GD&T, or Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing, is a logical system of numbers, symbols and conventions applied to 2D drawings, either electronically or as blueprints. Have you ever used GD&T? What are your thoughts? Leave them in the comments below!
@BrilliantDesignOnline Жыл бұрын
Extremely valuable. I have been a designer in SolidWorks for over 15 years, and was ignorant of how this worked; I knew intuitively about datums by way of design intent, but now I fully understand the basics of GD&T. Thank you for this primer.
@starrapid Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Comments like yours motivate us to produce more.
@davidhernandez99852 жыл бұрын
Love the fuse & both architecture & engineering with a decimal solid 3dprinting machine!
@draco_2727 Жыл бұрын
Damn! the stuff I didn't know I needed to know. Thanks for sharing your knowledge! much appreciated.
@dodaexploda Жыл бұрын
This is really good info. As a hobbyist it's good to know what I should be looking into. I had no idea this existed before now. Thanks!
@starrapid Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Comments like yours motivate us to produce more!
@dodaexploda Жыл бұрын
@@starrapid Well then, I'm happy that I commented. I'm just a hobbyist playing around with a 3d printer, but I've learend so much from watching your videos. So thank you!
@abigaelbalbuena1917 Жыл бұрын
Thank you kindly for this!!
@starrapid Жыл бұрын
You're very welcome!
@kunjukunjunil14812 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video, much appreciated.
@starrapid2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching :)
@beachboardfan9544 Жыл бұрын
Why is IJK used for rotation when xyz is used for linear movement? Is there a logic there or did someone just pick random letters?
@fadirasmi440328 күн бұрын
Thank you ! I subscribe to the 5 rules. Does this apply to bigger parts, say a frame of a bicycle made of tubes or in composites for instance ? Thank you again.
@starrapid23 күн бұрын
Thanks for the question. Yes, absolutely GD&T discipline applies regardless of part size, product or material type.
@mohamadkhatib86242 жыл бұрын
if we do not use GDT what would be happened ? your feedback will appreciated .
@jehanzebawan432 жыл бұрын
Nothing. You can use +/- tolerances. It makes inspection and tolerance stack up hard. If your quantities are not too large, you maybe fine
@mohamadkhatib86242 жыл бұрын
@@jehanzebawan43 that means The more assemblies we have the more GDT we need for complex assembly right mr jehanzeb ?
@lawrencestrickland92642 жыл бұрын
@@mohamadkhatib8624 HI by using only +/- dimensioning it is impossible to convey the design intent. In addition you are unable to establish the true relationship between critical to function features in relation to the matting features aka datums. This leads to a ton of manufacturing problems down stream. Like over toleranceing features, which drives up the cost. GD&T is a language and properly applied in addtion to being understood gives back tolerance to manufacturing. They what a machinist wants to hear.
@mohamadkhatib86242 жыл бұрын
@@lawrencestrickland9264 sounds great mr lawence we really should care about the function and relation between different feature .its great to have your update
@addy45902 жыл бұрын
promosm
@lawrencestrickland92642 жыл бұрын
I completely disagree that you generally only need 3 Datums. You did qualify your statement by saying "3 is enough for everything you have worked on." I work with all the world leaders in manufacturing and %80 of the drawings i work on have more than 3 datums. I believe that is a reckless statement. You are going to get some new inspector or machinist yelled at when they say that to a good engineer.
@rinnengan7119 күн бұрын
"These 3 are usually enough"... I understand why most people say that engineers have little to no reading or listening comprehension.