Indian Defence Industry when its ICBM,MBRL,Air Defence-🗿 Indian Defence Industry when its Drone,Standard Battle Rifle-🤡
@saurabhtiwari92987 ай бұрын
कामचोरी है कही सारी psus में
@Ronit_99777 ай бұрын
Tapas drone is a good drone buddy, and after benchmarking against Israeli drone, I am sure Tapas will get induction.
@Mr.Evil-0017 ай бұрын
@@Ronit_9977 navy will and maybe airforce but army doesn't want anything indigenous until its forced onto them they want everything from foreign country
@Abhinavjha5687 ай бұрын
I agree with you grim reaper Indian defence industries when it comes to ICBMs , MRL, Missile technology 🗿 But in making rifles, 🤡
@Mr.Evil-0017 ай бұрын
@sawcon4305 we don’t even push our stuff have you ever seen the PR US Russia and china put out of their products while we all saw how first ever flight of tejas mk1a was a shity grainy video
@ashblackhawk7 ай бұрын
Mark 3 will mean Skardu smoked in event of war with Bakis and escalation will mean Lahore, Rawalpindi, Karachi all gone and 300 m will mean Peshawar and Quetta too
@debdulalsenapati77207 ай бұрын
If drdo can achieve near 300km range for this 300mm rocket upgrade along with Precision targeting like Himars, well then that would be an absolutely fearful low cost ballistic missile grade Solution for sustained battlefield targeting power against any enemy. This really will be a strategic battlefield asset and will definitely be a EXPORT HIT too.
@detectivesdelhi7 ай бұрын
What is the cost sir 🙏
@amrinder-0764g7 ай бұрын
@@detectivesdelhiIs pinaka guided or unguided?
@ashishr13387 ай бұрын
Exactly sir...my thoughts are also in same direction...could you shed some light on tech differences & feasibility also the cost factor please
@coolkal75907 ай бұрын
150-60 kms should be possible with same length as Pinaka rockets 175-80 with some stretch/better propellants For 300 kms we would need a 375 mm rocket at best (assuming single stage, single pulse)
@ashishr13387 ай бұрын
@@coolkal7590 Sir...why so much difference in range...300km as MBRL but just 160-170 km as anti-ship missile...is there any difference in trajectory, which might explain the difference or is there something else...sorry to bother you, but i am just curious
@ExploreIndia_ByRajeev7 ай бұрын
America me Darpa bhi yhi karti h khud technologies par reserch karke private sector se banwati h, iska asan tarika h ki govt research funds khud uthaye fir jab products ready ho jaye or jise production partner banaya ja rha h usse har piece par Ek certain amount of Royalty laga kar le le isse dono kaam ho jayenge other than GST to milega hi .
@GGexcellence7 ай бұрын
R & D is a super expensive side with many risky variables. Govt should shoulder it because: 1) it will reduce the financial burden on domestic business(which will manufacture with ToT from DRDO) so there is no extra pressure towards corruption etc 2) Govt should establish economies of scale first so businesses will feel confident of investing in R & D too. Otherwise it's a waste of time, talent, nations resources. Time lost is more life's lost (at the border or in any conflicts) Strong weapons in a timely manner ensure peace and stability. Wars only usually happen when there is a weakness identified on the other side. Be strong in defence, world cannot go through another war scenario.
@coolkal75907 ай бұрын
Public cost for pvt profits? ;) DRDO must charge license fees for the tech like foreign OEMs do
@GGexcellence7 ай бұрын
@coolkal7590 name any 1 major or minor private industry in the free world that is created without any kind of help from public money. 😂😂. Where do you think the roads and railways(billions of $ public investment) come from that helps in transport of private goods. Without substantial investments from the govt and unless there is sufficient economies of scale, private players won't work. Or else govt should rely on public firms like in the past. You are right about lisencing fees, but only if the product is being exported, or else our armed forces will end up paying for that too as the end user.
@james4807M7 ай бұрын
I used to watch other defence channels as well. Lekin lagta aapne jo $10,000 nahi liye vo unhone le liye.
