5 Incredible Things We've Already Discovered thanks to the James Webb Telescope

Unravel the mysteries of the universe with the James Webb Space Telescope! From impossible galaxies to ancient black holes and potential signs of extraterrestrial life, explore five mind-blowing discoveries in this captivating video!
Warographics: / @warographics643
MegaProjects: / @megaprojects9649
Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
Brain Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373
Places: / @places302
Astrographics: / @astrographics-ve4yq

[@TimberworksTables]

I'm one of the thousands that spent years designing and building this amazing telescope. Even *we* are amazed at what our work has produced!

[@danbuckley6584]

That's awesome, it really is awesome what has already come from it.

[@dwightbelinfanti836]

Wow that's amazing 👏

[@flipflop82ful]

Good thing you didn't hire spaceX, fanboys would have cheered while your hard work exploded into little bits of space debis.

[@jedaaa]

Awww look at the little naysayer who doesn't understand what he's talking about 😅 ​@flipflop82ful

[@trumpone4443]

That's pretty awesome.

[@himnishishaan2364]

I don't think even James webb telescope can figure out how many channels this man has 😂

[@J30YLK]

You can spend a lifetime exploring the Whistlerverse and still leave more to discover

[@Tsar-Czar]

Infinity

[@StoccTube]

It does spot the smaller ones by accident occasionally

[@yecto1332]

He's johnny sins of youtube

[@jackmcandle6955]

He’s, he’s AI 🤖 😂, kidding, he is a master of concise delivery of information.

[@scottantonille784]

As someone who spent more than 10 years of my life putting JWST together and making sure it worked right, it’s nice to see it highlighted in your work. Thanks.

[@seanstewart8942]

Me too, I designed it 😊

[@glennllewellyn7369]

Well done! I changed the oil on my lawnmower, my wife is kinda proud.

[@djstarrjunkie]

@scottantonille754 Any new discovery JWST brings to the public is similar to a Christmas morning~ Exciting, new surprises, infinite possibilities~ I'm a kid again where learning about our Universe is priceless~ TY.

[@scottantonille784]

Obviously I am only one of the hundreds across the globe who dedicated themselves to JWST, but I think we all consider it our baby.

[@Rancid-Jane]

I thank you for you work. Technicians and engineers like you are invaluable as exploratory tech becomes more and more advanced.

[@Busmagnus]

A tip for the sound engineer. Relax with the compressor, i can hear all the inhales the dude is taking and it is really distracting. Otherwise, if you really need to push the compressor that hard. Just edit the inhales down so they are not that loud.

[@dddaddy]

I agree. Plus, has something changed in the audio quality in the last few videos? It's like he's slurring the words and speaking very fast. I'm asking because I'm trying out new speakers for the tv and it coinsides with this new weirdness for me.

[@M3PH11]

@@dddaddy he is talking faster. it's almost like he went down into the basement and danny gave him some powder to inhale but i do not hear slurring

[@tamarothA]

And here I thought that I hear the inhales because I'm high as balls. But I compared woth other vids and it wasn't used to be like that before.

[@ernsailor9041]

I just commented the same thing then looked to see if it was noticed by anyone else and here we are.

[@Stable_Genius]

He's not talking too fast. Are we special needs?

[@bazzer124]

Tools like the JWST help science prove that there are always more questions to ask about the universe than answers to give. So cool. Cheers....

[@NeutralDrow]

Cosmology's one of those fields where even figuring out _what_ questions to ask is difficult, but exciting.

[@tgdm]

And one of those fields where we get almost obnoxiously-excited at the prospect of being proven wrong with new data.

[@theshadowoftruth7561]

Questions are more important than answers !

[@mischeviouslingo8065]

The language of science is precise. Thank you for being one of the few podcasts that use exact and correct language to describe science to us half-learned

[@X22GJP]

Speak for yourself.

[@sirfer6969]

He still can't say "kilometres" correctly

[@realdreamerschangetheworld7470]

@@sirfer6969different dialects

[@crunks420]

Thank his writers. All this man does is read scripts.

[@DonnaChamberson]

He’s not actually British first of all. He grew up in Michigan. 😂

[@ME-ke7qc]

im 51 years old i wanna see some aliens man

[@patriciaaturner289]

I’m two decades older, and I agree. I’ve wanted to meet space aliens since I first watched the cartoon Col. Bleep at the age of 6.

[@beatooze8025]

Go have a conversation with an octopus. Might be the closest thing we get lol.

