I own both of these truck, a straight up no bs obs comparison.
Пікірлер: 151
@4570levergun9 ай бұрын
Ill keep my old square body chevy. Maybe when the old 350 dies I will stuff a LS motor in it. But I love the old style squares.
@PosiXMosh9 ай бұрын
Interesting. I have a 1993 gmc 3500 dually with the 6.5 turbo. It has its quirks. Mainly that it doesn’t like to start when it’s hot because the fuel vaporizes in the lines going from the fuel filter to the fuel pump. I have the nv4500, which, apparently, was built with synchros made of butter. Oh, and the starter bolts are dogs hit, so I replaced them with some decent ones and now it starts before the motor turns all the way over. With all of that said, the thing is bulletproof. It has the mechanical fuel pump (after 1994, they went computerized), which is nice cuz I understand it and can rebuild it relatively easily. Sure it’s gutless, and it takes 20 seconds to get to sixty. But it runs cool and gets 25 mpg on the freeway and 22 mpg on streets. It runs cool, ac blows colder than is comfortable, and if I need more power, I just turn a couple screws and it’s there (mechanical fuel pump and mechanical waste gate). Upgrades I did when I got the truck is a fluid damper hydraulic damper, some decent shocks, new starter with arp bolts, idler and pitman arms, and Michelins. She’s a sweet smelly oily old breezy but she’s mine and I can work on her without a computer.
@davidshepherd-sj2tj4 ай бұрын
Yea, wait till he has to put injectors, flywheels, etc . Etc. the ford will cost way more in the long run, and I got news for him the split ford front end goes through tires and ball joints as well !!
@cameronhamer94329 ай бұрын
I’ve owned more chevs than fords , they all have issues I was working in the far north in British Columbia , close to the Yukon . Winter time , minus fifty . 1990 , the crew all had diesel Fords , brand new . Plugged in they would barely start , plugged in . My old 76 Chevy sat for a week , my boss told me start that truck or you’ll be stuck here . I told him it’ll start no problem , so I went over opened the door reached in never touched the gas , not plugged in , as soon as I cranked her, boom she fired up Next year when I went back up north , the whole crew had new chevs .
@bluecollartradesman71510 күн бұрын
You are comparing a diesel to a gas engine. When it comes to cold start, gas wins every time. It’s not a Chevy vs Ford thing.
@coolestguyontheplanet7239 ай бұрын
When that turbo kicks in. It makes night & day difference. . I always got 16-17 mpg with tools. 1999 2500 6.5 turbo
@cydonianman4 ай бұрын
The ford front end is what's called the twin- traction beam suspension. Basically the 4x4 version of the twin i beam. IIRC, the twin i beam and traction beam were discontinued in the 1/2 ton F series after '96, but still have them in the f250
@bradleyyounger84996 ай бұрын
I think they are both great trucks. The gm needs a couple of things like relocating the pmd. Put some slightly bigger injectors and it makes it a completely different truck with power closer to the powerstroke. The 12v is my favorite. Traded my last one at 560k and still ran amazing
@ambikesandboards3 ай бұрын
Not even close. 6.5l needs a LOT of upgrades to come anywhere close to a powerstroke. not just "slightly bigger injectors"
@rock-uu7qrАй бұрын
@@ambikesandboards they are close in stock form 🤣7.3 powerstroke makes like 200 hp pretty much in the ballpark of a 6.5
@todds5956Ай бұрын
The pmd kit is 50 bucks
@wolferogers30479 ай бұрын
Had an ‘86 6.2 3500 now have an ‘03 7.3 F350, your evaluation is spot on. Thanks for sharing your videos!
@snowysnobdds78429 ай бұрын
We have had all the ford motors. My favorite is the 6.0. Some people dog it, well most, but it's a fantastic motor once you understand it and fix the quirks. It's smooth with the bombproof automation transmission, plus it is the best sounding diesel ever made. My list of other ford motors from best to worst is 6.7, 7.3, 460, 6.4. You did good with that truck.