@mohitm77 ай бұрын
Agree on this
@akaj1887 ай бұрын
Great news. Thanks for sharing. Jai Hind
@ashvinn157 ай бұрын
250km maybe that would be awesome , will it have some guidance for better accuracy ? Would be great if more updates could be available
@bharatigamer43777 ай бұрын
New guidance system have been tested in 2021 and 22
@bharatigamer43777 ай бұрын
@@paragcan7277 We are also developing one such system with long range.
@suryanshsagar27737 ай бұрын
@@paragcan7277 china also eats bats, start that too
@djsk750official87 ай бұрын
Usne kaha china to चमगादड़ भी खाता h,hum bhi khana start karde kya@@paragcan7277
@Ronit_99777 ай бұрын
200-250 km is a very descent range, hope the system will come in realization within 3-4 years.
@bharatigamer43777 ай бұрын
That's the main issue 😓
@ninthman29957 ай бұрын
They should explore using Ramjet propulsion too for Pinaka for increased range and speed. And even for handheld RPGs
@bharatigamer43777 ай бұрын
@@ninthman2995 Yeah,but everything should be done in time.
@P_kumr7 ай бұрын
Jai BHARAT, best explanation
@santochele19937 ай бұрын
🧡🧡🧡
@HimanshuSingh-og3zn7 ай бұрын
Jai Shree Radhe Krishna 🙏🙏🧡 Jai Bharat Rashtra 🙏🙏🧡
@hsjawanda7 ай бұрын
A 300mm rocket (vs a 214mm rocket) will not only carry more fuel, it will (or at least could) also carry a bigger warhead. A modular rocket should be developed where one could trade warhead size for range (or vice versa).
@warrior_singh1117 ай бұрын
250 km ki rockets bhi Indian army ke pas ajaye🔥🔥,to Bht badi punch milegi...,
@ajayrajsinghthakur98257 ай бұрын
Striking Range should be higher in todays context, and DRDO is much serious than private companies, we need quick response by companies, but they are taking time to implement plans. It's better to let DRDO handle what they want to make alone and what in joint.
@amiyaranjansahu80086 ай бұрын
Sometimes I think privatisation is the reason behind delay of projects. And I also dislike Govt approach to provide the technologies hard earned by DRDO scientists & public taxes to private sectors for free by making such joint ventures.
@kattarhindu2717 ай бұрын
200 km range mbrl is lit..
@rajeevbarve21137 ай бұрын
Nice Informative Vdo
@vipinpatel1008infinity7 ай бұрын
Maheshwarastra ki kya progress hai bro
@ChandrakantPharate-lh8hr7 ай бұрын
सुपर सोनिक ड्रोनका जमाना आनेवाला है.दुनियामें मधूमख्खीके झुंड जैसे आधुनिक ड्रोनके झुंडसे यूद्ध हो सकते है.
@avi_arihant7 ай бұрын
That’s how defense sector partnerships work, especially to develop the defense ecosystem. Indian private sector in defense will not become R&D leader overnight. We need to get out of the old thought patterns. If these partnerships are based on technical competency and are outcome driven, with PMO’s oversight this is a very healthy trend and will encourage initiative and new product development.
@kunalsinha23557 ай бұрын
Jai hind 🇮🇳
@mercedesbenz37517 ай бұрын
India should give at least some quantity of its weapons to Armenia for free, so that we could get an idea of how good they are in wars.
@Sudhirkhalkar-f8j7 ай бұрын
Jai hind
@gokuldastvm7 ай бұрын
I remember the time when India was struggling with missiles like Prithvi, Akash, Nag and Trishul and rockets like Pinaka. These days, the labs are churning out and commissioning such projects faster than you can name them.
@indianlovingreaction4000yout7 ай бұрын
Bahut hi achhi news bhartiya sena aur bharat ki suraksha ke liye. Jay hind. 👉👉🤗🤗♥️💪👉👉🤗🤗♥️💞💪💪🤗🤗♥️👉👉🤗🤗♥️💞💪💪🤗🤗💞👉👉🤗🤗♥️💞💪💪🤗🤗 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@samsar7857 ай бұрын
Pin point 📍accuracy with GPS guidance would make it a different.