[@sentientmeat96]

​@@beatooze8025fr

[@CliffSedge-nu5fv]

Why?

[@beatooze8025]

​@@CliffSedge-nu5fvmost species have likeness in multiple branches of evolution. We can, for example, trace dogs back to prehistoric times. Rodents, mammals and reptiles and what became of even the most remote ancestors. But cephalopods, that is crazy obscure. They share so little with others in their environment and resemble even less. They very well could be a foreign body that is "alien" to our evolution pool.

[@NomaddUK]

Once you notice Simon's sharp intake of breath you keep hearing it. Trust me.

[@arunmoses2197]

Dude I noticed it before I saw this comment and I can't unnotice it.

[@Adam-zr9qy]

I hate you guys😂😂😂

[@NomaddUK]

@@Adam-zr9qy Nah ya don't. 😁

[@zepherreload]

Dammmmm yoooouuuu hahahaha

[@draconbacon6395]

You... What have you done?

[@FrankOdonnell-ej3hd]

I know there was some controversy about webb due to its ten billion price tag as some scientists thought the money could have been better spent on a variety of smaller but useful projects. Also there were issues with the lengthy time it took to design and build it and fears of a launch disaster that could end it all but looks it was one big gamble with results better than anyone dreamed of.⚛😀😀

[@pobsdad]

That seems to be the thing with space exploration. Everything we do (Hubble, the Mars landers, Voyager 1and 2, etc) either crash and burn or blow our minds! Massive gambles, but the results are well worth the cost.

[@jokerace8227]

It is both an engineering and a scientific advancement when it works out, which I also believe is worth the cost and effort, as is the case with the JWST.

[@Thurgosh_OG]

They are building a bigger version as we speak. And a couple of others, of similar size but specialised for specific light frequencies.

[@biazacha]

In a way human history with exploration is just constant gambles: be it remote areas, underwater or outer space is a bunch of money, planning and some folks crazy enough to try despite the huge probability of going wrong.

[@I_Have_The_Most_Japanese_Music]

Wait--this nonsense cost _10 BILLION DOLLARS???_

[@MakesCache]

All i can hear is him taking breaths between words and i cant unhear it now.

[@zorven]

I had to stop watching because of this

[@EllieMaes-Grandad]

Ever listened to Kate Garraway on Smooth Radio? She's even worse . . .

[@Adam-zr9qy]

Whaaat😂 why did you do this to me😂😂😂😂😂

[@MakesCache]

@Adam-zr9qy didnt mean to spread that black magic to you.

[@Adam-zr9qy]

@@MakesCache you have been shunned upon!😂

[@rockythao5394]

This just hurts the brain, to think about just how little we know about the existence of, well, existence.

[@adamredwine774]

Well, we know both very little and also a tremendous amount. Think of it like our understanding of a hurricane. We can know a lot about how and why they form and do what they do but we’ll never know the exact position and velocity of every raindrop.

[@SebHaarfagre]

@@adamredwine774 And we have done wonders in biology, come far with DNA and brains and immune systems and whatnot... yet we have not even _seen_ the _tip_ of the iceberg of _how_ and _why._ Cosmology and Neurology are equally mind boggling to me. As well as some philosophical subjects like phenomenalism How can for instance some "simple" neurons or energy impulses "know" what to do and form any semblance of coherency, let alone conscience or perception. How can microbiological forms on such small scales act almost as if they "knew" what they were doing. How come we are both the greatest caretakers but also greatest destructors of our known universe.

[@adamredwine774]

@@SebHaarfagre I never understood why people think conscience is so terribly hard to understand. It seems pretty straightforward to me. And yes, i understand that the nervous system is very complex and that we don’t fully understand every aspect of perception, but the basic concept that simple chemical mechanisms underlay conscience seems perfectly understandable to me.

[@richpalm616]

Perfectly stated

[@mrfattypancakes]

Information doesn't come from mass or energy, it only comes from a mind 👍 The instruction book of life is the most complicated, intricate, intelligent, information packed into EVERY SINGLE LIVING CELL. Even Darwin, from his own statements, would not believe in Darwinian evolution today with the knowledge we have of the complexity of a single cell now- irreducible complexity. The same God that wrote that book inspired a book for you to read, to help you in the life He gave you, intentionally, of His own free will. That's the best selling book of all time- the Bible. Read the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John- the eyewitnesses to Jesus' life and sacrifice for YOU.

[@joshm3484]

Whatever this telescope cost, it was a bargain.

