It's important to mention that a 35mm lens on a aps-c camera like the ones people buy the most ( Nikon d3300, Canon t5i, sony a6000) will be equal to roughly 55 mm. The 50mm will equal to roughly 78 mm. What this means is that if you have one of these cameras, you will not get the look that you see in his video because he has a full frame camera. You will roughly get the look of his 50mm lens with a 35mm lens but your 50mm will become more of a telephoto lens. This means that you wont be able to get a wide view of the scene. It will be zoomed in all the time. I write this because I didn't know that before and I always thought that my 50mm on my nikon d3300 was giving me the focal lenght of what the eyes can see but it turns out it was my 35mm who would give me the best representation. Hope that helps someone and great video dude!
@alpirl29217 жыл бұрын
Emilioh888 same camera as me, which lens do you recommend to use with d3300? Used for some event, portraits and fashion photography?
@Emilioh8887 жыл бұрын
For portraits I would recommend the 50mm. You get an easier nice background blur effect and the faces will appear more natural. But for events it will be very difficult to get wide shots with it. The 35mm is better for wider shots. So if you do more portraits-->50 mm. If you do more event--> 35mm. The best thing to do is to go to your local camera store and try them to see which you like the most. Hope that helps ;)
@Emilioh8887 жыл бұрын
Lol i don't know why the 50mm part in my reply is crossed... I didn't intend to do that..
@alpirl29217 жыл бұрын
Emilioh888 thanks man i appreciate the reply
@manwhalejoe69627 жыл бұрын
If you honestly don't know at the beginning, I don't think you could go wrong getting some version of a fast standard zoom. For canon aps-C I would recommend something like the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8. After using a decent lens like that, you start to realize which end of the spectrum you gravitate to (ie do you like your 17mm photos more or less than your 50mm photos). On the other hand if you need a walkaround lens or an event lens (like at a wedding, where you may miss shots if swapping lenses, and cannot "zoom with your feet" in certain situations) then a fast standard zoom will likely serve you much better than one fixed lens. I personally use a manual focus 50mm 1.4 old legacy Minolta MD Rokkor lens I got off ebay for $40 on a fuji XT1 and I absolutely love the perspective (it is about a 75mm FOV FF equivalent). But it took me ten tries with different lenses to figure it out!!
@Brother_TD15 сағат бұрын
Great video! Ex-combat photojournalist here. While your 50mm shots were masterfully artful, your 35mm told better stories. Beautiful family!
@ironmike27322 жыл бұрын
I am watching this video today that you made four years ago, and it is a timeless video. The topic applies today and for generations to come. I love your 35mm family photos, great composition and context for you to look at and remember in years to come.
@russpartee1137 жыл бұрын
Matt, the shot of Molly through the window with your reflection is something else. Her eye is almost perfectly placed where yours would be!
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@hoorayforpentax38017 жыл бұрын
The general (though not universal) thrust I got from the pictures is that 35mm puts the subject in a broader context more easily; 50mm is there for when the context/background isn't so important and the subject comes to the fore.
@DevonLad7 жыл бұрын
I hadn't even thought on consistency before this. In the age of social media and scrolling through your Instagram images or portfolio, having that consistence is a benefit indeed.
@nickbedford7 жыл бұрын
35mm has been my staple lens every since I discovered the X100s 3 years ago. It has ultimately changed my approach to photography and I no longer use zoom lenses. For myself, I'm also happy with only the 35mm (environmental portraits and documentary) and a 50mm (more intimate moments and portraits). I only use an 85mm for professional portraits where the compression is needed. If you were to give me one lens for the rest of my life, I wouldn't hesitate in saying 35mm!
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
I think the X100 series was a gamechanger for a lot of people in terms of that focal length, myself included! When the original X100 came out, that was the first time I shot with that focal length on a daily basis.
@ironmike27322 жыл бұрын
Absolutely. I have the X100F and the 35mm FOV is just perfect for family and life around the home photos. 28mm fels a bit to wide for me, and 50mm feels too tight.
