In every video I've watched - the .40 has taken the cake. The .45 expands larger, but the .40 utilizes its energy better, therefore, creating a greater wound track. You're also getting higher capacity in a more compact gun. Everyone who despises the caliber needs to take another look!
@Lee-rq1ek8 ай бұрын
BUT, you forgot that the 40 is so "snappy" I can't shoot it crowd !!! I have carried the 40 cal for almost 29 years and have faith in the cartridge.
@tarteen0913118 ай бұрын
@@Lee-rq1ek I moved up from 9mm to a .40S&W now, got the Beretta PX4 Storm full size and added a compensator from vantage point armory barely any recoil with that combination
@Lee-rq1ek8 ай бұрын
@@tarteen091311 I live in SE Texas and can carry a Glock 22 comfortably even in summer. The 40-caliber cartridge is a good pistol cartridge especially in a full-size pistol. Many people repeat what they've heard others repeat.
@EvilynKing8 ай бұрын
I wonder if your losing velocity@@tarteen091311
@EvilynKing8 ай бұрын
@@Lee-rq1ekI carry a 23 and I'm an average size woman. It took some work but I can hit pretty tight groups at ten yards
@frankbrowning328 Жыл бұрын
Either one is going to be a good stopper
@josephpepper30879 ай бұрын
Thanks for testing the Silvertips and in a good test medium! I generally agree that .40 s&w > .45 acp > 9x19.
@BillHimmel Жыл бұрын
Solid test, real useful! I can see the usefulness of this .45 acp in scenarios where you have to avoid overpenetration at all cost!
@adammitchell0 Жыл бұрын
Good video, I like that your testing light for caliber against light for caliber. You should do a hornady critical defense 45 185 against .40 165 grain
@synystur21 Жыл бұрын
I like that you cut through the wound track, I dupont think I've seen any other channel do that before. Very good video!
@AzAirgunner. Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, I appreciate that!!
@guardianminifarm8005 Жыл бұрын
The 40 checked all the boxes pretty well. The 45 did really well all things considered. It would be better if it could penetrate a bit more but the stills tell a story also and the big bore didn't disappoint. The permanent cavity may not have been as large as one might desire but it wasn't insignificant for sure. If these are available and reasonable they wouldn't fail to be effective for purpose IMO. Thank you. Good comparison.
@AzAirgunner. Жыл бұрын
Thank you😁
@meekman48428 ай бұрын
Just now running across your video. Thanks for that test. I've seen a number of 9mm Silvertip videos that are mostly failures. I'm glad to see it do its job in .40 and .45.
@theoriginalOSOK8 ай бұрын
I carry a Glock 22 stoked with 180 grain HST's - they have tested really well from what I've seen. Both those did good too. I do like a bit more penetration though...
@silenceismycanvas Жыл бұрын
Just a suggestion. I'd like to see a Nosler 40 S&W ASP 150 gr JHP test if possible. Compact and full sized pistols.
@get_it_done45804 ай бұрын
Nosler 200 grn. Accubond (blue tips) jhp's are very good
@mrwayne515811 күн бұрын
Thats the one Ive been wanting to see as well
@matterickson59936 ай бұрын
I like the way you do these videos - chronograph, gel, and results... perfect!
@jmichaelcarbonniere9549 Жыл бұрын
Good test, AZ, but a sub 1000 fps 185 in 45 ACP is downright pitiful! A 185 should be doing close to 1100 fps or more, which would probably put it close to 1000 or so out of a short barreled 1911. Not that the frangible Silvertip bullet would have done any better, it would have maybe made a slightly larger stretch cavity but penetration would have been just as poor! The 40 is a much better choice than the .45 in this case! My Speer 185 Gold Dots are doing very close to 1200 fps out of my 1911 Govt Model, which is the velocity a good 185 should be getting! None of this watered down junk for me! Cheers, jc
@nokoolaid Жыл бұрын
Underwood has 185g @ 1200. That should be close to 1100 in the shorter barrel. Most 45 stuff out there doesn't meet advertised specs let alone capability.
@bullpup335 ай бұрын
It doesn't matter. Either one will take care business. I still love both calibers.
@nokoolaid Жыл бұрын
There are probably some 230g loads that will do as well velocity wise in that barrel length. 45 is kind of underloaded in a lot of ammo.