[@larrywhittaker9901]

UNLIKE MAAANY other "EXPENDITURES" 🤔

[@dezpotizmOFheaven]

Not even 1% of what the US spends on their military in just 1 year.

[@anthonyrobinson3514]

Pennies compared to we spend on other things that arnt necessarily at all

[@SuperCatacata]

Yep, there is no pricetag on such groundbreaking knowledge.

[@TheDraeg]

It was purchased on a deep discount sale for 346 trillion dollars.

[@bench-clearingbrawl7737]

My father helped build the JWT in the early 2000’s working at Northrop Grumman, in El Segundo, CA. He retired in 2011 after working there for 37 years. His highlighted resume: B-2 Stealth Bomber International Space Station James Webb Telescope Background: Grew up in a small ranch in Mexico. Grew up eating beans and corn tortillas EVERYDAY, no other choice. He started working at the age of 4 taking care of cows, then 7 he started growing corn crops, teenager started building stone/boulder fences. Migrated to America at the age of 16 with only $30. Started working at Northrop in the early 1970’s as a sweeper. Then moved up to eventually create tools for Northrop to build aerospace technology and worked on hundreds of aerospace and military. Mexican migrants are a jewel to America’s advancements DON’T HATE CONGRADULATE!

[@saydvoncripps]

And I'm so grateful. I live in London, we love our Mexicans.

[@user-ml7dj2ni1j]

It seems that we are learning enough to know that we don’t know anything yet. We are still young and relatively new at this whole space study venture

[@s.crawford12]

I was on pins and needles watching this telescope launch, set up and start sending its first images. I wanted this to be a success so much even though i had nothing to do with building or designing it. I love science and i wanted so much to have everyone's hard work pay off and they all deserved the success they all earned. From my heart to yours, thank you, you are a rockstar and we cant wait to hear what you discover. ❤

[@TheEducat0r]

Who needs sci-fi when reality serves up discoveries like these? James Webb Telescope, you're a star!

[@bariman223]

This video makes me think that the big bang theory may need revision in the future.

[@phapnui]

Every theory is subject to change. That is what is great about science. It is understood by every scientist that with new evidence, applicable theory reevaluated.

[@CliffSedge-nu5fv]

All theories undergo revision all the time.

[@bjhudson7673]

There's probably already a betting pool on new, alternative, and updated hypotheses based on how far out each researcher team's time with the telescope is dated. If there's not yet, I need to talk with some bookies.

[@Alaster-]

Similar to observing ripples from a rock landing in a pond, there's enough evidence that the big bang occurring can't really be disputed. What is definitely up for grabs is the why and how. And what was before that...

[@kwaki-serpi-niku]

​@@Alaster-The Big bang can't be refuted.....🤔. So you're telling me that all those billions of years ago, there was some unbelievably dense point of matter that popped into existence from somewhere. We don't know where it came from, but trust us....that point of matter was there. Something caused that miraculously dense point of matter to explode....oh sorry, rather expand into something. Oh yeah. What did that point of matter exist in? Was it space? No, but it existed in something. We just don't know what it was. Then that point of matter for some reason or under some mechanism that we don't understand or know why.... decided to explode or rather expand into the universe that we know today. That's one hell of a yarn as far as I'm concerned. I don't believe in fantastical bullshit. If you want to, go right ahead.

[@cheekyb71]

I consider myself a smart woman, I have a masters in education and have almost a whole 4 year health degree under my belt.... I don't know why I watch these videos - I understand about half the words, and even fewer concepts. I never feel more stupid than when trying to get a grasp on physics. The people who do get it, and the ones who are advancing it? Mind blowing!! Keep it up!! ❤

[@siyrean]

A disturbingly large amount of people in the comments don’t seem to understand that all statements made about the theories of the universe include the caveat - “Given the information we had at the time.” as if theories aren’t meant to be tested and broken when new information comes in to play, and that such things are celebrated rather than scorned.

[@iconofsin1043]

Exactly, that's how basic logic works

[@xgentis]

Some still bring up the bible, don't waste your time trying to fix stupid.

[@MineCraft-nz9pg]

The problem is that theories are treated as proven facts by the majority of people who know about it, mainly the general public.

[@bubbathedm]

Clarke’s First Law: “When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.”