@devanshguru38077 ай бұрын
Intertial navigation system instead
@Abhishek_Bais7 ай бұрын
Jai Hind❤
@RustamShah7 ай бұрын
Che Hind
@SomnathPradhan-df1bi6 ай бұрын
Tech support for pvt players from DRDO is 👌 👍 बेस्ट
@sudhanshusharma4917 ай бұрын
अगर आपने नोटिस किया हो तो आपके चैनल पर आजकल ऐसे कॉमेंट हो रहे है जो govt को और हमारी संस्थाओं को टारगेट कर रहे है भ्रष्टाचार के आरोप लगा रहे है ।
@sumantsinghyadav58537 ай бұрын
Aur channel full govt ajenda ko aage le ja rha hai.....😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂bhale desh bech do ..... conflict x pr china occupation ko bta dete Jo Sonam wangchuk bol rhe hai😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂aag lg jayegi bhakto ki😅
@devendrasinghpawar94547 ай бұрын
Ye vahi log h jinki ma ka musalmaan ne blatkar kiya tha
@pradym24977 ай бұрын
Ye kaam people high on overconfidence due to consumption of concoction of sri sri Dhruv Tatti ji and Pappu mutra, this whole low IQ, easily brainwashed and manipulated brigade is everywhere on social media. Need to counter them with facts, sarcasm and contempt. India badly needs critical thinking and woke antidote during school education.
@Narendra020117 ай бұрын
कुत्ते को भौंकने दो उससे हाथी को कोई फर्क नही पड़ता।
@Narendra020117 ай бұрын
@@sumantsinghyadav5853जब कांग्रेस ने 43000 sq km भूभाग चीन को दे दिया था उस पर चमचे कुछ नही बोलते, रही बात देश बेचने की किसके बाप मैं इतना दम की वो देश को खरीद लेगा, अगर देश बिक गया तो तुम लोग कैसे जी रहे हो, असल तो ये है अब चमचों को कमीशन मिलना बंद हो गया है
@nishublitzkrieg7 ай бұрын
Are these guided rockets? What is the range of current guided pinaka?
@amrinder-0764g7 ай бұрын
Pinaka guided rocket hai ya unguided?
@MRHUNTWARRIOR7 ай бұрын
VERY NICE 😍 🙏
@amarjeetbadhani36167 ай бұрын
JAI HIND 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@mnd73817 ай бұрын
Removing DRDO, HAL totally from important projects is very very poor decision. Our private sector is still not like USA. We would have an AMCA prototype and 300MM rockets tested if not beacuse of these delays.
@cbi03697 ай бұрын
are XRSAM ka kya khabar hai? kuchh age badha ya nehi? 1 saal se upar ho gaya hai koyi update nehi
@GelloMello-j9z7 ай бұрын
April first joke hai kya?
@purudate40497 ай бұрын
Greetings ! Alpha Defense. I appreciate your efforts to update common public like us. Public-private partnership is growing. How does the government safeguard design and operational secrecy of defense systems in the light of entry of private players?
@indianlovingreaction4000yout7 ай бұрын
Vande matram.
@warrior_singh1117 ай бұрын
Indian government have cancelled MRFA 🔥🔥🔥, instead gov will fund 50k cr for ORCA/TEDBF for IAF and Navy🔥🔥 Dats great... Iske sath India ki dependency Forgein jets pe se khatam ho jayegi
@ankursharma78127 ай бұрын
Hi I have one question when we say that govt companies are providing technologies to private then what did that mean. What are the condition that needs to be followed and does our psu's earn from this.
