3 Ways to Maximize Performance of the Sony PXW-Z280

[@AfricanSunProductions]

I had a huge problem with my Z190, turned out to be as simple as diffraction! Thank you for the info, much appreciated.

[@FavstoFavillos]

man you talk so well, i could watch 3 hours of you talking and never get bored

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Thanks, but I think my wife would disagree with you! 🙂

[@PulkVideo]

so take one of his courses, really worth it!

[@joeakestudiosstudiob9300]

Doug nothing beats experience. As a editorial and commercial photographer I have learned to shoot it right in the camera first. I only learned that over time and it’s all about your time when you do this for a living? You learn the trade. Thank you for your videos sir. Great job.

[@johnmack3017]

You sir are a lifesaver! Great demo of the back focus adjustment. I would not have known about this when I rent this camera tomorrow. Assumed (wrongly) fixed lenses did not need adjusting. Perfect explanation of the diffraction problem. I have been talking about this to students for years but this absolutely demonstrates it perfectly. I always thought that you had to go smaller than f11 for it to be a major problem. Happy to stand corrected.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi John, I'm glad you found the video helpful. That is exactly the reason I decided it was needed. The Z280 is a fantastic camera, but like any high-end gear, it must be used properly to ensure excellent results.

[@PaulRhysTV]

Kudos to Doug as well that he answers our questions wherever possible. It must drive him mad sometimes repeating himself but having an expert who is so engaged and really cares about people making the right choice is just brilliant.

[@ericdarling8903]

Thanks for this well thought-out video, Doug. It's a nice rebuttal against uninformed opinions on this excellent camera. Folks wanting grab-n-go without any learning curve might want a simpler camera, but this camera is absolutely excellent, and I've achieved so many great results that we bought a second one for documentary and live events in run and gun situations. Agreed on all fronts!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Eric, it is great to hear that you share my feelings. I wish more people had the confidence to rebut the unfounded complaints that are being made. As I say in my video, the Z280 is not a perfect camera but it is very impressive.

[@Farisgor]

many thanks Doug for your quick response, Im from michigan I drove all the way to Chicago this morning and I picket it up, its in great condition

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Congratulations, I hope it serves you well for years and years.

[@RICHARDJOSEPH747]

Hi sir I am from India,was confused to buy camera but the way you explained was mind blowing see this is what experience,and your English speaking skills dame good, anyway thanks a lot .....

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Thank you! I'm glad you found it helpful.

[@BoatZone]

you are the best Keep them coming !!

[@AwesomePlayers]

Hi Doug. Fantastic video. I was initially very interested in the 280 but all the bad reviews sacred me off. I had seen some of your videos on the 280 and was puzzled by how your opinion differed so greatly. I even got involved in some of the Facebook discussions and ran some tests on my old EX3s for comparison. Thank you for producing a logical, clear and professional video on these subjects.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Thank you for the nice comments. I couldn't just sit on the sidelines anymore and watch such an amazing camera get slandered by people who might have gotten in over their heads with a camera that they don't understand.

[@MechanicalTrader]

Positive, Classy, Intelligent Guy!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Thanks! That is very nice of you to say.

[@Masteringvoiceover]

Hi Doug. I love my Z280 and your masterclass for it. This is a great update. Thanks!

[@Tortenelemportal]

HI! For me - 3 are also noisy, the middle third of the image is sharp on 4k recording. 😪 The picture is good in HD resolution. Is there a good setting for sharpness in the masterclass? For the clothes? Or does it just show what's what?

[@G0UDG]

Thank you Doug an excellent video I am seriously thinking of purchasing the Z280 for recording Rock Gigs as well as for holiday video's I am currently using a Canon XHA1s, your video's are extremely helpful

[@bridlingtonengland75]

Just stumbled across this video. Fantastic review and discussion.

[@alvaromorello]

Thanks for the video. I hope to get this camera and your course soon.

[@ricklavon3632]

This is good video for someone like me who is potentially going to buy the Z280 and read all the comments on B&H about barrel distortion

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Yes, it is unfortunate that a few inexperienced people can cause so much misinformation. The Z280 is still one of my favorite cameras of all time.

[@ricklavon3632]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia a couple of quick questions. My other camera is an EX-3. The EX series seems to have a sticky zoom issue where it's not a smooth movement..it sort of sticks at the beginning of the zoom. I've noticed this with other EX cameras we've bought or rented, so it's not just the ones we own. Does this camera have a smooth zoom?......2nd question: Some of the reviews stated when using a remote zoom you can't get slower speeds. We do a lot of 3 camera concerts where that's important feature. Do you have any knowledge of that?...Final question: what would be a good 7" field monitor? Thanks and keep up the great content!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@ricklavon3632 Hi Rick, I would have to admit that the servo zoom control on the Z280 is not as good as I would wish it to be. I can usually get smoothly-ramped starts and stops to my zooms, but it takes more concentration and effort that I would like. Of course, I have to keep in mind that the entire Z280 camcorder costs 1/6 of what the Fujinon 24x lens on my Z750 costs, so I have to cut the lens some slack. But yeah, the bottom line is that I do wish it was better. I've tried three different external zoom controllers and they all performed about the same, so I doubt you will find one that suddenly makes things better. I don't have a suggestion for a small 7" monitor. It is not something I own or wold ever need so I don't have any suggestions. Personally, I find the flip-out LCD and OLED at the rear of the camera to be more than adequate for normal shooting. And when I do need a monitor, the minimum acceptable size is 17". Anything smaller than that is of no use to me.

[@ricklavon3632]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Hi Doug- I am really liking the Z280 so far. I have found that the rocker zoom is not sticky at all. So that is an immediate improvement to the EX-3. I wound up getting the Shinobi SDI on-board monitor because we needed something for a concert configuration and the other cameraman preferred one. I also got the Manfrotto remote zoom. Does the remote zoom depend on the internal camera settings?...Right now it is on variable with high at 8 and low on 3, which was the default.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@ricklavon3632 Hi Rick, it's good to hear you like your Z280. I don't know the answer to your question about the remote zoom controller. It has been two years since I used a zoom controller on the Z280 and my memory is not that good! :-) Try it and find out.

[@joyoffilming9500]

Wow! Doug, you made me falling in love with this camera. Would you still recommend it in 2023?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Yes, I would still recommend the Z280 today. No question about it. There is no other small camcorder that exceeds the performance of the Z280. I even test the Z280 against a Canon XF705 last summer and the Z280 won on nearly every comparison between them. Great camera.

