3.0 - RAND [Maths] | Basics of Teletype

3.0 - RAND [Maths] | Basics of Teletype
This is a continuation in a series of videos dedicated to demonstrating the basic functionality of the incredible Eurorack module by Monome, the Teletype.
In this video we will be looking at the use of randomness.
* Just to make a clarification, in the slides for RAND and RRAND I completely fail to mention that the range of numbers for these OPS can not only use positive values but also negative ones (-32767 - 32767), apologies*
Obviously, these videos are aimed at people who starting out with Teletype for the first time and will hopefully serve as a reference for those wishing to develop their basic Teletype skills.
EXTERNAL LINKS:
Joe's Teletype Talk: shorturl.at/ajCT7
Teletype Manual: monome.org/docs/teletype/manual/
Teletype Reference: monome.org/docs/teletype/TT_c...
Monome: monome.org
Teletype Forum: llllllll.co/tag/teletype
MUSIC:
Bandcamp: theghostsaboteur.bandcamp.com
KZbin: / @theghostsaboteurmusic...
SOCIALS:
Instagram: shorturl.at/zEHK6
Twitter: / ghostsaboteur
MERCH:
Teemill: theghostsaboteur.teemill.com
Timestamps:
0:00 - Intro
0:15 - Operator: RAND
1:24 - Operator: RRAND
2:01 - Operator: RAND.SEED
3:10 - Patch Notes: RAND, RRAND, RAND.SEED
4:03 - Example: RAND, RRAND, RAND.SEED
9.32 - Outro
#monome #teletype #basicsofteletype #noiseengineering #basimilusiteritasalter #desmodusversio #monometeletype #wmdfracture #euroracktutorial #eurorackpatch #modulartutorial #eurorack #patchnotes #theghostsaboteur #cv

[@fsuchs]

Super neat!!! And your videos are really a treasure as it 's clearly and righteously leading the way into this fascinating module!! Thks!

[@tobiaskarlehag802]

Every video in this series is pure gold. Thank you so much

[@theghostsaboteur6546]

Really appreciate it. I’m glad they were of some help to you and thanks for watching 👍🏻

[@MetricNotStandard]

Absolutely amazing! Thank you for all of the great TT videos.

[@patchingpublics8170]

Brilliantly inspiring series, and this might just be the best you've done so far. What a great idea to use RAND.SEED for A/B parts in a patch.

[@theghostsaboteur6546]

Thank you so much for this! I’m super happy that these videos are helping folks out. Yes, it’s a pretty useful trick with R.SD. Also try using PROB.SD if you’re after some random, repeatable triggers 👍🏻

[@raymondcortez5184]

Yesssssssss this is heaters delight

[@theghostsaboteur6546]

Thanks 🤘🏻

[@endless_arps]

Awesome!! Will get into this video tonight 🙌 thanks so much 🖤

[@karhukainen2274]

This is probably my favorite series on youtube focusing on a module, I am hesitant on getting the teletype though since it is kind of costy but probably worth it

[@theghostsaboteur6546]

Thanks for that! I had the same feelings before buying mine but have no regrets, I think it has to be the most used module in my rack. 👍🏻

[@kevinhartley2538]

Awesome awesome series, and very inspiring aesthetic to your production. I hadn’t quite understood seed, so thanks for covering it.

[@theghostsaboteur6546]

Hey, thanks for tuning in. Glad the video helped 👍🏻

[@peamarte]

Beautiful and very clear video as always. just give me some more clarification on R.SD? I can't understand the understanding between the numbers you write in script 2 and the CV voltages in script 1. Thanks again (:

[@theghostsaboteur6546]

Hi Emi, thanks very much. With regard to R.SD, this OP sets a starting point for a series of random values that are used by the RAND OPs in script 2. R.SD allows all random values in all scripts to be looped or repeated every time script 3 is triggered. So the note sequences in script 2 can be looped. The reason we write R.SD Y is because we are reading a value from the PARAM pot and storing it in to the variable Y which in turn is being used by R.SD and PROB.SD. I highly recommend watching my 3.0 RAND video, it’s explained much better there 👍🏻

[@peamarte]

@@theghostsaboteur6546 Thanks

[@peamarte]

@@theghostsaboteur6546 join the teletype discord channel:))

[@endless_arps]

Hey , I have a question. When u say a second clock that runs script 2 at a different rate. Is that preprogrammed? I might have missed the part were u are talking about that second clock

[@theghostsaboteur6546]

Hey man, apologies, I probably scanned over it a bit quick. Both clocks are produced by Pamela’s New Workout, the first one is set to x4 and the second is set to /8 and so is much slower than the first. This way the second clock will trigger the random seed (which loops the sequence) every 64 beats of the first clock. The second clock can be divided by more or less to change the length of the sequence. 👍🏻

[@endless_arps]

Okay , I figured it was pam's , just wasn't sure , thank you. I am realy enjoying these videos , I have been strugglin with TT for over a year now just because I am realy bad in learning this type of thing by myself. Thanks again for putting in al this effort 🙌 realy keeping up with what u showed us so far!

[@simondoes]

What I am not getting yet is how scripts are feeding into one another; how does script 1 know what seed script 2 is referencing, i.e. where is the seed "fed" into script one? (that's the only way I can grasp the repetition, as the "random numbers" for the RAND-commands of script one are in fact the same ones) why does it loop even though script 1 uses RAND/RRAND which is proper randomization (or not?) and should, by my scatterbrained logic, create different values in each iteration of the loop? That would be enlightening to know...^^

[@theghostsaboteur6546]

r.sd only needs to be specified in one place in your code as it is a global function. So, for example, if you place it in script 5 and trigger it, it will effect every rand command everywhere in the scene (all scripts) If you change .sd’s value and trigger it that new seed will apply to all rand commands. 👍🏻

[@simondoes]

@@theghostsaboteur6546 aaah alright. understood. thanks mate! :)