7.4.1.2 Packet Tracer - Skills Integration Challenge

[@koanje0186]

Дружище, благодарствую! Выручаешь

[@multiSPEEDitUP]

(accidental ASMR) needed help walking thru this PT... and i got a buzz from it. Thnx for reading everything and typing everything out.

[@trumpthemessiah1238]

thanks so much my friend. your videos are helping me and making things alot easier at school. the teachers are lazy as eff and dont care if you understand or not. College really is a waste of money. I would rather pay you for CCNA. Thank you my friend😘👍

[@jasongalloway5549]

I thought it was just my school lol. My instructor has been in Cisco & Programming for like 30+ years and acts as if we should have known everything before we came.

[@truestory5925]

You are the best I highly appreciate your efforts.

[@rickybernales3147]

Thanks for the videos you are posting! It really helps me a lot to study ccna without any hassles =)

[@calin1980]

This was tough as I had to remember things learned some time ago... Thanks for providing the video so I can check myself against it.. my RIP v2 commands knowledge weakened a bit already lol

[@notbobtekk]

You switched the devices required for the ACL configuration. HQServer should be on Branch and BranchServer should be on HQ.

[@inakijauregui]

Thanks for all your videos.. Very helpfull! really appreciate your collaboration!

[@mousevision661]

Thank you SO much!! You guys are the best!!

[@TechAcad]

Our pleasure!

[@pyrlel2072]

Thank for all your helpful videos Tech Acad! But I really had hard time finding out how to get the network addresses of 2 new subnet masks. Do you have a demo for those? Can you please insert them here? Thank you so much for your help!

[@enrickopulliam3840]

I'm not sure either, for example why did the mask change from /19 to /20

[@bakaandhoney5396]

Your videos have seriously helped me in my networking studies. I appreciate all of them. But I want to know: how did you figure out the network address into two equal subnets? Did they become a /20 because you borrowed another bit?

[@MBAKB]

Whats the logic why not keep /19

[@OhNanoh]

The named access lists arent working for me.

[@unkown_4498]

Yo, I have a new PT from my network design class, setting up a standard and Extended ACLs. You still doing Videos? Would you like to try out the challenge?

[@spyman359]

Awesome vid thanks for the help!

[@dpolendo]

Thank you Tech Acad!! You're the best!!

[@TechAcad]

Thank you

[@jose500shinobi]

Thanks so much!

[@TechAcad]

Thank you

[@soceur1977]

I follow your vids and up until this point I can follow and get 100% completion, for this challenge however, I was only able to get 32% completion although my PT requirements are just like the ones shown here...

[@Amaru2000]

soceur1977 I don’t think the points are working when you configure the access lists, I already did everything by myself and try everything and it’s working but the points are not adding up, they get stuck at 32, I guess it’s a packet tracer problem

[@xXalphatrazXx]

you might have misspelled the acl for HQServer as HQserver. This was the issue for me anyway.

[@yourboyamar8304]

Same the points are stuck at 32

[@multiSPEEDitUP]

I was stuck at 55/60. I opened the "check results" on the instructions window (at the bottom let corner) then clicked "Assessment Items" tab and it had a red "X" on the access-list on HQ gig 0/1. I deleted the access-list, made it again, and reassigned it, and it got me to 60/60. Prob was spelling or capitalization error. using PT version 7.1.1.0137. FYI if i leave PT open for too long (5hrs 8 hrs) without closing it, I tend to get unresolvable completion. 79/80. I just start over normally.

[@Football.Nille01]

legend

[@TechAcad]

Thank you so much for your great support and sharing my dear Friend...

[@DominicLemay-sb5hh]

Thanks a lot for this video, i wonder if you can help me out on this exact packet tracer lab but with acl extended

[@TechAcad]

Yes, sure

[@AlanGarcia-ut3ez]

Thanks brooo

[@TechAcad]

Any time

[@primobadboy]

The topology and instructions are different from the packet tracer above. Where is my version?

[@primobadboy]

not above i am on the wrong vid. i am referencing ccna 2 7.3.2.4

[@zebinho8353]

Thank you!

[@TechAcad]

Thank you my dear Friend..........

[@TheItalianFun]

My friend,just a a question. If I define an access list on the outbound of G0/1 interface of HQ that will deny network 172.16.144.0, that will prevent access to the server and it's correct, but it will block as well the access to HQ2 and we don't want that. I know the test ask for a named access list, but in this case an extended would be more correct in my opinion. Thanks for your amazing video.

[@skinnyyouth]

I thought the same thing. This is the ICND1 section which doesn't include extended ACLs yet. I created an ACL on the Branch router to deny the HQServer 172.16.0.1 outbound on int g0/0 Bad as well as the traffic would be routed on the network but it makes more sense rather than block HQServer and HQ2

[@cinytube9125]

you have to explain properly some interface configuration why and how

[@loglou8352]

thank you 😭😭😭😭

[@TechAcad]

Thank you dear

[@drew1035]

why was the serial interface made passive?

[@TechAcad]

Hi Drew Here we not want to advertise the link to the Internet on the router HQ. And here we set a default route on HQ which directs traffic to S0/0/1 Interface. That's why we made this serial interface as passive Thank you for your support

[@shariqashafar4800]

thks so much

[@ciscocisco-iw4kj]

Can somebody do CCNA-2 Case Study v7.0b ?

[@carlossandoval2802]

porque no pones para que descargemos el archivo pk ya resuelto?

[@TechAcad]

Could you please message me in English..... And thanks for your great support my dear Friend...

[@carlossandoval2802]

@@TechAcad good video but you would have put the file already solved

[@ternotan2383]

ist Veraltet das gibt es nun mit 90 Punkten statt 60 Statt RIP gibt es nun ACL

[@IvanIvanov-qm3ft]

Hi Tech Acad, can i contact you by e-mail?

[@TechAcad]

Hi dear Friend, You can contact us using our website, link will get from our latest videos description.

[@IvanIvanov-qm3ft]

@@TechAcad Hello, I still haven't found the link on your website to contact you