9 Ways Honest Gun Owners Accidentally Wind Up In Jail

Go to learbackfire.com/ or call 800-707-4575 to receive up to $15,000 in FREE bonus metals with a qualified purchase.
______________________________________________
GEAR I LIKE
Hearing Protection: goaxil.com/pages/gs-extreme-a...
My favorite scopes (blog post) backfire.tv/scope
My favorite rifles (blog post) backfire.tv/best-hunting-rifle/
Above links, or the pages referenced, contain affiliate links. Commissions earned.
______________________________________________
The Backfire KZbin Channel is owned and operated by Backfire LLC, a Utah limited liability company.

[@backfire]

Go to learbackfire.com/ or call 800-707-4575 to receive up to $15,000 in FREE bonus metals with a qualified purchase.

[@user-qk1cx6gs2z]

Ironic, don't you smell? Honest Americans think about and consider these issues. However, modern American "law enforcers" are MORE consistent with WWII NAZIs than true Peace Officers AND "just follow odors.....oops orders" AND NEVER consider "lawful"......

[@t.m9341]

I literally do not give a f about bump stocks. If anyone wants to be a Karen then they need to re evaluate the last 5 or so years and see the long game

[@TacticalKangaroo1776]

I wish you'd stop saying 16" or less.....IT'S Less than 16", there is a difference

[@calvinwaligora8312]

What torques me off about most lawyers who talk about guns, is that they constantly talk about Federal and State Laws, but they never talk about Constitutional Law, which is Supreme Law and any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void. The Supreme Court said that any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void. Lawyers need to grow a Spine and band together and take on these UnConstitutional Laws. What people don't understand is that Doctors are far more deadly than Guns ever will be. Doctors are responsible for over 8 Billion People's Deaths since the 1960s, in the United States alone. As a Journalist, I get these reports all the time. Wake up People, this Country is on the tipping point of not being the United States, but a totally different Country.

[@Powertuber1000]

They didn’t clarify, have a gun and marijuana, or have a gun while using marijuana.

[@Phil-nl9ed]

So much time and energy is spent towards law-abiding citizens. Imagine if they use those resources to fight real crime instead.

[@blackrifle6736]

*Remember it is always about the paycheck. A bust like this is easy pickings with little risk and ones arrest metrics look good come next performance review.*

[@Jack-ur5or]

Welcome to communism

[@rottman88]

​@blackrifle6736 That's right. Go for the "low hanging fruit" and the establishment knows that the honest citizens will pay the attorney and the fines.. all that looks good to the public and helps fuel the "industry." Edit- typos corrected.

[@blueovalfan23]

they did at one point. they really need to learn the saying, "just because you, doesn't mean you should"

[@letmedriveman5986]

Problem reaction solution...order out of chaos

[@kynaston1474]

If you can legitimately accidentally go to PRISON the police AND legislators are THE problem.

[@maxnomad8561]

if "ignorance of the law is no defence" then we all need to have a good education in law from the earliest age.

[@michelerorabaugh8134]

That is the intent. Make any laws that make you a criminal and make the gun unsafe.

[@anti-popfpv4638]

How else would they make money? Trust minor laws ruin lives. Lmk if you want to hear one person's experience, soon as I turned 18 I was a target.

[@mikeswierczynski9334]

@@maxnomad8561there's ignorance of the law and then there's the code book that's eight feet thick and changes from state to state and county to county. Simple common sense gun laws yes but what law abiding citizens are expected to follow, which change on a whim, would be a full time job. Gun scholars can't even agree on the meaning of some of these laws, How is John Q Public supposed to?

[@thisismyusername6717]

There is an army vet in my town who sold a gun to a guy who wasnt allowed one. The story is he went to buy it and the guy asked him if he is a felon to which he replied jokingly “ive been in 40 years” or something like that, i forget the quote. But long story short this 70 yr old man is going to die in prison and like 340 guns are being sold of his through family. I bought 2. A .17HMR and a .22 hornet. Both for $200 plus ammo and scope. Its sad. BUT. His legacy will live on bc im telling my kids and grandchildren this story when i hand these guns to them…..over my dead body ofc😅 i love rimfire. Wnd yes ik hornet is center but the recoil isnt like a centerfire either.

[@gnosphotos]

“Shall not be infringed” has been infringed upon over 22k times

[@camdenkulpa3938]

More then that.. all of those people who spent time for nothing.

[@gofastpulluphard7799]

read again @@mister_walter_sobchak

[@Shiftdougler]

@@mister_walter_sobchakthe right of people

[@mikecarroll520]

🎯 exactly

[@JoeBz2011]

Shall not be infringed doesn't mean what you think. It doesn't mean - and therefore no limitations can be applied. It simply means you can own a firearm...which we can. It doesn't mean - therefore you can own a bazooka.

[@guildig1]

No firearm or firearm accessories should be illegal. The only thing that should be illegal is using the stuff to commit a crime.

[@Judicialmenace]

Exactly! Yes! Somebody finally said it!

