50 Insane TANK Facts You Didn't Know

[@TheInfographicsShow]

For all war and history geeks... Are kits with tank models on your Santa's wish list? Which one?

[@Xyb3rTeCh]

No. 3 - There is no such thing as Object 269. The one that you are looking for is the Object 279.

[@shrekfanboy1734]

The Infographics Show no

[@matt_44882]

Yes! Tiger 2, t-34, and others

[@spacemonkey037]

The only thing thats on my wish list is that you get your FACTS RIGHT!!!

[@maryheadpoppins3242]

@Jakob Pistola PL-01 is bmp

[@russotusso1695]

*draws t34* *calls it kv1* *its actually kv2*

[@urby5996]

You know that zinoviy kolobanov stopped tank division at leningrad with his KV-1

[@overlord4404]

@@urby5996 yeah, but he mentions that crew was latter killed by grenades, that means its the monster of raseiniai

[@acceleratergun7597]

Actually, it's not known whether the tank at Raseiniai was a KV-1 or a KV-2.

[@whatinthefuckisahandle]

@@acceleratergun7597 it was a KV-2 there are even pictures of it

[@edinpok5481]

@@whatinthefuckisahandle yea i think also its kv2

[@knecht874]

4:06 : The Abrams is the most technologically advanced tank in the world 5:50 : The T 14 is the most advanced tank in the world

[@michelangelangelo7091]

Meta *HMMMMMMM*

[@SpheroJr3289]

HMMMMMM

[@swordfish4621]

HMMMM

[@bazinga3160]

@Snickering Ginger "4:06 : The Abrams is the most technologically advanced tank in the world 5:50 : The T 14 is the most advanced tank in the world" The word service was not mentioned once in that statement.

[@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385]

HHMMMMMM..........

[@melnibone1]

please do a ''50 insane wrong facts in our videos''

[@alexroode4104]

melnibone oeo I’m curious if that would shock me

[@amiigaf4476]

Hmmm. Your comment is.. Perfection. Like.

[@alisonarnett3484]

They don’t have to their already is this one

[@Jeff194gaming]

OUR

[@asneecrabbier3900]

Alex Roode i have a hand zapper if u want

[@chasebh89]

the lack of research and the amount of wrong actually hurts

[@berndlauert1046]

Word

[@bunkerxwaffles3422]

chasebh89 I know

[@rpurves80]

I'm upset as well do your goddamn research properly next time and redo this whole video please draw the KV-1 in that reupload (VK 36.01 was never mass produced)

[@M8Oktoberfest]

@@rpurves80 cites AMX-56 Leclerc. Says AMX-53. Leclerc never was an AMX tank.

[@rpurves80]

@@M8Oktoberfest the VK 36.01 H is a German prototype NOT a French tank that was a prototype in the lead up to the tiger I

[@RkEr-hd3xg]

Imagine the infographics show, but they do enough research to know that many of the facts are partially or completely incorrect

[@steelkat7905]

I second this notion

[@Hunter-bm6ss]

yep

[@RafidRahim]

Yep too many incorrect facts

[@tbt0380]

They used to do research when they had 3 uploads per week. Now they only go for quantity and maximizing views.

[@EHAMaviation456]

@@tbt0380 and the worst thing is that braindead sh*tters believe it

[@shake_well]

T-90 has the biggest cannon Laughs in kv2

[@SS-zd6yi]

KV-2? Laughs in Sturmtiger

[@shake_well]

Sɪᴍᴏɴ Sᴇɴᴀᴠɪᴇᴠ it aint a tank

[@SS-zd6yi]

@@shake_well Oh... I can see you are one of the bois who don't know what a tank is

[@papameowmeow8236]

kv 2 has a howitzer, not a cannon. the su100y (example) hold a 130mm naval cannon

[@szyszkimarcin8736]

HAHAHAH ultra laughs in schwerer gustav (802mm canon)

[@_saxonia2786]

So much wrong information in this video!!! who does the research ?! ...

[@cossmith3116]

I agree.

[@manwithaplan27jp37]

Some American on vodka trying to impress a Russian most likely.

[@Schnittertm1]

You must be new here, Infographics Show and research? That would be like water not boiling off on the surface of the Sun. You can be lucky if anything they show goes beyond what is on Wikipedia and depeding on the subject Wikipedia can be fairly accurate or grossly inaccurate.

[@SomeOne-kj6bo]

Yup.

[@maniacalclickz5084]

@@Schnittertm1 bruh they said the biggest cannon on a tank was 125mm... when it wasn't

[@s.crawford12]

That was not a KV-1 tank! You drew a T-34 variant. Do your homework.

[@iulian29-67]

Also it was a KV-2 that held the german division back Not a KV-1

[@mashedpotato238]

Time stamp?

[@mathiasandersen3401]

Look they are called Infographics show; Info and graphics, not necessarily info that goes with the graphics and visa versa...

[@linders2000]

the last fact isn't a p1500 monster, but a p1000 ratte with extended tracks

[@bryan5538]

I also heard that it wasnt a grenade. Appareantly they rolled an anti tank gun to the rear of the tank and shot it making a hole and killing the crew if im not mistaken

[@bobozeehax]

"abrams is the most advanced" "t-14 is the most advanced" bruh u forgot about leopard 2 or what?

[@Dichtsau]

m8, leopard 3 is in work.

[@aaronhuang580]

Uhhh, leopard 2 actually has many flaws. Though it better than Abrams

[@dustinontaiyabbi5608]

Correction you can drive a tank just about anywhere in the US as long as you have rubber tracks instead steel. And you can get a permit to have a working cannon on it. You can still have the gun but they cut a hole in the barrel so you can't use it. And you don't need a permit to own a tank. It's like owning a tractor. These are facts

[@bop3752]

Dustin Sanders Finally, someone without mental issues.

[@triplelp5462]

You can own a tank in nearly every country. In austria, a guy has a Challenger or some other british tank in his garden, and tells the government it is a statue. You can even buy tanks that were deweaponized, but need rubber tracks and a special driving license .

[@qwartz1586]

0w0 REALLY!?!