[@Iscream4j0y]

Same for a software developer honestly 😂 every time I've told someone something isn't possible, it's because I wasn't experienced enough, now I just describe the time it'll take

[@ignitionfrn2223]

0:50 - Chapter 1 - Impossible galaxies 5:00 - Chapter 2 - Oldest black holes in the galaxy 8:05 - Chapter 3 - Dozens of jumbos 10:40 - Chapter 4 - A small rock 12:55 - Chapter 5 - Possible signs of life on another planet

[@vetinaris1297]

Chapter 1 & 2 - debunked false info proven false even before the video was made.

[@philosophicaltool5469]

oh the irony, starting off with "Impossible galaxies".. (according to their Standard Model, that falls flat on its face every time its predictions fail. Which is mostly all the time... ) .. to then tell you about "oldest black holes in the galaxy". Which seems fine, but only when you believe in such nonsense as Black Holes...

[@Dsnipez18]

Links please ​@@vetinaris1297

[@demoneIephant]

Simon Whistler you are single handedly educating the Internet! I love you so much my guy, all your channels are so interesting! ❤

[@stevennicholas4708]

He has a team he just reads but... yes lol

[@xjunkxyrdxdog89]

Dude has a dozen writers... 💀

[@ellen9575]

​@@xjunkxyrdxdog89 He does, but would you or many of us know anything about this if Simon wasn't the one reading it to us.

[@xjunkxyrdxdog89]

@ellen9575 how known these topics are isn't relevant to the point that he's not doing this "single handedly".

[@ellen9575]

@xjunkxyrdxdog89 and he's very very upfront about that, just look in his cellar.

[@saydvoncripps]

I brought my son 2 images taken by this telescope. I was so awe struck by the pictures,the beauty of stars and nebulae, the amazing universe we live in. I couldn't help but think of all the scientists that have contributed to our knowledge and what they would have given to see these images. Douglas Adams said something like, the garden is beautiful, it doesn't need fairies at the bottom of it. Sums it up for me.

[@joncederqvist4337]

An episode about the JWST but the thumbnail is from Hubble.

[@Coastfog]

I should've known there was already someone here who noticed. 😄

[@animalbird9436]

​@@CoastfogIs Simons head on upside down?

[@rgerber]

@animalbird9436 his whole room is actually upside down and he is hanging down like a bat

[@jasonsanders8797]

Has it found the edge of the ever expanding 'List of Simon Whistler's Channels'?

[@ElenarMT]

Don't be ridiculous. We'll find the limits to the universe before we find the end of Simon's channels

[@jasonsanders8797]

He literally has a channel with almost 100k subs....and ZERO f**king videos! And the worst part is...I'm one of the subs!

[@phapnui]

I strongly suspect he is part of a set of identical quintuplets. And each of them fathered a set of identical quintuplets. And so on and so forth

[@tr1p1ea]

He has 1 channel in each universe and KZbin is viewing them across the multiverse.

[@jasonsanders8797]

@ChrisKatsu 'The Whistlerverse'. I like that. I think you just coined a new phrase. We should all try to get Simon to do a video on 'The Whistlerverse' as if he has no idea what it is. I know the whole meta thing has been done to death, but i think that would actually be pretty cool.

[@MetalSlug-ev5wu]

Perhaps time for us to recognise we don’t know sh*t. Our civilisation is young and we’re still learning

[@stevenson720]

Learning like what this is, and as far as knowing shit, we know a lot more than we used too. I don't really get your point.

[@saydvoncripps]

I know. What a future can we have. Just have to sort out who gets to be our leaders, or have none at all, and we might just make it

[@bladedicedragon]

Hubble walked so JWST could sprint.

[@tomkop213]

With so many scientist with their projects waiting for JWST observation time and the shere amount of incredible things that the telescope has already found we should put at least 5 JWST-y telescopes in space one after another every six months. I know the cost was huge and the process was time consuming but there arent enough hours in a day for all the people who want to peek trough the instruments of this AMAZING telescope. However....i heard that the plans for even better and biger ground and space telescopes are already in motion. Good video.

[@jamesspears7242]

*** - "sheer"...

[@LivingWithTheCoopers]

You know when someone points something out and you can never unsee, or unhear it again... From this point onwards, you will always hear the absolute gargantuan breaths Simon takes between sentences. You don't become a big brain without big breaths!

[@mizzshortie907]

I noticed them as well!! I love his channels and videos but they could do with editing these out for the sake of my sanity

[@LivingWithTheCoopers]

@mizzshortie907 there isn't editing software strong enough to remove them! Ha ha

[@littleblackcat2273]

If you've ever watched a news or weather report, you can hear the big gasps of breath inward as they talk... once having focused on them, it is difficult to try to not hear them.