[@joyoffilming9500]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Doug, thanks a lot for your insights. I did a lot of research over the past weeks on camcorders and saw quite mixed results re the Canon XF705. Would you rate the Z190 a less pricy good alternative?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@joyoffilming9500 The Z190 is an excellent camera as well, but definitely a step down from the Z280. One of the areas where they are most different is in light sensitivity., I could not recommend a Z190 if someone was going to be doing a lot of low-light or indoor shooting without lights.

[@janstappertjie]

Great video Doug! Thank you so much.

[@Nordbiene]

Such a great video, thank You so much. Best regards, Kai the bee filmer.

[@RJvidmoto]

Thanks for making/posting..Right there with you on this topic!

[@JSMultimedia-fw9ow]

Wow, I really want one now.

[@jose-pereira2208goa]

Very beautifully explained. Thank you.

[@mangaljitsingh1]

Hi Doug, its nice to see your knowledge about video cameras. I just came across one z280. what is the best settings in it for use with green screen.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

The most important thing is to choose a 4K 10-bit codec. I'd also choose HG3, increase the detail slightly, and raise the saturation. That has give ne excellent results in the past. Good luck.

[@SashavanderFok]

Dear Doug, good day. Could you please say about image stabilizer of Sony PXW - Z280. Have you ever used it? Is it really efficient?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

It works well for small movements and vibrations, but it is not a substitute for a gimbal, if that is what you are wondering. :-)

[@SashavanderFok]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Thank you so much :)

[@paulhopkins1065]

Thanks for this Doug. I had the EX1 r before I bought the Z280, and do find it more advanced, and harder to get great results from out of the box, but I am learning it, and like it more and more. Has there been any complaints about the image stabilization on the Z280? It seems nowhere near as good as the EX1r. I really struggle with running and gunning with it. Almost always need it on a tri-pod.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Paul, I'm glad to hear that the Z280 is growing on you too. I haven't shot enough handheld with either the Z280 or EX1 to make any comparison.

[@martinduffy3229]

I'd like to see a real world example of the X34 extender. When activated does the camera still start at 18mm or it different? Thanks

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

When you engage the 2x Digital Extender it doubles all focal lengths, from the widest to the longest, and everything in between. But the 2x can be activated at anytime, even while recording.

[@UKAviationMovies]

Excellent video 👍👍👍

[@ionutt3175]

Hi Dough. Really a fantastic video. Thank you for taking your time to teach us this amazing lesson, especially for free. I have a issue with my PXW-Z190. In the camera meniu the AUTO FB ADJUST is missing. There is a way to activate? Thank you very much for your time.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Thank you, i'm glad you found the video helpful. Back focus on the Z190 cannot be adjusted with the menus. If you think there is a problem then you will need to have the camera serviced. But due to the different design of the Z190 is it much less likely to have a back focus problem.

[@johnneumann8124]

Thanks for this Doug. I’d watched this video before but have come back to ask a question specifically related to your discussion on diffraction. You’ve been saying the thing for years; I’ve heard you discuss this in your old DVDs that I happen to have. Is this phenomenon specific to 3chip camcorders? The reason I wanted to ask is because still photographers will frequently give advice counter to what you’re saying. They like to stop a lens down to an f-stop like f8-f13 to hit a typical sweet spot and achieve maximum sharpness; especially when photographing wide vista landscapes. I’m not disagreeing with you - just interested to hear your comments on this. Thanks, John.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi John, potential issues caused by diffraction are not unique to three-chip camcorders -- or even video cameras in general. Diffraction is a potential problem for all cameras and all lenses. The reason is it more closely associated with video cameras is because historically video cameras have had smaller sensors, and smaller sensors are more susceptible to diffraction. And the more a lens is stopped-down (smaller iris hole) the more that diffraction will degrade the picture quality. The Z280 has 1/2" sensors and the Z190 has 1/3" sensors so that means they are much more susceptible to diffraction than a camera that has a full-frame or Super35 sized sensor. Both sensors are many times larger than those found in the Z280 and Z190. Thus my advice to shoot with the lens wide open as much as possible. Even though you might not notice a problem in most situations until you got down around f/5.6 or smaller. It's just good practice to shoot wide open as often as possbile to avoid diffraction and achieve the shallowest depth-of-field that a certain camera/lens combo can create. The electronic variable ND filter found on the Z280 and Z190 makes it super easy to set the iris wide-open and do all our exposure adjustments with the variable ND. It is a game changer. A serious photographer shooting landscapes is probably going to be using a FF or S35 camera so they can get away with stopping their lens much farther down before diffraction becomes a problem. So if they want to get maximum DoF, stopping down to f/8 -f/16 may make sense. But with that said, I mostly shoot with FF cameras right now and I still keep my lens wide open 90% of the time. I hope that helps answer your questions. You can probably do a Google search for diffraction and get a better explanation! 🙂

[@eaglehealthy]

Thanks

[@adipop]

Great video! Learn something today ! I wonder to ask how video stabilization is while you walk with this camera ?

[@DuffTV]

Doug thanks for the great info, I previously had a Sony PMW X160 and there were some great aspects I liked about that camera especially the sharp pictures and wonderful low light capability. Similar to the EX range they just blow other brands out of the water in this regard. Is it fair to say the Z280 is a 4K version of the x160/180 range for the layout looks almost identical. One thing though that put me off the x160 and that I hope has improved is how that camera handled blue LED in stage show filming. I found them really washed out. In fact I sold my x160 for this sole reason. I quired this problem with a chap in Ireland who like yourself also uses Sony's higher end Sony ENGs like the 400/500 range, and he suggested this blue led light issue is a common problem with Sony cameras. In fact I've seen news footage of Police/ambulances and the blue flashing lights have this weird sort of sparkle to them. Guessing they are Sony's. Can't say I remember this issue with the Ex1s but thats a long time ago now and pre LEDs being used so much in stage shows. Thanks Doug, been watching your videos for a long time so its nice to be chatting to you.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

In chapter 16 of my master class I recommend that a setting called ADAPTIVE MATRIX be turned on to deal with this issue. Very simple solution.

[@DuffTV]

Hi Doug, two questions. Do you know of any samples that show the X34 digital zoom that you and Sony claim has virtually no loss of quality when used in 1080 HD? Also when that feature is activated on the Z280 is the wide still as wide as when not activated?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

I am not aware of any samples online. There might some some 34x footage in my Z280 master class but I cannot remember at this time. It has been well over a year since that video was produced. Personally, I don't care about that feature of the camera because it can't be used for 4K, so I'll never use it. Yes, it would make the field of view of every focal length to be 50% narrower when it is turned on.

[@cncmedia1461]

Thanks Doug for the tips. Can you tell me what adapter or plate system you were using to put the two cameras on one tripod please🙏 need one, many thanks

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi, it is just something I made myself out of a thin plank of wood and various pieces of hardware I had laying around in my boxes of junk. In other words, nothing you can buy right off the shelf.