@jelly.1899 Жыл бұрын
May I ask why compression is 'needed' in professional portrait? Do you mean to shorten someone's big nose?
@nickbedford Жыл бұрын
@@jelly.1899 I said "where needed". Professional portraiture might want the 85mm look, or the wider look for certain goals.
@jelly.1899 Жыл бұрын
@@nickbedford thanks, I misread.
@thewzrdharry7 жыл бұрын
Your photos have got a certain magic about them
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Faded.Visuals7 жыл бұрын
David Preston well, he is using a Leica 🤓
@critical_eye15 жыл бұрын
Yep... they are all black and white.
@seantuck7 жыл бұрын
Great video mate and some beautiful images in there. Thanks for sharing!
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Frantixj7 жыл бұрын
I always felt like 50mm on a FF is just what I see with my eyes. That's why I rather prefer 35mm because I always want a wider angle and show more. However, 50mm is also great because, as you said, it compresses things and makes the photo more focused on one object. I used a 50 to shoot Xmas last year and it turned out great, didn't feel like I missed anything in the frames and since I've been using the Nifty Fifty, they came out beautiful :)
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
That's an interesting point! Thanks!
@steveg83226 жыл бұрын
Both are far more seductive when viewed through an SLR,especially the 35,RF cameras and frame lines are fine and the much vaunted Leicas are fabulous instruments, but through the lens viewing with a fine SLR is incomparable.
@jamesmolleur21966 жыл бұрын
Great video, I always find it interesting that people struggle to figure out what mm lens to use. When I started out I was told by a pretty seasoned professional to buy a lens anywhere between 30mm and 50mm and then just move myself accordingly, it will make me a better photographer. Example: If I shoot with my 50mm and want to fill the frame more I move closer and vice versa. Obviously you can't always do that as fixed objects tend not to move out of your way easily but I have never really had an issue. Actually, some of my best shots have been because and object was in my way and I had to take the shot from a different angle that I didn't initially consider.
@mtcrun2 жыл бұрын
I love how your photos always capture the exceptional beauty of everyday life Matt.
@tallaganda836 жыл бұрын
I travelled through Japan with only the Fuji 23mm f2, it nearly did everything I needed, there may have been one two times I could have used a 24mm equivalent but for the most part it is the jack of all trades.
@singletrack293497 жыл бұрын
It's all preference, but I feel like the 35 is a better story teller.
@eminakben15 жыл бұрын
This is all needed to hear to go for 35mm after all the research.
@satinimage15775 жыл бұрын
I made the right choice
@siuuuscribe-74 жыл бұрын
Yes.. My first lens is 35mm. But it depends on environment. For me, the right choice is 35mm
@randomrichardhere4 жыл бұрын
Well he did say he grabs the 35 ninety nine percent of the time
@geralkay30123 жыл бұрын
50mm is way a bit more zoom for me. I choose 35mm too.
@jrodori4 жыл бұрын
I prefer 50mm. I get less lines intruding on my compositions, and it’s as much of a portrait lens as I need it to be in tighter quarters. Getting a wider view is just a matter of stepping back. I save 28mm for country landscapes 😊
@pablors67182 жыл бұрын
Pure Black and white art in those pictures!
@abrahamalbertn2 жыл бұрын
I use the 35mm for group photos. I use the 50mm for portraiture with single model but i still want some context, where the model is. I use the 85mm when i simply want to focus on the model (that's all, not the surounding)
@carlosenriquez20923 жыл бұрын
I use a 35 but I'm saving for phat 50. I always recommend both and lenses can be had fairly cheaply. Work your network se what your photographer friends are trying to sell. Check your local shops.
@Davey_Boyle7 жыл бұрын
Really like the direction your channel is taking, gear reviews are fun but I find vids about creative choices when making pictures are where its at for me
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I'm trying to share more practical, every day use kind of videos.
