

Fascinating times of discoveries!

[@gevesen3307]

as someone who hasnt started his formal education in physics yet, the fact that quantum teleportation is a thing is insane to me. i can't wrap my mind around it

[@kidzbop38isstraightfire92]

Once we really understand entanglement, I have a feeling that all of this "teleportation" stuff is going to be proven incorrect and will become much more boring

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@kidzbop38isstraightfire92 Yeah the word may be misleading. But it is real as measured, and it doesn't need a new theory it is QM

[@kidzbop38isstraightfire92]

@@nmarbletoe8210 sure, I understand it's QM, but we still don't really understand it or why/how it works. There are many aspects of QM we don't truly understand, even though it is testable and repeatable (wave function collapse being the most prevalent that I can think of).

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@kidzbop38isstraightfire92 ok yes i see what you mean. i expect the model will become even weirder when we see the next level, but idk. maybe more boring and weirder both. like ER = EPR is weird but it is boring in the sense that it adds nothing new, just combines two things that were thought to be totally different

[@kidzbop38isstraightfire92]

@@nmarbletoe8210 yes good point, it may actually get weirder before it gets more "understandable". I don't think we'll ever know tho, because I don't think we'll ever have a TOE (sew Godel's theorem)

[@crazieeez]

Energy teleportation is crazy stuff. Oh dayam

[@kannon1610]

PBS SpaceTime lookin thumbnail ya got there

[@wyatony]

What a time to be alive while these incredible discoveries are taking place 🙏🏾

[@JenniferSpearman-u2n]

This is all so exciting to an old guy like me who earned his physics degree in 1978! Thanks for sharing and explaining the physics so well!

[@danabikarki8429]

this helps a lot in physics

[@PietroColombo-em5mz]

Thanks to Quanta Magazine, for sharing videos so interesting, giving me the chance to understand in some way, things too far from the limits of my culture.

[@GabInUtube]

I understand nothing from this video but I watched it all, fascinating time we living in.

[@fortune3911]

Im so so so proud of the scientists. Thank you for all the work you all do.

[@XDarkGreyX]

This is the second video of this channel I have watched and I have to say I am excited about what games the narrator is going to present to me. Yeah, I so far have not encountered his voice elsewhere other than in Directs.

[@AlexanderLefort]

I have seen all 2023's breakthroughs of this channel, I can say that the most exciting ones are in physics.

[@rainygale3715]

Where can I find the papers and people you read and interviewed for this video?

[@problemecstasy1385]

Very informative and beautiful findings.

[@aaronpedersen6658]

8:20 Is this not “information teleportation” as apposed to energy teleportation? With the slide of hand being that information did not travel, but rather an “isolated” assumption was made about particle b based on our understanding of quantum entanglement?

[@dcterr1]

One thing I'm very relieved to see is that there now appears to be plenty of new physics on the horizon, unlike in the bad old days of String Theory!

[@DonnaPowell-r2u]

Love that I can get up to date physics information like this. The quantum energy teleportation is mind blowing!!!.

[@annoymous9807]

4:11 Does anyone know which paper the speaker is referring to when they say “new physics”? I’m really interested to see what theories have been proposed… thanks!

[@annoymous9807]

The speaker mentioned strings or other types of dark matter to explain the Helling-Downs Curve

[@GregoryKn]

Imma have to take physics next year, I'm actually excited. As a musician and composer, I want to discover the science behind the sounds and patterns that we hear as music. How can these sounds effect us in this way?

[@ConnoisseurOfExistence]

Pulsar timing array is absolutely crazy ingenious invention! Who came up with it?

[@freedomzvision]

The more we seek, the more we learn. Thank you for sharing. 🎇

[@M._the_model]

I love the mechanics of creation ❤

[@mina86]

So Star Gate SG-1 was a documentary after all!