[@cncmedia1461]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Wow...that's amazing, it looks like a typical rig with 2 tripod plates mounted on metal rods, unless my eyes are playing tricks with me. It looks steady as well. Could you build one for me and I pay for it please? Thanks. I usually shoot with 2 cameras front facing (M.Shot and Wide)and using 2 tripods sometimes doesn't work bcos of the small space, so this is very handy for one handed movement as well. Thanks

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@cncmedia1461 Oh, I'm sorry. I just looked at the video again and the dual-rig that I used in THIS video is not the one I currently use with my FX6 and Z280 today. The one I use today is mostly made of wood, but the older one that you refer to is made from a 15mm rods and a three tripod plates. One for each of the cameras, and another mounted upside down to mount the rig to the tripod. However, it is still just a home-made rig that I cobbled together from old parts I have in my junk drawers. I appreciate your asking me to build something for you, but that's not really my forte' and I definitely don't have the necessary hardware. I suggest you contact Zacuto and tell them what you want and I'll bet they can recommend a few components that would work for you.

[@cncmedia1461]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Thanks Doug. If you ever have no use for the old one please let me know and I will happily take it off you. Thanks again

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Will do!

[@AW-go1tf]

Excellent video Doug. Two questions: 1. Looking at the specs I see that the camera is capable of a solid 600mbps at XAVC-l QFHD. This would seem to be one of the selling points for this model compared to cheaper models in the PXW-Z line. Do you find this extra data is noticeable in terms of a better image produced? I have the computer processing power to handle the extra bit rate data, so the question is more about the qualitative value the higher bit rate. 2. I don't doubt your knowledge and I'm sure you are correct, but your explanation about the refraction issues when stopped down seems counter intuitive to me, and counter to my experience on the dslr and cinema camera side. Specifically with almost all my stills lenses, including very good professional ones, the image is generally softest at the most wide open setting e.g. 2.8, and then gets sharp a notch or two more closed e.g. 4.0. This is also true with cinema lenses. Is this a function of sensor size or camcorder geometry or?

[@AW-go1tf]

Ok. I partly answered my first question by finding your Z280/Z190 split screen video. The 280 was significantly better. I'm not clear though how much of that difference is the sensor and / or the lens differences. I'm assuming you recorded both those at the same codec / bit rate / fps. so that may not directly address how much of an advantage the high data rate would be (too).

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

You're only going to see a difference between XAVC-I (10-bit 4:2:2) and XAVC-L (8-bit 4:2:0) if you're going to grade your footage. If you don't care about color grading, enhancing footage in post, or chroma keying, then I think it would ne impossible to see a difference with the naked eye between the same camera recording two different codecs. But when you compare the Z280 recording XAVC-I and the Z190 recording XAVC-L you're definitely going to see some difference whether you grade or not. The difference is between two camera where one is simply a better camera regardless of the codec being used.

[@VanguardmediaTv]

Another great video, although I wished I didn't watch it, now I want to buy a Z280! BTW, what pan bar handle are you using?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

I made that pan bar myself from the handle of a screwdriver I got at Lowes. I love it. I've given all the information about it to my friends at Sachtler and suggested that there is a need for a shorter panhandle. They seemed interested, but I have not seen a prototype yet. The standard handles are just too damn long for cameras like the Z280 where the viewfinder is located at the rear.

[@VanguardmediaTv]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia What about contacting a company like Zacuto or SHAPE that makes aftermarket / third party parts and accessories? I agree some handles are to long for the smaller cameras.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@VanguardmediaTv Well, I have a handle now that I like so there's really no reason for me to contact other companies. I only sent my suggestion to Sachtler because they are the manufacturer of the head and I have worked closely with them in the past.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@PaulRhysTV (sorry Paul, I accidentally deleted your post) I made my custom handle from this Irwin Nut Driver. However, in order to mount it to the head, you have to take the knob off the original Sachtler tripod handle and put it on the Irwin. The diameter of the Irwin happens to to be the same as the Sachtler handle. www.irwin.com/tools/screwdrivers/irwin-6-in-1-nut-driver

[@PaulRhysTV]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Fantastic, thanks Doug!

[@rodyates2669]

Doug, thanks for all this crucial info, delivered in such an effective way. i presume you are in the US, but it would be interesting to work with you. I bought a PD150 HANDY CAM years ago, but now find its obsolete, and I think the 280 is a necessary replacement. How long do you think the 280 will be up to date?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Rod, thank you for the compliments. I think the Z280 will be up to date for many years. I really can't think of anything major that a new camera could have that the Z280 doesn't already do. I think we might see a larger version with quasi-shoulder mount like the EX3 was to the EX1, but even that is just a guess.

[@malcriadamedina5358]

I'm going to try the back focus I thing, I was assigned this camera at work and absolutely hate it. the color always seems off and the image never really crisp. Was shooting with a c200 before and preferred that one

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

If you're shooting with the "out of the box" settings the image will never look very good. Sony expects operators of their ENG cameras to load-in a custom scene file or create one themselves using the dozens of paint menus. It is like a blank canvas.

[@malcriadamedina5358]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia i loaded the setting that my job has us work with, not exactly sure what those are

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@malcriadamedina5358 Yes, I understand things are not always in our control. But before you blame the camera on a public forum, I would look at the settings you're using because the Z280 is capable of shooting very nice looking video.

[@malcriadamedina5358]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia not blaming the camera, just not sure it's better than a c200 or c300

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@malcriadamedina5358 That's like wondering if a Land Rover is better than a BMW. They are totally different vehicles for totally different purposes. It is not possible to say one is better than another. But if you have the wrong vehicle for what you are doing, then that might be a problem. There are things the C200/300 can do that the Z280 cannot match, and vice versa.

[@jmichaelstone]

Great video, thanks Doug. I'm sorely tempted by this camera. Would it be nuts to sell an FS7 II to replace with a Z280? The convenience for travel is really tough to ignore...

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Jason, that is a very difficult question for someone else to answer for you. I wouldn't take my advice no matter which direction I told you to jump! :-) As I have said many times before, I still believe the FS7 offers the most bang for the buck of any camera in history. The Z280 comes in a close second, but I still think the FS7 is the better camera. But that does not necessarily mean it is the right choice for everyone. The two biggest selling points of the FS7 are shallow depth-of-field and true CINE EI S-LOG mode. And the biggest selling points of the Z280 are the 17x lens, simplicity, and speed of operation. I would say you need to decide which of those things are most important for you and the work you do. Either camera is capable of great results. Fortunately, I find it more than worthwhile to have both!