@acrobaticfish7 жыл бұрын
One of the key points you make that I'd articulate yet another way is to think about focal length in terms of what else you include when you keep the "subject" the same size in frame. Focal length then forces you to think about not only what you include, but how big those things are to one another, which is clearly vital to composition of an image (as opposed to vital to photography).
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Very true! I didn't even think about that but that's a great point.
@laurastokes47775 жыл бұрын
You are rare in that you don't spout wide open for everything which is an unfortunate fad these days I used 35 for 85 percent of my weddings at F8 and always sharp focus...composition is everything along with timing and lighting and expression in ongoing documentation near and far with your feet being the zoom I used 50 for formal portraits of bride and groom 85 for details and close up of vows and rings during ceremony as well as 35 for wider scope
@TheBepacific3 жыл бұрын
Whenever I want to see some good photographs and really enjoy watching them with good music I play this video. Is it just me? Really love your work @matt
@TomKaszuba7 жыл бұрын
All your videos are brilliant. Your style and presentation and personality make these THE most watchable and enjoyable I have seen in years. I can’t thank you enough for producing and sharing such great content. You have a gift.
@Jakeisinthepool2 жыл бұрын
I shoot on apsc crop sensor and i love focusing my subject so I always shoot 50mm and 85mm. I like it personal shot.
@boarini20037 жыл бұрын
One of the best things about 50mm on the M is the great amount of space around the frame lines. I never would have thought how amazing that is until I got the 262. Seeing what is just outside allows me to anticipate and compose much more freely.
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Very true!
@timryan63954 жыл бұрын
Focal length makes little difference unless your working in confined spaces. For most out door work, you can zoom with your feet. I could get the same composition “roughly” with my 20mm as I can with my 105mm - the distance to the subject would certainly change. So why different focal lengths? We select different focal lengths because of the difference in DOF and the background compression differences to either isolate our subject or put them into their environment- simple as that.
@chifungleung83577 жыл бұрын
Great photos. I too shoot (mostly family photos) using both and find them to be great complements.
@RazibShahrier7 жыл бұрын
Matt I must admit that your Black & White photos are outstanding and so inspiring at the same time. Cheers!
@leond123Ай бұрын
After watching thousands of KZbin videos, this is one of the best! Wonderful photos. Definitely see the 50mm for isolation and 35mm for context. But, both look like they belong together.
@bunmeng0073 жыл бұрын
Thanks Matt. I bought Fuji 35mm lens (50mm ff equiv) as my first prime - a bit tight for me at first but it grows on me. I just picked pick up Fuji 23mm (35mm ff equiv) and yes it is more versatile. Overall, 50mm (ff) is better to isolate a subject and portrait. 35mm (ff) is versatile and good at storytelling. Great to have both prime lens in our arsenal :)
@BTCAsia6 жыл бұрын
First, you’re incredibly talented, especially when taking “apparently” casual shots. Apparently because when I look at the attributes - lighting, timing, focus, composition) - nobody could be nailing all these difficult aspects just haphazardly. I’m sure you’ve trained yourself so much of the effort is subconscious, but the results show tremendous effort. The pic of your wife with a halo of your reflection, your child with hair covering half her face with just an eye - in focus - poking out with so much life. I, for one, would like to see more videos on composition and lighting, especially of people. Thanks.
@TarrelScot6 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Very useful video. I'd been considering getting a 35mm for my Pentax Spotmatic but, looking at those photographs at the end, I realise the 50mm suits my style so much better. I guess that's why the 35mm 1.4 hardly ever leaves my X-Pro2 (roughly 50mm equivalent on the crop sensor).
@E3Zombie7 жыл бұрын
24 - 50 - 85 I can get almost any job done with these 3.
@cnick67 жыл бұрын
I use 28, 50, 75 myself. Close enough. :)
@dwlphoto7 жыл бұрын
cnick6 Same here. 28, 50 and 75mm for my M10.
@cnick67 жыл бұрын
Draw with Light How are you liking the M10?
@dwlphoto7 жыл бұрын
cnick6 It is fantastic. The image quality is really great.