@KeystoneOutdoorsman9 ай бұрын
Awesome trucks. I have a 91 w250 12 valve cummins. Starts incredibly well in cold weather and is a work horse.
@aaronpowell48859 ай бұрын
Great breakdown and for those two particular trucks I totally agree! As I've said before, where I live, rust is almost non existent. Still tons of second gen Cummins trucks and quite a few first gens aswell. Even so, there's a handful of Cummins swapped f-2 and 350's around, now that's a heck of a truck!
@joecurmaci58805 ай бұрын
Good breakdown of those trucks
@nospam34099 ай бұрын
Totally agree with your assessment. My first was a '93 f250 ext cab with the same rear axil. That zf5 is a rock solid transmission. Mine had over 250k on it before i had it rebuilt. If yours needs a rebuild, use South Bend parts. There's also an upgrade for the clutch pedal that involves installing a yolk. DO THAT UPGRADE. It replaces a plastic bushing. When mine went out, i was in the parking lot at work. I was lucky it didn't total somebody's vehicle. I routinely had north of 5,000 lbs in the bed. My primary reason for moving up to a 2000 f350 crew cab was that the kids needed more leg room. All in all, my '93 was a better work truck. It road rough unless you had at least 1,000 lbs in the bed. I've always loved the 6BT, but I hate the truck they put it in. When the 6.0 came out, a lot of guys were driving their new ford's straight from the dealership to the shop and swapping it for a 24 valve. Those guys are still driving those trucks.
@justinp76879 ай бұрын
Love the sound of those 7.3
@shanegiggie9 ай бұрын
Yes sirrr 7 🌲
@danielbenedict92369 ай бұрын
Awesome video tinman. I am trying to talk my wife into a super cab f350 from that era for firewood hauling. Very helpful.
@shanegiggie9 ай бұрын
The best, Built Ford Tough !!
@mikemckain65569 ай бұрын
I own a 2002 f350 with a 7.3. It has 430,000 miles on it. Pull a 31 ft camper trailer and a firewood trailer. Runs great. The old 96 really benefits from a tow/haul tune. Not a big increase in power but really wakes it up. Buy a quality glow plug relay for a spare in case it goes open circuit. Won't start cold without it. Also a spare cam sensor
@307j.o.a.t99 ай бұрын
Ive driven and worked F350 crew powerstrokes for 25yrs. My first was a 95 7.3L that i had i bought in 02 and had for 5yrs. 2nd was an 02 7.3L i bought in 04 with 80k mi. It finally has given up with 300k mi last winter so i just got a 16 6.7L to replace it. When im loaded with logs and or equipment im pushing 30k lbs. They get the job done.
@orlandoduran77405 ай бұрын
best comparison video of these 2 trucks, i had a 1996 f350 7.3 and a 2000 C3500HD 6.5
@BrownsMechanicsАй бұрын
I have a 1996 F-SuperDuty (F450) with the 7.3 I just took it on its first real drive, after sitting for a long time. I also have a 1994 C2500 with the 6.5 TD love the truck, just wish it was a 4x4 and a long bed, but the 6.5 runs great and has some upgrades which really wake it up.
@edwinburns47859 ай бұрын
Good comparison. Agree nothing beats a Chevy ride and comfort. I drive a 1999 dodge dually 2 wd, auto (bd) dodge one died15 years ago. Banks 4 inch exhaust and towing power chip. Never driven in the winter and pulls trailers and daily driver all summer. Little rough when empty.
@stevetheriault41649 ай бұрын
NICE TRUCK TINMAN ,,SHES IN GREAT SHAPE BUDDY SOUNDS GREAT
@OzarkMidwest9 ай бұрын
Awesome video Tinman!!! I did coil over conversion on my ol silverado, so smooth now. Straight game changer!!
@tinmanssaws9 ай бұрын
Didn't even know you could do that to these trucks. Pretty cool
@OzarkMidwest9 ай бұрын
@tinmanssaws OH yeah, probably the most rewarding upgrade I've done so far.
