MashAllah very good analysis keep it up and never worry from any rubbish establishment we all with you and I have a little compliment for you to that take part in election because this system always in need of persons like you Thank you I am Bilal Nisar Bhatti from Lahore
@isakhelvi5 сағат бұрын
Taimur, you are my hero. Keep up the good work.
@sajjadbangash998523 минут бұрын
MashaAllah Dr saab. Great explanation.
@GTPLDPLСағат бұрын
Sir explained very simplistic way . Pakistan youth should get direction to move forward. Put subcontinent judicial history in one lecture. ❤❤
@hil-laal8 сағат бұрын
To put it simply, when the concentration of power is in the hands of leaders perceived as corrupt, especially when influenced by foreign funding, poses several risks to a country's governance and stability. Firstly, when power is centralized, leaders operate without adequate checks and balances, making it difficult to hold them accountable for their actions. This can lead to corruption and misuse of power. Moreover, If the judiciary is under the influence of the executive, it will fail to act independently in upholding the law and protecting citizens' rights, acting as a mere puppet at the hands of the establishment. Also, the perceived corruption and foreign influence has abolished any public trust in the government institutions. Naturally, when citizens believe their leaders are not acting in the nation’s best interests, it will lead to apathy or unrest. Similarly, concentrated power often leads to political instability. If leaders are seen as illegitimate or corrupt, opposition groups may mobilize, potentially leading to conflict or unrest. This is worsened by the dependence on foreign funding which compromises national sovereignty. When leaders prioritize foreign interests over local needs, it creates a disconnect between the government and the populace. As seen since the inception of Pakistan, corruption coupled with concentration of power only exacerbates social and economic inequalities. As power dynamics are skewed and resources are misallocated or siphoned off, the disenfranchised populace feels increasingly marginalized, leading to social unrest.
@timewasters3796 сағат бұрын
Was waiting for this❤️
@saadatyaseen1157 сағат бұрын
What a thorough analysis of the current situation. Thanks for showing us the different and right way of thinking.
@mudassirhussain9337Сағат бұрын
I think we need more political activism to make space for the Mazdoor Kisan Party sir,
@muhammadirfan-jq7pf3 сағат бұрын
❤❤❤
@jehangirkhan57423 сағат бұрын
very rational and profound view point
@alkkkkkk8369Сағат бұрын
please discuss other points of 26th amendment as well please
@ssingha20713 сағат бұрын
👍👍👍
@meursault50157 сағат бұрын
I was waiting this vlog❤
@ximboff4382 сағат бұрын
Very very good analysis
@ShahidHussain-nw9vb17 минут бұрын
Sir, The white color sits on thy head like snow in the mountains! Time, the thief of youth charms us, make us dream, fight the ebbs and low, The dying years of sorrows and joys and the coming ones would be furious and agonizing!
@sharjeeljawaid7 сағат бұрын
Excellent analysis. Jazakallah.
@bilalbashir2 сағат бұрын
Very good analysis of dr sb but we know that fruits and vegetables of independence of judiciary Ifthikar chaudhry son getting benefits from malik Riaz and saqib Nisar son selling pti tickets politicians are blamed but all are corrupt
@shahidkhan-gt7qn6 сағат бұрын
Great analysis
@eman-qq6qx5 сағат бұрын
A lot of love from Pakistan college of law ❤
@themashhoodahmad8 сағат бұрын
PKLI is a glaring example of Judicial Activism.
@noorulislam52666 сағат бұрын
It's not the duty of judiciary to check rates of vegetables visit hospitals steal mill etc All the chiefs must be appointed by pm as he is the public representative freedom doesn't mean absolute freedom each and every one is answerable to public through parliament.
@jamilkhan7156 сағат бұрын
Well explained. Thank you Mr.lal.
@rahmanhazratbuner5 сағат бұрын
Very well illustrated
@mujahidhussain62647 сағат бұрын
The conclusion is that Might is right, no rules of law, no development, no education, and no health, so no prosperity. Ashrafia is in a win-win situation. The demise of PTI is eminent and non conscient leadership will be in power.