@kranskistyles7 жыл бұрын
true!
@gskowal6 жыл бұрын
I personally love the 35mm and can live without any other lens if must be but when it comes to closer head and should type of portraits 50mm is a lot more pleasing to an eye.
@jackmckechnie58017 жыл бұрын
I have an APSC camera (Fuji XPro1) and what works for me is my Nikon 35mm F2 with a focal reducer adapter and my old film fuji 55mm 1.8 lens with regular M39 adapter..(close to 80mm equivalent) .These two just cover the range nicely.
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
That's a solid combo!
@calvinchann19967 жыл бұрын
Grew up with the 50 because back in the day, it was what was sold with the camera (K1000 in my case). Keep trying with 35, so now I'm kind of stuck between the two. My favourite photo, irrespective of focal length and apart from the last Molly photo, is the one of Nora at the bottom of the slide.
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Thank you! They're both versatile lenses, for sure.
@AlejandroRamos-im4to4 жыл бұрын
The best video I have ever watched showing the difference between both lenses!! Your photographs are awesome!! Fell in love with the music too!! Greetings from a Mexican residing in Canada!!
@wingkongyip4 жыл бұрын
I haven't come across such a clear explanation for the choice between the 35mm and 50mm lenses and understand why you chose to use both.
@joeszeto3102 жыл бұрын
Stumbled onto your video and found it very informative. However, what I appreciated most is the high quality images you included. Wow! Those are some of the most gorgeous, yet simple and natural, b+w images I've seen in a long time!! Excellent work!!
@alphaandliarize6 жыл бұрын
For people who owns an APS-C camera, whichever lens you get, work your style and composition with it! I would say the same with people who uses Micro 4/3 and Medium format users. Don't stress out which lens is good. Go try what you can and get what you like.
@Audimann4 жыл бұрын
On FF the 40mm focal length is the most natural I think. 50mm is just to tight for me.
@Pascal15B6 жыл бұрын
The photos really showed exactly how both lenses have their place. The photos, for me, were superb. It was a pleasure to see them & feel inspired. You have a new subscriber.
@kuchabhi2 жыл бұрын
Very useful discussion; and the pics are lovely! Thanks for sharing your personal insights.
@anaglog777 жыл бұрын
I love your photos of the family they're s heartwarming to look at
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@HarveyWallbanger-ho2cq11 ай бұрын
Matt, you don't just take photos, you capture life
@TXTundra-ex8bw Жыл бұрын
We I started photography I love zoom lenses but over time I fell in love with primes because I love fast glass. I love both the 35 and 50 and often struggled to decide which to carry. My rule now is if I’m on vacation or street photography then it’s my 35mm 1.4 but if I’m going home for the holidays or places like weddings where most of the pictures will be portraits then it’s my 50mm 1.2. Love the video and your photos 👊
@Kaip9117 жыл бұрын
Thank you for including sample photos. Some people who talk about gears are all talk but no show.
@texa5boi2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. It helped me decide on the 35mm. Especially the samples you provided as that is the style of shots I would be taking of our kids. We already have a zoom lens that can cover for the 50mm and above.
@andreasschroder78805 жыл бұрын
I personally prefer the 50mm and the 27/28mm instead of the 35mm. But the again I shoot DSLRs or Mirrorless so I can get much closer to my subjects with the 28mm lens.
@martinhall9326 жыл бұрын
i only use 35 and 50 too... i bought them as my "starter" lenses and thought the reason i hadn't added more to my arsenal was because of procrastination but after watching this video i realize the real reason is that the 35 and 50 capture all that i'm most interested in. I like your pics and like your voice too man. Thanks for the vid.
@millertime67 жыл бұрын
Pretty cool the discipline you have. It probably makes it easier to point and shoot rather than overthink. Awesome images!
@allanredford60706 жыл бұрын
for the pice of a cla service on an m, you can buy a cam, with 24-85. no lost shots changing lenses. I had an m2 for 35 years, great for its time, now a relic.
