6.12 Seconds - James Croft's Harvard LGBT Bullying Speech

Example of Linking Self, Us, Now

[@Valentinasol_.]

Amazing courage. James Croft, thank you for your bravery and inspiration to be better people. Much love...

[@mnguardianfan7128]

Heart breaking. Thank you James.

[@jayasapkota2303]

You so braveee.. lots of love!!

[@CoolhandLukeSkywalkr]

There's proof that Harvard discriminates against cis-gender applicants. 20% of Harvard's class of 2025 is gay when only 7% of Americans are gay. I haven't found any concrete evidence that indicates Gay and lesbian people have a significantly higher average lQ level or better SAT score averages. If we look at how they do outside of college after they graduate, lgbtq do consistently not quite as well as cis-gender people financially and as far as we can measure their productivity, it's slightly lower than cis people. If anything, lgbtq should be slightly less at Harvard than what their general percentage of population in America is. Instead, it's 3x higher. The people who hand-pick these students are far more likely to pick someone who is gay compared to someone who is straight. The per capita rate of lgbtq at Harvard is alarming. It's not supposed to be legal to discriminate based on sexual orientation. Nobody is even talking about that.

[@auntypizza]

cis-gender? What the h is that? There are TWO genders. Simple.

[@zer0s0und]

Correction: 20% of Harvard's classes *declare* themselves as being gay while 7% of all Americans *declare* being gay in polls. Boundary conditions matter. If you go back in history, you might get a 7% to zero rate instead. Comparing a small, regional sample to the whole population is also a big trap. Maybe if you take the statistics for *all* universities and colleges, you would have a better mirror to the whole population. In any case, trying to establish from this the existence of individual "hand picking" as causing these numbers sounds like the old bias-jumpiness we see everywhere.