[@joeakestudiosstudiob9300]

Keep reflecting on you needs. I do this now almost consistently before buying any new gear.

[@banggi21]

After watching this clip, I love the z280 more.

[@DuffTV]

Wonderful review Doug. Can you tell me does the 34X zoom remain sharp in 1080 HD? Thanks

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

There is some slight loss of resolution but you would have to look very closely to see it. I have no reservations about using that mode if I'm shooting in HD.

[@VideoProducer_DP_Editor]

Hi Doug, thank you for the great video! Will Sony be releasing a new Camcorder to replace the z280 anytime in the future? I noticed it was out in sept 2018.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Gina, if I knew for sure that Sony was coming out with a replacement camera I probably would be under NDA and couldn't tell you. 🙂 But I have heard no whispers of a replacement. That's doens't mean they couldn't announce one tomorrow or two years from now. My advice to anyone thinking of a Z280 is to o just go ahead and get it now and put it to work.

[@VideoProducer_DP_Editor]

Thank you, Doug! It was nice meeting you at NAB show in Vegas this year! I recently got a chance to test light sensitivity of Z280. Do you have any advice on the best gain setting range for it? I was using Hyper gamma 4. Cheers!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@VideoProducer_DP_Editor In chapter 17 of my Z280 master class I list all my recommended settings and shooting techniques for a custom Scene File I call "LOWLIGHT/Z95/A". The details are too complicated to list here, but they are by recommended settings or low light shooting. vimeo.com/ondemand/z280

[@VideoProducer_DP_Editor]

Thank you!

[@alirezaershadmanesh5353]

Hi my master,I have a camera sony x160,how do I do her back focus?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

I don't think it is possible to adjust the back focus of the X160.

[@FreeTheDonbas]

What if I want deep focus? Can adjusting the detail settings counter this softening problem? What if I downscale 4K to HD in post, would that help the issue? One final question. Does your class go into the best settings for the video-look as well? I know I want deep focus & a high frame rate, but I don't want to end up coupling those with other cinema-look settings, just bc I'm not familiar with them & I end up blindly following cinema-look advice. The colours not looking muted is important to me, hence why a camcorder with a chip for two primary colours & green is of interest to me. I noticed for instance you called the sensor(s) "small", comparing it to a single 35mm one. But 3CMOS sensors are in a class of their own. The largest I've heard of is 2/3".

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Shooting with a deep depth-of-field is no problem at all for the Z280. The 1/2" sensors make that the easiest way to shoot with the Z280. The camera has literally dozens of paint menus with thousands of combinations of settings you can can program YOUR camera for a very wide variety of looks. If one person wants vibrant colors and strong contrast, they can have it. If someone else wants more muted colors and a little different look, that is possible too. The camera is extremely flexible. I don't understand your questions or concerns about detail settings or downscaling. You can program the camera for whatever looks good to you.

[@FreeTheDonbas]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia I just want the footage to look as close to what the human eye sees as possible.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

​@@FreeTheDonbas Not me. But if that is your goal, you should shoot with an iPhone @ 60 fps held at face level and never zoom in or make any cuts. That should give you the look you want.

[@FreeTheDonbas]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Picture quality is measured by how closely it resembles what the human eye sees, that's what HD, HDR, HFR, etc. are all in aid of. An I-phone doesn't more accurately reproduces what the human eye sees than the pxw-z280.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@sange I was thinking in terms of frame rate and field of view. But we have different goals. I always want the video I shoot to look more impressive than reality.

[@marekhajduk6269]

Very useful! Thanks Doug a lot!

[@KYwx]

Doug, I should have purchased this camera two years ago instead of the Panasonic CX350. The Sony Z280 has Been out for a while. Does Sony have plans to replace this camera or make a major chip upgrade soon? My fear would be getting this camera right before something similar but better comes out. What's your thoughts? Thanks for all you do!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

If you had asked me about the CX350 before you bought it I would have steered you away from it. In 2019 I was involved in testing and evaluating various cameras for a high-budget sports/reality show that was produced in Fiji. The CX350 was one of the cameras that was in the mix, but it was eliminated in the very first test due to poor low-light performance. The difference was gigantic between the CX350 and the Z280. The show eventually went with 25 Sony Z280s, 30 Sony Z90s, and 22 Panasonic Varicams. I don't have any special insight into Sony's plans for upcoming cameras, and if I did, I couldn't discuss what I know anyway. But I would be really surprised if Sony releases a replacement for the Z280 anytime in the next couple of years. The pandemic put new camera development on the back burner and Sony can't even meet demand for the Z280 and other cameras right now. Plus I don't know what they would change or do differently on the next generation of Z280. Personally, I'd like to see 120 fps in 4K. touch-screen focus tracking, and the option to use Picture Cache and S&Q Motion simultaneously (only the FX6 can do it right now), but other than that, I can't really imagine what they would improve or features they could add.

[@KYwx]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia I wished I had known about you in 2019. I purchased a Sony AX700 for a dashcam in 2021 and that's what lead me to you. I watched your videos before I purchased it. It sold me on the camera. Fortunately, one big event paid for that Cx350. I believe that the Z280 would be the perfect match for what I do. I'm an old News and documentary type guy and I just can't efficiently shoot with Ciema cameras like I can a camcorder. I repect your opinion and certainly appreciate your time. Thank you very much for responding!

[@gilbertodasilva2008]

I'm from Brazil - I bought a pxw-z190 and I can't get clear images, could help me solve this problem which setting to use to make images sharp

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Gilberto, have you watched my 6-hour master class on the Z280/Z190? vimeo.com/ondemand/z280

[@ivanrusso3466]

Ciao, vorrei comprare la master class , però vorrei i sottotitoli in italiano come su youtube. Su vimeo non riesco a vederli . Come possiamo fare?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Mi dispiace di non avere una risposta per te. Tradurre i miei video in altre lingue va oltre le mie capacità e costerebbe troppo. Scusa. Ma grazie per avermelo chiesto.

[@CHEIKHATSY]

Help!!! Thanks Doug for the good videos. Which option on the menu can i use to record only on sd card Sxs stolen!!!!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

To record on an SD card you will need an SxS to SDXC adapter like this one: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/978782-REG/sony_mead_sd02_sdhc_sdxc_card_adaptor.html

[@CHEIKHATSY]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Many thanks!!

[@DAHCKRAM]

Awesome info thanks. I just bought an AX700 (still in transit) today and have been watching all of your videos... will the 8-Bit 4K be good enough to get started shooting stock footage?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Oh yes, 8-bit 4K is plenty good enough for stock footage. The key is to get the footage as close to perfect (finished) in-camera so you don't have to manipulate it too much in post -- because that is where you'd see the difference between 8-bit and 10-bit. Shoot with a good custom Picture Profile, expose perfectly, have a correct white balance, and shoot some interesting content and you will have success with stock.