[@charlesbrightman4237]

TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe. The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. NUMBERS: (AND ZERO POINT ENERGY): 'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time, my gravity test has to be done which will help prove or disprove the TOE idea), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe (including 'space' which is energy itself, 'time' being the flow of energy), and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, the 'gravity' modality acting 90 degrees from the 'em' modalities, which act 90 degrees to each other, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows: Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction. Then: 1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe. (And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have. This would also be the maximum potential energy point or as some might call it, the 'zero point energy point'.). And also how possibly mathematical constants exist in this universe as well. * While in bed one morning after a restful nights sleep, and assuming the above is correct, I mentally went 'inside' the 1 (the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself). I still saw with my mind the 3 different interacting modalities, the 6 maximum modality points, the '9' including and being the neutral points in the middle which faded into a 6 (as each maximum modality point came towards zero), that 6 fading into a 3 (as each modality came together), which turned into a 1 (which was the '0' point), but '0' wasn't zero. So, '0' is not really '0' but is something, not nothing. '0' is a relative '0'. But then here again, the zero point energy point is the maximum potential energy point for any and all modalities of the 'gem' photon. '0' is '1' and '1' is '0', this is the '1' inside the '1'. Now I just have to come up with some tests to test this idea of the zero point energy point being '1', a maximum potential energy point of the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself. The maximum potential energy point not really being potential energy per se, but the neutral point of kinetic energy. Tapping into here would be tapping into the 'zero' point energy point of eternally existent ever flowing energy. But then again, tapping into here, 'if' distorted what makes up space and time itself (assuming that 'space' is energy itself [the 'gem' photon] and that 'time' is the flow of energy), could it alter or even destroy the very fabric of space itself? What would occur if even only a single pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon were to explode? What potential ripple effects could occur with the rest of space and time? Hence also why I try to think some things all the way through so as to try to identify potential issues before the test. Unexpected, unintended, potentially dangerous or even deadly consequences. If nothing else, it keeps my mind active. The mind, use it or lose it, but using it could also lose it, permanently. (My own and other's). Putting the 'zero point energy point' into actual practice could be deadly. Warning: Proceed with Caution. The last words of human existence on this Earth might be, 'Hey it worked, ooooppppppsssssss.............'. * Note also: Nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and mathematical constants can exist and do what they do in this universe from the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SMPP). While the SMPP has it's place, I believe we need to move beyond the SMPP to get closer to real reality.

[@fatitankeris6327]

You have written an extensive text about all these important ideas, but that are given no context beyond the video mentioning gravitational waves and quantum vacuum. You share conclusions about the most fundamental concepts of study of reality. Please, if you so wish to understand reality, share with us the thoughts in a more structured way of a published article, going from a simpler prerequisite and context of your thoughts, up to what you're writing here. Simpler said: a paper. With that you'd move closer to achieving tests. If you already wrote and published a paper, I beg to give its name and other ways to find it. It's already the second long comment that my intuition struggles to tell wether it are the most profound hidden gems (pun), or the most absurd jargon and trips.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

@@fatitankeris6327 Here is the longer version of the TOE idea, followed by a post with my gravity test for the TOE idea, followed by the current math for the TOE idea for you and others to peruse: THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: Revised TOE: 3/25/2017b. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. (The 'stationary photon' does not really exist, it is mentioned basically only to help describe what a stationary photon would do.) 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

