DR. Vandiver , thank you for a beautiful lecture and demonstration of Vibration Isolation. These lectures defines a solid makeup of Mechanical Engineering in the real world. I hope that Mechanical Engineering students all over the world are enjoying these classic lectures.
@BoneyardShadow4 жыл бұрын
This has been great. This lectures represent the beauty of mechanical engineering, makes me glad I am part of this world.
@syakirazmi50386 жыл бұрын
I'm glad I'm not in MIT. These students are geniuses to get it right off the bat. I need to replay a couple of times to even begin understanding this lecture.
@emmanueloluga97705 жыл бұрын
remember this is lecture 21 from a series on this topic
@miguelmeireles29543 жыл бұрын
thank you i know i am
@miguelmeireles29543 жыл бұрын
you are an amateur
@zbi21693 жыл бұрын
@@emmanueloluga9770 Pretty sure it's not. Are you talking about vibrations or vibration isolation? He introduces the topic right now
@adambruce16883 жыл бұрын
Syakir--there's no shame in needing to replay and gain a deeper understanding. I (successfully) defended my PhD two days ago; one of the big projects of my thesis was vibrational isolation for space telescopes. I started my education with OCW in my Dad's house over 12 years ago at the age of 16. I struggled, replayed, tried the exercises, struggled more..rinse and repeat for 12 years. I have now taught dynamics twice to graduate students in aerospace and mechanical engineering. It is a subtle subject, and there is no shame in needing to revisit the concepts. Remember, it took years even for geniuses like Newton, Lagrange, Hamilton, and Jacobi to really get this stuff! The only real mistake is giving up!!
@冰糖葫芦-x2f4 жыл бұрын
this teacher is good , the function of the theory explain so clearly.
@jiaweishi72263 жыл бұрын
WOW, some truely practical knowledge! Really lucky to be able to watch his teaching!
@kdmq2 жыл бұрын
"Is everyone even awake?" sounds about right
@lineage138 жыл бұрын
Change your frequency or hz to skip at vibration points.
@tornjak0963 жыл бұрын
This was the best lecture by now !
@anonbro73687 жыл бұрын
i love you professor i wish i had a professor like you, it's so easy to understand vibrations on your lectures,
@miguelmeireles29543 жыл бұрын
love you too
@flavioing1 Жыл бұрын
Very special Professor. Thank a lot to MIT for these lessons.
@vondelpark81414 жыл бұрын
Great audio to listen to when composing ambient music!
@cheedu1006 жыл бұрын
Loving these lectures!
@beefybeef13266 жыл бұрын
Great lecture. Thank you for sharing this! Much appreciated
@flymulticopter792911 ай бұрын
appriciate it, thanks Dr!
@skilstopaybils40144 жыл бұрын
why bother with the comb-over?
@wallaceyang79716 жыл бұрын
Thank you for a great lecture Prof. Kim Vandiver. A couple of questions: 1)From what little I know, a common strategy is to place isolation pads between the motor and the table, in your first problem. We get to choose the material and the thickness. It seems difficult to find the damping value c for many materials, and is c related to thickness? 2)Continuing to put isolation pads beneath the motor, there seems to be another equation called power law frequency-dependent attenuation, where the pressure waves are attenuated by the thickness of the material we use for isolation. Pressure attenuates by exp(-a*w^n * x), where a is constant, w is angular frequency, n ranges from 0-2 depending on material, and x is the thickness of the pad. Can you please reconcile this equation with what you have shown in this lecture? Thanks.
@IBMua7 жыл бұрын
1:03:25 - probably forgot that /(2*pi) it seems.
@brainstormingsharing13094 жыл бұрын
Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍
@christinanasika12977 жыл бұрын
Do they eat in class in MIT?
@MS-ld3jn4 жыл бұрын
At 4:19 the guy with the dark gray shirt in the second row on the left was taking a little nibble behind Prof Vandiver's back lol
@martinhugo87367 жыл бұрын
If the application was not a cantilever bean, but actually a table, how does isolating the receiver method apply to the table?. increasing the beams length decreased the response of the system, x. given its a beam, it is possible to calculate the k. how do i do the same with a table?. is it equivalent to moving the table a longer distance away to from the source?
@maheshvalmiki5 жыл бұрын
My opinion goes to isolate the source of vibration itself. Which solves 90% of problems. Rest to check imbalance in equipment etc...
@happyonly6345 Жыл бұрын
Why did increasing the mass to the vibration source make things worse?
@syedwaleedshah28308 жыл бұрын
beautiful
@Vicky-pb5hg5 жыл бұрын
At 38:31 , shouldn't we have m(x_tt + y_tt) in the EoM. Only m(x_tt) has been considered. Why is that?
@jkhong255 жыл бұрын
Vicky because the system we consider is only for mass m which is in the x cordinate. Thus the inertia term is only for x
@ColocasiaCorm Жыл бұрын
2:54 56:54
@ColocasiaCorm Жыл бұрын
3.31
@theaudioman44467 жыл бұрын
I need this guy to set-up my hifi
@ColocasiaCorm Жыл бұрын
lmao that's exactly why i'm here
@Anomander8883 жыл бұрын
I'm still watching this man And I still haven't a clue what he's talking about
@francescoindolfo7 жыл бұрын
why there was a minus sign in front of tan'-1 and then it has disappear?
@jkhong255 жыл бұрын
Francesco Indolfo because the tan inverse function is an odd function( means that f(x)=-f(-x) ). So in this case the imaginary part of the transfer function is minus, the minus sign has disappear.
@ayushgupta50618 жыл бұрын
very nice presentation !
@Kenan27304 ай бұрын
Why he says wN but writes wm?
@connorharris1900Ай бұрын
his notation is driving me insane
@sidenvironnement382 Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot. Very interesting 👏
@禹萧何3 жыл бұрын
professor i love you!
@nazirsadiq64323 жыл бұрын
Brilliance
@Commandermgn11 жыл бұрын
Bei solchen Vorlesungen irritiert mich der statisch überbestimmte Tisch doch am meisten, den man mit einem Keil am Wackeln hindern muss.
@salmanjalali11 жыл бұрын
This is sweet!
@miguelmeireles29543 жыл бұрын
have you tried chocolate cake
@ColocasiaCorm Жыл бұрын
i didn't like his ruler experiment. you needed both a ruler and a balance, right? the prediction of res freq required both deflection and mass.
@ColocasiaCorm Жыл бұрын
ah I misunderstood. all you needed was deflection and gravitational constant. that is cool!
@ColocasiaCorm Жыл бұрын
i guess your deflection would want to be in meters units if you use m/s/s for g.
@Tadesan7 жыл бұрын
Well, at least I know I'm smart enough for MIT...
@rabenklang73 жыл бұрын
thank you, nice lecture! :)
@upanddown79118 жыл бұрын
thank you sir!
@animisteddie81932 жыл бұрын
12:15
@animisteddie81932 жыл бұрын
34:18
@Dmytro-zj9it4 жыл бұрын
Мне 37 и я тоже хочу так учиться!
@eglintonflats3 жыл бұрын
He is just copying a book and they pay 40grands a year for this.
@LearnWithFardin2 жыл бұрын
💝☘️
@vincenzocasa80203 жыл бұрын
Vedi su KZbin " antisismico su rulli autocentranti per gravità ", brevetto n° 0001429105 di Vincenzo Casa.
@nigelinNL31603 жыл бұрын
He's horribly all over the place with his sig. figs though.