[@devontaenash409]

@@qwartz1586 yes real , the catch is it cost a lot of fucking money to buy one. Cost more that a expensive sports car.

[@IFDFAdmiralY11]

I believe you do need a special license to bring a tank out onto roads, though. Military Vehicles license or something along the lines. While it may be like owning a tractor . . . it IS still a tank. Also, I did not know you could have a working gun on them, though the hole cut thing . . . if it's in the barrel, I don't think it STOPS it from being used, I think it just weakens the kinetic power of shells fired from it. Unless the hole's drilled straight through the breech block or the firing mechanism, in which case, it's unusable, or in the former's case, plain fucking stupid and bound to get you killed. Either way, you're spot-on. Now if you'll excuse me, I'll be off to find/build a BT-7.

[@NotSaddamHussein]

Noobs in comments. everyone knows the best tank in the world, is Bob semple. It can easily destroy Abrams, T-14 and one shot challenger mk. 2 at any range, while being immune to the enemy rounds.

[@battlemage1327]

Due to many tanks modern explosive armour this is untrue

[@Atesz222]

@@battlemage1327 Trust me.. any armor explodes after taking a hit from Bob Semple tank

[@notrequired602]

@@battlemage1327 r/woooooooosh

[@Koneic]

@@notrequired602 i wanna be in the screenshot with a small smiley face at the end of my comment

[@jarrhead3538]

Haunter 74 woooooooosh

[@jacobjohnson426]

It's not the P1500 "Monster" it's called a P1000 Ratte and yes that is how it was spelled

[@Okkas123]

wasn´t P15000 called "the mouse" in german?

[@ny_lium]

Outboard no Maus was a super heavy while p1500 is just a Schwere Gustav on tracks

[@zestonsd5717]

The P-1500 is different from P-1000

[@GG-fn5ep]

Nothing about leopard 2?!?

[@hannes2211]

Or the merkava IV!, when even haivng it in the intro as the tank in the background

[@TomSawyer1010]

The german made leopard 2a4 and, now in use, leopard 2a6 tanks are pretty good. They have been used against the taliban in afghanistan multiple times.

[@jackm7405]

Came here to say this. I would argue the Leopard 2 is the best tank in the world. Absolute beast

[@butterybutterman7364]

Seriously, the Leopard can Rival the Abrams. Why wasn't it mentioned?

[@marajade2932]

American propaganda._.

[@coledavis5212]

8:11 *Says KV-1* *Shows T-34* *is actually KV-2* Start researching facts instead of putting down what you first see.j

[@bagas_akbar]

And the tank who hold the entire German division is KV-2 tank, not KV-1 tank

[@hanzarco7445]

IamYour Nemesis Germans threw grenades on the KV-2 succesfuly after 24 HRS of battling the KV-2 with atry and other tanks...

[@punonn6792]

also the Vk 36.01 H did not enter battle

[@hanzarco7445]

Pun Onn Yeah exactly

[@Mage-zs2ow]

@@punonn6792 yes, they were prototypes

[@BigBoyMan01]

dude. the guy who did the researching for the facts should be fired. and the guy who draws things. there's a lot of wrong information in this informative video.

[@aorusxtremem1_sam183]

Exactly they haven't even researched it right totally wrong.

[@Zeytrixx]

Thomas The *Tank* Engine is the most powerful tank.

[@Mlgtrek334]

i subbed to you

[@lmao6769_]

Dank*

[@magicdonut7125]

Yeah, he has a secret turret in his smoke stack

[@_aragornyesyes_7171]

No it’s the Bob simple tank is the stronkest

[@Dunkskins]

This comment has won the internet today.

[@spacemonkey037]

8:12 Thats a t-34 not a kv-1... At 10:27 The tiger was Tiger 131 not 223.. 11:49 I dont think Object 269 exist, you mean the object 279. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT!! PLEASE!

[@gerrylieianorigeneza3979]

Yes and You spelled Tiger wrong and also at 11:49 it used a T-54 turret, AND at 12:19 you forgot about the P1000 Ratte or Rat

[@spacemonkey037]

@@gerrylieianorigeneza3979 I can see that it uses a t54 turret, but it is still no obj. 269..

[@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385]

obj 2 6ix 9ine Lmao

[@adrianneflors.genetiano425]

hmm in some accounts its called as OBJ 270 or also OBJ 269

[@qwartz1586]

Actually Object 269 did exist... Just never mentioned and had never been known world wide as it was lost to prototypes of the Object 279

[@zuv42]

10:27 It's true that the film Fury is the only film where a working Tiger tank appeared but the reason for it is that there is only ONE completely working Tiger Tank in the Word. It is in the Bovington Tank Museum (UK) and was captured by the british early 1943 in Africa and then sent to the Museum.

[@mEmEzMaN...]

Your welcome From the UK

[@tonk_0139]

you said word and not world btw

[@jarrhead3538]

*Says p-1500 monster* *Shows a poorly drawn p-1000 ratte* The p-1500 looked like a rail cannon on tracks, p-1000 had five turrets. One was a 188mm twin naval turret, two were 88mm anti-infantry turrets, two were anti-aircraft turrets, and there was even a cannon mounted on the front. The p-1500 had a non-turret mounted 400mm cannon EDIT: the p-1000 also had three sets of tracks on each side, but they were side-by-side. The p-1500 had four side-by-side sets. They were horrible for turning.

[@MihaelTurina]

Actually the naval guns on the Ratte were 280mm, the "anti-infantry turrets" were Maus turrets with 128 mm guns, and the Monster had an 800mm gun, not a 400mm. Other than that I agree.

[@veryorignalname4804]

It was a turret from the battlecruiser gneisenau

[@isaiahdunbar9614]

I'm glad I'm not the only one who got triggered about that

[@josephpbrown]

I thought they were E100 turrets used...

[@FainaBani]

CreeperLord gaming 380 mm

[@finnandjake112]

Imagine the infographics show in youtube rewind.....

[@TheInfographicsShow]

lol.

[@Tsukiko.97]

I shouldn't have to imagine. Infographics along with many other content creators have long earned a spot on KZbin rewind but KZbin shilled to corporate industries. Like Cardi B? Really? She's not even a F ing youtuber.

