8 INVENTIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES THAT WILL CHANGE OUR WORLD!

Electric power consumption will be hardly reduced in the future. The more electrical devices - the more electricity required. Indeed, the price we have to pay for our comfort, gets higher. However, some innovations are aiding to save non-renewable sources to some extent. This video features the smartest and the most original ones.
If you are the author of the materials or the copyright owner of it, but your authorship was not indicated or you object to its use, please contact me: [e-mail]
Subscribe to my channel to get to know all news! ► / @innovativetechs3044
#inventions #top #gadgets
Don’t miss next videos: Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications

[@boxsterman77]

I'm sorry, but I'm in disbelief about the assertion that one kite generator can satisfy the electrical requirements of 86K homes!

[@thorstambaugh1520]

Ben Franklin generated all the electricity America used with but a kite and a key

[@somenygaard]

He also said the kite was 295 ft diameter and 500+ feet in the air. If that turbine hanging from the kite was 295 feet in diameter that kite was 1/4 mile long.

[@cryptfire3158]

what could go wrong? "it's a bird, it's a plane... nope just a giant 500 pound kite landing on our house killing our kids.

[@dongorrie1828]

@@thorstambaugh1520 no he didn’t generate any electricity. His experiment was to demonstrate that lightning was caused by electricity.

[@PhongNguyen-cf3kj]

At those wind speeds, it's like a airplane turbine. It's spinning very fast.

[@kaylera1]

The one with the folding petals should have been called "Flower Power"

[@Gamertaque]

Ya mean power flower?

[@miketalon2197]

A lot of misinformation in this video. Horrible fact research and reporting. Done correctly this could have been a useful video. Sad

[@martinwalzer]

yes, agree, this people don't know what they are talking about, KPS went our of business last year.....

[@markslater1081]

Who cares bro, its not like this video's gonna be used to make actual decisions. At best its gonna inspire some kid to be an engineer

[@AnInterestedObserver]

Exactly what is incorrect in this video? Your statement about it being 'misinformation ' smacks of mindless censorship of which there is too much lately. Evidence what you say or don't say it.

[@L.M1792]

Some great ideas. The turbines on sea beds sat on heavy stands in strong moving currents is a great invention, doubly so for use in producing hydrogen from the salt sea water it is sat in.

[@CUBETechie]

What about the Wells turbine?

[@ladeda7033]

Thats the ONLY worthy idea in this video . But submerged that deep will be a hugely expensive maintenance project. More than its worth. The last one is the idea i had in the early '60's

[@beauwright7989]

Riytssu

[@rRobertSmith]

Rust never sleeps.

[@debbiehenri345]

I'm sure he said it powers around 2200 homes, which isn't a lot really. Also, abandoned driftnet, kelp, rust, seals, whales... and quite an 'etc' once you start thinking about it. I think the most upsetting thing about these sorts of videos is - for the most part, that's exactly where you'll see most of these inventions for a very long time - on videos. Why does it take so very long for governments to get their act together and start employing these devices? I quite like wind turbines to be honest, but certainly if those little Spanish ones produce 1MW of electricity - 'each!' - they are going to be a heck of lot less 'visually obstructive' in the eyes of those who don't like the rotating sort. Strap one to the top of plenty of other visually unimpressive structures (pylons, street lamps, water towers), and no one has any right to get huffy.

[@stephenmerritt5750]

Considering the world demand for electricity will triple by 2050, we are going to need a lot of wind kites and solar flowers and those sidewalk thingamajigs.

[@briannedollar7153]

I love all of these inventions. It’s incredible what people can come up with. The kite one is really innovative and awesome! Some are not necessarily feasible for everywhere or not necessarily completely effective, it’s definitely interesting how far we are getting with natural resources and I’m really interested to see where we go in the future.