[@DAHCKRAM]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Cool I see some of your classes in my future... I have been editing video for 20+ years and have some KZbin channels with millions of views and thousands of subs but have not made anything new for over a year... the itch is back and it's time to start with some new equipment and sticking with straight video cameras not hybrid micro four thirds like everyone seems to prefer these days... will you be my new mentor? Lol... 😎😀

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@DAHCKRAM Yes, my videos can be your mentor! :-) I have written and produced them as if I myself was the one watching them. What would I need to knowo be successful?

[@DAHCKRAM]

I stopped the AX700 mid-ship and ordered the NX80 after watching your chapter 1 of the Z90/NX80/AX700 master class gonna rent the class before it gets here...

[@ybrayymmeredow7926]

Здравствуйте, можно узнать это камера подержавает xqd memory card?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Some codecs and frame-rates can be recorded with XQD cards in a SxS adapter. Results will vary depending on the codec, recolution, frame-rate, and type of XQD card.

[@ybrayymmeredow7926]

Спасибо! я проверил и все работает в всех 🎉

[@Vetriwaves]

Hello sir I am getting grains in my videos. Any suggestions and changes has to be made in z280

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

When you say "grains" I assume that you mean noise. Are you shooting with the camera at 0dB Gain? Are you following the recommended settings and techniques that I provide in my Z280 master class? vimeo.com/297946781

[@fictionaladult4293]

Hey Doug, I loved the video, it was really nice to see an informed take on the Z280. I was curious if you wouldn't mind offering some feedback on deciding between two setups for recording in 4k60 (and I apologize as its a fairly uninformed question). I'm going to be filming martial arts competitions, and wanted to set up two fixed position cameras at different angles to record the matches. I was considering the z280s because I want deeper depth of field to avoid auto focus blurring a shot as the action changes, and as they won't be actively monitored while filming, I thought the smaller sensors on the z280 might help with that. However, since I don't really need the zoom lens and have good control over the lighting, I was wondering if I might be better off with the fx6s and a fixed prime lens. Any insight would be greatly appreciated, thank you!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Thank you for the compliments. I really, really try not to recommend specific cameras for other people because there are so many factors to consider. But you have explained your circumstances and thought process pretty well, so I will take a chance and tell you what i think. If I was in your shoes, I'd rather have the Z280s. The zoom lenses will give you more options for framing. The deeper DoF will actually help produce sharper images. I think the Z280 has overall better picture quality. You have far more control over the "look" of the image to fine-tune the kind of picture you want. Good FF lenses for the FX6 would be expensive to buy. The Z280s would be easier to use. The Z280s have viewfinders. The Z280s are more versatile cameras, should you ever decide to use them for some other kind of shooting. Anyway, that is my thinking and what I would do. I hope it helps.

[@fictionaladult4293]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia I can definitely understand being apprehensive to share a recommendation, so I appreciate it. Thank you!

[@anthonypeirce5875]

hi doug can the Z280 handle fast moveing image on a video head tripod etc panning and tilting talking fast moveing like aircraft airshows the head i have sachtler FSB 8 with flowteck tripod

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Oh yeah, the Z280 would be a great camera to use at an airshow. And the FSB-8/Flowtech is a super smooth tripod. Nice combination.

[@anthonypeirce5875]

thankyou doug great to here that

[@lcaadvertisingproductionsi970]

HELP. How do I turn off the auto gain? When I follow your directions for back focus I can't get the the 3 to align - shutter speed - gain and iris ...I can get 2 of the 3 but not all three

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Are you sure that the CAMERA > AUTO EXPOSURE > AGC menu is turned off?

[@lcaadvertisingproductionsi970]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia found it thank you for your help.

[@davidanderson880]

I realize this is an old video however it seems as the 280 camera is still quite good. Do you have any information regarding the dynamic range in stops of this unit? Is the Z280 still the Cadillac of the prosumer cameras? Thanks for your excellent videos and your time.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Yes, the Z280 is still the top performing camera in this category, but I wouldn't classify it as "prosumer". The Z280 is a full-featured professional ENG camcorder that has no rivals. It is basically a smaller version of Sony's $35,000 Z750 camcorder (which I also own and use with the Z280). As for the dynamic range, it is certainly good enough to create spectacular images,but I don't know what the actual number is. I don't think Sony has said what the dynamic range is and I don't have the necessary equipment to measure it myself. BTW, the Z280 has been out for three years, but the pandemic put many things on hold, including camera manufacturing and development of new models. So you really have to look at the camera as being only a year or so old. And to be honest, besides 120 fps in 4K and even better face/eye detect AF, I don't know what features Sony could add to a new model that would matter very much.

[@davidanderson880]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Thank you very much. Just sold my PXW-Z190 and picked up a Z280. I'll be watching your videos as soon as it arrives and may look into the masterclass although I do much more in the live setting and not so much in pre-recorded and post. I'm curious - do you have any recommendations for aftermarket batteries to use or do you suggest using genuine Sony batteries. I've had good results with Watson batteries in the NP series but am unfamiliar with batteries in this series. Thanks again! PS - I saw your reviews on B&H and appreciate them.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@davidanderson880 Congratulations on the new camera, I'm sure you will like it as much as I like my Z280. I own several of the official Sony BP-series batteries because they go back 12 years to the EX1, EX3, F3, FS7, FS5, etc. And that is the only brand of BP batteries I've used, so I can't comment on other brands. But you'll want to be sure any other batteries communicate properly with the camera. BTW, I use Anton/Bauer v-mount batteries for everything else (lights, monitors, bigger cameras, etc.) but Anton/Bauer does not make any BP batteries.