@husaislander48389 ай бұрын
F350 Superduty an 2004 6.0 with 195000km been a great truck no head gasket issues
@Asamccp4 ай бұрын
Great video! I've owned several IFS GM trucks over the years. One '95 454 with an 8' plow that I sold to my grandfather and he still has it with 230k on it and the original ball joints and tie rods. Another '96 6.5 with a 9' plow and sold it with 186k and all original frontend. 2 duramax trucks and rebuilt the front end on one of them at 268k because of 1 balljoint stating to clunk. Maybe I've been lucky, but the IFS has been very good to me. Currently rocking a pair of Fords, a '97 7.3 and a '14 6.7. I love the 6.5 and with some upgrades, its a pretty good engine for light-duty stuff. 10k lbs of trailer or less. The 7.3 is a true "medium duty" engine and it is so much more robust than a 6.5. Love them both!
@toefield2514 ай бұрын
Rear diff- Ford 10.25" Chevy 10.5" Front diff- Ford 9.0" Chevy 9.25 He mentioned the Chevy having a 8.25" front diff but those only came on the K1500s and light duty 6 lug K2500s.
@HuckThis19719 ай бұрын
Reason these trucks are more expensive is because the newer diesels require a DPF and urea to run. More problems to deal with. Yes the newer trucks can tow more.
@93redfox9 ай бұрын
Love the ford content! I have a longbed version of yours. It will also eat door handles lol. I have 4.10s so I can't match your mileage!
@JimmieJoiner5 ай бұрын
I have 6.5 with the nv4500 that i bought with 36,000 miles last year. Pretty good and reliable truck. Until recently i also had the 24 valve Cummins as well which i sold when i got my hands on a L5P Duramax. The 6.5 felt like it was averaging better MPG than my Cummins. Thought about swapping out the ole 6.5 for a 24 valve Cummins. But well see.
@kennethsonier17669 ай бұрын
Good morning from Cape Cod 🐟 work for an overhead door company that bought me a new 89 f-450 super duty with a 7.3 dually cab and chassis. Built my own custom flatbed with racks over the cab. Double stacked side boxes and the welder generator and a full-size set of torches. All the overhead door repair components and tools, there happened to be 5,000-lb over the rear axel. Being a service truck it was constantly in motion for half a million miles, never a problem other than fuel economy, which was nonexistent. With that said it was a great truck but I'm still a Chevy guy 😂👍✌️🇺🇲
@tinmanssaws9 ай бұрын
Sounds like our econoline 250s at work. Always overload and never stopped long. They never break.
@JoeRainis1569 ай бұрын
Great shoot out comparison
@tinmanssaws9 ай бұрын
Thanks Joey
@dew68749 ай бұрын
Lovin your honest compassion! I'm a ford guy,but was raised with chevy. I think all the auto makers have the last laugh, making us spend all that money on parts!!!! You know they can do better every time we turn our wreanch!!
@joescott8039 ай бұрын
I can tell you what will help that 7.3 last longer. Unplug the pedestal valve and put a 6637 air filter on it. My 95 f350 has a zf5 410’s 33” Patagonia mt’s. With a snow plow bracket with a winch and a dump bed insert. It’s my Swiss Army knife on the 300 acres I live on. It’s my work truck and mostly daily driver. I get 16mpg pulling my landscape trailer and 20+ without. Living in Pennsylvania the rust belt it’s rusty but I can’t find anything else to replace it just from the utilitarian value. It’s stock with 318k miles. I do have a ts6 chip with stock tunes that really helps me pull heavy stuff. The winch I use to plow. Pull bushes and trees down when they get snagged. The dump bed is crazy handy with 12 cords of firewood every year. Just love it. I don’t know much about the 6.5. There’s no too many around me. My son has a 95 f250 he’s fixing up. That is his first vehicle and exactly what he wanted
@codbusters007928 күн бұрын
I got a 94.5 stock Powerstroke 5 speed and a 93 ford idi turbo auto fully built both tow 10k-20k everyday and never skip a beat!