@acid6urns11 ай бұрын
short barrel .45 does absolutely awful most of the time. .45 is already moving slow, and it suffers MUCH more from velocity loss in a short barrel
@nokoolaid11 ай бұрын
@@acid6urns A short barrel will have an effect, but Federal HST works pretty well in a short barrel. Some ammo makers really drop the ball here. for instance, Hornady Critical Defense in 45 is supposed to get 1000fps out of a 3" barrel with a 185g bullet. I've seen videos where it doesn't make that with a 5" barrel. That's a problem and it's not because it's a 45, it's because the manufacturer is screwing over the customer in not delivering the performance as advertised. Buffalo Bore and Underwood generally perform very well by comparison.
@acid6urns11 ай бұрын
@@nokoolaid i don’t think you understand what i’m saying. even good ammo from a .45 in most 230gr loads that’s just shy of 1000fps out of say a 4 or 5 in barrel will see MASSIVE velocity drop going from a 5”-4” or 4”-3” in comparison to basically any other handgun round. .45 acp as a round is just simply more susceptible to bleeding velocity when shortening barrel length than other calibers are.
@nokoolaid11 ай бұрын
@@acid6urns I do, and to make matters even worse it's underloaded and by that I mean a lot of ammo doesn't meet published specs let alone what is possible.
@rodolforivero72829 ай бұрын
Las .45 son ideales de 4 pulgadas para arriba. La pequeña mamba negra (Glock 27) es formidable con cualquier munición... ...amo a la mamba y al toro negro (Glock 30s). Ambas excelentes para portar...✌️
@bobjones-bt9bh Жыл бұрын
Win Silvertip in .40 is a very good round in nearly every test I've seen, including in its LE Ranger variant- ranger advertises like 1205fps the .45 mimics what Harrell's results show in terms of penetration. Short barrel .45 is disappointing usually in velocity. 332fpe what is the point? A micro 9 can develop that.
@richki.24 Жыл бұрын
both did awesome ....
@Patriotx-gx4ceАй бұрын
Great video as always. I preffer 45 Critical Duty and also 45+p in same as i am 6'5" with enough strength and power to handle that recoil. I also shoot a lot of 357 and some hot factory loads and used to bit of recoil. All thos complaining about "snapines", over penetration by 45 or any other rounds dont know their bullet designs, barrel lenght or dont train enough.
@fanman8102 Жыл бұрын
Excellent; thank hanks!
@AzAirgunner. Жыл бұрын
Thank you!!
@angrysheepdog9744 Жыл бұрын
The extra velocity in these light-for-caliber makes a difference. 45ACP's historical effectiveness is based on the subsonic round's huge expanded dimensions plowing a wide path. Shock-wave tissue disruption is velocity-based and exemplified in 357S/MAG crossing into hydrostatic shock territory. Ballistic studies have established the 125gr/1450ftps=583ft/lbs as the Gold Standard of defensive rounds dumping this energy in 12-14 inches and causing central nervous system (CNS) damage from the ballistic pressure wave. Water is not compressible which makes it an ideal medium to transfer energy to the brain.
@acid6urns11 ай бұрын
no pistol bullets produce hydrostatic shock except for maybe super hot .44 mag and up. pistols are extremely weak in comparison to rifles
@angrysheepdog974411 ай бұрын
@@acid6urns Your theories are old. Hydrostatic shock begins at 9PBLE and goes up from there.
@drewday6109 Жыл бұрын
Love the content
@AzAirgunner. Жыл бұрын
Thank you!! Glad ur enjoying. Appreciate ya!!
@TheFlutecart3 ай бұрын
Both look really good to me, but did you see that gel jump of the table for the .45? - That's the Fudd myth about delivered impact power. It may be over stated in the retelling, but it is real and both these rounds display it. Just a jiggle in the gel with a 9mm. But a 55gr 5.56 at 3000fps will make it jump too. The gel jumping up seems like a reasonable thing to observe about delivered energy. Fixed camera with a superimposed grid to measure it.
@scottythebody0811 Жыл бұрын
Great comparison.
@Fordgroup006 ай бұрын
The advantage of the .45 is you don’t get over penetration
@unkorads1009 Жыл бұрын
thanks for the video, i'm for team 40sw. 🙂
@AzAirgunner. Жыл бұрын
Thank you, I appreciate u checkin it out!!
@ronaldwells44274 ай бұрын
Great information! Thanks 🎉
@KMondy Жыл бұрын
All right all right.
@rangetime6779 Жыл бұрын
40 S&W wins this test. Good expansion and penetration. 45 ACP looked great but under penetrated and velocity was a little slow.