[@XxDAOGJAYYxX]

Pewds

[@dickmeatbootysack2165]

Ala Harrabi the other channel was, the one with blocko. I can’t think of the name now. Edit: it’s life noggin

[@dickmeatbootysack2165]

Abyssinia Empire KZbin rewind has youtubers. Anyone who posts videos is technically a youtuber. So cardi b is, she’s just an artist

[@That_Montage_Nerd]

*Sees thumbnail, reads title* Welp, time to see what trash we're taking out today

[@MobPsycho-lf4lc]

No Bob semple tank No like. The bob semple tank is far superior than the challenger 2 or m1a2. @infographicshow stop posting this unscientific nonsense.

[@rugged2050]

Bob semple tank best tank.

[@aydankhaliq2967]

It was said by the chosen one who goes by the name of simple history

[@romanfesas9721]

its pronounced jesus not bob semple omg

[@marajade2932]

Capitalist American pigdogs with their propaganda my Tsar._.

[@swedishmeatballs7818]

The Big Bob

[@ShepardFR]

Fact n°35 : Russian T-54 and T-55 tanks are not from 1943... Those are post-war designs...

[@gabrielb5387]

they actually aren’t - they were developed during the war. He got them wrong anyway, both have can have both guns.

[@Karagianis]

Well the T-54/55 is based off of the T-44 hull which was actually developed then. The iconic dome turret however was a post war development.

[@TheRagaz]

in love and war, the british have to make tea.

[@TheDaltonius]

Yea

[@aaronquinn7640]

@@TheDaltonius ,ZZD

[@maticsega3311]

4:20 A 125mm is the biggest cannon in the world???? 8:14 It was the KV-2 tank that held aganist the germans for the whole day. Not a KV-1 as you mentioned in the video. They both have the same hull, just the turret on the KV-2 is way bigger because it had a 152mm gun. Also, the KV-2 had 6 crew members while the KV-1 had 5. 10:29 The last running Tiger 1 has the serial number 131, so, surprise-surprise it should be the number 131 not 223. Also, the Tiger 223 was the part of the Waffen SS Battalion and was destroyed. The serial number on the tank was writen way closer to the gun in the 223. I know I could be going through all the miss-animated stuff, but It would take a very long time. Maybe If this gets 50 likes.

[@thomasthepanzerkampfwageni2586]

like the German railway cannons

[@luckyplayer5305]

The t92 hmc has a bigger gun at 240mm

[@the-blues-three]

Sturmtiger 380mm

[@ancientwarrior3482]

@@luckyplayer5305 If that counts as tank then does the Schrewer Gustav at 800mm

[@anaverageweeb1582]

That's a railroad heavy artillery gun ya know

[@neromastic4512]

You are definitely not the geeks of Tanks Infographisc show. The Biggest Gun Build on a tank was the FV4005 183mm Cannon. That was made by the British. And not the Russian 125mm.

[@MihaelTurina]

Maybe he meant it was the biggest gun on a modern tank but I agree.

[@vintzvi3406]

2B1 oka biggest gun on tracks

[@vintzvi3406]

Madam Meouff Why i said it was biggest gun on tracks

[@braith117]

Germany has designed and tested a 130mm gun for the Leopard, I believe.

[@Luziferratus]

Kw- 2 152mm gun, Jagdtiger 128mm, Maus 128mm. I wonder why no leopard 2 is coming in here. The Abrams is coming from the MBT Projekt 70 to Like the Baguette. The tiger model used in this info graphic but for a tiger often a vk3606? Dudes...

[@asamantus9057]

Т-54/55 were not produced in 1943. T-44 was.

[@passenger8705]

No it was not.

[@passenger8705]

As much As I know the the production began in 47, but I maybe wrong. if you have otger info please share.

[@billytheshoebill5364]

1 year later Me: if there's already a T-44 that already been build at World War 2 then what is the use of T-34 series tank

[@christopherrhodes3228]

Well, you partly got it wrong on one fact. Tanks are road legal in the USA, and anyone can own and operate a "military tank" under two stipulations: the cannon must be deweaponized, and the steel tracks must be replaced with rubber.

[@tea4223]

Christopher Rhodes... What about turn signals, brake lights, tag light, head lights with dimmers, rear view mirrors, license tag, inspection sticker, etc.?

[@pepijnlams4262]

And here i am lining in the netherlands, where even having a pocket knife is only allowed under strict rules. Yet in america if you want to take a slightly modified tank to the highway you can do so.

[@pepijnlams4262]

Living, not lining of course.

[@darylfoster7886]

Bull shit the tanks are waaayyyy over DOT weight limit lol

[@Crankiebox99]

You can shoot the M4A3E8 but you have to be watched by FBI

[@aurimasknieza7320]

4:20 I gotta stop you right there. The largest cannon on tank was 183mm on FV4005. The 125mm is not the largest even between MBT classed tanks because MBT-70/KPZ-70 had 152mm cannons

[@Booster_ysh]

And that is just on usual tanks, several military expert agreed that some artillerie pieces are tank, with 155, 167, 180, 240 and 280mm canons.

[@PotPam]

@@Booster_ysh what about the 130mm cannon on the Is 7

[@harrybraddon1865]

If the FV4005 fired its gun while the turret was facing sidways the force created would flip it on its side. Also it was a centurion hull with a fricken barn on top.

[@wizzy5202]

i know it's not really a tank but The 2A3 Kondensator 2P :D

[@vintzvi3406]

Aurimas Knieža 2B1 Oka has 420mm but only fits the topic of biggest gun on tracks and not tanks

[@MfSDD]

"A Russian KV Tank" showing a T34-75 fighting Pzkpfw Löwe

[@beastbro9823]

Might be a inden panzer

[@MfSDD]

@Jace James the VK30.01 is a prototype Tank for the Tiger...

[@OltsuSuomesta]

@@MfSDD well, the Löwe wasn't ever even built as a prototype. Also the tanks look like VK 36.01(H)s. You also said T-34-75 when it had a 76mm gun.

