$700,000 Porsche 356 vs $100,000 Porsche 356

[@EverythingCars_dxb]

A chilled entertaining way of having some valuable piece of information!

[@jaferkhan4108]

Loving these. More please.

[@Assyl.Yacine]

Done baba! Thank you for the spport

[@studid55]

Lord these price tags are just simply incomprehensible! Very clean, but for a car most point at and say clown car, idk man... I love em tho :D

[@ahmadramadan4097]

What an insightful take on liquid.

[@anthonyfunderburk7871]

Air cool life 😎

[@DonAl9114]

Honestly , these cars are 60 years old, drive like a beetle and cost an ultra fortune. Totally ridiculous but there are plenty enthusiasts out there that smile as they sign the cheques. 😂😂😂

[@Assyl.Yacine]

Oui, mais they are prettier, faster, more fun and they appreciate in value. 1965 Porsche 356 is triple the value of a '65 Beetle, and triple the experience. Thoughts?

[@sbadaro]

11:52 - 11:55 😊

[@Assyl.Yacine]

60 kmph!

[@shingoose6197]

ugh too much #porscheweenie talk...

[@sbadaro]

Twin cam per each cam... I mean per each bank 😊

[@Assyl.Yacine]

Yes I realise that now (watching Jay Leno's video 😛). So quad cam and twin cam are the same thing right? Twin cam for each side, therefore quad?

[@sbadaro]

@@Assyl.Yacine per each bank ☺... like in the 365 gtb4... how I understand it brother... (I'll fix typo in a second). Of course if it were, oh say a 105 series Alfa Romeo GTV with an in-line 4, then no, a twin cam per each bank is not a quad cam ...

[@Assyl.Yacine]

@@sbadaro Got it. So in the case of a boxer/V engine, quad cam and twin cam are basically different terms for the same thing.

[@sbadaro]

@@Assyl.Yacine yes mr. Assyl. How have you been?

[@Assyl.Yacine]

​@@sbadaro Hahaha all good thank you Hajji