@kanwar0617 ай бұрын
Pinaka mark 3 me india ko experiment krne chiye jese cluster bomb 2 se 3 mrv and 200 se 300 extend range Because std format me to rocket assisted artillery bhi 150km ki range de rhi hai
@dhirenpunjabi91677 ай бұрын
Firing frequency of Pinaka seems to be far far lesser than BM-21 launcher
@SHEKHAWAT-Kushal-Singh7 ай бұрын
Always get CONFUSED 🤔... Is it पिनाक और पिनाका....Are we missing something here to
@GenghisKhan-on2fk7 ай бұрын
mushkil ye hai ke bharat abhi bhi purani technology pe hi baitha huya hai, so 70-75 km range ke pinaka rocket system se pakistan ka 140 km range ka fatah-1 rocket system kahin behtar hai.🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨
@deniedchirst7 ай бұрын
Thank god Chussia said no ,, otherwise we will never be able create our own.
@babuvishwass59107 ай бұрын
You Offend many Chussian Bhakts 🤣🤣
@studytime25707 ай бұрын
Dont Abuse..
@studytime25707 ай бұрын
Dont be westoriod for
@studytime25707 ай бұрын
youtube popularity.
@singhabhay18107 ай бұрын
so EEL's maheshvarastra is a no go ?
@SauravAlex7 ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah, MashaAllah, SubhanAllah
@ak_insas7 ай бұрын
Abki baar 300(350+) par....
@AnkitMehta-n8t7 ай бұрын
Is it true MRFA is cancelled by CCS yesterday and orca is revived ??
@ninthman29957 ай бұрын
Ramjet principle should be used in Pinaka too in order to enhance range and speed. If a shell can be Ramjet proplled then why not Pinaka. Even handheld RPGs should be ramjet propelled. Using some gunpowder as fuel even the bullets in Anti-aircraft guns and Sniper guns should be Ramjet propelled for longer range, speed and armour-piercing capability
@Royal_Rajputana457 ай бұрын
Next rocket system should be like HIMARS...
@ashokirkal58507 ай бұрын
Sir is it tactical nuke capable?
@AlphaDefenseHindi7 ай бұрын
Nahi
@pv.unmesh32037 ай бұрын
👍
@ashishr13387 ай бұрын
We must work on this 300mm/300km rocket...this might provide us a low-cost combat-sustainable missile for both land attack & with some changes also a naval anti-ship missile for smaller vessels like corvettes & OPVs PS - Subodh Ji...could you or any of the more experienced/qualified member please shed some light on tech differences between a 300mm/300km guided rocket & 300km range anti-ship naval strike missile...i understand some modifications might be required eg a booster stage for VL & an onboard radar/guidance...my query being, is it technically possible & most important the cost difference
@Arabboy7466 ай бұрын
india is super power with hunger rate of 111th in the world 😂
@vishukoolboy7 ай бұрын
DRDO/govt. should start charging small percentage from private company as royalty for the technology transferred from DRDO and use that money for new technology development...
@vinamrashrivastava67387 ай бұрын
Kindly make a video on India's A2/AD weapons.
@rohanmodi63487 ай бұрын
Solar industries is the key player in MBRL
@rksgaming11347 ай бұрын
India govt should look at maheshwarastra mbrl by solar defense group
@EXPLORADVEN7 ай бұрын
👌👌👌👊👊👊👌👌👌
@ajayvs17 ай бұрын
We need 1000mm with 2000Km range.
@chandreshsoni60447 ай бұрын
That will give you agni....which we already have
@Euroasiagazzette12127 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂 Toiletistaan 😂😂😂
@coolkal75907 ай бұрын
Pvt sector LoL 😅 Expecting them to make anything new & indigenous is a joke A relatively easy task for them would be converting the Pralay/Pranash into 150-200 kms seeker less rockets (& a seeker less Brahmos) Hope Solar can do that much (after having leaked the new propellant data 😡)
@hp1983YT7 ай бұрын
Can you please elaborate more on this news that ARDE has issued tender for consultancy about the design of this new rocket system. From news it appears that ARDE itself has no expertise and neither other drdo agency will be helping ARDE. It seems a lot absurd to me that ARDE is seeking consultancy from private company. I may be totally wrong. Please do make a video on this.