[@doobidoo095]

CO2 at 0.04% is a 2,500th part of the atmosphere. That means to warm the climate by just 1"C carbon dioxide molecules must capture 2,500"C of heat energy. That is impossible. It also breaks the fundamental laws of thermodynamics. Methane at 0.00017% is a 600,000th of the atmosphere so it's even more impossible. However, the climate is changing. This is because of deliberate geoengineering programmes, in particular ozone thinning away from the poles. Though largely unreported ozone thinning effect is directly observable, this summer you can see a unnaturally bright sun just as we did last year. Under these conditions the pain felt when looking at the sun is not only from the increase in visible light but the much larger increase in infrared. (Look up at the sky and you will see a range of geoengineering operations in progress, these include chemtrail induced cloud or hazing, ripple patterns caused by HAARP installations, bizarre and unnatural cloud formations). Climate change is a programme to force change in accordance with the implementation of Agenda 21 /2030. Current events demonstrate this transition is well underway and will involve massive population cull through injected nanotech (re transhumanist programme). Agenda 21 also sees the permanent loss of all property rights with the introduction of universal basic income (ref NESARA/GESARA) and has/is being promoted by The World Economic Forum. 'You will own nothing and you will be happy' WEF In a depopulated world the surviving brainwashed and controlled population will be confined to mega cities. Carbon limits will be used to restrict consumption and liberty. Meanwhile the re-greened wilderness will be the exclusive playground of the ultra rich elite posing as conservationists. The CO2 hoax amounts to the theft of the world and the enslavement of humanity by a parasitic few. Welcome to the future! _________ I have included a debunking of 'accumulated heat' as it is so often used to explain how trace elements, so called 'greenhouse gasses', can warm the planet. Accumulated heat whilst sounding a reasonable explanation of how heat can build up is rather nothing more than gobbledygook. In fact it shows those using such arguments do not even understand what heat is. When we measure temperature we are measuring the heat energy a thing is losing. In short heat is a measurement of flow, the transfer of heat energy and this will always be in the direction towards the colder. For this reason a thing can never 'accumulate heat' in the way those advocating CO2 climate change describe. The temperature of a body is the measure of heat output, it can never be greater than the measure of heat input. Output = input. When a thing is warmed it is heated to an equivalent of the heat input. If this input is not maintained it will cool. Those that propose that heat can build up to be hotter than the total measure of heat input at a given time either do not understand what heat is or are being deliberately misleading. To illustrate, an object being heated by a flame can never become hotter than that flame, it's temperature cannot rise inexorably to the temperature of the sun for instance. Heat cannot be accumulated. When we think about it common sense tells us this must be the case. NASA and even Nobel Prize winning physicists have expounded 'accumulated heat' as the explanation how CO2 is able to warm the atmosphere. They claim that over hundreds of years CO2 has captured heat energy and this heat has 'accumulated' to produce a serious warming effect. As I have just explained, this is totally impossible and fundamentally violates all the laws of thermodynamics. That respected scientists should support such uneducated, unthinking nonsense is disturbing and only reflects that in terms of being able to think clearly about a subject they have no facility or inclination. These are the Dark Ages of science. Belief has outweighed logic or any critical thought. It tells us that we should not unquestioningly accept anything we are told, that experts can be fools. (NB: be aware of attempts to discard thermodynamics by talking about biology. Eg. 'It only takes a drop of arsenic to kill a person.' This would be somewhat desperate, muddled thinking. Clearly biological processes based on the reaction of a cell are not the same as the laws of physics/thermodynamics). (AS PROOF THIS DECEPTION IS REAL, DISSENTING INFORMATION SUCH AS THIS IS BEING BLOCKED. THIS COMMENT WILL BE BLOCKED, BURIED, OR DELETED WITHIN HOURS. PLEASE COPY).

[@erikswenson2659]

Please get someone with scientific and engieering expertise in renewable energy to vet your ideas and edit your videos.

[@relentlessmadman]

Also did you know that looped music was invented to drive us all insane?????

[@Pearlescent800]

Clean energy ❤

[@ricbayles5415]

So I wonder how much energy is required to manufacture each of those energy producing devices? What about the cost of installation and maintenance? Does the energy produced equal or exceed the cost I mentioned above?

[@Brian_rock_railfan]

great video

[@ladyvincenza]

Hooray for these inventors!

[@bryander]

There’s real, worthwhile technology in this field, but some of your examples here are fairly bogus.

[@jsmariani4180]

I would avoid walking on those squish-able tiles.

[@balazsrako9528]

@KHALIIL01 It would be like walking up a hill because it's specifically designed to remove energy from your walking. Also it's about as efficient as solar Freaking roadways

[@YouGotCreeped]

The tiled pavement idea would be more efficient for cities with a lot of foot traffic. The most efficient energy generation in this list as it is using people. On a large scale in major cities, the energy generated would be enough to have a significant impact. If you installed this type of technology modified for safe use on roads and highways, you would have even more energy production.

