How to show nonexistence: kzbin.info/www/bejne/r3izpKKcicmnh9ksi=iPH8WT3GM-nsgFcA
@NixelKnight3 ай бұрын
Thanks you so much! I don't have to take Calc 3 at my university, but I've always wanted to learn it. Your videos have been so helpful for me and I really appreciate it!
@andyloescher24013 ай бұрын
Take it for fun
@IisChasАй бұрын
I laughed out loud at 15:30 when you drew the frowny face saying that there was no conclusion. I don’t know what it was, but it just got me.
@fireballman313 ай бұрын
The polar blooper lol
@Vernonnotyourman3 ай бұрын
forgot to edit the middle part😂😂
@SuryaBudimansyah2 ай бұрын
@@Vernonnotyourman It's basically becoming a feature in his channels
@bprpcalculusbasics3 ай бұрын
Be careful when we use the polar method: kzbin.info/www/bejne/nX2Vl617gat5rbM
@leonardobarrera28163 ай бұрын
Thank for not editing that I appreciate that (Not sarcastic)
@eduardomarcicnetomarcic35113 ай бұрын
Thank you very much! Wonderful
@darth1592 ай бұрын
Is there any way to tell whether you should start using the path method to show the limit does not exist or start the Squeeze Theorem?
@Gabes13212 ай бұрын
At 18:08 why can’t you just substitute r=0 into the bottom then leave it as (rcos^3@)/cos^2@ then cancel out the cos to get rcos@ then substitute r=0 again to get the limit as 0?
@krithikkumar98872 ай бұрын
Again what if theta is pi/2, then u can't cancel cos
@Gabes13212 ай бұрын
@@krithikkumar9887 two things. Doesn’t cos^2(@)/cos^2(@) approach 1 as @ approaches pi/2 anyway? Also as @ is an introduced variable, I thought we were allowed to cancel?
@thepotato12323 ай бұрын
Can someone explain me why (e^2x - 1)/x is equal to f'(0)? ( I only know math up to derivatives)
@t.b.49233 ай бұрын
one definition of derivatives is lim x->x_0 (f(x)-f(x_0))/(x-x_0). Plugging is 0 for e^2x we get: lim x->0 f(x)-f(0)/x-0 which is thr expression above
@thepotato12323 ай бұрын
@@t.b.4923 I see now,thank you
@EmmanuelGiouvanopoulos2 ай бұрын
L'Hopital's rule is haunting this man.
@joshuahillerup42902 ай бұрын
Has there been a video showing where the limit of a product exists, but the product of the limits does not exist?
@bprpcalculusbasics2 ай бұрын
You can just use 1/x and x as x approaches 0.
@aubertducharmont3 ай бұрын
My way: set x=y, then use the l'Hopital's rule. It is probably not mathematically correct, but it works, if both x and y are aproaching the same value.
@projectseven27272 ай бұрын
Just a problem: there's a possibility that the limit does not exist. The issue with multivariable derivatives is that there are infinite directional limits and not just left and right sided. It is possible that limit x=y is not the same as lim x=0 or y=0 etc
@davidcroft953 ай бұрын
Is there an equivalent theorem of L'Hopital rule in calc 3?
@anthonyflanders13473 ай бұрын
Unfortunately no
@davidcroft953 ай бұрын
@@anthonyflanders1347 shucks! Thanks for the answer tho :)
@l9day3 ай бұрын
Now number 5, the larch.... the larch
@איתיריכרדסון3 ай бұрын
He wrote squezze lol
@chonkycat1233 ай бұрын
Why can’t L’Hopital’s rule be used for the substitution method? It’s single-variable?
@griffinf84692 ай бұрын
You can use L’Hopital’s rule and you’ll get the same answer. The derivative of sin(t) is cos(t) and the derivative of t is 1. Plug in 0 to t and you’ll see that cos(0) is 1.
@chonkycat1232 ай бұрын
@@griffinf8469 yeah, that’s how I would approach it. Just curious as to why bprp said you couldn’t use it
@chrisyoutube082 ай бұрын
@@chonkycat123he doesn't like using it for some reason, I've noticed it in other videos as well
@gileadedetogni90542 ай бұрын
Hi man, I can explain to you. The reason is that the limit of sin(h)/h as h goes to 0 appears on the derivative of sin(x) by definition. So, to know that the derivative of sin(x) is cos(x), you need to solve that limit first, resulting in a cyclic thing, get it?
@Brid7272 ай бұрын
@@griffinf8469 yeah for sure, but what if you were to do the derivative of sin(t) using the limit definition? You would find this limit while working it out, and then you'll be tempted to use L'Hopital's rule. But that just doesn't make sense because you are taking tyhe derivative of sin(t) in the first place. That's why you have to find other ways to do it, preferably the squeeze/sandwich theorem