[@Maxwell_Twist]

I wish he just said "KV tank" so I could give him some benefit of the doubt, but no, he said KV 1 when it was actually a KV 2.

[@ivansonnerbrandt2395]

it's not a Löwe, its the prototype turret for the Tiger 1...

[@Tiney1]

[ 6:26 ] The text reads out M1A2. While The narrator says M1A1. :/

[@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385]

he can't read (dyslexia?)

[@swedishmeatballs7818]

HMMMMM.......

[@coledavis5212]

7:39 Many soldiers did this before Korea...

[@nicolass3195]

dude what’re you talking about

[@Zenovarse]

Sticky bombs, motolov and steel bars don't exactly count

[@beastbro9823]

Fv101 scorpion 51 mph... Laughs in M18 hellcat

[@joshualee1827]

laughs in italian lunchbox

[@bru_5741]

Laughs in M1 Chrysler

[@TheTerraPyro]

"The M18 Hellcat was an American tank destroyer of World War II," sorry to ruin your day but m18 isn't a tank. Its a tank destroyer. Lighter class vehicle with specific design to be fast and hunt for enemy tanks. :)

[@YaBoiFetz]

Not one word about the Leopard 2? Like wtf?

[@Drache191200]

He is an Over Biased American Shitlord, thats why

[@YaBoiFetz]

@@Drache191200 scheint so

[@sirdukeofyork8839]

Found the Wehraboo

[@CrazyNikel]

Considering its recent performance with Turkey. *Its better to be ignored.*

[@YaBoiFetz]

@@CrazyNikel they only have an old generation leopard 2

[@StarReveurMA]

INSANE TANK FACT: 2.0 br tanks can kill 10.0 br tanks

[@divinesan7786]

***Mingot Army*** yep

[@manwithaplan27jp37]

I see your a man of culture. I love also meme thunder as always.

[@maticsega3311]

Attack the D point!

[@francocestari8580]

Sturmpanzer boi

[@coledavis5212]

*tHëRêS å HøLé Îñ YõÛr RíGhT wÌnG*

[@Glorbo_fIorbo]

THE WORLDS BIGEST GUN IS A 183 MM AT FV4005

[@bigfloppa6328]

Viljar R. Nilsen Have you heard of a sturmtiger that is 380mm

[@ClementineFlFlFl]

@@bigfloppa6328 Have you heard of Karl-Gerat? 600mm mortar

[@bigfloppa6328]

Miria_No6 well he said FV4005 I thought he was meaning vehicles but yes I have and it was impressive

[@scharlesscalvin]

(laughs in 800 mm gun on p 1500)

[@ASFAL.AdminMika]

Says a russian KV-1 holds off an entire german division, yet it shows a T-34 (57mm or short barreled 76mm?) vs some German Vk 3601

[@shep7544]

cliner kyle perez Yeah. And it was a KV-2 that held of the panzer division, not the KV-1

[@OchaFauzan01]

It should be KV-2

[@elt39]

Dallas got his medic bag it was not a kv 2 he was talking about krovslavski or What the hell his name was, he took out like 20 or something like that german tanks in a KV 1, there has never been a incidenten with a KV 2 in that way. Tho, he never fought any VK. 36.01 as they never left paper

[@michelangelangelo7091]

cliner kyle perez *tzé tzé tzé* Typical Infographics show military facts, always wrong

[@michelangelangelo7091]

cliner kyle perez also no, it's a 57

[@ShadowCorgo]

Nothing shocks me more than a lightning bolt.

[@theaussie6526]

Or me slapping you with the net force of God

[@DejaLuMusic]

Ohm my god you're right

[@firerodan2965]

Lol nice joke

[@dusty4102]

You better amp up the V’s on your puns. I’ll finish this off with the electric boogaloo ‘cause I’m bored.

[@citaderu9323]

Well do you know what bursts my bubble? Needles

[@zombygaming8831]

Zimmerit was also used against stickies, not just magnets. There was also a "Monster" tank Germany wanted to make called the Ratte.

[@arturparisyan5233]

stop doing history/war videos because you make it very bad

[@joseignaciohileradorna5122]

Ikr

[@aydankhaliq2967]

Halo mein feldmarschall, good to know your healthy

[@ajko5494]

They always bias the american stuff

[@nickbusch1454]

This is so biased

[@Hunter-bm6ss]

that's every list channel i watch these to face palm

[@KingDayDayDay00]

Didn't mention the fake tanks in ww1 guys

[@aydankhaliq2967]

Like the meme m10 panther

[@kingtigerthomas318-69]

U meant the Balloon tanks

[@tigertank3024]

Or that the biggest tank battle ever was the Battle of Prokhorovka ( part of the battle of Kursk)

[@tigertank3024]

And they say that the t-54 is first produced in 1943 it’s 1947

[@omfgspoon7]

@@tigertank3024so it was the battle of kursk then idiot

[@samuelobrien9267]

10:17 “The T28 super tank...” Cries in T95 turtle 🐢

[@_aragornyesyes_7171]

8:21 Ok wtf.First of all that’s a T34 variant not a Kv-1 Second of all a Kv-2 was the one who stalled out the Germans

[@ariqamsyarazizulazmi5091]

Actually, people doesnt know what KV it is. But I think its a KV1 tank because KV2s arent made to destroy tanks. It was made to destroy enemy fortifications. Plus, KV2s are too weak as it has lack of rate of fire.

[@zjotheglorious]

@@ariqamsyarazizulazmi5091 Aaaand another WoT player. Any tank can have a good rate of fire. You just need a strong loader.

[@acceleratergun7597]

@@zjotheglorious Nothing has a good rate of fire if it has a 152mm gun. The weight of the shell and the constraints of operating in a turret see to that. A KV-1 is much more likely, and the commander of the German force there identified it as such.