@mrzachwright Жыл бұрын
It’s crazy rewatching these old videos to find some inspiration and seeing a baby Elliott and tiny Nora.
@mattdayphoto Жыл бұрын
They're big kids now 😭
@chrismercado8267 жыл бұрын
I'm currently I'm using a 21mm and 50mm. The 50mm is great for me as a general purpose lens while the 21mm is landscape or when I want to create a scene.
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Very true! Thanks for watching!
@russdenney2 жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed seeing your photos - wonderful composition and an eye for good light. I receive my first Leica next week - an M11 with the 50mm Summilux-M 1.4 ASPH. I am really looking forward to this new type of shooting experience.
@theideastring47065 жыл бұрын
Although you say you can't fill the frame as easily with a 35mm, my Pentax M f2.8 35mm has min focus distance 30cm, the M 50mm f1.7 45cm. (although both focus closer than marked), giving basically the same view close up. Also on a recent walking holiday in Albanian Alps I took the 35mm, 50mm and 135mm on my LX, but used the 50mm most of all because even with landscapes I find I'm often wanting to cut stuff out of the frame (annoying branches etc). And 11:20 is just super, super cute!
@cafeglobulot6 жыл бұрын
The reason I prefer the 50 mm is that I feel comfortable with the distance I am from people in the street in order to frame their whole body : approximately 5 meters (3 meters with the 35 mm).
@nerwin7 жыл бұрын
Choosing between 35mm and 50mm is so tough sometimes.
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
This is why I like to only bring one. No decisions to be made in the field. I just shoot. :)
@nerwin7 жыл бұрын
Matt Day That is true. I need to stop telling myself "I should have brought that one instead of this one" and just shoot with what I have. I think we all get caught up in gear sometimes.
@danni05105 жыл бұрын
Indoor 35mm is better outdoor when you can move both would be great
@ongngoaiharmonica78715 жыл бұрын
That’s why 24-70mm comes in
@armandozertuche40544 жыл бұрын
Currently, my dilemma right now. I like both but can only get one right now. Ugh its frustrating I like the depth of the 50mm but the 35 is a bit cheaper.
@outsidethebox2623 жыл бұрын
To me, picking lens is more about the work that I do really. Wide 23mm lenses if I want to go outside to take pictures, 50mm if I want to take portraits with less emphasis on backgrounds.
@Ryan_Schlutz6 жыл бұрын
I search so many videos to find this comparison. The part I like most was your tipod shot to show how the lens changes the scene. Thank you.
@aaa007054 жыл бұрын
As the one who normally use medium format cameras, I would say that 50mm is a well-balance lens between land scape and portrait shooting, since I mostly goes with upper 75mm lens which is not purposely made for land scape photography and I always tend to use 35mm camera with 50mm lens that could give me more space for land scape shot for any sudden situations.
@noonsound48946 жыл бұрын
Just rewatched this video....how I love these photos. ❤️
@stinkystealthysloth5 жыл бұрын
As I use 2 bodies I actually prefer using 35 and 75. 35 is my go-to, and when I want to shoot through things or get in a bit closer 75 just works better than 50 for me personally
@FlatheadHarvey7 жыл бұрын
Great video mate, as always. Seeing side by sides and a lot of the real world use is unbeatable for getting the point across. I've used a 35mm equivalent lens for so long that when I use my 50mm I often find I'll have to take two steps back from wherever I think I should be standing...I guess our minds just get conditioned like that. Looking forward to whatever you put out next, take it easy Matt.
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Glad it was helpful!
@jacobh58173 жыл бұрын
Matt, what a great video to watch. This is valuable information for many amateur shooters. But in fact I was blown away by the last image of you and Molly at 11:52. What a great double portrait. Beautifully composed and you can really feel the love. As a professional myself, I recognize these once-in-a-million shots. By the way, the image at 11:22 is another beauty. Thanks for sharing.