@@fatitankeris6327 GRAVITY: WARNING: (CONTAINS EXISTENTIAL MATTERS): Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) (An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space. Maybe I could concentrate the Sun's 'em' into a high powered laser. Might even work with the correct set up breaking the Sun's 'em' down into single 'em' energy frequencies acting like a single energy frequency laser. A high energy laser powered by the Sun. Cool, or actually pretty hot. More than one way to build a laser.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. (But hey, might even still get a Sun powered laser, which of course could even be utliized in outer space for various agendas.). This test can speak for itself. It will either be true, partly true, or not true at all. It will either show what gravity truly is, might be, or is not. Science still wins either way and moves forward. * And note: Whether my gravity test or another's, a gravitational black hole would have to be formed to prove the concept as being really true. A gravitational black hole that 'if' self fed itself, could literally wipe out this Earth and all on it, possibly this solar system, possibly put a black hole in this section of our galaxy, and potentially even causing a ripple effect in this galaxy and surrounding universe. But hey, if it does, no worries. Nobody would be left to prosecute those who did so. (Possibly famous last words: "Hey, it worked. Ooooppppssss.................) But as NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species, and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy, we need to figure out what gravity truly is and see if we can generate artificial gravity so as to have smaller space ships and proper gravity conditions for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, at least all human life will most probably die and go extinct one day. Currently, no exceptions. * Added note: Just trying to save at least 1 single species from this Earth to exist beyond this Earth so that life itself from this Earth has continued meaning and purpose to. Gives me something to do while I exist, otherwise, what is it all and everything for? Even if my TOE idea were correct, but if it did not help species survive beyond this Earth, what good would it ultimately be? So, are you feeling lucky? Doing nothing and at least the entire human species eventually dies and goes extinct with a high degree of certainty. Doing a gravity test, (mine and/or another's), and there is at least a slim chance of literally wiping out this entire Earth and all on it, and possibly more. Do you and other's truly want me to prove my TOE idea as being really true? But also: Questions: Are at least some black holes in this universe due to a species who were trying to discern what 'gravity' truly was, came up with a test to do so, were successful, but the black hole generated (to prove what gravity truly was) self fed itself and wiped them and at least their entire planet out? What species might have existed where a black hole now resides? (Since all of life itself is ultimately meaningless in the grand of scheme of things anyway, do the gravity test and see what occurs?) * Added note: Suggestion: 'IF' society did not want to do the gravity test, one suggestion might be to at least create a model as if it were true, then see how that model matches with observations and predictions. It might be possible to discern the theory of everything without actually generating a gravitational black hole (which would definitely prove the TOE idea as being really true).

[@charlesbrightman4237]

@@fatitankeris6327 MATHEMATICS FOR TOE IDEA: The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows: The formula has at least 3 levels to it: 1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable. 2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle. 3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it. 4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects. 5. In addition, I am operating in a realm where one plus one does not always equal two, and often does not. While in bed one morning after a restful nights sleep, and assuming the above is correct, I mentally went 'inside' the 1 (the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself). I still saw with my mind the 3 different interacting modalities, the 6 maximum modality points, the '9' including and being the neutral points in the middle which faded into a 6 (as each maximum modality point came towards zero), that 6 fading into a 3 (as each modality came together), which turned into a 1 (which was the '0' point), but '0' wasn't zero. So, '0' is not really '0' but is something, not nothing. '0' is a relative '0'. But then here again, the zero point energy point is the maximum potential energy point for any and all modalities of the 'gem' photon. '0' is '1' and '1' is '0', this is the '1' inside the '1'. Now I just have to come up with some tests to test this idea of the zero point energy point being '1', a maximum potential energy point of the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself. The maximum potential energy point not really being potential energy per se, but the neutral point of kinetic energy. Tapping into here would be tapping into the 'zero' point energy point of eternally existent ever flowing energy. But then again, tapping into here, 'if' distorted what makes up space and time itself (assuming that 'space' is energy itself [the 'gem' photon] and that 'time' is the flow of energy), could it alter or even destroy the very fabric of space itself? What would occur if even only a single pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon were to explode? What potential ripple effects could occur with the rest of space and time? Hence also why I try to think some things all the way through so as to try to identify potential issues before the test. Unexpected, unintended, potentially dangerous or even deadly consequences. If nothing else, it keeps my mind active. The mind, use it or lose it, but using it could also lose it, permanently. (My own and other's). Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be. And I never said it would be easy. But now I will say that putting the 'zero point energy point' into actual practice could be deadly. Warning: Proceed with Caution. The last words of human existence on this Earth might be, 'Hey it worked, ooooppppppsssssss.............'.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

@@fatitankeris6327 * Note also: While I am 'Charles Brightman', I am not the 'Charles Brightman' many think I might be. (Professor of Physics). I just like to study and think a lot.

[@monkerud2108]

It makes perfect sense that Einstein would predict they would never bee seen, because he knew of just stellar sources and the existence of black holes and neutron stars andnsuch were really hypothetical at the time, and indeed for most processes the gravitational waves produced are really really weak.