[@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385]

low budget editing there chief

[@zakkyun]

uwu it’s you

[@a39tortoise40]

As much as I thoroughly enjoy the rest of the channel, Please, just stop with the military vids, especially with tanks...that didnt even look anything like the challenger 2! It looks like a bloody leopard 1 prototype! The landkreuzer you showed was the p.1000 ratte .Oh, and lets not forget to mention the extreme bias... US this! US that! Half of your Abrams facts are wrong anyway- yes, it's up there with some of the best tanks, but you glorify it wayyyyy too much.There's more to the world than the USA. This is why these military vids you do are pretty boring. Other than military vids I enjoy the channel quite a lot :)

[@michelangelangelo7091]

ollie 1012 have you seen his 50 jet fighters facts? Most on them are on the F35, like 55% of the facts

[@a39tortoise40]

yep it's pretty sad

[@simonmaala7311]

@@a39tortoise40 Yeah ur right.... Germans and Russians were the real masters of Armoured combat mot the slimey tea sucking brits and the fat muricans... I mean.. Srsly... Boi ..the Bias

[@a39tortoise40]

@@simonmaala7311 get rid of the slimey tea sucking brits bit and ill respect ur opinion XD

[@raidzor5452]

ikr....The Abrams literally gets outclassed by any modern tank in mobility and armor... not to speak about the composite armor leaving open spots of literally sheet metal and the technology innovation being from the '80s, meanwhile other tanks have advance computer-controlled anti missile systems, ceramic composites, unmanned turrets and much more powerful and efficient engines (because Americans still use that gas turbine thing which gets outclassed by modern diesel engines in power (1500hp for russian tanks and 1200 for the Abrams), efficiency (a jet engine consumes more than any other engine in high torque applications), stealth (it emits double the heat, which allows for easy IR missile targeting, and makes an incredible amount of noise even at idle), not to speak about the throttle response being awful and the servicing being expensive and time consuming, as well as reliability) Anyway, it's good... but really just absolutely not the best nor even impressive.... Maybe just the ammunition is really good but that isn't even mentioned...

[@SparksHardcoreMusic]

Is it bad that I love the fact each time they animate a tank firing, the flames briefly form a skull? It looks too dead on to not be intentional.

[@birkusmaximusspiller8345]

The high mm of a gun dosent mean it is better.

[@michelangelangelo7091]

Birkusmaximus Spiller British 57mm QF MK.7 was better than American 75mm M3, and both were short barrel guns

[@TheLtVoss]

Well in smoothbore cannons a bigger caliber means u cann accelerate the (same) projectile stronger at the same barrel length more Vmax means more punch so bigger is better for that but a bigger gun means more recoil and less ammunition and 120mm upward they need a automatic loading mechanism all of that makes the tank more expensive

[@combativeThinker]

The ammunition is what really matters.

[@jingledfriskies5048]

Panther > Kv2.

[@naggie6358]

High calibre short guns are better infantry support, smaller calibre long guns are better for anti tank.

[@jcasoriousa]

4:21 "largest cannon in the world" 125mm

[@alamoemperor3845]

Maybe largest in service on an mbt? Tho i think theres some leos with 130mms

[@83athom]

@@alamoemperor3845 The Abrams and Leopard 2 both had variants in testing equipped with a long barreled 140mm gun that fired projectiles several times larger at much greater speeds than the current 120mm both use. Plus if we're going by caliber, the KV-2 during WWII was equipped with a 152mm howitzer. Oh, and that's sort of ignoring the Centurion modification (Fv4005) that gave it a 183mm naval gun.

[@samobispo1527]

M551 Sheridan and M-60a2 "Starship" has 152mm cannon/missile launchers.

[@fernandosonato8022]

Gustav is best gun

[@carly8_421]

(50 insane lies that you dident know)

[@darthcalyx8986]

they also use the wrong picture for the p1500 Monster the picture they did use is the p1000 Ratte

[@vintzvi3406]

P1500 is also a SPG and not a tank, basically they meant P-1000 ratte and not P-1500 monster

[@morganainscough9981]

Video hasn’t started but I already know I’m about to get triggered

[@CrazyNikel]

Good get triggered you 3rd world rug kisser. You jealous haters just *fuel and secure US dominance* thanks for the help 😉😂

[@essentialjazzforaspiringmu1605]

Lol what is that even supposed to mean. Hes saying that because its going to have a shit ton of stuff wrong.

[@brentonherbert7775]

@@CrazyNikel Idiot...

[@sirbillyblacksmith4393]

@@CrazyNikel HOLD UP...

[@--X--]

Seems heavily US biased

[@michaelanthony2249]

The line about the man blocking the tank was pulled right off of wiki

[@shady1237]

Talks about KV-1, shows a T-34. The Division attacking looks like the Porsche Tiger design, which was later made into the Elefant. Did you guys really look into it?

[@deleteyrself1]

Also the so called kv 1 was actually a kv 2

[@hamstergaming1792]

the division attacking are vk36.01 prototypes i believe. and deleteyrself1 is correct. it was a kv2. the hero of raseiniai

[@qwas_1234_]

its a t-34-57

[@lxrd_cs]

The T-90 has the biggest gun? How 'bout the shitbarn with the 183mm i mean ofc the FV4005

[@divinesan7786]

Tou Fou I think they mean modern MBT?

[@Mike_Fin]

@@divinesan7786 "equipped with the largest cannon in the world" I doubt that

[@divinesan7786]

Mike_Fin well for all MBT, Russian has 125mm while others use 120mm Rheinmentall

[@manwithaplan27jp37]

@@divinesan7786 but there was no mention of mbt when he said the biggest gun.

[@manwithaplan27jp37]

largest gun known so far is the German railway artillery gun. But for a tank to my knowledge is a 183mm naval gun aka fv4500 aka battle barn

[@joker_9476]

fact number 27 is so wronng the leopard 2a6 or 2a7 is by far the most well defended tank in the world right nonw

[@--X--]

The T90M and MS Tagil (and T-14 Armata) actually have the best defense among all modern MBTs, with the A7+ being alongside them.