@05EVORSАй бұрын
I got a 25k mile '84 M1008 'cucv' military on 38" Patagonias has the factory 4:56's in 14b locker out back D60 up front. The 6.2(99% same as a 6.5) in it is reman and they all had cast cranks new in 80s/90s. I did a 700R4 swap last year and its getting an out of production Banks Sidewinder kit this week. Found it on a buddies donor truck getting an LS swap out here in California(smog exempt) The beauty of the 6.2/6.5 world is the motors are STILL MADE NEW by AM GENERAL and they are IMPROVED big-time in the form of 'Optimizer 6500' totally new castings/metallirgy/FORGED CRANKS....so they are still sourceable NEW from AMG. Classic Diesel Designs in Seguin TX makes big power pumps for the Ferds and the DB2 pumps for the 6.2/6.5 able to fuel 500+hp out of these things. The crankshaft is the achilles heel of a 6 2/6.5 OEM gm trucks, but the Optimizer version w Forged crank combined w a big pump+ bigger boost will survive and run hard. Depends how much money ya got like anything else. Standyne pumps in GMs are internally governed to 3500 rpm that can be removed and they can spin 5krpm if fueled for it. The 6.5T is in the all new AMG Saber military truck and being made for Hummer repower contracts. There is also the out of production AM Genreral 'P400' 6.5T that has the forged cranks and a CRAZY strong block w stud girdles and more. The marine industry runs 6.2/6.5s also 7.3s are awesome and the hot rodders are pickin em clean so they are getting rarer by the day. 6.5T world is still alive and well and they can be made to run well of you got 10-15k
@robertfrey36075 ай бұрын
7.3 idi turbo. Simple, reliable, buildable, and last forever. Mine has 410,000 miles on it and the engine has never been touched. The body is rotting off of it, but it still starts...every time. Powerstroke 7.3's are great, but need more monitoring.
@rock-uu7qr4 ай бұрын
7.3 idi is not buildable at all. stock power is pretty much the limit for them
@whatnowstinky9 ай бұрын
Is the Wood Weasel off to a new home, or getting parked up somewhere safe "for future reference"? It will be kinda sad to see it go. Coming from a country without many massive "trucks" it amazes me how big those things are. The Wood Weasel looked big enough but the F 250 makes it look small. When we do wood it is a combination of 4wd trayback utes (with trailers) and a or several trucks with tippers. (With 2.5 to 8 ton capacity.)
@fatmattchopshop36209 ай бұрын
I’ve owned a 1997 f250 there great work trucks, yes they ride rough but when there loaded down they just float down the road
@brycestalvey72209 ай бұрын
Tinman you can change the oil in the oil pump housing of the 7.3 and ot will quiet down the idle
@todds5956Ай бұрын
Just bought a 97 c3500 to pull my race car trailer. It’s been nice so far.
@dannytriplett86258 ай бұрын
I’m a ford drivetrain master technician and have repaired quite a few ZF transmissions in your configuration. I highly recommend you service the transmission and replace the transmission fluid with GM synchromesh fluid. The blocker rings ( synchronizers) will love it. Now it will feel stiffer shifting in the winter. Maybe do a 50/50 mix with trans fluid where you live. You have a great truck there. I’ve owned a Chevy truck like yours and loved it too til the injection pump went out. Never was the same again.
@tinmanssaws8 ай бұрын
Funny story but I have many jugs of that synchromesh fluid in my shop, may have to try that.
@billyb.98789 ай бұрын
My friend you got a very nice WORK truck. My first work truck was a 1969 F350 crew cab, long box w/a 6.9 international. A sleeved block. I got it an auction from consumers power. Fleet vehicles that were well maintained. Got a divorce and had to sell everything. In 1982 & still running strong. It also had a 5 speed manual. She was very vindictive and new I would have gave her the house. If I could have kept the truck. Anyway I'm now retired and have a 2001 Chevy 3/4 ton w/a 6 litre gas motor. Pushing 280,000 miles. Don't leak a drop burns a little oil. First Chevy ever. And I'm good w/ it. Enjoy your back seat. Won't own a truck without one. 🙃😉.