[@etiennejulius1179]

I absolutely love how physicists are willing to accept new data and re-define their theories based on these new discoveries. … unlike some archeologists … 🧐

[@dragonrykr]

Why is this the only one of these videos without captions?

[@Deutschebahn]

It has them now - I think sometimes they're autogenerated by Google and it takes some time

[@momothain]

“The Universe is *much* weirder than anything we could dream up.”

[@ANobodiemyspace]

That hoda Tele experiment is mind blowing. It will prove to be a turning point for civilization.

[@MicheleSimpson-s6l]

Waterloooo! Im in the Math Physics and this is great! An alumni making discoveries! Amazing!

[@danielvargas5098]

thanks for the video!

[@julienleboulch6672]

I have seen all 2023's breakthroughs of this channel, I can say that the most exciting ones are in physics.

[@ad5558]

Shout out the animation team, great work!

[@manngandhi5237]

Waterloooo! Im in the Math Physics and this is great! An alumni making discoveries! Amazing!

[@VictoriaMacLean-j6p]

I can’t wait to finish my degree in physics. As an undergrad. It seems a long way from now for me to be able to do research like this.

[@theresaronnie]

Amazing. Thank you so much for doing this. Perfection series

[@Joyexer]

Masahiro Hotta seems like a Nobel Prize contestant. Crazy stuff!

[@eqwerewrqwerqre]

QUANTA IF YOU'RE READING THIS I NEED YOU TO MAKE A PHYSICAL MAGAZINE! I'LL PAY WHATEVER YOU WANT, THERE ARE VERY FEW GOOD MAGAZINES ANYMORE AND MY CHILDREN MUST HAVE A LARGE STACK TO SORT THROUGH LIKE I DID. I WOULD PAY ANYTHING TO HAVE THESE AMAZING DISCOVERIES COMMUNICATED SO WELL BUT IN SOLID MEDIA THAT COULD NOT BE BLOCKED OR REMOVED FROM THE INTERNET. I NEED THIS IN PERMANENT FORM PLEASE. Sorry for yelling, i hope you're doing well. Everything you make is amazing and I'm so happy quanta exists and all of the people who work there do what they do. You're all amazing people

[@fatitankeris6327]

Best honor for these discoveries you could give is to read the papers. Problem is, as you were talking about scientific communication, it won't be understandable at all unless you give it your life's obsession to study.

[@LeonaLucas-d9k]

Awesome, thank you.

[@TheRevenant-pn2xi]

The energy teleportation snippet left me speechless

[@to2burger]

Is this “quantum energy” what Nikola Tesla theorized existed all throughout empty space? Edit: Also, for these initial experiments/in general in order to send information through entangled atoms do they both need to be the same material? Could a carbon atom transmit the information to say a gold atom? Also how can we predict/tell what pockets of zero point energy will be entangled together? Meaning, is one carbon atom uniquely linked to another specific carbon atom (think their QR codes match) OR is it that ANY carbon atom is forever entangled with every other carbon atom that exists? Also, my last question is (and this seems like the biggest bottleneck to me) how do we, humans, organize our understanding of this to intentionally decide the destinations of this information we beam into these entangled particles? Also, is it possible that our radio waves give off some resonant energy frequencies that tickle the zero point energy particles and might be, unbeknownst to us, transmitting some kind of quantum data elsewhere in the universe or perhaps even beyond our (3D) dimension? Is what we are witnessing hints at the base code of the universe; between this and quarks and muons and all that kind of stuff? I don’t really know what I’m talking about, just a bunch of questions I’m asking to try and grasp the concepts . Any academic paper recommendations or lectures or podcast interviews from experts in the field would be super helpful if anyone ever bothers to read this gargantuan post.

[@vasumathigovindarajan2139]

Teleportation of comic energy ! Most interesting. We are able to know all these thro this wonderful video. Just blissful.

[@basquetboi1480]

So cool to know. Thanks!