[@assassinlexx1993]

The cost of maintenance on wind turbines is now coming in. The cost repairs to the blades and the turbines is much higher than what they expected. The blades only last so long must be replaced. Because of what the blades are made of. They are cut up and buried. Tons more landfill.

[@markphilpot4981]

I believe in alternative energy systems. Some are better than others, but none is without problems. For a given area, solar is the best overall in my opinion. Unless you live in a dismal climate that stays cloudy. Wind generation is fine provided you live in a windy place. The key to finding the one which will benefit you and your needs is knowing which is more plentiful. One is bound to be better for your situation. Now affording it, that is another matter. There are tax breaks for doing so. Helping remove a fossil fuel dependency issue is worth an expense in the long haul view. Being a part of the solution is also helpful.

[@BaawBee]

Those last two were awesome

[@keithgeisen]

I truly believe that the collective knowledge will find a source of power for the future- they must try and continue every effort- this is and will be the future- people who state “this or that is stupid idea” go back into your cave and start your fires 🔥

[@alanritchie7918]

Check out coastal tidal generation storage....the idea is the invention of peter tse and is a ground breaking revolutionary energy source for the future which does not receive the media coverage it deserves the spin offs are unbelievable ie it feeds a eco system which has the capability to solve future food shortages brought about by our ever increasing population. It could and should be funded by central government. Peter has formed a company and patented his idea but if it is taken up it will probably be by foreign investors ,it reminds me of the long dead British motor engineering industry .which failed to move with the times thus was killed off by Japanese and other Asian countries.

[@tonysafetychannel4064]

smart flower solar cell wowww.......

[@1234JoNaThAnA56789]

The solar flower has way too many moving parts to make it worth it. At that point, you mine as well put up a small static structure in the shape of a flower.

[@MrDuck-oi3qc]

Making stuff complicated and shiny is always a good thing. Now put a phone charger on it, some eeeh wifi network coming out of it and you start the 10 industrial revolution.

[@MagnetOnlyMotors]

3:43 nice idea, but what about all the marine life that gets killed by the blades, just like wind farms have.

[@robertschlesinger1342]

Interesting and worthwhile video.

[@805BigSarge]

KEEP LOVING IT PEOPLE

[@youstupidamerican3423]

Uh......is the author of this video using public content to mix a video with no actual facts related to each product?

[@Ian-ff2hz]

Yep

[@AutitsicDysexlia]

A 492'... 'Bladeless' for which almost certainly there is a applied materials problem that has yet to be solved. Was I not even supposed to blink when they said it was 500' tall?!

[@AutitsicDysexlia]

Wave power though... I mean... they're almost certainly killing sea creatures with some of that stuff, but the real problem is the energy that is in waves is NEEDED... butterfly effect of extracting it, and all the sudden Ocean Currents slow to a point where some area of the ocean that was more sensitive to subtle changes in current jsut utterly dies off, and watch when that was an area with a critical role in the local ecosystem, and then we have a cascade failure... and once again, we all die. Back to the drawing board on those... we don't need any of these technologies anyways. We already have what we need, it's just been demonetized.

[@snapperl]

Tidal power is great and full of promise, but salt water is incredibly corrosive, I dunno how they are going to keep the maintenance costs down. The turbine that can be lifted out of the water seems like a good idea, from a maintenance standpoint.

[@ikkedansk]

vortex bladeless has been an "emerging tech" for over 5 years, it's a hoax so far i know

[@Thearyshare]

Some great idea.

[@dharmeshkothari9124]

Nice. Should mention solid oxide fuel cells. Lot of research and industrial technology around in place for SOFC.

[@VoltsRu]

it all looks very cool!

[@TropicalArtPaganMxVideoGames]

Looking forward to this

[@harshagarwal.]

This is super video

[@burlybair]

Perhaps you should look into what the Hadon Collider is doing. It is what we all will be doing. Maybe in our lifetime.

[@chreinisch]

I can hear the advocate's of fish in Nova Scotia screaming, the guys who throw by-catch over board

[@vthilton]

Save Our Planet

[@kevinlopez-kd8ld]

Thumbs up. Excellent choice on gathering these ideas. Such a shame that some people don't understand that it takes time to improve efficiency on a new concept tho

[@julianocamargo6674]

First three, two bogus, kite power very experimental and low scale, a huge challenge for control technology.