@boyfowler60789 ай бұрын
I drive a 2002 f250. I find it rides really rough. Dont know if it's just design or if the leaf springs are janky. Grew up drive obs 7.3 lots of love for those trucks from me
@HuckThis19719 ай бұрын
I picked up my 2000 k3500 on Friday with the 6.5. Square headlights, single cab. Loving it so far! I live in Eastern Ontario and was looking for a non crusty truck! I finally found it.
@whilomforge34029 ай бұрын
I’m not a brand loyalist, but I’ve found that most ford trucks are simpler to work on, and tend to take abuse much better that the other brands. I like the creature comforts of the GM trucks, but for work, I tend to lean Ford.
@tinmanssaws9 ай бұрын
I agree
@Alberta_MTN_BearАй бұрын
Man I love the k2500 all day. I really love the sound of the 6.5
@tinmanssawsАй бұрын
Yep thqt was great truck. If we didn't have a baby I'd probably still be running it. But that being said the 7.3 in this video is just flat out a better towing and hauling rig for me. The difference in power is day and night
@js67295 ай бұрын
I own a 97 F350 that I modified the engine to be able to handle up to 1200hp (I've only got it tuned to 500hp, but I wanted the added reliability) it's got air ride rear suspension and an eaton 13 speed. Truck has 892k on the odometer atm.
@user-vg9dg4pu7o5 ай бұрын
I like both trucks the frontend on the ford is rough on tires but the detroit engine was way behind times then. Never seen a 6.5 or 6.2 that didnt blow head gaskets under industrial use. The chevy rear suspension is way better they dont sag when fully loaded ford hasnt had a good hauling rear suspension since 72.
@HairlipButcher9 ай бұрын
It's crazy to think how much power they make now days.
@robertsmith75809 ай бұрын
Ima chevy guy but I have to admit the powerstroke sounds good
@tjhughes669 ай бұрын
Im a gm man because of the parts interchangeability and not such a pane to worke on but gm best deals are lly snd up and you dont have to pull the cab of to worke on and the injectors are not under the valve cover and Allison trans
@coolestguyontheplanet7239 ай бұрын
F & S are for EGR or non EGR. FOR THE 6.5 TURBO
@michaelbefumo-qg7ji6 ай бұрын
Both good truck both have good and bad years
@coolestguyontheplanet7239 ай бұрын
I got a 6.5 turbo. 2wd Silverado 2500
@jamiedalluge94729 ай бұрын
The old wood weasel sure does look better in my opinion
@davidpugh64959 ай бұрын
I concur
@HuckThis19719 ай бұрын
I had a 95 Ram Cummins. I had to shut off the engine to order at Tim Hortons drive thrus!😂
@longhairedcountryboy69rrr879 ай бұрын
Hey buddy you forgot the Dodge my is the 99 24 valve lond bed 4 wheel drive extend cab with a stick 5 speed The Cummins is a beast but yours sound good
@Rational_Party3 ай бұрын
I'm a GM guy and I wouldn't exactly say the two trucks "directly competed" back in the day... If you wanted an efficient diesel that rode and drove nice and could do a bit of work, the GM truck was the ticket. If you needed towing capability, you really had to look at Ford and Dodge for the power of their diesels... '96 the pinnacle of GM trucks, '97+ got the speed sensitive steering that will eventually try to kill you...
@andrewk68449 ай бұрын
My dad had a 1985 toyota landcruiser 2h diesel 4lt . beam axles front and back on leafs . carted 5.51156 pounds on it for years when carting potatos
@alans.46589 ай бұрын
Drag race for the winner!