@alirazasyed2763Сағат бұрын
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@akbar-nr4kc2 сағат бұрын
Sir please answer this ..i want to know if zizek is critical of postmodernism why his work is influence from mainly Jacques lacan and also from jacques dierada and michael focault .? You also sir mention about zizek about in vedio on postmodernism . I want to know your views on zizek and his take on hegel ? Plz answer sir
@Hunzapost5 сағат бұрын
سلام لال سر ۔۔۔ کیا ہم گلگت بالتستانی خود کو پاکستانی کہ سکتے ہیں؟ جبکہ ہم پاکستان کے آئینی حصہ نہیں ہیں۔۔۔؟ ہم پاکستان میں ووٹ کر سکتے ہیں نہ عدالت جاسکتے ہیں ---?? جبکہ ہمارے اپر جو ظلم ہو رہا ہے اسکو کوئی بیان بھی نہیں کرسکتا المختصر نہ تعلیم ہے نہ صحت نہ پختہ سڑکیں ہے نہ بجلی نہ پانی اسکے ہمارے غیر آباد علاقوں کو خالصہ سرکار کے نام پر ہڑپ لیا گیا ہے 😢😢 معدنیات کو لوٹا جاتاہے ہے
@CricketInformation-wi6jz50 минут бұрын
Put it simply sir we couldn't understand major discourse but Judicial activism..
@ejazkhan15877 сағат бұрын
very complicated discussion , the matter has been extra explained by the speaker , it would better to shade lights over amendment despite goiing in history what made things complicated
@ximboff4382 сағат бұрын
Imran khan ki to pol khol Di ap ne
@abidmajid49386 сағат бұрын
اگر فیض حمید اتنے ماہر ہوتے تو وہ اپنے لیے بھی کچھ جر سکتے تھے
@junaidahmed1628Сағат бұрын
He has totally misunderstood the reasons behind the lawyer's movement. Later Iftikhar Ch was criticized by the very lawyers who were at the forefront of the movement.
@Taimur_LaalСағат бұрын
@@junaidahmed1628 I was part of that movement. I know it inside out.
@sohrabmohammad28227 сағат бұрын
With due respect Sir, you have stated completely wrong facts here. Vote of no confidence against Imran Khan was not an organic motion by the opposition parties; rather, it was Gen Bajwa's establishment that was the main architect of that move. It was the establishment that prodded and convinced the opposition alliance to launch that motion. Besides, it was actually the establishment that arranged the numbers for PDM. This fact has subsequently been proved by the public statements of the then key politicians from the opposition including Khwaja Asif and the chief of PDM Maulana Fazlur Rehman himself. Secondly, if it was Faiz Hameed who made Imran Khan into a popular politician that he is today, then why his popularity didn't dissipate once he was removed from power after the transfer of Faiz Hameed from the ISI? Also, Ik wasn't even half as popular during Faiz Hameed's tenure in ISI as he is today. If history is any guide, artificially propped up popularities are never sustainable and fade away as soon as the impetus is removed.
@masumahmed92636 сағат бұрын
I like prof taimur but his views regarding imraan is utterly biased and twisted
@awaismajeed73026 сағат бұрын
لگتا ہے آپ کی امی کو کرش بھی جوانی میں خان رہا ہے۔
@Taimur_Laal5 сағат бұрын
@@sohrabmohammad2822 the answer to the first question is that in fact the PDM had been working towards a vote of no confidence since the day IK’s gov was created. If you recall IK called for a vote of confidence on March 6th 2021. He won it by only 6 extra votes (172 was needed he got 178). He was already on shaky ground. PPP agreed to power sharing arrangement in Sindh with MQM. That destabilised PTI. I’ve made videos on this in the past. You can search and watch them. The only hurdle was that army was against PDM. But as they inched closer and IK put more and more pressure on army to use their power to stop the PDM, the alliance of PTI and army broke. Second question has a straight forward answer: if economic conditions had improved since Khan’s ouster people would have moved on. But they got worse. That is why his popularity (which actually declined while he was on power) once again rose after being wrongly imprisoned. PTI has been persecuted by a regime that has made the economic situation worse. And that is why lots of people have turned back to PTI.