[@hristogeorgiev3453]

I think gravity was stronger in the early days of the universe. The space time was more flexible. Little mass curved it more. This allowed big galaxies and supermassive blackholes to be created in less time than it needs today. Also the density of the matter in the early universe slowed the time.

[@erikeriks]

The ever increasing expansion of the universe proves you to be right. In fact, if we assume that since the dawn of the universe no energy has been created nor destroyed, we can assume that gravity will eventually reach a point of unsustainability, and the universe will freeze in time.

[@jacksonlyman5242]

This is awesome!

[@NityaKrishnaDas926]

Thank you

[@cybergintoki]

“one of the most mysterious sound in the universe” and begins to explain lol

[@sabrinakoch9712]

great video✨

[@tobyw9573]

"The smoking gun of gravitational waves" Beautifully mixed metaphors!

[@mhmdalharbi2370]

1:38 lower wavelengths or frequencies?

[@gravity0529]

Is where we come from more important than where we are going? The greatest thing I love about since is past present and future, we learn together, students of the universe

[@-LSC]

7:20 him explaining this part is just like explaining how a crypto blockchain transaction works. The world is all connected but on different classifications and dimensions. Never ceases to amaze me. God is great.

[@benh5831]

After reading/watching 3-body Problem - the quantum teleportation is friggin mind-blowing. We are living in the future.

[@5133937]

@7:30 I don’t understand the use of the 3rd atom C in this experiment. Can anyone explain it more clearly?

[@PersonneAll]

Thanks you so much : beautyfull and passionating ^^

[@va9053]

Awesome, thank you.

[@Vaishvi_1]

Fantastic😮

[@314calls]

Waiting for mathematics one.

[@ValidatingUsername]

0:45 If you calculated the shadow of the gravitational wells onto a flat spacetime surface, youd get an interesting compression relative to the objects 🧐😏🤔

[@dcterr1]

These are some amazing discoveries! I'm especially intrigued by the teleportation of energy. Can this be done faster than the speed of light, and if so, why doesn't this violate the consequence of Einstein's theory of relativity that no information can travel faster than the speed of light, or does it?

[@robertoo01]

7:27 I am not intelligent enough to grasp this concept, but the animation is beautiful 😀

[@DanielTejnicky]

Cant wait for 0 ping quantum internet

[@SpotterVideo]

"Beyond "Standard Model" Physics"... Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. --------------------

[@Pressured179]

Something good to write down

[@fatitankeris6327]

Do these thoughts find a place of structure in any papers, perchance? Please send if so.

[@davidliverman4742]

Thanks.

[@jawadmansoor6064]

information travels at the speed of rigunculous speed.

[@andreandes7485]

Does Quanta do breakthroughs in chemistry too?

[@empatikokumalar8202]

I don't think people have yet understood what the existence of these waves means. These waves are also the waves that carry images. So, if you are observing something in space, you can achieve this with the knowledge carried by these waves. But if these waves are moving, naturally the information carried as light will deviate. Maybe we cannot notice this in the solar system, but at the galactic level, all observations are wrong. This means that no galaxy is anywhere in sight. This means that if one day we have a spaceship, even at the speed of light, and goes to that galaxy, we will not be able to find that galaxy at the destination of the route we set. Maybe it could be in the observation area again. But we can't get there the same way again.

[@earthian2777]

Energy teleportation is crazy

[@AngelRodriguez-qg5zq]

Martin Martinez 😎👍🏻Now you have a fan👌🏻

[@erikeriks]

The fact that gravity travels in waves is huge if we consider the fact that waves can cancel each other out/enhance each other. In theory, this could mean that we can generate gravity perhaps in the foreseeable future.

[@eldrago5977]

so exciting ❤️

[@lpepano7935]

by any chance are you (the speaker on this video) related to minutephysics? just curious. thanks

[@ronfeenstra3659]

Can the calculation of the age of recently discovered "early" galaxies be off? They're in the infrared, so they're super hot compared to galaxies with red shifts in the visible spectrum. We would expect early galaxies to be hot. Anything unusual in the spectra? Some hereto unknown mechanism why the age determination might be off?