@toddpacheco47489 ай бұрын
Tinman you’re a chip off the old block now I know why you and Buckin get along so well with each other ❤😊😮
@mikkinikki19024 ай бұрын
you should make a sleep music track of the 7.3 idling and upload it to your channel...therapeutic sound...
@ColonialEricSR9 ай бұрын
That was a pretty good comparison the fords definitely better
@tranquility76924 ай бұрын
My 97 k3500 extended cab dually chevy has the 454. I love the power but 9mpg hurts when I see the 22 of the 6.5. And the 454 is tired at 230,000 miles with 15psi of oil pressure hot at idle on 15W40.
@tinmanssaws4 ай бұрын
I hear ya on tbe 454 mileage, the first truck used here to do my chores was a 97 454 powered 3/4 ton exactly like the one in this video.. The 454 has way more power then the 6.5 but probably 1/2 the mileage.
@timboslicehannawacker52599 ай бұрын
Tug of war time!!
@tinmanssaws9 ай бұрын
The ford would win for sure lol
@nicholasmoser19185 ай бұрын
Feel like 6.5s are mainly for better MPGs and decent power good looking trucks and in my opinion will sound better then other diesels love them chevys and fords
@FishFind30009 ай бұрын
I never hear much about those old Detroit’s in the chevys
@tinmanssaws9 ай бұрын
They're not in the same class as the more common engines. But like I said in the video they are great on fuel and good for the occasional towing session..
@markmacdonald64529 ай бұрын
Got a '99 F250 7.3 with the ZF6. The Ford in that era was more powerful than both the GM and the Cummins. First light diesel offered by the big 3 to have HEUI injection system. Those motors are known to go over 500K miles.
@tinmanssaws8 ай бұрын
Your truck is exactly what I started off looking for. When I found this one my heart fell in love with the old style body. Although by modern standards these old rigs are "underpowered " I think they do the job just fine. Thanks for commenting!!
@fil13295 ай бұрын
I rather a 12valve with more torque.....less revs too They will easily do 800 000 Inlibe 6 better main to rod bearing ratio HEUIs have advantages until high pressure common rail fuel systems came out.......but u can beat a mechanic injection system with less complicated electronics.....
@livewithnick5 ай бұрын
Except the 12 valve had less torque than the 7.3 PS. @@fil1329
@googlesux9512Ай бұрын
Every chevy fan ive seen haven't bought a new truck in the last 10 years
@inktownfishing45059 ай бұрын
I have a 2000 GMC dually 6.5td 4x4 3500 and my underhood sticker say's 210 HP /440 foot lbs. F code. WTF..lol! I've done every bolt on upgrade, excepted intercooler and it's chipped. Dose what I need it to. Just wish they came with a intercooler because long grades towing, my EGT's are threw the roof and have to backpedal so it doesn't melt...lol! Thinking when it dies, 12 valve swap and full restoration.
@tinmanssaws9 ай бұрын
I've read 440lbs but honestly I don't think they are there. At least compared to the 7m3 which is 450. Local guy has your truck with a cummins, it's pretty sweet.
@infernoking75046 ай бұрын
I like diesel engines I would love to own both.
@gabrielsandoval49948 күн бұрын
Cool sun visor on the Chevy. GM all day every day.
@andrescuriel45124 ай бұрын
What about the death wobble of Ford and dodge vs gm
@jamiedalluge94729 ай бұрын
Bowtie or no tie
@shanegiggie9 ай бұрын
Predominantly been a Chevy guy too, until one guy told me you should buy a Ford where you're so hard on stuff. I laughed, he said seriously. He wasn't wrong in my experience Ford takes the most abuse I could throw at it. Built Ford Tough !!
@tjhughes669 ай бұрын
Ford was a ok brand until the 2000 but part interchangeability is what does it for me and the ford power stroke stroke
@irishuwould51855 ай бұрын
Funny, our ford fleet at work are the most undependable vehicles we have. Our Chevy fleet keeps going. We had a 6.5 diesel that ran circles around the fords until a co worker totaled it in a wreck. Our new ford trucks are constantly in the shop it’s ridiculous. I’d be pissed I paid that much for a truck just to have it constantly throwing codes and burning oil and having cam phasers going out prematurely.
