5 Biggest Mistakes in Beam - Big Mistakes in Steel Construction of Beam

[@99kevin99]

Great video of the REAL WORLD...thank you!

[@sampangibalakrishna5276]

1. Do not provide crank bar 2. The stirrups spacing should be maximum at supports 3. The angle. Of hook not designed for 135degrees 4.there is no designed for development length according to 0.87*fy*dia/4toeb*d 5.the Bending wires not tiet properly..... Thank you sir 😍

[@bubblespark4265]

stirups minimum space at supports ..l/4 length..centre space more

[@cliffriifiu1586]

Great lecturing, thank you.

[@yxhankun]

Would u mind turn on the CC so that words are on the screen be recorded as still picture and we can capture the main mistakes in this lecture without retyping? Please and TIA.

[@sathishkaruppiah8788]

Thank you for the information brother.....do more videos bro

[@sripalsri]

Good information bro thq alot 🤜🤛❤

[@CivilEngineerss]

Welcome 🙏

[@JavedKhan-ny3pm]

Can you show an example of 135 deg stirrup bars as most people are using 90 deg. ?

[@gurmailchanddhiman4062]

Nice 👍👍👍👍👍 information sir

[@romanditobongalus7202]

Alayqumisalam. Watching from Philippines.

[@amacdavidz]

its very clear. thanks for the info

[@AA-om4vb]

Amazing work

[@taffythegreat1986]

When you point out these mistakes, do they rectify them, or do they carry on and pour the concrete ? Nice to ‘now video as I’m in the middle of constructing my own house. 👍👍👍

[@nigelunruly3543]

I would like someone to answer the question

[@edrisesmaely]

what is the minimum and maximum space of stirrups? in L/4 and in the middle ?

[@hendrabangsawan875]

Waalaikum salam....god !! Salam from indonesia..

[@mohammadtalhashah3260]

Dear, crank bar is not provided for shear resistance, but it is provided to encounter negative moment at the support or any position it needed. Secondly in SMRF design code recommends the spacing btw stirrup at the support should be less than 4in. And at the last, according to the code i never see 135 bending in stirrup of the beam. Thank you.

[@ahmadmustafa3937]

developing lenth kisay banaty hae?

[@paagou3496]

Crank is not necessary in beams because it will be supported by thousands of bricks and that 90° rings are also not a problem as long as you mixed up the joints alternately

[@vijaynarayan1936]

Greetings Sirji, Does the undersize steel and all the mistakes get certified by the building inspector before pouring concrete?

[@ramonplee]

Good commentary. Ur right.

[@sampangibalakrishna5276]

Sir why we are provided max steel reinforcement bare in bottom of simply supported beam

[@tapasbhunia8895]

Sir make a video for design of cantilever beam and reinforcement details and SF, BF

[@vikrantparihar5962]

Please make a video on how to check beam shutting line level & plumb bob

[@SONUKUMAR-uo4di]

Sir Why captions is not available

[@MohamedJamir-pl8nw]

Crank not mostly given instead extra bars are given in L/4 at top reinforcement to counter shear at junctions

[@aglbakers]

Hello, I have some cracks that have developed. May I send you a video?

[@manjunathkk9425]

Suuuoper Tq u

[@paonamdineshmangang6179]

Sir can you please give some idea of 17.5 feet beam

[@alongzorlymzorlym4032]

Sir evn they did nt put the crank bar in beam why??

[@ayoubenaciri]

Thank you Sir 🙏🙏

[@rolando3853]

You need hooks spliced to beam steel thus tying in beam to columb.

[@Faizkakar2233]

Yar hum ny gar Ka tamerr Kia Abi beAm kase deay chath Abi tak nhi banaaya hin

[@jongmagoncia1735]

That problem should have been prevented if there was an active site/resident engineer on that construction.

[@royangraham5695]

noted ‼️💯

[@selvamv4680]

Column striupps is also not there inside the depth of beam junctions...

[@shahidghafoor3541]

yaar waisay samaj zara be nae aaye. aap asan language use kerain instead of technical terms. ta kay aik normal person be samaj jae. or saath main solution be be bataen, assan basha mai.

[@epindarkharkongor7127]

Sir Please .show the drawing of crank bar

[@Abu-Dhabi786]

Good Job

[@radhikat6496]

Good

[@ramonplee]

The problem there is that the engr who signed the design did not see it but he makes guarantee for the building.

[@aus2tigran]

top bars transfer load to bottom bars?? that's not how beams work...

[@MasterCivilEngineering]

Yes dear

[@aus2tigran]

@@MasterCivilEngineering top bars are mainly there to hold up the stirrups, or for negative moment, or to reduce the neutral axis depth. The bottom bars resist the tensile stresses from bending action

[@MasterCivilEngineering]

Stirrups are used for shear while top bars are used for negative moment at supports

[@DesignReady.]

This is Ileagal .... Report this construction

[@MasterCivilEngineering]

True

[@MasterCivilEngineering]

Video solutions of civil engineering questions here

[@epindarkharkongor7127]

Thank you sir do more vedio

[@DesignReady.]

This building will collapse

[@bulbulebaagemadina]

Walaikum assalam bhai

[@johnbrando2666]

Not ok amigo

[@ramzysaikadatu7350]

The hook. That’s one of the mistake

[@MasterCivilEngineering]

Right bro

[@Canada4Israel]

Okay

[@noslen6077]

You know why it's all mistake? Ba cause some already it budgets is in the pocket of the foreman

[@williamsgiancarloyenquecar189]

el gancho de los estribos no es correcto

[@viosog9661]

Etrierii nu sunt corecti , nu ai etrieri in noduri ,ciocuri la barele de la grinzi

[@rickyguade3304]

Okay okay okay okay

[@sathishkaruppiah8788]

All of them are mistakes.....

[@MasterCivilEngineering]

Beam is full of mistakes bro