I fall in love with the channel everyday. Thanks a lot
@pile3333 жыл бұрын
Very clear.
@anthonyccente2693 жыл бұрын
Socratica en español por que no vuelve ?? Tanto k me gustaba y recien lo descubri k pena ...
@gerryiannuzzi8156 ай бұрын
Noble gases in single replacement reactions? Along with metals, single replacement reactions can also involve _____ replacing each other. Question on edpuzzle
@kirbymarchbarcena3 жыл бұрын
The reaction I can only make is smile.
@Socratica3 жыл бұрын
This reaction is the BEST reaction! Thank you kind Socratica Friend 💜🦉
@benjaminkirbytennyson3863 жыл бұрын
@@Socratica Hi, Socratica! I love your videos, your videos have helped me a lot in my school during my exams. Please never stop making videos, never stop educating us!
@benjaminkirbytennyson3863 жыл бұрын
@@Socratica I would love to see a series of yours on quantum physics, & it also may bring you more views than your usual nowadays videos, as people are really curious about this quantum physics stuffs.
@benjaminkirbytennyson3863 жыл бұрын
@@Socratica Also, I saw that you have a channel named axioms & let it die. Why don't you post something on it?
@sasqu-atch8 ай бұрын
thank you for saving me for my chem test
@chabis3 жыл бұрын
So burning stuff in chlorine instead of oxygen like Cody's Lab demonstrated does not count as combustion?
@Antoniohfdrgsse3 жыл бұрын
Precisam voltar a postar os vídeos em português
@Afshiha3 жыл бұрын
Nice
@raunitsingh6763 жыл бұрын
Plz maths also
@chabis3 жыл бұрын
So burning stuff in chlorine instead of oxygen like Codys Lab demonstrated does not count as combustion?
@chabis3 жыл бұрын
Funny new bug: I can not post comments containing apostrophes anymore. Now I have to write formal English all the time. My English teacher would love it.
@Socratica3 жыл бұрын
Such an interesting question! Regular English "burning" and "combustion" means something a little different than the stricter definition chemists use. By the usual chemistry definition, "combustion" usually means when a chemical rapidly reacts with oxygen, so must chemists would not call Hydrogen + Chlorine → HCl "combustion," but they would say it "burns." More generally, they would call it an exothermic combination reaction. But other chemists would say there are these edge cases to combustion, like reactions with chlorine, fluorine, nitrous oxide - anything that strongly "oxidizes," and it doesn't have to be oxygen. But there's so much of chemistry that is like this, that is put in fairly arbitrary categories. Here are some nice demos of this reaction from @wwwRSCorg (Royal Society of Chemistry): kzbin.info/www/bejne/g6XcmJx5rNN4sNk kzbin.info/www/bejne/mnOpZJacqLWDha8
@Socratica3 жыл бұрын
YT likes to mix it up hahhaa thanks YT we appreciate you
@chabis3 жыл бұрын
@@Socratica Some definitions are just that, definitions. Like "metalicity" of stars in astronomy or flavours in quantum theory. Still kind of works.