[@ducminhtran4136]

@@--X-- That's the disputing one

[@harryzhao727]

says female tanks have machine guns, shows two of the same tanks but one with 2 cannons on the side. also you can't say Kursk for Germany and show vk 36.01 h tanks, they're freaking prototypes, do your god damn research and don't use the first google search that comes up

[@mp88474]

Pickled Pickles the vk3601h was not shown it was a tiger with its “stock”/ prototype turret

[@harryzhao727]

it's not a tiger, look and the hull, you'll see a break in the track protection above the track towards the front, tigers didn't have that, along with the fact that it's not in a box shape, plus box towards the box of the tank, and lastly, it's not in the tiger's box tank form and it doesn't have the engine protection on the back of the tank @@mp88474

[@MAG_1204]

Typical wot player

[@MAG_1204]

@@mp88474 umm, you're wrong, the vk 36.01 h turret only designed for vk 36.01 h Since it was meant to only used by VK 36.01 (H), Which is Tiger I's prototype.

[@michelangelangelo7091]

Pickled Pickles those aren't even VK3601, they are VK36.01 chassis with a Panzer VII Löwe (just a design, never made any prototype), which makes it even less accurate

[@Combatwombat-sn7ng]

Although the t14 has a 125mm gun many previous tanks have had larger guns, even if you include the 152mm upgrade

[@Combatwombat-sn7ng]

@@zykom1 I know- like the KV-2 or centurion avre (not ww2)

[@packee8052]

Bigger dose not mean better.

[@isni1946]

These are not anti-tanks cannons, the are howitzers (to destroy bunkers)

[@Combatwombat-sn7ng]

@@isni1946 KV 2 was anti tank

[@kubauhlir1730]

@@zykom1 Yeah, that's bullshit and doesn't make sense at all... Only larger guns used during and after WW2 were howitzers... Also it is bullshit, because the guns were very accurate even back then, sporting higher than 90% 1st shot kill rate

[@leonardorenzi2861]

8:16 It was actually a KV-2 for various reasons: the main, and most important one, the fact that 6 crew members were buried. KV-1 tanks only had 5 sits. Another one is that KV-2s, with their 152 mm main cannon, usually operated alone, instead than in groups like KV-1s and other tanks did.

[@josefstalin9678]

7:22 I've heard the m18 hellcat was able to get up to anywhere between 55 to 60 miles an hour

[@merle1476]

Josef Stalin Yh sure it could 55 kmh that’s about it

[@Schnittertm1]

Turn off the governors on modern MBT and they could also go much faster. The only problem would be that after a short while their suspension and tracks would be shot if you do that.

[@TaipansSpicyHighlights]

The tank A-20 from Russia can get up to 80 km/h.

[@Zalified]

Apparently the new wheeled light tanks can go at 100kmh

[@josefstalin9678]

@@Zalified World of Tanks?

[@Mr-Ad-196]

Where the German super tank from ww2 name the mauss? Although it was not used during combat they do have prototype during the war

[@aydankhaliq2967]

Unlike the monster

[@dandrelowery3714]

Sent to museum I guess. Since it’s proven like the Monster too heavy to carry on rails. Good concept but limited resources

[@dtk9257]

what happened to the P1000 "Ratte" huh?

[@TotoGeenen]

@@dtk9257 it only excisted on blueprints

[@ameya5819]

Maus tank was captured by Russia after they found out about its existence.... It is in a museum in Russia.

[@rishanaftab3460]

There's misinformation in this video. At 8:15 you say that a KV1 stopped the panzer division alone.However, it was a KV2,equipped with a 152mm howitzer.After the tank was taken down,the famous tank came to be known as the KV2 of Rasenai(the place where the battle occurred).

[@nickbusch1454]

You said kv1 and drew a t34 but the battle of raissenai was a kv2

[@lukaskytte8511]

Kursk was not the biggest tank battle. The battle of Brody was

[@stalinium4769]

Luka Skytte finally someone who knows

[@dmitrit.4862]

You should compare the numbers and then say which battle was bigger? There were over 5,000 Soviet tanks and almost 3,000 german tanks in use during Operation Citadel. Then the Soviet counter offensive came, with over 7300 soviet tanks against over 3,200 german tanks. And I didn’t even count the men, guns & mortars or aircraft in. The battle of Brody was more like 3,500 Soviet tanks vs 750 german tanks.

[@stalinium4769]

Dmitri T. Source ?

[@Marvin-fw2bn]

That's still subject to much debate. But it mostly comes down to how big you define "battle". So in which area and in which time frame which engagements are attributed to the battle.

[@cunuchc6153]

The battle of Kursk is bigger by numbers, front tensions, results and military-political consequences.

[@oerwout10]

4:19 i dont really understand this one, because i know for a fact that the russian kv-2 had a 152mm cannon. and there are probably tanks out there with even bigger cannons. he also didnt specify wether it was the biggest cannon on tanks. because battleships could have calibers up to 406mm. and the carl gustaf railway artillery cannon had a caliber of 800mm

[@TheFallOfSaigon22345]

Where in the high hell did he get "23,000" tanks participating in the Battle of Kursk from?! The highest speculated number I've seen anywhere before is between six and eight thousand, which is a far cry from that immensely hyperbolic claim in this video. Another note, as it seems very little in-depth research was performed for several key portions of this video, the so-called Polish PL-01 never was a legitimate attempt at a new advanced tank. It was a mockup built on the chassis of a T-55A in Polish service several years ago. And lastly, the Challenger 2 incorporates the usage of the Dorchester model armor scheme, which is improved derivative of the Chobham armor originally designed and incorporated in the M1 Abrams and Challenger 1 back in the 1980s.

[@simonhofrichter2551]

With those 23.000 tanks they probably inclued SPG and SPAA's aswell

[@koskok2965]

Chobham armor is an umbrella term used to refer to the well known british composite armor packages "Burlington" and "Dorchester". Dorchester IS Chobham, 2nd Gen Chobham to be exact.

[@coledavis5212]

23000 tanks is way too unlikely. The Russian and German economies weren't made for mass production

[@mitasrb]

That's because ZERO research has been done.

[@Mage-zs2ow]

@@simonhofrichter2551 and maybe everything else that has a track

[@ashina2146]

No Bob Semple Tank? BOOOO

[@heathstory9655]

THIS CHANNEL IS AMAZING!!!! I'm obsessed!

[@niera-u9t]

"No abrams were destroyed by the ennemy fire to this day" (me looking up) "Seinfield song is playing hard".

