I bought the LHT 4.5-22 years ago based on your recommendation guide in Locals and it has been one of the best optic purchases I’ve ever made. Thank you for the work that you do!
@dppss12 сағат бұрын
Great comparison, thank you for this review Ilya!
@GTMGunTotinMinnesotan16 сағат бұрын
Love this category. Great video!
@JW-wi1nf11 күн бұрын
The Razor HD-LHT is my lightweight crossover for AR-15's chambered in 6 CM or 6.5 CM and a lightweight bolt rifle. The Toric 4-25x50 does have 47 mil of elevation but I prefer the Toric 4-20x50 with 20 mil of elevation and it weighs 34 oz.
@DarkLordOfOptics11 күн бұрын
4-20 is a nice scope. FOV is a little narrower than I like, so I find myself sticking with the 2.5-15x44 for general purpose use and with 4-25x50 when I need the adjustment range.
@RabbitSlayer488 сағат бұрын
Should have put the midas tac in there. With no illumination its pretty light weight. Had the LHT 4-22x50. It was just ok. For the price I think it pretty much sucked and I sold it off. It would be good for 600. The illumination didn't work out the box and the warranty replacement only worked 90%. Not that I ever use it, but for the price it better work. Image, meh. Slightly better than my athlons, not as good as my tract 4-20x50.
@jimothy-johnson16 сағат бұрын
Have you checked out a Maven RS1.2 2.5-15? I've heard very good stuff for it as a hunting scope especially with its eyebox and reticle (allegedly).
@DarkLordOfOptics15 сағат бұрын
I reviewed the earlier version of it a while back. It is a nice scope. Reticles are a little iffy to my eye but adequate. Tract 2.5-15x44 is essentially the same scope with different turrets and I rather like it. The reticle us a bit more normal, but both are good designs