@bcomhaire7 жыл бұрын
I share your love for the 35mm for all my personal stuff, it is such a natural focal length that makes you work for your image!
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
That's for sure! Thanks for watching!
@S3l3ct1ve6 жыл бұрын
24mm is another good option, although u need to get close to your subject and there will be some distortions. But overall it 24mm 1.4f if very versatile fixed focal lens you can shoot landscapes, indoors and portraits with it and the results will be pretty good. Although 35mm is special length, it has that cinematic look
@charliejg3 жыл бұрын
A video from almost five years ago, but super helpful. Love your images as well as your explanation. Thanks five years later!! :-)
@Daniel_Zalman9 ай бұрын
You are such a wonderful photographer. I can feel the warmth and love you have for your family through your images. This was, also, very educational. I do see the subtle different between the two lenses. 35mm is great for showing someone within a space. There’s a sense of depth. With the 50, you are capturing facial expressions and details. The 50mm is about the subject. However, outdoors the difference between the two lenses is a bit less noticeable. It’s tough if you don’t have 2 cameras. You want to be able to create both kinds of images, but you also want to be spontaneous..so changing lenses is not an option. A 24-70 is an option, but those suckers are heavy (though the Tamron 28-75 g2 is lighter and a perfect focal range for photos of people, but it’s not a Sony (I shoot on an a7iv). Maybe I should stop being a brand snob and just make the compromise that suits me. Or get a 35 and just accept that on days that I have my 35, I won’t be able to make exactly the same kind of images I can make with my 50, and vice versa. Eh, first world problems.
@hiredphotographer7 жыл бұрын
Molly look super cool. I always like 10, 14, 24 *Jump 50, 80 * Jump 200, i don't understand what those in between for, always thought of it as redundant focal length, now i know what 35mm is for... Great explanation. Thank you. 👍
@tomarnd87247 жыл бұрын
I have a 35mm and a 50mm for my Nikon FM and this was very helpful, thanks Matt !! Also : the acoustic guitar you use for your slideshows is really wonderful and it goes so well with your photography, keep being awesome
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Thank you, man! I'm happy to hear that. Enjoy that FM!
@TheJoejoez7 жыл бұрын
Nice shots. I personally much prefer 35mm. 50mm photography actually makes me cringe for some reason. Strong aesthetic preference? My first camera was my dad's Konica c35. When I stepped into a DSLR I did the whole "nifty fifty" thing and loathed it. It feels like I am seeing the world with blinders on. I shoot a rangefinder 35mm then switch to a DSLR for basically anything else (zooms/macro/whatever).
@PunjabiGymBeats5 жыл бұрын
i love 35mm too but if you just shoot family friends you can take portrait with 50 but in events or weddings sometime its hard to get too close to subject to get portrait with 50, then 70-200 comes out of bag.
@bobsaget66756 жыл бұрын
Great images man! 35 is by far my favorite length but I also love an 85 and 135
@ashugupta80907 жыл бұрын
What if I use a 35mm lens and then crop the portion which I want?
@MichaelRusso5 жыл бұрын
I like both the 50mm and the 35mm as well. I do have many short tele lenses but I find I don't use them too much.
@zulfiyawilde63656 жыл бұрын
Oh my, this is such a good video. Thank you a lot for this! Also ... You have a great family, man. Your kids will absolutely love those photos when they grow up.
@RazibShahrier7 жыл бұрын
Excellent video and lots of solid information and mostly its wort watching when you come across at 9:31 and 10:32 shots. So amazing!
@Narsuitus3 жыл бұрын
I had a 35mm wide-angle lens and a 50mm normal lens for my first 35mm rangefinder camera (Argus C3). The angle-of-view of the two lenses was too close together for my taste. When I purchased my second 35mm rangefinder camera (Leica M6), I purchased a 35mm lens. Since I did not feel the need for a 50mm lens for my M6, I never bought one.
@mrhzml7 жыл бұрын
Your photos are just amazing and pleasant to look at
@gazwerks19513 жыл бұрын
Just fell across your page. Love your photographs. Put a big smile on my face! Mission accomplished.