[@preppertechnicianee6013]

Same with tidal power its in long term testing now

[@preppertechnicianee6013]

Actually most of these are bad or exaggerated

[@SammytheStampede]

Dude, once they 1/2 the power here in the USA they’re going to 2X the cost to compensate for the loss of $$. But hey, I’m just an electrician, what do I know.

[@MrDuck-oi3qc]

Its a well know fact that the electric company's will take the loss on their behalf, just so that everything returns to the green like when the dinosaurs were alive and not oily. Everyone will understand each other hold hands and have great nature inspired orgies.

[@FLASH_YT-2.0]

Why not scientists make an invention or electricity by using air pollution.... I guess this would surely help our environment.... I hope this idea reaches the scientists 🤞

[@adtosse666]

I dont think that two of the statments in the wideo is true!!! Slopy reserch"!" The Maygen tidal power is the only one that you have that is almost true, but it is not 320MW/pcs, it is 1.5 MW/pcs. so you just oversaturated it by 213 times.. nice reserch :-(

[@garyjohnson4657]

1.5 ? You are being generous, I think. I would hate to see the visonal pollution like wind power has brought. Until we have a storage solution, I don't think they are practical.

[@patrickb.4749]

When you hear crap like "megawatts per hour" you know you are dealing with a clueless person just saying stuff he does not understand. Enjoy the images and do actual research for things that feel promising.

[@ibanezrg320fm]

I'm here to see if there's a new Speaker invention. Every speaker I see is a traditional circle. I feel like there could be a new way of designing speakers 🤔

[@kallurisubrahmanyam4350]

GREAT

[@user-ht1qg9xn3ra]

They will change the world, but a infinitesimal bit.

[@albertopatrocinio6102]

The future energy source that can be use substitutes for fossils is the Deuterium which the Philippines has the highest reserve. Hope for investment someday.

[@realtalks9472]

Vortex bladeless...superb

[@deserteagleiii1643]

I was curious on the first 1.. since weight was their target to create energy i think they might be developing same thing to put on road since cars are more heavier and it goes off and on.

[@tovarghese7058]

it is a sustainable technology because all are need the input. but with few weight W=L x E or E= Lx W modifications. by the same we can make vehicles with the spring actions and gears. firstly we will not get satisfactory but that will bright some sence through the same. because I done it. ex. bicycle's pedal with 2kg. will become as lever principles and get revolution.

[@tovarghese7058]

curiously inactivated somebody 's to combine to get new things to new World. because everybody wants to get power free. it will happen while I shall get with a full support. anybody come forward for the same.

[@jasonreed6688]

I have the perfect innovation!!!

[@charliepearce8767]

The production of power is the easy part... Storing the power is the difficult part.

[@Random-rt5ec]

The Massachusetts Cape Wind project only guarantees to quadruple electric bills & if you want to see how many birds a windmill kills/day visit the windmill next to the Hull, MA high school. You will leave in tears after watching so many innocent birds lives come to an abrupt end with the sound of a thump.

[@syedmaricar9946]

It's time to Invent and invest in different ways to generate power

[@yasir9103]

Sorry not a single project that can changed the world

[@aakashkesharwani9936]

0:56 this technology should be use in roads.

[@shaikhibrahim3615]

This is what free energy looks like

[@apurvmj]

Most of them are no efficient, that is the reason they are not in mainstream

[@austin1839]

I loved all those chemtrails in that one picture.

[@eblair12]

We never get real talk about that stuff ..

[@precisiont5188]

The best sustainable way to remove carbon dioxide from the air is converting deserts into forests, jungles, etc. Plants do many positive actions including producing oxygen and removing carbon dioxide.

[@RadiantMabon]

Great innovative generators...with great scope for improvement....

[@jamesbrown7314]

Solar flower and the kite generator are the only ones I found impressive. The hydroelectric generator looks like it would kill allot of wild life

[@MrSimonw58]

1:10 ... pretty sure it's got something to do with passing a magnet through a copper coil

[@wickedleeloopy2115]

Think I rather hydroelectric... its efficient & it works.

[@spare9434]

Pretty dirty and destructive to the environment

[@dekutree64]

Hydro is good, but we've already dammed most of the rivers in America (including a lot that should have been kept natural), and it's still nowhere near enough. Dams consume a massive amount of concrete too, which is on the way to scarcity.