[@davidanderson880]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Do any of your videos talk about media recommendations and have any links of what/where to buy? I just realized the 8TB worth of SD media is not usable. This seems like a whole mess to navigate and I probably need the ability to record 2 hours at less than 29.97 - most likely at 1080p but need to plan for 4k in the future. I mainly record speakers and presenters. Final output for my recordings is 1080i. Thanks again!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@davidanderson880 Yes, chapter 6 of my master class goes into detail on compatible media and my recommendations. vimeo.com/ondemand/z280

[@DuffTV]

Wow is this camera really 18mm on the wide? So in HD and at 34x its around 600mm?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Yes, that is right. And all at f/1.9

[@megamattzero7348]

Thanks this was very informative. I'm in the market for an all around ENG camera. My first camera was the Sony NXcam5u. I ended moving to mirrorless cams like the A7sii amd A7iii for a few years. Now i want a ENG again. I was looking at the FS7mkii and FX9. However i don't want to deal with interchangeable lenses for my next documentary. Anyways do you have any tips to customize the Z280 to have ergonomics like the FS7 handle? Is there any cages you recommend for EVFs? I have a SmallHD 503 sidefinder and want to attach it without compromising the hotshoe for sony xlr adapters for more channels of audio. Thanks!!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Matt, I have suggested to Sony several times that they need to release a EX3-style version of the Z280. Or mayb a PMW-320 style Z280. I think that would be exactly the camera you would like to have. But, I don't see that camera on the horizon. I hate the FS7 handle and would never use it, so if you're looking for something like that, I can't be of help. The Z280 has a grip on the side of the lens like an ENG camera should have and it works just fine for holding the camera. The issue with turning the Z280 into a good handheld/shouldermount ENG camera is not the grip -- it is the placement of the viewfinder. Having the the viewfinder at the rear of the camera makes it impossible to use the the viewfinder with the camera resting on your shoulder. So that means the flip-out LCD must be used as a viewfinder and that means it needs to have a loupe. I have also suggested to Sony that they release an FS7-style viewfinder loupe that could be attached to the Z280 to turn it into a quasi-shouldermount camera. I have experimented with the kind of setup and it actually worked very good. I also suggested to Hoodman that they design a custom loupe for the Z280. I even met with one of the Hoodman owners at the Sony booth at NAB 2019 to show them exactly what was needed. But I never followed up and I don't know what they did about it. They seemed to think that one of their existing loupes would do the trick but I never tried it myself. So the bottom line is that Z280 makes a pretty good quasi-shouldermount camera if you can find a way to rig a loupe over the LCD. You don't need a cage and you don't need a grip. You just need a 3rd party viewfinder or loupe for the LCD panel. Good luck.

[@Farisgor]

hello Doug great stuff sir, im looking to purchase a used z280 with 325 hours on it, it was used for event shooting, in good condition, im hesitant about the hours, with 2 cards 256 sxs cards 2 batteries and card reader and zoom controller for about $4000, what's your appoint please and thank you, GOD Bless

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Fairs, that sounds like a great price. The hours don't concern me, and 325 doesn't sound excessive. It is the overall condition of the camera that matters most. My advice is to grab it if everything checks out.

[@artistjoh]

I appreciate your clear and methodical communication style. I am saving the pennies for the Z280 as an upgrade from my Panasonic DVX-200. I have a feeling I will be purchasing your Z280 tutorials when I get the beast. Do you have any opinion on the best wide conversion lens to buy for the Z280?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Thank you for the compliments. I'm sure you will like the Z280 as much as I do after you upgrade from the Panasonic. No, I don't have any suggestions for a wide-angle conversion lens. Not only have I not tested any myself, I have not even shopped around to see what is available. For my purposes the lens on the Z280 is plenty wide enough. You should try it out yourself before you decide if you need a conversion lens or not. Maybe you will want one, but I say try it first.

[@artistjoh]

Doug Jensen Thank you. I won’t be getting a wide conversion lens until getting the camera. I tend to like ultra-wide views from time to time.

[@pwood5]

I have followed all instructions to execute Auto FB Adjust and it is still greyed out. Has anyone experienced the same thing?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Phoebe, you are are 100% sure you have configured the camera according to the instructions and it still doesn't work, then my advice would be to reset the camera to factory default mode and start over from scratch. But before you do that, go though the process one more time because I think you must have missed something in the steps.

[@pwood5]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Yes I've definitely followed all the steps, have even asked colleagues to step in and check. It's a mystery! Thanks for the advice, I'll have to go for the full reset I think.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@pwood5 Be sure the camera is not in a special shooting mode, such as S&Q Motion.

[@somethingsomething7205]

Incomprehensible that you never mentioned the Z280's 3-chip sensor as a selling point. That's its major distinguishing feature. Doesn't it make post-grading unnecessary, thereby speeding up/simplifying post-production workflow? Personally, I can't wait for them to finally make a "full-frame" 3-chip camcorder to shut those cine-snobs up for good, who are just so in love with shooting video using photography equipment.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

It's incomprehensible that you think the purpose of this video is to list all the selling points of the Z280. I didn't mention the 3-chip sensor because it is irrelevant to the topic being covered. The intended audience for this video is people who ALREADY own the camera. If you want an introduction to the Z280 and to learn about all its features, please watch this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iGW8f3eigdmog80

[@somethingsomething7205]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Thanks! I was only referring to the short section of this video where you quickly list the pros of the camera.

[@RaymondToms]

Hi Doug. Another great.video. I had not looked at the Z280 before, as I was going for at least a 1” sensor camera (e.g. Z150) as my step into 4K that gives some cinematic reduced depth of field. The Z280 has some great features and codecs. It is a shame that is uses expensive, and now redundant SxS or XQD media, to be able to use all the codecs. Sony’s lineup is well overdue for a refresh. Do you know of anything hiding in the wings, like a camcorder with the sort of specs that the new A7S has in mirrorless?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Raymond, the differences in depth of field between the Z280 and camera's with 1" sensors is not nearly what you'd expect. For one thing, the Z150 has an f/4 lens while the Z280 has an f/1.9 lens. That difference right there wipes out most of the difference. Also, the Z280 is a far superior camera that produces better overall images that more than compensates for any slight increase in DoF. Don't fall victim to the belief that shallow depth of field is most important. If you disagree, then you should be looking at camras with Super35 or Full-frame sensors anyway. Like I said, the visual difference between 1/2" and 1" is not that big. As for a new camera coming out, you might consider the Sony FX6 when it arrives in a few months. It should have many of the specs of an A7 but in a camcorder body.

[@watchvideosoul]

One reason it still uses SxS is because many newsrooms, studios, and trucks use SxS decks for playout to servers/broadcast/ satellite transmission. It’s a old established workflow, and there aren’t equivalent decks for other media.

[@watchvideosoul]

Heya Doug, long time! Just watching this again. What's that thing coming off your tripod that looks like a pan bar, labelled "IRWIN"?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

That is my do-it-yourself panhandle. All the handles that come with heads are too long for use with today's smaller cameras. Nobody makes shorter handles so I made my own out of a screwdriver from Lowes hardware store. Works great. I've got two of them setup that way.

[@watchvideosoul]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia I just saw your post about this in the Sony Cine forum. How funny.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@watchvideosoul Someday Sachtler will make a shorter handle. I've been bugging them about it for a few years, but they are slow to move.