@slimlight57865 ай бұрын
I work on the Railroad and the Fords have lasted way longer than Chevys. Trans are junk in Chevy and the top end of the engines go. I run a 2014 with a 6.2 Ford that has 13000 engine hours. Another guy runs a 2011 with over 17000 engine hours. Plus they get around on the bad roads better.
@BiffTannon19834 ай бұрын
@@irishuwould5185 agreed. From my experience, Ford & Dodge have transmission issues. Granted, mine were all pre-owned, and I doubt the transmissions were serviced even 40k - 60k miles, like they should be.
@stevebuttrum8 ай бұрын
I have a 93 c2500 6.5 with 5 speed and 330k and it runs and drives like new im shocked every day
@wallyfryklund35374 ай бұрын
I go to high school with someone that has a 1996 Chevy 2500 6.5 turbo diesel extended cab long box and it has 800,000 kilometres on it
@andrescuriel45124 ай бұрын
1995 gmc 3500 4bolt main 350 nvg5400 and 14 bolt rear with 4:11 gears single wheel tough tough can be not fast but reliable
@slowstang88Ай бұрын
In no world have i had a better ride in a 3/4 ton IFS Chevy than a F250 TTB
@rondoziegler8465 ай бұрын
Stock GM tires 245/75/16 LRE 3042# vs 235/85/16 3042# Both trucks can handle upgraded flotation tires
@BiffTannon19834 ай бұрын
I'm a GM/Detroit guy, but I'd MUCH RATHER have that Ford. It even sounds 100X better. 😁
@ironjohn59144 ай бұрын
7.3 no brainer~
@6.5L-tow-truckАй бұрын
With the 6.5L in 1997 the horse power was upped to 215 and the torque was upped to 450 lb ft of torque but at the end of the day all the 90s diesels where slow reliable and somewhat fuel efficient I’ve towed with all 3 90s dodge ford and Chevy there all slow
@HuckThis19719 ай бұрын
Torque gets you going, HP keeps you going.
@kingvipervlogs98962 ай бұрын
I own a 1997 Chevy Silverado k3500 dually and she’s needing a lot of work done to her to get her running
@zacharygross4609 ай бұрын
Just seen a 1997 f 250 7.3 for 3000 grand just like yours
@js67295 ай бұрын
There's 2 reasons the Cummins 12 valve is commonly transplanted into other brands of trucks is because (1) the body/frame/interior of the 2nd generation Dodge was shit and (2) the 12 valve is significantly easier and cheaper to get more power and is known for being ridiculously long lasting (There's actually a Cummins million mile club because it's so common for those engines to last over a million miles)
@retired-pipefitter9 ай бұрын
The ford motor is better However, your going to need a ladder to get in the back of the ford 😂. Damn they were tall and noisy. Congratulations on the new to you truck.
@tinmanssaws9 ай бұрын
My chevy is actually taller at the rear bumper by several inches, the front pf the ford is way taller though for sure.
@retired-pipefitter9 ай бұрын
Just bought a new ram half ton with the eco diesel, 3 liter has more hp and torque than the power stroke 7.3. It’s amazing how technology has improved performance but has made a mess with the emissions. Stick with the older and reliable trucks. I’m enjoying the variety of vids lately.
@jrm44085 ай бұрын
I have one of each so I don't have to make the choice!
@christopherpernat545822 күн бұрын
I drive a 1999 3500 6.5 with nv4500 and I like it but my brother has a 1999 250 7.3 4 speed both nice trucks but the 7.3 definitely has more ass but my 6.4 has 410 rears so it has a lot of torque going up hills I can go up a pretty steep hill in 5th at 35 mph just fine but on the 7.3 it would shift down
@brandoncardwell33283 ай бұрын
215@3400 hp/rpm 440@1700 lbs.tq/rpm I own a 95 3500 with a h/o 6.5 and other than a high flow intake plenum and straightpipe it has no other mods.