[@mcv2178]

I'm okay with hearing people breath; I do it myself, like, ALL the time! Seriously, I understand how it could be annoying, but I guess my brain just edits it out for me. : )

[@ssj2_snake]

You are history's greatest monster

[@curtislindsey1736]

Simon sounds like he's in a box. The difference in sound between the podcast channels and the others is crazy. Why can't he use the same microphone??

[@Adam-zr9qy]

Yeah its not good falling asleep to these😂😅

[@matthewpiper6526]

Loved this. Excellent empiricism, pace and explanatory elegance. Thank you!

[@codybailey855]

I love the fact that the more we see, the more we find out we don't know.

[@nachoman]

he's not even gonna expand on the giant bear in space? that's terrifying

[@tietosanakirja]

Hi, I'm sorry to bring this up, but your audio seems to have an issue. It sounds like you have exposed hard walls around you, accross each other. There appears to be a short hard echo that dies out slowly (like ~0.5 seconds). They are more prominant on certain frequencies, around the frequency of your speach. It seems the sound can bounse multiple times and still be picked up by the microphone. It reduces the clarity of your voice and gets iritanting in the long run. You may know all of this already, but you may add acoustic panels or heavy cloth on the walls at the points of primary reflection. I don't see your microphone, but you may consider bringing it closer to you, increasing signal to echo ratio. If you have already treated your walls, it's possible the echo comes from your floor and roof. Your production quality for video is so high, it would be a shame, if your sound were to lagg behind. Anyways. Thank you for your videos. They are generally very well made.

[@andygish3461]

I've always been a bit of a space nerd kinda geeking out on the photos before JWST. Seeing the first deep field view from JWST and the picture of the Pillars of Eternity made me fall in love with space and our universe all over again. Can't wait to see what else we can find out there and what the next space telescope will be able to do.

[@anonymousrex5207]

There are so many things out there we still need to discovery and/or figure out.... it really is humbling that every time we make new breakthroughs in technology, the usual first thing that comes up is more questions than answers. I am looking forward to seeing what comes next from the JWST.

[@danielmahoney8576]

Big fan I think your mic to close this vid getting a lot of breathing louder than normal

[@Moto_Medics]

It’s all I can hear

[@jajo1166]

Space truly is amazing

[@TexasTimeLord]

Years ago, I wrote a paper arguing that the universe is much older than 13.5 billion years. Many scientists now believe it's at least 20. The fact that there are stars older than the universe itself should have been a clue. This makes those huge bright distant galaxies far more understandable

[@SebHaarfagre]

But the largest problem is that "time" is a man-made concept and it's arbitrary and subject to things like energy, mass and other things. I've never understood (after realizing the full picture) how "everybody" is so caught up in trying to use "time" as a _constant._ It is fallacious at best, most probably wild guesses, and misleading bollocks at worst. Why isn't _energy_ the common denominator, even in "hobby" usage?

[@HaYlEeXx19]

@@SebHaarfagreyou sound really smart 😍😯😯😯

[@tonywells6990]

There are no confirmed stars older than the universe, and your claim of 'many scientists' is wrong. Maybe a few.

[@zoltanszabados8445]

Re: the excessive compression on Simon’s dialogue: it’s really difficult to lower the volume of his breathing because the original audio was compressed too hard. It has nothing to do with phase, professional engineers record dialogue in mono (his voice was recorded in mono, correct?) Best option: create a frequency profile of the breaths, attenuate those freqs with an eq and side chain it to a downward expander with very fast attack & decay. Flux makes a dedicated downward expander but you can get the same results with Fabfilter Pro-MB.

[@user-bb6ur9kb4i]

Love your work Simon

[@foreveranimallover1504]

awesome video!!! Thank you it made my day

[@JungleJargon]

Cosmologists are the greatest… “Bursty star formation” 👀😳

[@philosophicaltool5469]

*charlatans

[@JungleJargon]

@@philosophicaltool5469 The explanation for star formation is somehow missing from the script.

[@philosophicaltool5469]

@@JungleJargon the whole video is missing mainly a lot of common sense, much like the field of theoretical physics.