[@mattthane8807]

Hi Doug, Your videoas are outstanding, informative and easy to watch. Do you still consider the Z280 the camera to buy in its price range in April 2021 or for a bit more an FX6 ? I like the Z280 , especially since reading your thoughts on it, but I’m worried I’m buying a camera that’s about to be superseded, but I suppose that’s ok if you are buying quality...

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Matt, than you very much. I'm glad you like my videos. There is nothing else like the Z280 and I don't expect Sony to replace it anytime soon. I'd still like to see a shoulder-mount version, like the EX3 was to the EX1, but I've been told by Sony not to hold my breath. So the Z280 is still a rock solid choice, but it has practically nothing in common with the FX6. It's hard to imagine that someone would be considering making a choice between the two. They are both good cameras but it is like not being able to decide between a 4x4 or a sports car. Two totally different cameras (cars) for totally different kinds of shooting (driving). I think you need to decide which type of camera will serve you best and then the choice will be obvious. Good luck.

[@mattthane8807]

Thanks Doug, I very much appreciate your very prompt and detailed reply, I will give it some thought .

[@G0UDG]

Hi Doug I am building my editing Computer fer use with the z280 can I ask which monitor ye use fer editing I am thinking maybe this one Eizo ColorEdge CG319X Thanks in Advance

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Kevin, I don't recommend using a computer monitor for editing. I edit using Premiere and DaVinci Resolve and I output a true video signal to two regular video monitors. One is a professional Sony 17" production monitor and the other is a 60" Sony Bravia. If you are color grading or making any adjustments to the picture you need to be monitoring the program signal on a video monitor -- NOT a computer monitor. Here's the test: If you can put your mouse over the image, then you are not monitoring a true video signal. Blackmagic makes several UltraStudio devices for getting a true video signal out of your computer with Resolve, Premiere, Catalyst Browse, and other apps. This is the cheapest one: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1578062-REG/blackmagic_design_ultra_studio_monitor_3g.html?sts=pi&pim=Y A big advantage of outputting the program video signal to a real video monitor is that you don't have to worry about jumping through a bunch of hoops to calibrate the monitor. You just set it up to color bars and you're done. If you want more information about how I monitor my video in post, I cover that topic extensively in my Resolve training video. vimeo.com/ondemand/resolve

[@G0UDG]

@Doug Jensen Thank you Doug I will Take yer Advice appreciated

[@joakimforsberg4943]

Does the 2nd and 3rd performance tips also apply to Z190?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Joakim, definitely yes on the diffraction issue, but I'm not sure about barrel distortion. I don't have a Z190 anymore and I didn't look at that issue when I had one.

[@joakimforsberg4943]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Thx for your reply. If you change the chapter info in the description to 0:00 Introduction 4:40​ Checking the Back Focus 10:40​ Avoiding Diffraction 14:45 Mitigating Barrel Distortion Then the youtube will add chapters to the progress bar.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@joakimforsberg4943 Thanks for the suggestion. I should have done it a long time ago.

[@zachhunter7897]

Hey Doug, I know this is kind of a difficult question to answer, but I am currently an FS5 owner, but I'm looking to upgrade to a camera that can shoot 4K in 10bit, and I am torn between waiting and getting the FX9 when it comes out, or going the more economical route and getting the Z280. I primarily shoot sports documentary content, interviews of players, and some on field content. I know that both cameras are vastly different (full-frame vs 3-chip half inch) but part of me thinks that the Z280 would be more useful for type of shooting that I do, but then again, I don't know how much I would miss the look of a large sensor camera, especially with it's newer color science/profile. You mention that you ended up using your z280 a lot more than your other large sensor cameras. How do you think the Z280 compares to my current FS5? Is it a higher quality camera? Would I be happier with the picture quality if I made the jump to it rather than going for another large sensor camera? Also, have you had a chance to use the FX9? If so, do you see yourself using it more than your z280?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Yeah, that is a tough question to answer for somebody else. Between the Z280 and the FS5 there is no doubt that I prefer the Z280. For picture quality they are probably about the same, but the Z280 is so much easier to use and packed with all the traditional XDCAM features and functions that aren't included on the FS5. To me, the FS5 is almost a glorified consumer camera with it's very limited capabilities. And there is no way you're going to find a 17x f/1.9 lens for the FS5. The Z280 is all about versatility and zoom range. Your choice really ought to be between the Z280 and the FS7 because they are almost the same camera except for the sensor size and lens mount. Really, they are brothers much more so than the FS5 is to the FS7. So that makes your decision really down to small senors and 17x lens, or a big sensor and nice shallow depth of field. That's what you have to decide. And then you will know which camera is right for you. Yes, I've used the FX9 and I've posted 10 videos of test footage. Here is one of them and you can find links to the other nine videos in the description. kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIGtZIhjptOchrc In my opinion, the FX9 is very nice but is basically a Full Frame version of the FS7Mark2. If you don't care about FF then get an FS7Mark2 and get shooting.

[@mikeslawin9681]

Hi Doug, Very interested in this camera! Do you know if it still has issues with the Lanc port for remote zoom control? There saying it is unable to go at a slower speed. Also, do I wait for somethin new to come out beside the z280?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi MIke, I'm not aware of any "issues" with the LANC port. No camera with a built-in lens is going to offer the same precision and performance of a true ENG lens that costs more than the whole Z280. It is what it is. I have learned to live with its limitations and I don't believe there will be any forthcoming changes or improvements via a firmware update. And I'm sure some LANC controllers will work better than others, but I am not in a position to test various controllers or make recommendations beyond what I talk about in my video. As for something new coming out to replace the Z280? I would be shocked if there was anything remotely like the Z280 to come out in the next couple of years. There is really nothing to improve on at this point in time.

[@mikeslawin9681]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Thanks Doug! I appreciate all your professional expertise! I've been in the "Sony" family of cameras for years, just looking to move forward in 4k. It might take a couple of Doug Jensen Sony classes, but I will learn how to use this PXW z280!

[@mikeslawin9681]

Hey Doug, Quick question for you. My Sony HXR-NX3 is not recording .MP4 files. I can open the AVCHD folder and convert it over to .MP4 but it always recorded those files normally. Is there something in the setup menu I should be looking for? Thanks!

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@mikeslawin9681 I'm not familiar with the NX3, but I think that MP3 files can be recorded in addition tothe AVCHD files. Have you checked this menu: REC/OUT SET > REC SET > SIMUL/RELAY REC > MP4 SIMUL REC

[@gigicherechesiu2504]

Thank you,great video!