@WhatThisVideo-WTv7 ай бұрын
Means indigenous HIMARS 😮
@piyushtiwari10327 ай бұрын
Indian Defence industry when ICBM ABM Air defence system MBRL Naval warships 💀💀 Indian defence industry when UCAV UAV Battle Rifles Fighter Jets 🤡🤡
@Whatdadogdoin6-97 ай бұрын
True
@bharatigamer43777 ай бұрын
Add tank to lower statement
@piyushmoond68507 ай бұрын
@bharatigamer4377 kyu krein add arjun heavy hai iseliye army ne zyada orders ni kiye mobiltiy kam hai thodi otherwise it is a good tank
@bharatigamer43777 ай бұрын
@@piyushmoond6850 Arjun ke alawa bhi tank hai,namely Karna and Zorawar.
@bharatigamer43777 ай бұрын
@@piyushmoond6850 And what about FMBT,also kam nahi bohot kam tank order kiye hai.
@hp1983YT7 ай бұрын
Also similar news is about ADA we which has floated tenders for private company help to GTRE for maintaining GE engines. Which is again ridiculous. Tejas ioc/foc planes are already flying. Who is maintaining those engines for IAF then?
@Crick.light.7 ай бұрын
Jsr dynamics bhi toh bana raha hai
@Lucky.reaction-k6n7 ай бұрын
Hia hamare Saina ko super pinaka ki jaroret hay our iss ki rocket badiay our dangerous honey caheya
@LazyNoob177 ай бұрын
Petrol ka dam kab kam hoga
@successfulway-p8T7 ай бұрын
Need Kinzel missile atmanirbhar Bharat & cost cutting !!! 25 cr for one bramhos shoud be 3 CR!!! And bramhos capacity Hypersonic and 3000 km range!!!! China has complete Rocket force
@1a178907 ай бұрын
DRDO doing r&d pvt sectors making money ; how sick !
@blackbirds14407 ай бұрын
Aj 1 st April hai yaad rakhna😂😂
@AlphaDefenseHindi7 ай бұрын
Arrey vo bas twitter k liye hai
@atharvatoskar16337 ай бұрын
_overall, nothing will happen till next 10 years......._
@himalayasekanyakumarihindu80347 ай бұрын
@vinayjeengar770058 Pakistan got missile defense from China, but oops, it missed detecting India's accidental missile. Guess they're pretty optimistic about their Chinese-inspired missile systems 😂😂🤣🤣
@fahadnazir9457 ай бұрын
But spyder battery commander detected paf ka slow moving target 😬😬😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
@himalayasekanyakumarihindu80347 ай бұрын
@@fahadnazir945 I don't understand the words of lower class people i.e. Pakistanis because you must know what you understand and what nonsense you say??
@himalayasekanyakumarihindu80347 ай бұрын
@@fahadnazir945 I don't understand the words of lower class people i.e. Pakistanis because you must know what you understand and what nonsense you say.
@thelibral6697 ай бұрын
China have already make 500 km pinaka system, how is it posseble that India is still strubbelingen with 120 km system.
@murtzakambo65947 ай бұрын
Aur Fatah 4 ki range 700 km tak hougi
@Lucky.reaction-k6n7 ай бұрын
Hum ko penaka 4.he bana caheya yeh roket badia our katnak hona chahiye
@behappy52877 ай бұрын
Aah, using sub sonic ballestic missile would be much better in that case except wasting money on rockets. And predator drones can easily destroy any rocket systems.
@himmanshu857 ай бұрын
In ur videos u always say that pvt sector is not getting involved in developing any kind of defence systems whether this pinaka or amca etc.. can u do a deep dive as to whats the issue that indian pvt sector doesnt want its hands in this lucrative domain.
@AlphaDefenseHindi7 ай бұрын
It is growing For years pvt were kept away from
@nishantshrivastava96747 ай бұрын
@@AlphaDefenseHindi Is DRDO working on something like GLSDB??