[@Schnittertm1]

Yes, the US is rather famous for killing their own tanks, they don't need outclassed enemies that can't hurt their tanks to do that. ;)

[@imperialwhovian3461]

Yeah anyone who claims this is just lying, the Abrams is a great tank but any tank can fairly easily be knocked out even if it’s just for a short time, even if the crew survives with a few million dollars of equipment heavily damaged I’d be surprised if not some attempt is made to retrieve and at least salvage.

[@alexschenewerk7436]

Tanks are tanks man. Any one of them can be neutralized. Especially with the US and NATOs compliment of CAS and multirole aircraft, like the a10 and others that would make quick work of any tank.

[@--X--]

That RPG7 would like a word

[@miguelb.655]

Tanks can be destroyed Isis and Iraqi rebels have destroyed scores of Iraqi Goverment M1A1. The same in Yemen. Also a IED can be considered enemy fire so a lot of US M1 Abrahams have been destroyed in Iraq War.

[@Flyguy779]

Wow i’m sooo shocked about all these amazingly well researched facts.... eh what did i expect... i give a solid 4,5/10

[@michelangelangelo7091]

Flyguy779 10/10 would fact again (this is sarcasm)

[@waitthatscopyrighted3198]

“Tanks are the ultimate weapon” Nuclear weapons: AM I A JOKE TO YOU?!

[@markomamic6322]

No Leopard 2 on the list :(

[@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385]

I feel ya

[@josec8896]

No way..again...video sponsored by the U.S. army

[@simonmaala7311]

@ AMERICAN BIAS!!!

[@sentinelwinters6584]

Well it is true that no american M1A2s have ever been destroyed but its definately not the most advanced tank anymore, now that title belongs to the T-14

[@sentinelwinters6584]

​@ Those are not M1A2s, they are other variants

[@FOX0NE]

American bias all I can say and there is proof that the tanks in the Iraq army were T-72 M, they were under armoured and didn't have the same amunition as a normal T-72 and I bet that a Russian T-72 can take an American tank any day

[@Sarfanger]

@@sentinelwinters6584 Saudi M1A2s has been lost to Houthi fighters.

[@stevewonder10]

The Leopard 2A6 is considered the best allrounder tank.

[@--X--]

Surely, but after the T90M

[@saltboat5091]

I personally think the M1A2 Abrams is a sweet deal

[@11Tits]

@@saltboat5091 nah I would rather take the 2a7

[@davinnguyen9792]

11:42 It’s Object 279 not 269.

[@luckyplayer5305]

davin nguyen without it’s tracks it looks a UFO

[@roobobin]

lucky player it is a ufo. The Russians meant it to fly)))))))))

[@lolthistruebias5057]

A nuclear resistant, flying tank... da comrade...shoots Stalin guided shells...

[@11Tits]

I was trying to find the comment that mentioned this

[@ikea_man]

*WARGAMING WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION*

[@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385]

*FIAT 3000 WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION*

[@rishavoo7]

FV 4005 STAGE II WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION

[@luckyplayer5305]

T92 HMC wants to know your location

[@anaverageweeb1582]

STURMTIGER WANT'S TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION

[@ikea_man]

@@rishavoo7 *DEATH STAR WOULD LIKE TO HESH YOU*

[@endoftheworld29]

why is the Maus not included?

[@masen3319]

33:the kv-2 have a fckin 152mm derp gun :P

[@masen3319]

And another thing: in 8:25 has a T-34 not a kv-1!

[@MrWhips243]

The fv-4005 had a even bigger gun at 183mm

[@dleljak100]

Mastryx you called?

[@thevigamerpixerlator]

@@MrWhips243 important to note its called the version 2 for a reason. Because the 1st version was a different prototype

[@heroninja1125]

t92 hmc has a 240mm gun schwerer gustav railway cannon has a 600mm cannon

[@mariofan1ish]

"Tanks are the ultimate weapon!" Navy: Laughing hysterically

[@messinberver4683]

The Death Star: *laughs till it blows up*

[@Kevin_Lin603]

air-force:..........

[@JokerLokison]

Said the squid on ManAss Monday...

[@smurfie8412]

Sometimes when I close my eyes... I can't see

[@kristjankalariu183]

*THE MORE YOU KNOW*

[@raffaelegrasbeck4171]

OMG! It happens to me!!!

[@anthonysalazar5867]

What do you mean "sometimes" 🤔

[@satyamjha3268]

You've got LIGMA!!

[@spartan4576]

Omg same

[@ramadhani201]

KV-2 : *DURP*

[@dleljak100]

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURP

[@lukeimmo7268]

Color red it’s valled DURP DADDY

[@lukeimmo7268]

Just so you know

[@dleljak100]

@@lukeimmo7268 k thanks m8

[@TXLAdventure]

Your channel is getting more and more unenjoyable

[@ferdinandstrau3513]

The T-54 was not introduced in 1943 it was in 1954 also the T34 was the most produced tank

[@thedamntrain5481]

no the t54 was the most produced tank

[@williamnghiem6890]

*T-34, not T34. T34 was American heavy tank prototype while T-34 was Russian medium tank

[@michelangelangelo7091]

Ferdinand Strauß and the T-54 entered service in 1949 for the first time, you are confusing with the late version/ T-55

[@Orinslayer]

@Prussian Eagle you dont

[@Sarfanger]

Wrong. First prototype was ready in early 1945 and first production tank rolled off from production line in 1946. But that was only 3 tanks, under 100 tanks were made in 1947 being first production variant called T-54 Mod.47 (T-54-1)

[@n3DJ_]

Kursk wasn't the biggest tank battle but was arguably the most influential

[@MrTarka34]

Kursk was a operation

[@awkwarddoggo05]

Did you know a Panther tank in Normandy, 1944 killed 2 Shermans with 1 shot?

[@hamstergaming1792]

and their is also a rumor which i don't know whether actually true that the gunner of otto carius's tiger tank shot a plane down with its 88mm main gun.