[@588ta]

Hello Doug, Ilike your video very much,can you help me with my Z190.Question The footage I shoot looks very dark.My white balance is 3200,f1.8 shooting on manual iris gain set a 6db I have two Lirta pro.The footage looks dark PLEASE HELP9I will gladly pay a Services fee. Thanks Tim Awe

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Tim, it sounds like the location where you are shooting is simply too dark for the camera. All cameras have a limit on how they can handle low-light situations, and it sounds like you have exceeded the Z190's capabilities. If that is the case, there is nothing you can do except to add lighting.

[@georgeanthonyco]

great video ! thank you

[@kirk0831]

Hi, I am a viewer who comes from your stock footage video. I was planning to get a GH5 mirrorless camera. But after watching this video, I wonder, should I also get a camcorder instead of DSLR/mirrorless to shoot stock footage? In your opinion, do you think the camcorder is a better tool, to shoot stock footage?

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

There's no question in my mind that a genuine video camcorder is a better tool for shooting video. Although DSLRs and mirrorless cameras can be used to shoot video, that is clearly not their primary purpose. The analogy I use is that I can pound a nail with a screwdriver if I want to, but a hammer will allow me to get a lot more work done in a lot less time. I've seen very nice footage from a GH5 so I don't question that the video quality is good enough for stock footage, but it is not a tool that I personally would want to work with. Other people may feel differently and that is their right.

[@andyobrien6263]

Thanks for this video Doug. I’m a wildlife photographer in the UK & have recently been shooting a lot more video. I currently use my Nikon D5,D850,D500 with long fast glass & Fuji XH1/XT3 with associated lenses. In your experience would I be better off using the Z190 or Z280 for my video work? I’ve seen your wildlife stock footage & the quality is tremendous, I appreciate your skill level is a major contributor to that! As you may know, our light in the UK isn’t great for a lot of the year & I wondered how well the Sony’s perform with low, flat light? Any advise would be appreciated. Thanks 🙏

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Andy, thank you for the compliments. I generally do not like to recommend cameras for other people because there are too many factors that need to be taken into consideration, such as budget, size, weight, intended use, level of operator experience, etc. Also, I have never used any of the Nikon and Fuji cameras you have mentioned and know very little about their video capabilities. But with all that said, I am strongly against the use of DSLRs and most mirrorless cameras for professional video production. In general, most of those are cameras that just happen to shoot video as an afterthought. A video CAMCORDER is always going to be the better choice for the day-in- and day-out needs of professional video production. They offer better ergonomics, better viewfinders, better codecs, better audio quality, XLR inputs, and many other functions and features that a lot of people don't think about but still make a big difference. Things like better zebras, peaking, timecode, custom clip naming, more customizable paint menus, and the list goes on and on. Also, the rolling shutter problems of DSLRs and most mirrorless cameras, that is most visible with longer lenses, disqualify them from consideration for shooting wildlife. The Z280 is an excellent camera for wildlife and stock footage plus all other kinds of professional video production. It's not designed for shallow depth-of-field, but other than that, it beats all other cameras in it's price range. The Z280 is essentially a FS7 Mark II with smaller sensors and a 17x lens. A great camera. The Z190 is also pretty good, but does not perform very well in low light so I don't recommend it to most people. Another camera you might want to consider is the Sony Z150. I've shot some nice wildlife footage with my Z150. vimeo.com/207652687 I hope that helps.

[@andyobrien6263]

Doug Jensen Thanks for such a thorough reply Doug, I’ve checked out your video link, great work on the Z150 - I’m going to hire one of those for a couple of weeks before taking the plunge! The Fuji XT-3 has great frame rates & codecs but you make a good point on the rolling shutter! Thanks again

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@andyobrien6263 I think you'd have a tough time using the viewfinder on the X-T3 when shooting wildlife. A huge advantage of a camcorder is having a viewfinder that can be angled up towards your eye. Shooting moving wildlife or any telephoto action smoothly while tracking focus would be next to impossible. Have you ever noticed that almost all DSLR and mirrorless video you see (which can look very good) is shot wide angle? This is partly because of rolling shutter but also the inability to track movement while looking through a proper viewfinder.

[@CapeAtlantic_LIVE]

Compared to the FS5, where does this rank? I need a secondary camera and see that the FS5 has dropped in price.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

The Z280 is a vastly superior camera to the FS5. Not even close. Not just in terms of picture quality but also in professional features and functions. The only thing the FS5 offers is shallow depth-of-field. If you can live without that, the Z280 beats it hands down. The FS5 was designed to give DSLR shooters a camcorder alternative with minimal features. On the other hand, the Z280 was designed to be a miniature version of Sony's high-end professional ENG camcorders like the Z450, Z750, and even the FS7.

[@Dohahere]

thank you

[@sabymondal]

Thanks for the great video! *1 Question:* is any info available about how many stops of dynamic range this camera exactly offers (while using gamma logs)? Just the word "HDR" does not give any idea about what we are talking about.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Hi Saby, to the best of my knowledge Sony does not publish how many stops of dynamic range the Z280 offers. I do not have the necessary charts to measure it myself, however, it is my understanding that is is little over 12 stops.

[@sabymondal]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia Thanks Doug! That is really helpful!

[@rasigaastudio5068]

tnk u sir

[@danielvitalis1858]

Nice

[@victormwanikimwai5802]

Thank u eye open my camera work . Victorworld pictures Kenya.

[@janstappertjie]

Hi Doug, it me again. I have bought my Sony PXW Z280!! (very excited). Please can you assist me with the following: Is the following compatible with the Sony Z280?? 1) Professional Aluminium Camera Tripod Camcorder Stand with Pan Head Plate for DSLR Canon Nikon Sony DV Video 2) What bag can I buy to protect my camera? Or does it come with a bag standard purchase? 3) Microphone for front of camera? 4) Microphones my TP would wear when I record them? Can one have microphones with are wireless with this camera? 5) Which additional battery would you recommend? THANK YOU SO MUCH Doug! Really appreciate your assistance.

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Danny, congratulations on the new camera. Most of your questions are answered in my 6-hour Z280 Master Class. vimeo.com/ondemand/z280 For more suggestions on accessories, I recommend going to the B&H website and looking up the Z280 and then clicking on their button for accessories. They do a pretty good job.

[@janstappertjie]

@@DougJensenVortexMedia thank you so much Doug!

[@ninotocka]

All of this is good advice for inexperienced shooters, but it could have fit in less than 10 minutes

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

Ha, ha. It's as long as it needs to be to get the information across, and not a second longer.

[@ninotocka]

Fair enough, maybe I'm not quite the intended audience, having used everything from EX3 to Z280 daily during the past 12 or so years :)

[@DougJensenVortexMedia]

@@ninotocka Yup, yeah gotta know your audience and what information they are likely to need. I would rather err on the side of being too long that leaving people in the dark about some little detail that trips them up.