@arunangshude60467 ай бұрын
I've been asking you to make a video on the progress of ak-203 for days now bro
@murtzakambo65947 ай бұрын
Pinaka Pakistan k fathah rocket system k agay kahain nhi thairta fatah 3 k range 350 km ha
@sanchittandon91967 ай бұрын
Dear anti drdo bhakts your big fat private companies didn't do any R&D on pinaka mk 3😂😂😂😂...now you should realize why drdo is important.
@Bishal_Goswami7 ай бұрын
The Indian defence industry needs an 'act of ego hurt', time to time, especially from foreign manufacturers. Whenever they get that, they bring out the most Indian looking piece of art and that's always a bang.
@praveensinghchauhan85507 ай бұрын
हमारे यहाँ कहावत है " अपनी आँख फूट जाए पर पड़ोसी का दिन खराब करना है " और " अपना 100 का घाटा हो जाए पर किसी का 10 का फायदा नही होना चाहिए। इसी सोच के साथ कुछ लोग भी हैं। DRDO research में खर्च कर रहा है पर बना नही पा रहा है तो कोई बात नही पर हम TOT pvt Sector ko नही देंगे😂 भले ही वो production rate अच्छा दें।और देंगे तो तबतक negotiate करेंगे जबतक वो भाग न जाए, जैसा AMCA के साथ हुआ। ऐसी सोच होती तो ATAG,Kestral kabhi नहीं बनता
@sudipbanerjee62857 ай бұрын
Jada range mat badao, nahi to yeh Pakistan cross karke Iran me jakar girega 😂
@fahadnazir9457 ай бұрын
Jaisy har bar nirbhay ger jata 😬😬😀😀😀😁😂😂😂😂😂😂
@rajeshnalavde52127 ай бұрын
In short pvt कंपनी को कुछ आता नही है
@healthmindfitness7 ай бұрын
Ane bale 2025 se 2030 ke bich China hampe hamla kar shakta hai. China ye jabvi kare, satth me Pakistan, Nepal, Maldives, Bhutan, Mayanmar in sabka bhi China istemal kare, unse hame kya. Ham hamesa se hi taiyaar hai. DRDO ka plan hai, aur chize banke samil ho gaya. Is me bahut antar hai. Please Jo hai unpe video banaiye barna China bhi kya plan kar Raha hai wo bhi bataiye. Khair Jo bhi ho ham kisi jaldi me nehi hai, 50 saal ka planing ke sath ham chal rahe hai
@bigchill337 ай бұрын
Subhodh Bhaiya ek baat please batao Saala Pakistan ke kabaili ghar mai Ak47 bana lete h 🙄 Par ham kyo nahi bana paate 🥺
@Bhartiymulnivasi7 ай бұрын
Pakistan have 430 km mad they are w9rking on 500😊
@dipakrana70097 ай бұрын
Pakistan sirf ullu bana sakta hain rocket nahi
@himalayasekanyakumarihindu80347 ай бұрын
@vinayjeengar770058 Pakistan got missile defense from China, but oops, it missed detecting India's accidental missile. Guess they're pretty optimistic about their Chinese-inspired rocket & missile systems 🚀 😂😂🤣🤣
@behappy52877 ай бұрын
Then it won't be rocket anymore. Bcoz when u have to increase the range u have to increase the size and if it's comes with 400+ range then they can hardly put one or two rockets in one vehicle. What's the point then , using sub sonic ballestic missile will be much better option bcoz it will give u precise hitting with maximum damage than a rocket.
