3 Reasons Caitlin Clark is the GREATEST Offensive Player in Basketball

[@amanrush7722]

Imagine Caitlin in a team that can create shooting space for her. For the last 4 years, she had to create her own space to shoot.

[@erob1962]

She's a great woman's basketball player. Why try to hype her as more than that? She ain't Jordan Curry or Bird. Defensive intensity is much greater in the men's game. Intensity overall is greater for that matter. I watched much of the women's tournament and I noticed the reflexes are much slower.

[@jasperbyronrivera7938]

@@erob1962 You can't even play half as good as her. Stop talking.

[@TaiyouArt]

@@jasperbyronrivera7938 not even 10% as good as her lol

[@chevyyyyyyy]

In this video, I think I saw two apposing players throw their hands up in frustration in the manner of van Lith in the opening. I would love to see such a compilation; It would amuse.

[@matutinam2673]

Just waiting for her WNBA debut, the ‘getting pissed at Clark’ highlights about to go crazy.

[@chevyyyyyyy]

@@matutinam2673 Who?

[@George-yz2ng]

One time cc was in the same situation as Allen Iverson crossing over on Jordan. The only difference, cc did the Iverson crossover, James Harden stepback, and then Jordan fade away with the Nowitzki kick. What human does that all in one shot? On top of that, she plays like Curry. I'm so convinced that she is the goat.

[@elmarko9051]

This is an excellent collection of highlights, not just that there are successful plays. It shows that Clark is doing it against All-Americans and future W players. Think CC's game won't translate to the W? Think again.

[@jejunamja]

Thanks for the video , I don't really know much about the how to play basketball well and so it was very interesting to hear you lay it out .

[@christopheryochum3602]

Great analysis!!!

[@TheBasketballAcademy1]

00:54 Shooting 🔫 (Step Back) 4:09 Scoring Spot 📈 5:25 Driving 🚗 7:50 Facilitating 👀

[@christee299]

Love this!

[@cinquebleuu9408]

Imagine trying to create space in professional ball. Raven Johnson at college level prove you can have some affect on over 25 shots a game.

[@6aliph77]

Shes gonna get alot of hate thou

[@JeffMelland]

In WOMEN'S basketball

[@bartell20j]

I bet you think you could take her in a 1 v 1 😂

[@JeffMelland]

@bartell20j I do not think anything of the sort. I do know, though, that there is a profound difference between WOMEN'S basketball and MEN'S basketball. Caitlin Clark is perhaps the greatest player in the history of NCAA women's basketball, but she would never have made it onto an NCAA D1 men's basketball team.

[@TaiyouArt]

@@JeffMelland sit down old man

[@JeffMelland]

@@TaiyouArt did I say something untrue?

[@user-bz7ki5if1q]

KK is good player, I like her very much, but calling her greatest offensive player in basketball is just fallacy.

[@arlypaulmigueldamuy5221]

Can't you wait, hater?

[@daltonmoore233]

She might be the most entertaining tho

[@Ottovontubes]

This is disgustingly pathetic. The woman LOST. The idea that she needs this kind of praise after LOSING the championship which would have made these accolades relevant is a pathetic attempt at creating some kind of legacy and is insulting to those who actually WON CHAMPIONSHIPS, the metric that demonstrates real accomplishment in a sport. Now it's what your stats were, not that you could take a team to and through a championship match and win, but how you interpret stats. Would she be the highest scoring player in college basketball without the three point shot, no, but let's pretend that it doesn't matter that she got more points per shots than the next person. There's no question that she's a very good player, but there's also a very good argument that she chokes when put to the test. She lost 2 years in a row when a true champion would have brought their team a trophy. Oh yeah, I noticed the qualification of making her the "GREATEST Offensive Player", instead of the best PLAYER. That's the difference between a champion and a "good" player, you have to qualify their greatness. And don't fool yourself. She knows the difference between a proven "champion" and being called the "GREATESTS" of anything by a KZbin channel and so does the WNBA.

[@bobbyd1776]

Wilt Chamberlain, Elgin Baylor, Oscar Robertson, Jerry West. Julius Erving, Larry Bird, Hakeem Olujowon, Tim Duncan, David Robinson, and Steph Curry have a combined grand total of 0 NCAA championships. Caitlin is in good company

[@user-lm9zl9xu8p]

Her records and stats speak for itself. You can be a champion being a bench player.

[@ramonpunsalang3397]

Just appreciate the dedication and hard work that went into developing the basketball skills, regardless of gender.

[@Pathfinder197]

Diana Taurasi, is that you? I have a lot of respect for someone sticking with their team - even though it’s definitely not stacked with top WNBA draft picks - and making it to the national championship two years in a row. And I don’t think anyone sincerely debates that 3 point shots from deep behind the line are huge crowd pleasers that can fill venues and get ratings - something the WNBA desperately needs. Clark’s assist stats and the way she reads the court is all quite impressive too. So her success seems pretty easy to understand. What’s less easy to understand is hardened sports fans suddenly becoming delicate, easily-triggered gatekeepers just because this kid’s drawing much bigger numbers to actually watch women’s basketball.

[@Ottovontubes]

@@bobbyd1776 Catlin doesn't compare to those men in the least. The NCAA purposely changed the rules to hamper Chamberlain's game. When Caitlin scores 100 points in a single game shooting only 2 point shots she can be compared to him. All the other players earned championship rings in the NBA before people started calling them champions. When Caitlin wins a WNBA championship, I'll put her in their league.