@dantan69525 жыл бұрын
Very nice, although I assume that the 35mm and 50mm mentioned here refer to the full frame equivalent field of view. So, I assume it’s the 23mm and 35mm XF lenses?
@DrJRaven3 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for this post, it helps me to understand the use of these lens. These photos are absolutely amazing.
@Jerry-kg9pr7 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing your beautiful family images . you have such passion for capturing images of love , joy , family life . 😇
@bharatadhikari41366 жыл бұрын
I have 50mm for nikon 7200. I'm missing 35mm for indoors. But 50 mm will always remain my fab.
@weebadwolf48935 жыл бұрын
Great video and stunningly beautiful photos...thanks and yes I agree those two focal lengths are so versatile... 👍
@chirag47 жыл бұрын
Fantastic & Lucid Explanation about the 35 & 50mm focal length, Matt Day ! Enjoyed the video thoroughly. Thanks.
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@dudN8R Жыл бұрын
great shots of your family! Getting 35mm for my family because of this video
@tuntitommosille5 жыл бұрын
Another great thing about 35mm is that you can crop to get the same composition as with 50mm. You lose some pixels in the process, but digital cameras these days have more than enough of them anyway. Some cameras even give you the option to digital zoom so you can compose directly at 50mm FOV even though you're really using a 35mm lens.
@olympus2OM3 жыл бұрын
35 oder 50mm? You could also use the Leica summicron 40mm f2 between.
@dwlphoto7 жыл бұрын
Great video, thank you for that! I have a 28mm, 50mm and a 75mm for my M10. But mostly using the 50mm.
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
Nice! How are you enjoying that M10?
@dwlphoto7 жыл бұрын
Matt Day The M10 is wonderful. I like the look and feel of it. The image quality is fantastic :) It was a great choice to switch over from Fuji - wich I also loved! But had the same reasons / issues wich you mentioned in your video.
@kui3607 жыл бұрын
Beautiful photos of your family, Matt! Thank you for sharing.
@AlanMorrisSF7 жыл бұрын
Great examples. I tend to use 35mm indoors because of limited shooting space. Otherwise, I prefer the 50mm
@mattdayphoto7 жыл бұрын
That wider reach of the 35 definitely has it's advantages indoors. Thanks for watching!
@spotsill3 жыл бұрын
I have owned both and must admit to being in the 35mm camp on this one . Time has robbed me of the joy of shooting family photos at this point I just have lots of books of the dead .
@tomscott44385 жыл бұрын
I shoot with a Fuji X-Pro-2 so obviously I also enjoy the rangefinder (style) body and experience. I started out with a bag of lenses and a serious case of GAS, or gear acquisition syndrome. Lately I've felt my interest waning and began to realize that my gear was physically and metaphorically weighing me down. When I looked back at my images over the past two years I discovered that the vast majority were taken with my 23 and 35 APSC lenses, or 35 and 53 in full-frame terms. Based on your video it's obvious you don't need a bag of lenses to tell a story. Thanks
@wasabi89207 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video Matt! I was kind of stuck on exactly this. Loved your 35mm series and how you compose on that length. Funny how just by looking at your pics I seemed to got all the clarifying I needed.
@christopherreily18957 жыл бұрын
One of your best videos to date. A question that I still contemplate after 25 years of shooting. The only 2 lenses I own for my M system. Your style is most excellent!!!
@Debussy19826 жыл бұрын
Hi Matt: honestly, at first I thought OK, another snob with Leica blablabla... but your photos are really impressive. You have a great eye! I have a Sony A7 with the first two lenses they made, the 35/2.8 and the 55/1.8. I do all my photos with that (the zoom is in the bag every time). As you, I prefer the 35, and use the 55 for portraits (or low light conditions, this is the only problem with the 35/2.8). I spend a lot of time thinking in buying new stuff. Maybe I should invest my time in improve my art and keep the money. Thanks for your video and your photos.