[@itemlocation]

I enjoyed your making fun of the phrase "Bursty star formation". But that is the way language works. You have to give something a "name" or "it" can't be talked about. Think about the name "Big Bang". This is actually a derogatory term given to "it" by its detractors. By giving "it" the name "Big Bang", you have given "it" a "handle" as the CBers (Citizen's Band radio) would have called it 50 years ago. Now, we can talk about "it" because "it" now has an agreed upon name, even if "it" is a silly name. Shakespeare said, "A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet." What he meant is that if we call a rose a "turd biscuit" it would still smell the same. Calling the process something silly like "Bursty star formation" does not undermine the serious attempt to differentiate the process from other, standard types of star formation. Think of it another way, would you rather it be called, "The Stevenson-Hewitt post-modern analogous rapid aggregation stellar nursery model" or "Bursty star formation." Sometimes, silly is superior to superfluous. Thanks for the smile.

[@JungleJargon]

@@itemlocation You can’t really talk about something that doesn’t exist. Star formation is an assumption without an actual process considering that energy and matter can’t make or direct themselves.

[@artdonovandesign]

Thank you, Simon, et al, for this great episode. As always- a stunning and provocative presentation. Simply Amazing!

[@mikereid1195]

As usual when someone says "This shouldn't be possible" what they are really saying is "We do not understand the science behind this yet"

[@vgstellar]

No shit

[@Beryllahawk]

Gosh I love when Simon geeks out about space stuff

[@Wolfie66]

These amazing discoveries by the JWT has renewed my interest in astronomy!

[@rossharper1983]

I love the images from the JW and i know 90% of what we see is known and explainable with science, but because that last little bit is guess work (for now), i kinda ignore all of it and just enjoy the photoa

[@clivemahony9827]

People should not be surprised when we see the universe surprises us isn't that the point of science to learn new things even if one of those things is we were wrong 😊

[@awandererfromys1680]

People expected to be surprised, it's just that the surprises far exceeded expectations.

[@captainspaulding5963]

Scientists LOVE to be surprised, it's quite literally what keeps the field growing.

[@Squidz66]

A thing so amazing. Involving so many bright people from everywhere. No war. We are all here.

[@jerrya9665]

I love your comment it is just so much information so fast and I consider myself someone that catches up on things fast, I can imagine someone that doesn't.

[@ArchFundy]

Great vid. You have a minor prob with your audio. Every intake of breath sounds like you are taking a haul on a respirator. Do you smoke? Gasping for breath is not a good sign. Take it from someone with COPD.

[@jimthar17]

Cool vid but the sound of you inhaling is distracting. Might wanna work that out with your Mic.

[@tr1p1ea]

Yeah he should do the entire thing in 1 breath.

[@Beeza2996]

@@tr1p1ea Okay bro, you got your smart-ass sarcastic comment in for the day. Congratulations 😃👍 But seriously, the audio is definitely off in this video.

[@excrono]

@@tr1p1ea Breath control goals.

[@TaylorFalk21]

I remember thinking that something was going to happen to the telescope during launch or during its unpacking at L2 and how bad that would suck for everyone involved. Glad it worked out

[@Scott-vr3kf]

I love hearing about this kind of stuff. Even if these discoveries seem inconsequential at this time, they contribute to a massive body of work that may lead to our salvation as a species.

[@andreamcleod9347]

Anyone else hearing the deep breaths in when he is talking? Gotta be a way to wait that out

[@vladalterax9840]

You can't just say "primordial black holes formed right after or BEFORE the Big Bang" as a throwaway line. AFAIK time emerged from the Big Bang. So, what gives?

[@HaYlEeXx19]

The more we learn the more questions occur. I love it ❤❤❤😮😮😮

[@petergalione1414]

I love how they are impossible, and not that we are just wrong

[@BOOGY110011]

is it me or host breathing is strongly laud between sentences?

[@takster050974]

Now I can’t unhear that. Thanks. 😭

[@KarlBunker]

It would be good if images that are artist's conceptions or CG were labeled as such, so they aren't mistaken for actual photographs.

[@mikejones-vd3fg]

I agree but im not worried, have you seen the images comming out of Mars? Way better then any CG depiction, the truth is actually stranger/more beautiful than fiction, theres black sand dunes and blue rocks... no one would have thought to model that on Mars.

[@DeeGee-mv6eq]

You actually believe those "photos" are from mars?? 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@mikejones-vd3fg]

@@DeeGee-mv6eq Yeah I really do, I'm sorry but our art is cool but not as cool as what nature's produced, that includes us.

[@fabianmckenna8197]

​@@DeeGee-mv6eq The area being checked out and photographed on Mars is huge so it should be a simple job for you to utilise Google maps to identify the exact Earthly area you claim is being used instead. Just think of the instant stardom and fame along with billions of "likes" that awaits your groundbreaking discovery when showing that to the world. We're waiting...........................................

