Impressive sure glad it wasn`t scrapped . I confuse modern mechanics when I told them I seen a 4 cylinder engine with only one connecting rod !
@steveskouson96208 жыл бұрын
Also, that camshaft, with 4 lobes for 4 heads. Intake and exhaust BOTH use the same lobe. I'm not sure how they list this, but looks like 2 cylinders, with a head at each end of each cylinder. What is amazing, I can get a car, with 100 MORE horsepower under the hood. (Although, I'm pretty sure the Hellcat can't TOUCH the torque here!) steve
@stanfischer61753 жыл бұрын
@@steveskouson9620 I had a 1951 Indian motorcycle that had a "shared" lobe camshaft that worked both intake and exhaust valves via rockers. The exhaust would close, the cam would rotate just a little and would start opening the intake!
@edwardjonez66159 жыл бұрын
The fellow in the green and white ball cap needs to get himself a pair of bib overalls. Belts just don't hold up a pair of working man pants. Great engine and a wonderful place. These fellows put their hearts into these machines THANKS!
@bobl788 жыл бұрын
it´s so hard to believe that These things used to run every day back then
@Highpocktz10 жыл бұрын
Music to my ears!!
@ponkkaa10 жыл бұрын
It sings! Beautiful mechanical rythm
@Jason1Pa11 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting!! I was there on Thursday this year and missed it running
@billmorris26132 жыл бұрын
Good morning to all from SE Louisiana 20 Dec 21
@therealchayd4 жыл бұрын
I was literally thinking "I wonder how many degrees past TDC do they have to bar it to start" now I know :) Was also wondering why Snow didn't include a small air powered motor to bar it. I guess it's because these ran pretty much continually, so there wouldn't really need if for the rare times they would need starting up.
@SteamCrane4 жыл бұрын
LOL! Never know when you'll be called to start one up. Yes, they would run for months at a time. However, skilled operators could get them to stop at a convenient angle to avoid barring.
@TumpaTalapatra6 жыл бұрын
I am fascinated.
@Flaaaaanders5 жыл бұрын
An engine that runs on snow as fuel? Awesome idea
@grettagrids9 жыл бұрын
there's one in ragroll MN too
@steveskouson96205 жыл бұрын
Bar some, pull up pants some. Wholly he!!, I miss the last generation! Someone get that BOY a belt! 2.52, you HAVE an adult. Finally! Maybe, not so much. He hasn't "moon" ed anyone. Yet! steve
@OnlyTheEd8 жыл бұрын
Sounds like the engine says "Faster, faster, faster, faster".
@nlo1146 жыл бұрын
I'd imagine a 3 cylinder double-acting engine would run as smooth as a straight 6 and need a smaller flywheel. Was one ever built?
@renegadeoflife874 жыл бұрын
Probably not. Sealing is a real problem on double acting engines, this engine's cylinder pressure is only a fraction of what modern engines run because of that. Even among engines from this time period very few companies were successful in building double-acting internal combustion. Also double-acting engines require the use of a crosshead, greatly increasing the reciprocating mass and the overall length of the moving assembly from piston crown to crankshaft.
@jameslacey8585 жыл бұрын
If the same cu. in. displacement was used with modern day technology I wonder what the hp would be using modern fuels?
@thegreenerthemeaner9 жыл бұрын
What particular job did this engine have in life?
@themadmailler9 жыл бұрын
thegreenerthemeaner It compressed natural gas to be sent to cities or elsewhere for use. the gas compressor is on the opposite side of the crankshaft and was operated off the push/pull of the crosshead.
@steveskouson96208 жыл бұрын
Yes, the interesting thing here, this engine didn't really USE the rotating forces, just the reciprocating forces. (Yes, I do realize, the engine used the rotating force to function, but it used reciprocating force to do its work.) Or, all 3 pistons went back and forth to do the work. 2 to make the power, and the third to compress the natural gas. Flywheel just kept everything running. steve
@themadmailler8 жыл бұрын
yes, that's correct. very unique set up for sure.
@Agtech40207 жыл бұрын
Is the engine being operated on only two cylinders as it sounds like the plugs are pulled out of two? Or is that the sound of the shaft seals leaking?
@stoomheier4 жыл бұрын
The sound is "suck suck dong dong" and that twice (two cilinders, double acting) suck is air intake and dong is work.
@renegadeoflife874 жыл бұрын
Coolspring has all 4 combustion chambers connected and running. But this video is from shortly after they got it running again. The seals were leaking, the chambers weren't firing evenly, and the throttle governor was not even connected- it was rigged for manual throttling. So some cylinders are hitting harder than others. More recent videos it has smoothed out considerably, hitting evenly on all 4 chambers and holding a steady RPM on the governor.
@BangAsoursRex10 жыл бұрын
in the description, it says designed speed is 100rpm. is that the max rpm for this beautiful engine?
@SteamCrane10 жыл бұрын
I believe that 100 RPM is the maximum. Some later ones ran a little faster, but not much. There is a huge amount of force on those heavy reciprocating parts and the flywheel at that speed.
@warmfreeze9 жыл бұрын
SteamCrane I believe max would be around 125rpm as 90-100rpm was its working rpm range.
@gregsampson41668 жыл бұрын
4 or 2 cylinder?
@SteamCrane8 жыл бұрын
+Gregory Sampson 2 double ended cylinders, thus operates as if it had 4 cylinders. This gas engine is very closely derived from steam engines used for the same purpose. That valve gear was often used on them.
@cyberbadger11 жыл бұрын
They need a barring engine to put it to the right position. :-P
@SteamCrane2 жыл бұрын
Since it would run for several months at a time when in regular service, occasional barring was no big deal. Also, a good operator could get it to stop in a good position to start without barring. Talking to the guys, the dead center range is fairly narrow, it can start at most angular positions.