[@mikehood4516]

At least the Canadians Are good at tidal Technology very smart AAA 😎

[@nomangreybeard535]

Mike Hood waterworld

[@garypierce7380]

How about if half the country puts a pole in their yard with a wind generator on top of it and sells the excess back into the grid? Wouldn't that make more sense than reinventing the wheel?

[@evanoshea9506]

WHATTT 2:54 I’d say double check in that fact.

[@DS-iw5nw]

$30,000 for the solar flower fully installed. 2KW system with tracking.

[@balazsrako9528]

For that kind of money you can build a non solar tracking system 10 times the size

[@enricopgamboa4821]

That's too expensive.

[@Ck-mt8ef]

For your $30,000 investment let me show you what to expect , what does 2 kilowatt really means .... Power ÷ Voltage =Amperage 2,000 watts ÷ 120 vac. = 16.66 amps US Standard 2 kw or 2000 ÷ 220 vac = 9.09 amps European Standard .. my information was assuming that this put out alternating current .. which means it would take DC put out by photocells ran it to an inverter to turn it into AC voltage ..

[@Cloud191286]

That's why the company went bankrupt...

[@tomsculpture]

I don't understand why large cities like LOS ANGELES don't use more underwater generators and power supplies; or even water distillation systems for clean water, since they have the resource right nest to them.? They just have to pay for the machine then it is free, except maintenance.

[@ramennoodleschickenflavor7404]

2:11. The guy laying on the windmill I seen on the news he’s from Rhode Island

[@fluibertje]

including transport of all kinds private use of energy is only 20% Industry is using 80% Make products more durable so they do not need to be replaced because a button breaks or some plastic thingy cracks. then we can easily achive 40% redduction in energy consumption. making a washing machine that lasts without any problem 50 to 80 years is technically no problem.

[@stephaniealdridge4964]

Chopped marine life, is there some sort of protection for fish and mammals from the underwater blades ?

[@alikececioglu8654]

good

[@AssumedZeus]

Did they say the ice wind turbines only worked efficiently over 7m/s but are braked to below 2m/s ?

[@Scott_C]

1:13 _how it generates power is still kept a secret_ ... Um induction or indicators is how it works; basic electronic component. Move a magnet through a coil = electricity. Step on it and it moves either the coil or it moves a magnet. But... shhhhhh... it's a secret.

[@Scott_C]

4:12 also an induction generator, waggle of stick in air moves the magnet through a coil. No real _"Secret"_ here.

[@electronresonator8882]

but what if it's a free energy device?

[@Scott_C]

@@electronresonator8882 😆 if you want to call people vibrating / moving a surface as they walk across it, or wind shaking a pole, "Free Energy" then yes it is. I'd prefer to call it "gleaned" or "neglected" energy.

[@n1mbusmusic606]

Thorium!

[@anthonyanth8368]

Liquid Fluride Thorium Nuclear Power is the should be high on the list

[@giorgiocooper9023]

maybe our world .... certainly not the third world !

[@KanishQQuotes]

Thunderf00t has joined the chat

[@2490debrick]

What we need is to build drones that are solar powered that act like Bussard Collectors and fly them over specific areas of the ozone ideally the Antartic so they can take in all the CS gases to prevent further fresh water melting into the oceans!

[@salamon917]

I hope that was sarcasm, I do

[@Sacto1654]

You *KNOW* that Norway is seriously considering tidal power because the Gulf Stream will provide a huge amount of water flow to offshore tidal power stations on Norway's coastline.

[@assassinlexx1993]

The cost to run and maintenance of these units. There is zero profit. Plus the sea life killed from the blades.

[@austin1839]

Harness the endless power of a woman's scorn and you'll have something.

[@mubinhw2553]

we must reduce the fossil consumption in the same time.

[@robertd9850]

In the same time as what? Generation 4 nuclear would do it.