@mpac8446 Жыл бұрын
How would you rate it on a home defense vs personal defense scaleq
@TENACIOUSTHORNLEON5 ай бұрын
NICE to see you used the Glock 27 which I carry. ----
@bobbytowesr33876 ай бұрын
Im a fan of the 45 rock , not the greatest penetrator, but reliable and proven. A very good defence peice
@aaronwilcox64172 ай бұрын
Both will work just fine.
@goranmalnar5172 Жыл бұрын
Good video like always si. Ceep going .👌
@AzAirgunner. Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir!!
@angel196420015 ай бұрын
I have the.40 and the.45 like them both
@viperdemonz-jenkins4 ай бұрын
bad guy would not be having a good day if he met either.
@gswguy4554 Жыл бұрын
AzAirgunner…… Out of all the Hollow points you’ve test…… Do you have any personal favorites in a given caliber?
@willmorris8966 Жыл бұрын
I’d love to see a 200 grain 40 vs 200 grain or 230 grain 45
@al01100 Жыл бұрын
200 is too heavy for the 40
@jaratt85Ай бұрын
I don't get why everyone is so obsessed with penetration on handgun rounds.. You don't want penetration, you want it to dump all it's energy as quick as possible and make a massive shock cavity. That's how you kill with a pistol not by having a ton of penetration and zipping out the other side. The only time you want a ton of penetration power is when you're shooting FMJ's through glass or metal.
@AvRail57 Жыл бұрын
Interesting comparison! I wonder how the 40 would do in a S&W shield 40?
@frankbrowning328 Жыл бұрын
Should be very similar as the barrel lengths are nearly the same. Glock 27 3.43'' barrel & the S&W Shield 40 cal has a 3.1'' barrel
@acid6urns11 ай бұрын
@@frankbrowning328i would like to say you’re probably right as .40 doesn’t really suffer from velocity loss in short barrels as much as some other rounds, but sometimes.3” of barrel can make a large difference.
@frankbrowning32811 ай бұрын
@@acid6urnsI agree that the performance in the 40 is less hampered by barrel length. I shoot most everything so I like to know when possible how they perform in short barrels as I have short barrels in both 9mm, 40 S&W.
@landofparadise2295 Жыл бұрын
40 has more damage than 45 ,40 damage 2inches 3/4 size hole while 45 only 2 inches size hole according for measurement
@SDGlock23 Жыл бұрын
I've always felt the .40 did really well from shorter barrels whereas .45 typically doesn't. I like both, prefer the .40 just because it's on a smaller frame and gets good ballistics. I've chronographed 230gr ball .45 in the mid 700's from a G30...ouch! Overall I think the .40 works well from pretty much any barrel length and the .45 really likes the longer barrels, no so much the short ones.
@emerald6408 ай бұрын
Are the silver tips on the bullets aluminum or nickeled gliding metal? The original 1980's 9mm was aluminum and later WW moved to nickel plated gliding metal.
@kennethferguson4283 Жыл бұрын
The .45 is just not a good short barrel round no matter the bullet weight. In this test the .40 got better much better penetration and produced more jell disruption.
@justusbryant7366 Жыл бұрын
The 40 won.
@EvMc305 Жыл бұрын
Usually does. Remember why the 40 came into play, fbi wants better then 9. 10mm developed, g men Pillow hands couldn't handle. Hence the 40. Years of 9mm development, 'good enough' much higher capacity. Single shot wound and terminal ballistics are extremely favorable. Round count is the only debate w 40 vs 9, not ballistics
@justusbryant7366 Жыл бұрын
@mikelev2574 40 is a good round and it's not hard to shoot accurate. Everyone just love 9mm. In today's market it's all about no recoil and flat shooting.
@EvMc305 Жыл бұрын
totally agree@@justusbryant7366 But the weirdos think 40 SW is somehow not effective or performs poorly evenly substandard compared to 9mm, when in reality the majority of terminal ballistic testing shows just the opposite. I carry mainly 9, then 380, the 40...shot placement always being the most important (:
@Jujuj-g4n10 ай бұрын
@@EvMc305they can't hold their gun right
@EvMc30510 ай бұрын
That@@Jujuj-g4n and lack of practice. Put 500 rounds of 40 sw per month for a few months and it will be just another pistol (:
@helluvademon393611 ай бұрын
1:40 paused for anyone who wants to see the 40. In the gel still spinnin
@helluvademon393611 ай бұрын
Tbh somewhere between a min 39 sec's an 40 you get the whole picture Even the bullet hole in the shirt (cloth)
@sgoell756 ай бұрын
My SR 40 uses a 180 grain 1100 fps and 484 foot pounds of force from underwood ammo!