[@garypippenger202]

We continue to discover just how useful the JWST is and how it is a breakthrough for all involved to overcome the daunting task of stepping up to successfully address the complexities of conceiving, planning, building and delivering the planet to its correct place in space. And now we have an instrument that will help us supersede our considerable knowledge about the Cosmos to date by proving how much we don't yet know. It's just the greatest of success stories in so many ways. Congrats to all, and may they have the good fortune to see JWST last for years of service.

[@jmik6229]

Some scientific disciplines create really highfalutin names for their concepts, and use terminology that’s little more than inscrutable technical jargon to anyone who is not in that field. But in cosmology it’s like, “what should we call the enormous space circle that’s so dense not even light can escape? Eh, I dunno let’s just call it - black hole.” And when you’ve got a burst of bursty stars bursting - well, bud, that there’s a bursty star formation. Absolutely mind blowing concepts, all revealed by highly technical science, but the names - straightforward af.

[@whiterice87]

Dear Editor, can you focus on quieting his inhales. they are much more pronounced than they used to be, and have become quite distracting the content.

[@Britgirl58]

I totally agree. Maybe he should just slow down.

[@SquidlyFishBeans]

Editor: *Shadow bans* 'This fool knows too much'

[@redogg2749]

Sound is funky, tinny

[@Timmycoo]

The pics of the JWST are amazing. My fav is the ones of Saturn.

[@mainman92]

I've been waiting for this update

[@Stormy_Fairweather]

i never realized ursa major had such a huge tail. i've never seen a bear with a tail that was more than a stub.

[@phapnui]

Bears do indeed have short tails. No evolutionary advantage for them if they had long tails. Maybe it represents a binturong. they resemble a bear with a long tail.

[@jota6262]

Are we sure it was a tail? The ancients did have odd imaginations at time.

[@chrisruthford4492]

Even Mizar is taking it to far.

[@doclewis8927]

OFF TOPIC -- Where is the microphone? Every breath you in take sounds like you've got the mic right up in your throat. It's very loud in the headphones and I can't listen any other way.

[@joachimb5721]

It‘s in the beard.

[@animalbird9436]

​@@joachimb5721I thought his head was on upside down😂😂

[@blakekizer6401]

I thought I was just stoned enough to hear that

[@philipmaxwell669]

Love your work

[@7r3v0rc]

Simon always looks so suave, I'm taking style tips!

[@CrazyUncleChris]

I'm not a Great Dane Mass Object. I'm more of a Morbidly Obese English Mastiff Mass Object.

[@txoilfield]

I'm a 13.7 Snowshoe Feline Mass Object

[@MikeLacey52]

That constantly heard sharp intake of breath is really really really really really irritating. Stopped me watching. Sort the miking out please

[@andrewb9790]

This all boils down to "we simply don't know". Our journey to understand the universe has only just begun.

[@VergilArcanis]

I was at an Open-house event in the Goddard center when they had pieces of it in one of the Clean Rooms. I have pictures of some of the mirrors

[@weirdkitty07]

The JWST is an infrared telescope so all photos are doctored to make them look more colorful and in human eyesight light, so the red ones might merely be artifacts of the colorization.

[@stephenbrewins3689]

I agree with you and as good as tech is today,it’s still transmitted by binary code so is it really that accurate or just a human/computer interpretation? And before this comment gets hated on by the uneducated,just understand that it is my opinion and I’m always right.

[@samuelgarrod8327]

​@@stephenbrewins3689😂

[@thumpyloudfoot864]

Fun Fact: James Webb Space Telescope and JWST have the same amount of syllables, so the acronym only saves time when typing, and you could make the argument that "James Webb Space Telescope" rolls off the tongue better than "J W S T".... Just sayin...

[@captainspaulding5963]

JWST: 4 syllables James Webb Space Telescope: 6 syllables

[@thumpyloudfoot864]

@@captainspaulding5963 how many syllabus in "double you" "dub bull you" thats 3... plus "jay" which is one, "ess" which is one and "tea" which is also one, now I'm mathematicianist or anything but I believe 3 + 3 = 6.... jay dub bull you ess tea is 6 syllabus....

[@robbabcock_]

JWST is going to teach us so much about the Universe. The problem is there's just one of them! It's like a keyhole with a hundred people standing in line crowding each other to peer through.