[@grahamoldfield3474]

&meters per second before it starts generating power thats about 25 Klm/h or about 15 MPH . Iceland has huge geothermal electricity no need for these stupid vertical axial fans . Tidal works best in high tidal rise and fall area like Northern Australia where it can be 9 meters . Trouble is the people are 3000 plus Kilometres away , lot of expensive cable and a LOT of power loss over that distance . Meanwhile there is so much land for solar in that area . Ossolating poles of nearly 500 ft high , just how big and costly would the foundations have to be ? Total simplistic video with no negatives really in this day and age ,

[@DerExsorzist]

2 [m/s] *(3600[s/h]/1000[m/km])= 7.2 [km/h]

[@tovarghese7058]

the condition of the several source getting successful but that is so far. that will become as so burden to bring home. my theory is so simple to iract any where with the modification of wind power procedure. we can make one big unit, but how much heavy ifell tower needs for transfer the power and how much heavy cable needs for the same, that is expensive. it is not not needs any raw materials of sources. it needs few minutes rpm only for prime movement only that getting with simple Antitorque system. anybody could not understand yet this system become as rpm. do you know small alternator needs 3000rpm and big needs 300 or so less than the same as per the dia. and diagram of alternator........

[@sakhawathossenshepo6744]

wow😮😮😮

[@lucamosca_]

All smart solution but should be mass produced so that could be used by masses and save tons of co2. A prototype doesn't make so much

[@Cr-gf3gn]

mad idea...why not use the lense effect to concentrate the suns rays onto a giant boiler. the resultant steam could drive an electric motor. bit like the desert array fields but using glass lenses

[@PhiTonics]

Wow lots of haters on your comments section, bummer, keep up the good work mate.

[@jimjackson4256]

More energy consumption ! not around my house between high efficiency light bulbs and efficient appliances i’m using less power than ever before.

[@gextreme2381]

unless you turn off and get rid of the ac, heat, dryer, fridge, oven, microwave, computers and electronics, hot water and anything else with a motor those lights are a drop in the bucket. it just feels good cause you see it. frontal lobe problem solving. get an electric car also, cause out of sight burning of fossil fuels feels better than burning it in the car your driving. it's much greener to burn it elsewhere, plus building those mqssiv3 car batteries dontg do any harm to the earth when th3 lqnd is stripped for the rare minerals to build them. even better if you plug in at a free charging station. then we wll get subsidies that are free. except for those nagging taxes that only seem to always increase.

[@jerrymiller8313]

sidewalk deal great in the winter I am sure. maint free? plus batteries to maintain . with LED lights I am guessing about a 300 year payoff.

[@bjl1000]

Forget wind energy, it's a waste of money and material.

[@sprintershepherd4359]

Global warming is winning and this is just the beginning Think globally, act locally . Reduce your carbon footprint Every dollar you spend is a vote Its time we behave like adults Its time we face the facts and take responsibility Please Act and Vote responsibly every day before its to late

[@mrav8r]

The carbon problem is not artificial.

[@hopefultoo]

Interesting presentation but excruciating grammar that makes me wince. Please, please learn to use gerunds and infinitives after verbs.

[@errickmackey8983]

Check out the Harmony Vertical-Axis-Wind-Turbine (VAWT).😊

[@KilloNova]

Tartarians had us beat

[@prakashbhairatilalsolanki142]

Superb🙏🙏🙏

[@vincent_hall]

Ice wind, so it's never operating efficiently? That's sad.

[@eunickissimo]

4:45 1 MW? No way!

[@thelastengineer2315]

Efficiency is a relative term, in the case of wind generation it is relative to the power output of a bicycle dynamo.

[@alanritchie7918]

Why not harness the hot air that is produced on a daily basis from Westminsters mps!!!!

[@tomfinochio3044]

Promises promises, promises!!! Still nothing comes to fruition!

[@thedude5040]

99% of these technologies will never come to fruition

[@faustin289]

Who are those *many specialists* who say global warming is artificial?

[@TheCatLady65]

They're climatologists and other scientists.

[@Bill.Pearson]

@@TheCatLady65 But not "many specialists". There are very, very few.

[@johnwang9914]

Renewable energy is not a technical problem, it's a socioeconomic problem. Several orders of magnitude more solar energy falls upon the Earth than our global or even anticipated global usage. We just need a business model that directs the gains to the investors rather than to the consumers. Alternatively, we could produce power as a socialist service instead of relying on capitalism.

[@paladin0654]

Nice kite, where the heck is the 295ft. diameter turbine?

[@vincent_hall]

Vortex Bladeless: there's a Dutch company with the same invention.

[@Hallettjs7957]

that carbon sequestering and the smart flower solar bits killed the video. It failed to mention how both will never be used and the carbon capture technology failed miserably almost every time it was implemented. the solar tracking is not cost effective as solar prices have went down and you can put one hell of a system that doesnt move on a root for $30K US.