@fahadnazir9457 ай бұрын
@@behappy5287 NO its fateh 2 is 2 stage rocket and it haver supersonic speed in terminal phase
@himalayasekanyakumarihindu80347 ай бұрын
@@fahadnazir945 Hey, why did you say supersonic? It would have been better to say hypersonic 😂🤣🤣
@akhandbharat.Ай бұрын
Khul milake modi govt ko ata jata kuch h ni bs har chis private krdo ni bane to ponch jao sarkari companies k pas same amca m delay kia
@skpatel32447 ай бұрын
प्राइवेट कंपनियों को बिना कुछ खर्च किए सरकारी कंपनियों की औने-पौने दाम पर तकनीक देना भी भ्रष्टाचार ही कहा जाएगा जब कभी भी केंद्र मे दूसरी सरकार होगी बहुत से लोग इसमें फसेगे
@moveon87057 ай бұрын
Bhai mere tender niklta h usme okk aise hi nhi de dia jata kuchh or rhi bat corruption ki to hr jagah h lekin ye proceser to kr rhe h yhi bhut h
@Lokpriyaclothstores7 ай бұрын
Oh bhai..... Kya comment kar diya
@naimishdbhatt79227 ай бұрын
वैसे भी अभी मजबुरी है पांच साल
@Raj-ug7dz7 ай бұрын
Man liya but kal private koi technology khud banaye phir usse profit ke liye Pakistan or chaina ko beche phir usse allow Kiya jayega
@guddu64247 ай бұрын
तुम मुझे चंदा दो, मैं तुम्हें धंधा दूंगा।😊😊😊😊
@VarahaMihira-h5g7 ай бұрын
While China has already inducted such 300kms MBRL systems.
@srijannetpoint81897 ай бұрын
Chaina ke misile me Pani bhara rahta hai.😂😂😂😂
@VarahaMihira-h5g7 ай бұрын
@@srijannetpoint8189 hospital hain, lekin China ke paas Hazaaron missile hain, 20 ya 200 nahin, just core strike forces of China has 8000 missile launchers with missile, If China is so weak why dosent America Dare to invade China?
@Uhhhtk7 ай бұрын
@@VarahaMihira-h5gUSA ko kia zaroorat hai China pe attack karne kee? China agar itna powerful hai to Taiwan ko kion nahi le leta? Tum jaise logon ka kaam he yeh hai ke negativity filao. China ke chamche bhi china ke tarah paper tigers hai.
@amanpatel25827 ай бұрын
Jitna tum soch rahe ho, china utna strong bhi nhi hai Or jitna kuch log soch rahe hai, china utna weak bhi hai In dono point k mid mai hai
@VarahaMihira-h5g7 ай бұрын
@@amanpatel2582 then why did India lose to China in 1962? And why can't India take back Aksai Chin and liberate Tibet?, India I Unable to take back POK and do you think pakistans father is weak, just a few days ago China gifted one missile tracker Ship to Pakistan and our gernails started to shout, India has only one such ship while China has 8 such ships, first we need to take back the land we lost to China in Ladhak and prepare for future wars, this Chuhiyapa thinking made India lose in 1962 🤣
@strongminotaurex82197 ай бұрын
Almost first,now pin
@VarahaMihira-h5g7 ай бұрын
It should be 314mm rockets
@saqidkhan1467 ай бұрын
Mashaallah Pakistan have achieved very great success in this field than that of India being a small country. We have proud lot upon it.
@babuvishwass59107 ай бұрын
Dear Russian Bhakts your Russia denied TOT of many Weapons but still it is best Friend of India 😂
@kshukla19807 ай бұрын
At least they didn’t enforce Pakistan , and vetoed for India many time in UN. Bhai kabhee history padh lo and don’t be a Dhruv Rathi
@MrShadw-qn5gp7 ай бұрын
Kitne rupee mile ye comment krne k liye. Muje v kamane h. M v or dunga comments bhai bta muje
@babuvishwass59107 ай бұрын
@@kshukla1980 Russian Bhakt Spotted 🤣
@babuvishwass59107 ай бұрын
@@MrShadw-qn5gp Russian Bhakt got offend 🤣
@kshukla19807 ай бұрын
Hahaha achas troll karoge ab lol - abe salon Jo waqt pe kaam aata hai wo dost hota hai - jo Pakistan ko patton tank deta hai wo sirf business partner ho sakta hai lol
@UstadUstad-mv3ig7 ай бұрын
Every master piece (Fattah 2) Has a cheaper copy(pinaka)
@DeepakKumar-MusicDK6 ай бұрын
Iqm.from ordnance factory chandrapur..here pinaka multi barrel RLS made