@mrfarmall-vk4gw9 ай бұрын
99 super duty with a 7.3, it is kinda scary how much weight this thing will pull😂
@stevenlaxton36189 ай бұрын
Chipped or stock?
@mrfarmall-vk4gw9 ай бұрын
Factory stock
@wayneharper879 ай бұрын
I have a 91 chevy k2500 but its gas, next truck will b a diesel
@tinmanssaws9 ай бұрын
When I first moved here I hauled Qatar with and identicle k2500 but with a 454. She pulled but was super thirsty.
@tmdillon19694 ай бұрын
I bought a 2000 C3500 6.5 DD instead of a F250 King Ranch with the 6.0. I warned about the 6.0 and was told the 6.5 was weaker than most but very reliable. It proved to be the opposite. That C3500 proved to be the single worst vehicle purchase I have ever made. Every 2 months it was in the shop. Put me off GM forever. It was clearly engineered by the mentally ill.
@devoncole57899 ай бұрын
Funny my 1996 Chevy says 480 ft lbs of torque at 1800 rpm and says 200 hp
@kirkpalmer17099 ай бұрын
He got one because he's been watching pegs channel...
@joeridenour4 ай бұрын
always gonna be a ford guy
@stevemino1425 ай бұрын
The 7.3 was good but so was the 6.5 especially turbo models 6.5 had less power than 7.3 225 HP vs 180 with 6.5 GM
@VinylToVideo2 ай бұрын
You weren't kidding about having no brand loyalty.. what's with the "Hercules" China tires? Lmao. Michelin or bust.
@PopsHowTo3 ай бұрын
The last powerstroke to outdo a Chevy.
@tdawg86059 ай бұрын
Meh... always been a chevy owner. My Pop's is a ford guy. Its funny they all get around 18mpg - 20mpg. I'm sure they could improve on that if they really wanted to. Never owned a desiel so I can't really comment, I can only say... Meh... they all rust and break down the same. TC Mahalo Tinman 🤙🤙🤙
@jamesgeorge48742 ай бұрын
There is no comparison. People still want 7.3 Powerstrokes. The 6.5 is legendary. For sucking. PMD issues. Optical sensor issues. Head cracking issues. No balls. The LB7 is 1000X better than the 6.5 could ever be. The 7.3 IDI N.A. is better than the 6.5 turbo. You might as well ask if someone prefers a 15oz fillet mignon, or a pb&j 😂
@BuckInchuteranch127 күн бұрын
I love my 7.3 IDI, do plan on adding a turbo kit soon just to get a bit more.
@bluecollartradesman71510 күн бұрын
Legendary for sucking lol. Legends are not known for being accurate. I have owned many trucks most of which have been diesel. They all have their own common issues. I used to own a GM 6.2 and two 6.5s, both of which were very reliable and fairly maintenance free. The only issue I ever had was the PMD. When it went I ordered a relocation kit and never looked back. I currently own a Ford 6.0 and 6.4, both of which are “legendary for sucking”. I can say they both have been great trucks. The 6.0 needed new injectors. While I was in there I replaced the oil cooler, deleted the egr, and updated the stc fitting. I have since put on about 200,000 Kms on this truck and haven’t any issues outside of normal wear and tear. When I bought the 6.4 it had an oil leak, a bad injector, and needed a clutch. I chose to delete the dpf. Overall it has been a pretty decent truck.
@BuckInchuteranch19 күн бұрын
@@bluecollartradesman715 with the 6.0 egr delete, toes the truck need to be reprogrammed?
@bluecollartradesman7159 күн бұрын
@@BuckInchuteranch1 No reprogramming is required, but the check engine light stays on because the truck throws a code. You can use a tuner to disable the code which means the check engine light will be off.