@sohrabmohammad28224 сағат бұрын
@@Taimur_Laal Exactly Sir, PDM was contemplating to oust IK right from the start while being in cahoots with General Bajwa. Khawaja Asif has publicly stated that in the first quarter of 2019 the then DGI offered us to form govt in Punjab and to take over the federal govt by the end of that year. The meeting was held at Ijaz Amjad's house, who happens to be Bajwa's father in law. We should keep this in mind that Bajwa was appointed after his father in law extensively lobbied for his ascension with the the then PM Nawaz Sharif. Even before the 2018 election, Bajwa had kept his options open. Shahbaz Sharif has stated in a live interview that he was invited by Bajwa and was asked about the names of his prospective cabinet. Then on the eve of 2018 election IK had clearly won a simple majority, but RTS was deliberately made to glitch on Bajwa's order and in the meantime election results were managed in such a way that a hung parliamemt emerged out of it and Khan was forced to form a coalition government. Bajwa had to return his favour to Nawaz Sharif at some stage. If thing weren't already cooking between PDM and Bajwa, why did the pml n vote for his extension in the parliament? Infact, PDM itself has its genesis in the connivance of the establishment. And lastly, will you deny the existence and contents of the cipher? All of these developments are interlinked like a thread of pearls. It doesn't take a 'Metternich' to connect dots and understand this entire episode of Pakistan's chequered political history.
@footballworld20233 сағат бұрын
"Pakistan ki tehreek Pakistan me nahi hui" because Pakistan is an ideological state ans not a regional or territorial estate unlike India that why in their national anthem they have "Punjab, Sindh, Gujrat, Maratha"
@naveedraza65115 сағат бұрын
very disappointed with Tamiur over his analysis of no confidence movement... it was about extension of army chief... thats why facts are more important than opinion
@Taimur_Laal5 сағат бұрын
General Qamar Javed Bajwa received his extension as Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff in August 2019. Prime Minister Imran Khan’s government granted him a three-year extension, citing regional security concerns, particularly related to Kashmir and the U.S.-Afghan peace process  . However, this extension was later challenged in the Supreme Court of Pakistan, leading to a legal review. Ultimately, the court granted him a six-month extension in November 2019 and directed the government to formalize the process of extending an army chief’s tenure through legislation . Khan sb was not the obstacle to Bajwa’s extension.
@sjaosrable8 сағат бұрын
Pakistan Zinda BAAD
@abidmajid49386 сағат бұрын
آپکی گفتگو سے بہت آسانی سے کہا جا سکتا ہے کہ نا صرف عدالت بلکہ سیاسی پارٹیاں ایک دوسرے کے خلاف فوج کا عدلیہ سے دو قُدم آگے آکر ساتھ دیا۔ تو ایسے میں ان پارٹیوں کا یہ حق کیسے ہے کہ وہ ترامیم کریں اور وہ بھی اپنی طاقت بڑھانے کے لیے ۔ جبکہ اسمبلی میں بلاول افتخار چوہدری کے خلاف بول رہا تھا اور اور اس وقت نواز شریف افتخار چوہدری کیساتھ تھے
@nasarali35886 сағат бұрын
Socialist Vision rakta ha ' future Ka. Hammy b agy daikna Hu ga.awr chaheya
@akbar-nr4kc5 сағат бұрын
sir i have question from you regarding philospher slavoj zizek . zizek is more of relativist or objectivist? plz answer
@Taimur_Laal5 сағат бұрын
Zizek is a critic of postmodern relativism.
@afzalkanhar91198 сағат бұрын
🤍
@dawarmajeed76355 сағат бұрын
Your analysis on the past is quite good, but your analysis on the present sanario is quite weak and biased. Faiz Hameed was not the reason. It was bajwa and international players who made all the drama.
@Taimur_Laal4 сағат бұрын
@@dawarmajeed7635 what are your reasons for believing that? Please state your case.
@umairsafdar4927Сағат бұрын
Dr Laal, plz correct these points, First it was Bajwa(And A few generals) were solely against Imran Khan and designed to topple the Government with the help of other parties and off course it was not an organic movement, secondly plz don't mislead people by claiming that elections were delayed by Kakar government because of poor economy, Is economy good today, plz remove your bias against PTI, and finally judicial activism was a thing of the past and a drama hosted by Saqib Nisar and finally it was very sad you didn't lament over the sabotage of one of the pillars of democracy, I wonder then how you claim to be a Marxist leader of the poos of Pakistan