@Passportbro33Mark22 ай бұрын
Let’s see this exact same test done with a full sized barrel… of course the 40 won Because it got closer to the advertised muzzle velocity… Also, even with the lower power of the 45 look how much it made the block jump😮 all that energy went into the first block! The energy dump is what creates the shock which turns off somebody’s system i.e. the stopping power! Remember, foot pounds of energy are the deliverer. But shock is the delivery!
@1badEK Жыл бұрын
I know someone that would hit the table instead of the gel at that distance.
@AzAirgunner. Жыл бұрын
😄😂
@ManOfChaiTea9 ай бұрын
People are obsessed with over penetration, you dont need 18 inches, the idea is for the round to dump the energy inside the body, not blow out the back. Your heart and aorta are about 3.5 inches deep from the chest. yes 3.5. Human bodies are frail, take a ruler, measure on the body just how thick it is. 10 inches is more than enough. The .45 was designed to leave a big hole and dump all its energy.
@josephpepper30879 ай бұрын
Gelatin isn't tissue and has no bones. It's merely a consistent test medium that is a similar density to relaxed muscle. Not all defensive gun shots are over the heart, at a 90 deg angle, and unobstructed. That's why more than 3.5 inches of penetration in test media is desired.
@Texan-191111 ай бұрын
Bro 5 inch barrel vs compact
@Papacopod-x5b Жыл бұрын
Dont forgot 45 is low pressure round can be loaded up plenty more stopping power slower is better and safer on urban areas both very close like twins 45 acp has history on it,s side Taylor,d one shot stopping power chart 45 ball has (69) one shot stops not bad flat point mich better
@WilliamSirman10 ай бұрын
Check the bore diameter of that Rock Island! That round was too slow!
@GBR1111-x2t5 ай бұрын
they will both work for whatever needed. C'mon
@danielrendon855511 ай бұрын
45 has always been overrated.
@ManOfChaiTea9 ай бұрын
Actually it really hasnt. If you understand the human body and location of vitals, you will learn it does the job very well. Your heart and aorta are only 3.5 inches deep in the chest..
@kevmac12303 ай бұрын
Overrated you say? Tell that to it's tens of thousands victims killed in war since the 1900s
@kenf266211 ай бұрын
You have got better ballistics testing form different brands in both 45acp and 40sw . I see just crappy ammo
@svcag1780 Жыл бұрын
Ok
@johnatencio95243 ай бұрын
A glock isn't a S&W.
@rickybristersmusic36582 ай бұрын
lol. Kidding right?
@andyeighttre16 күн бұрын
Just here to read all the 9mm fans act like Kamala voters to 40sw fans.
@travisstankowski74958 ай бұрын
Why do 45 people have to prove a 100 year old round is relevant. It's on the wayside. If you want a heavy gun with a low capacity good for you. The fact is 10mm is the best auto. Deal with it.
@themudshark11064 ай бұрын
10MM. is over kill in many ways. 1. Over penetration is a fact it can go trough the next 2 people behind your actual target. 2. Follow up shots suck. In rapid fire follow up shot situations. 10MM has allot more muzzle flip way more rise and takes you off center in rapid fire situations that not an advantage but a disadvantage on top of the extreme over penetration.
@travisstankowski74954 ай бұрын
@themudshark1106 Some people don't want to empty a mag into a target like the lapd. One or two shots is all that is needed in a defense situation. I'm sure you're somebody that thinks you should deer hunt with a 5.56.
@themudshark11064 ай бұрын
@@travisstankowski7495 No I'd rather deer hunt with my X-Ray Bow and Arrow or my Radar Shotgun.
@travisstankowski74954 ай бұрын
@@themudshark1106 That's cool. I'm sure you do.
@kevmac12303 ай бұрын
There's nothing to prove.Dead is dead.
@priestof1s10 ай бұрын
40 should have been 180 grain be closer
@independentthinker89305 ай бұрын
That's weak ammo!
@robertb8805 ай бұрын
Personally I don't use light bullets in any of my glock40's and I get almost the same size wound cavity and still more depth. Ill never change from that weight the round was actually designed for.
@toddd74449 ай бұрын
@toddd7444 0 seconds ago try the new?gold dot 45 acp 200 grain +p dead sure or deadwheelchair larry
@GregoryAlcorn-o3g11 ай бұрын
I hate to tell you this brother but hardly anybody uses standard pressure 45 anymore man maybe some Old-Timers but the new generation are using at least plus pee and 45 Soopers and 450 smcs and 460 Rowlands man Old 45 standard pressures basically becoming useless man