[@awkwarddoggo05]

Well the 88mm originally was an anti aircraft gun

[@hamstergaming1792]

@@awkwarddoggo05 yeah the flak 88 was effective against enemy armour as well as doing its original job which was the inspiration for mounting an 88mm gun on a tank that has even better armour than a kv1. but the guns aren't the same and placed very differently and most importantly the ammo used is very different. so if what i said earlier did actually happen then it is hell of a shot. so most of the credits should go to the gunner not the gun. and ofcourse luck

[@awkwarddoggo05]

Yes I know lol

[@Crispy_pata]

Lol!

[@IamLegendaryguy1998]

The infographics show greatness

[@TheInfographicsShow]

💪🏻

[@di77me]

it wasn't called the monster. It was called the "RATTE".

[@ichabodcro6508]

when we talk about cannons, how about German railroad cannon GUSTAV

[@potatosalad1093]

And Karl

[@4F6D]

Ichabod CRO big berta, Gustav Are love

[@maoama]

This is horribly inaccurate. The Abrams is an out of date #4 -rank tank. 2017 competitions proved that LeClaire and Leopard are better. Aramata is #1.

[@michelangelangelo7091]

joelouis lmao, are those names typed like that on purpose? Anyway I agree

[@Booster_ysh]

"Leclerc" i am french so don't try to make me angry ;p

[@gamingkingdom1146]

What is the merkava windbreaker place?

[@szarvaskoppany]

@@Booster_ysh Or else you surrender? (Sorry, couldn't help it.) Anyway, I heard about Armata, but actually have anyone ever seen it in action?!

[@mp88474]

We all know the real best tank is the German Mine clearer from ww2

[@KevinMillerPHX]

What about the Merkava? It's seen a LOT of action and is known for survivability...

[@grimanima]

And for it's, what can only be described as, sexy turret dread locks

[@hannes2211]

I know they didnt talk about the merkava in the video but isnt the very first art of a tank in this video that of some merkava IV:s?

[@anywherebuthere4389]

Good tank, but it is up against really really capable tanks like Leopard 2A7, Challenger II (for survivability) etc. So don’t feel too bad.

[@dleljak100]

Russian bias are the best

[@richardroopnarine870]

Tanks for making this informative video

[@darthcalyx8986]

the soviet tank at 826 is T-34 not a KV-2

[@technicus3412]

You are correct

[@qwas_1234_]

T-34-57

[@duckunderground183]

The SU-152, KV-2 and ISU-152 all had 152mm Cannons, and are over 50 years old..

[@dleljak100]

Yes that is right respect you elders

[@ancientwarrior3482]

Over 70 years old*

[@dleljak100]

@@ancientwarrior3482 yes you are right too

[@mp88474]

Infinite Science they were howitzers not cannons

[@ethancotton1549]

the t28 superheavy is actually known as the t95, and the obj 269 is actually obj 279.

[@biostar1278]

It's still a T28/T95 Super Heavy Tank

[@ethancotton1549]

@@biostar1278 yeah, but it's proper name is the T95.

[@Maxwell_Twist]

@@ethancotton1549 From what I've been able to find, the tank was only officially called the gun motor carriage T95 for about a year before being renamed the super heavy tank T28. There is some mention of some OCMs, but I couldn't find out what that stands for in this case.

[@ethancotton1549]

Pencil Twist yeah, or the more simplified t95. Also I think you mean gmc or even GC which are gun motor carriges or gun carrier such as the churchill GC.

[@fryyedlemmon7467]

Actually the T28 super heavy tank was a dumbed down version of the T95. The T95 had a total of 4 tracks and angled side armor while the T28 had only 3 tracks and flat faced side armor and don’t quote me of this but I think the T95 had a 105mm gun while the T28 has a 90mm, again I’m not sure about the gun size

[@MeMasterGamerGames]

FV4005 Stage II (Brtish) had the biggest gun for a tank.... a 183mm

[@michelangelangelo7091]

MeMasterGamer naval gun on tank chassis, typical wonder tank destroyer

[@lukaszgawlik19830416]

Actually 6 abrams tanks has been destroyed in second Iraq war they been later recovered repaired in USA and where back to action. ...

[@lamontaina3026]

Then they weren't destroyed but simply disabled

[@azharrizqin]

actually during the battle theres some abrams MBT destroyed, but by friendly fire

[@tristinjudd2595]

That means they were disabled not destroyed

[@naggie6358]

In a battle a disabled tank is basically the same as a destroyed one, if it can fight then there is no practical difference

[@arberchabot8760]

@@naggie6358 False, disabled is never considered destroyed by military standards since the 40s

[@Sm1leyFaCe]

8:15 thats a t34,not a kv1 also it wasnt a kv1 which did that, it was a kv2

[@jesseharwood6519]

Kursk was not the largest tank battle, it was the largest mechanized battle in history

[@tsemol5297]

where is leopard 2

[@beastbro9823]

8:12 the crew ran away and survived. Not even gonna mention the tank part cause that's a dead horse at this point

[@chrisbandicoot9552]

The best tank of all time is the Apocalypse Tank. Trust me, I've commanded hundreds of them.

[@meltingfire0138]

Excuse me while I go binge on Command and Conquer now.

[@Cobrazay]

lmfao

[@grimanima]

I'll see your Apocalypse Tank and raise you one GDI MARV Tank.

[@miming3679]

Nah man prism tanks are the best. Those glass cannons can take out anything from miles away

[@meltingfire0138]

@@grimanima and I will then raise you 3 Sonic Emitters, 2 Mammoth tanks, and a crap ton of FireHawks!....hehe see what I did there...okie back to C&C I go

[@Nonotom]

Otto Carius is the only man that destroyed a Plane with a Tank (Tiger I)

[@personontheinternet8151]

Nonotom 2015 no it is believed an american tanker also took out a German plane just after the Normandy campaign

[@williamnghiem6890]

There are also records of a Russian tanker who held a town in Ukraine for half a day and shot down one plane with a T-34

[@snonsig2688]

An american sherman (i believe) also was confirmed to have shot down a plane.

[@simonmaala7311]

@@personontheinternet8151 actually it was Otto Carius' gunner who shot it cuz the gunner said it was annoying him evn though otto said to run