[@DigitalVanity]

I feel like everything in the known universe is an exception

[@SavoryCaroline]

love this but please fix your audio

[@cleverusername9369]

I haven't noticed any issues whatsoever

[@TheMunchkinita2509]

If you're talking about his breathing, I highkey agree

[@nasanerd8931]

Scientists: This shouldn't be possible! Our theories and models don't support this & we're big brains! Universe: 😂 yeah..?! Well have a look at this..🔭🌌

[@alexandre4970]

You should talk about the Grand tack hypothesis one day.

[@stephenhammond6962]

Great video Nomis👍 from Nehpets 😉

[@markymark3075]

Sophons. Innit.

[@ElenarMT]

Wha??

[@paulceglinski7172]

All right! Posted 10 seconds ago. Bring it on Laser Eyes. Cheers from Tennessee

[@AnotherOneFromTwo]

The information about the binary pair JUMBO, so thought-provoking. Could it be the material that they're formed from was specifically and separately charged in such a way that they formed two separate bodies rather than one larger object? Then that charge-interaction is what links them as the pair forever while they fizzle away? It is fun to think about. I really appreciate your content. Thank you for it!

[@waxedearth5425]

The imaging of the “jumbos” is astounding

[@01gtbdaily30]

It’s almost like we have no clue what really happened billions of years ago and every time we make an educated guess that turns into fact only stays as such until we learn how wrong we are.

[@TekkLuthor]

We hardly have a clue to what happened yesterday

[@Its.Me.Wynter]

I still refuse to call it that…. For me it’s Jumbo Wumbo Space Telescope

[@douglasstrother6584]

In any discusion of Unified Theories, Gravity, Electromagnetism, and the Strong & Weak Nuclear Forces are taken as the four fundamental forces of nature. The first two are part of our everyday, macroscopic experiences. It's curious that Electromagnetism has been excluded from Cosmology. It might be a good time to crack open "Jackson" again!

[@laurinbaumann]

awesome video!! but you're EQ on the mic is terrible xd the gasps are coming through so well xD

[@user-lt9rq3yq4w]

Pre-date the Big Bang. I'm sorry, what?

[@CBe-ot8vu]

It means before duh. What don't you understand?

[@user-lt9rq3yq4w]

@@CBe-ot8vu It what a rhetorical question. What don't you understand?

[@captainspaulding5963]

​@@user-lt9rq3yq4w perhaps you should stop expecting people to read your mind on the internet? Your post was formed in a question, which was answered.

[@user-lt9rq3yq4w]

@@captainspaulding5963 Yes, it was a rhetorical question, as I already stated. Google that and stop expecting to understand things that you do not.

[@brandankankel5209]

Thank you for including the American measurement of the tiny asteroid

[@noelrios9320]

The theories of the last century are being put to the test and a lot are not holding up to evidence. New info is needed new theories need to be developed. An exciting epoch in the history of humankind's understanding of the universe no doubt.

[@ChadWorthman]

The audio is making it difficult to watch these. Please turn down the compression, we don't need to hear Simon's every inhale.

[@davidkennedy8929]

Sounds fine to me.

[@MorganBrunson]

Not as annoying as watching the evening news...

[@danbuckley6584]

I wish you hadn't mentioned this how it's all i hear

[@ariescorner7655]

All I hear is “ahhh” when he inhales now. Damn you.

[@robking6975]

At least add a de esser

[@user-fy2kx3mi2c]

Thank you science. No need to rely on fairy tales and superstition (religion). The natural world is more amazing than any fictional story could ever be.

[@fearfx1]

You should re-read what you wrote. That is the beauty of God's creation.

[@subrobsugrobych2809]

I liked the "pre big bang part", very fancy 👍

[@Julian-tf8nj]

he just "slipped it in there", to see if anybody was paying attention 😂

[@tylerchristensen1484]

“According to gas physics, an object as small as Jupiter…” Calling an object the size of Jupiter “small” is exactly why I love astronomy.

[@swartgevaar5794]

interesting content ruined by truly awefull audio

[@julianaylor4351]

Buy or rent better equipment, my pad isn't having a problem.

[@Kreenick]

FIRSTCOMMENT

[@Jesse-cw5pv]

I thought little kids 5 years ago were the only people that commented 'first.' I guess kids still do it

[@Kreenick]

@@Jesse-cw5pv mad you weren’t first?

[@dolorusedd2586]

Okay... what's your comment?

[@bagsmohess]

Probably the only accomplishment in your pathetic life 😂

[@ElenarMT]

You win 2 points worth of toilet paper with your useless comment which wasn't even first