5. Impulse, Torque, & Angular Momentum for a System of Particles

[@FelipeMedLev]

I've been binge watching this course, lol. Now I get to really understand all the equations I used last year.

[@georgesadler7830]

DR. Vandiver, thank for deriving Tangent, Acceleration, Momentum and Torque in Engineering Dynamics. These derivations makes up all the important tools in Dynamics.

[@chaitanyasurepally8249]

The lecture is very good and the way the derivations made out, examples considered is really interesting. This drives me to learn more in the subject. Thank you sir for all the lectures & thanks for the MIT for the course offered. Personally i fell the courses are really highly qualified.

[@Ragavakkarnan]

good to find lecture on impulse.......thanks to MIT open course ware team.

[@yevgeniygorbachev5152]

In lectures 2 and 3, the lecturer emphasized that the frame in which a derivative is taken should be specified, as results may differ in the case of rotating frames. When the angular momentum of a particle is discussed, that frame isn't specified. Also, the relative motion of A and O, specifically, whether A is accelerating or rotating with respect to O, aren't specified. Would someone be able to clarify this?

[@muhammadramadanm]

Was wondering at 23:57 the equation states (mass X [Vg/o 2nd frame - Vg/o 2nd frame ] ) . Should'nt it be (mass X [Vg/o final frame - Vg/o initial frame ] )?

[@mradilarab]

Yup. You're right.

[@venkataramaraovilasagaram9862]

Good lecture .It enlighten me more

[@Upgradezz]

Great lecture.

[@A.Hisham86]

@princenimbalkar96 Could you join MIT?

[@Martijncvv]

What book do they use?

[@FelipeMedLev]

hibbeler

[@princenimbalkar96]

Can anyone help me, how I can get into MIT for engineering. Other things like admission procedure, fees etc. also, please.

[@tag_of_frank]

So what is the reaction force on the cannon? They all stare blankly. You know, Newton had 3 laws... Blank stares... I'm sitting here thinking... these are MIT students... face palm.

[@ThePost1994]

Salty much?

[@alengm]

Maybe the answer is so obvious that no one wants to be the one to say it

[@SuvrathHegde]

Kim Vandiver is no match to our dear Walter Lewin. He's not at all energetic. So boring. Walter Lewin made physics interesting.

[@Ragavakkarnan]

+Suvrath Hegde don't compare with Walter lewin....Every Prof have their own style

[@Rayquesto]

Information density is larger for Vandiver, because it's engineering. I appreciate Vandiver's work far more than Lewin's after struggling for years over MDOF type problems and he just makes the content flow smoother than any other professor I've seen.

[@sahilkumar-jn8vb]

I don't understand why do people compare one to the other everyone is unique has own style I find these lectures very helpful

[@saharshyashasvi9169]

Notice that almost all the comments down here are by Indians

[@tag_of_frank]

where is the innovation coming out of india since they have probably the most engineers? Or do the best Indian engineers move to the west??

[@lucasvargas7515]

i'm not indian but i look like one

[@joshuaconstable6323]

Wow...

[@zombiekiller770]

Is somebody dying in the audience?

[@hdheuejhzbsnnaj]

This guy is really not the best teacher.

[@woodsmith_1]

better than many