[@anthonykeeton9103]

Agree if u can legally own a gun it should be any gun available

[@kgkg6649]

Straight to the point:)

[@staledorito6174]

I do think you should have to get a license for full auto weapons but agree

[@guildig1]

@staledorito6174 no you should not need a license for full automatic that is still a form of regulation. Before 1984 there were very little crime with full automatic gun. Just like today they want ARs banned and they are on the low side for crime.

[@Farnorthfarmer]

One item not mentioned…Hearing Protection Act….it should NOT be a federal crime to have a suppression device without a tax stamp. They are used specifically to protect hearing! Wish you would have mentioned that. I know Trump Jr. Is a huge proponent. Suppression devices do not kill unless used as a club. They should be readily available WITHOUT ANY permission needed to legal gun owners. Huge pain point. Keep doing what you do. I enjoy your vids and info sir 🤘💪

[@lancekrystoff9619]

Actually, Trump has gone on record saying at one point not long ago that he “didn’t like suppressors. Can we just ban them?” Trump is NOT pro 2A or anything shooting related.

[@austindiaz6767]

​@@lancekrystoff9619 can you read he said trump jr

[@maguslascivious4980]

As long as the corrupt government can control you, gather information on you and take your money... they'll do it.

[@lancekrystoff9619]

@@austindiaz6767You are correct. I somehow missed that. That said, I would highly question whether or not his words are genuine given his father’s track record with the second amendment and tendency to run his mouth.

[@theblishknovk]

No guns or gun accessories should require tax, stamps, registration, or permission. Completely defeats the purpose of the 2nd.

[@johandewet2588]

So many American gun laws are just plain stupid.

[@clydemarshall8095]

Literally all of them.

[@Judicialmenace]

@@clydemarshall8095 Why would they criminalize possession of property and not go after the ones doing the crimes? Because they want to impose on anybody who owns anything they don’t like. It sounds like these stupid laws were made by some insolent old lawmakers with no common sense whatsoever.

[@ulflyng4072]

They are well thought through....they serve the purpose they were intented. Stopping populos from saying NO

[@thegarage4570]

Not stupid, unconstitutional! Abolish the ATF and repeal the NFA/GCA!

[@TS-wq6qb]

They aren't gun laws they are Constitutional infringements. Plain and simple.

[@TheSakufighter]

I love how half these laws are so clearly tyrannical/unconstitutional yet nothing will ever be done about it. We are living on borrowed time.

[@Gnolomweb]

2a

[@AlexHernandez-ee5hd]

They aren't unconstitutional, but they are exceptionally controlling.

[@stevenwagner9912]

All gun laws are unconstitutional. If you say otherwise you are a collaborator.

[@betwandet41]

@@AlexHernandez-ee5hdshall not be infringed. but i understand your point. I’d counter that with just because a judge says it’s not unconstitutional doesn’t mean that it isn’t.

[@tactikiller]

@@AlexHernandez-ee5hdanything that would in anyway undermine the ability to keep and bear arms is by definition unconstitutional.

[@lorettacaputo6997]

I had an leo explain to me that when dealing with a suspect, they will find something that they can use to hold or be useful in prosecuting an individual. Laws seem to be in place not to prevent any crime but to trip citzens up in a web of legal problems.

[@texastomsshavingtips6359]

In My Humble Opinion, Unfortunately, that is probably closer to the mark than most people realize👍🤠🤣‼️ I am NOT saying that I agree with the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME, I'm just saying that your statement is closer to the truth than anything that the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME says to the contrary In My Humble Opinion !!

[@AlexHernandez-ee5hd]

@@texastomsshavingtips6359 You should probably start agreeing with the Socialist regime, because this problem is one of the big things we address. Late stage capitalism breeds this type of corruption for the cops, prosecutors, and judges to keep lining their pockets.

[@brandonsmith2299]

@lorettacaputo6997 Don’t forget. I learned this lesson first hand. COPS ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS!! They ARE SNAKES!!!! But to add to your point. The cops job is to get you in jail and return to duty as fast as humanly possible.. it’s messed up. And I learned that and will never forget it.

[@manny2ndamendment246]

Back the blue when they put you in jail for defending your life or your business?

[@Mark-Dibble]

Absolutely! I mean no! Or maybe? Please don’t bring logical questions to the comments section.

[@jeffccr3620]

Uh you can't even defend someone else if they are in danger or being robbed Unless your protecting a elected official or their family member then it's OK 😅 Laws are for you not them that's being proven daily

[@Farnorthfarmer]

While I agree, it’s their job to enforce the ridiculous laws that are out there. They have to presume the worst with all.

[@lancekrystoff9619]

@@Farnorthfarmer”Just doing your job” doesn’t cut it as an excuse for doing or partaking in something that is wrong.

[@Farnorthfarmer]

@@lancekrystoff9619 I DO agree with you, however they are held to an oath. If each upheld their own personal beliefs, ideals and feelings that were not based in the bylaws they agreed to uphold, I’d think the word “rogue” could be applied. I do support law enforcement 💯 and do my best to not give them anything they would question. I do have concerns with how I would be judged if I had to protect myself or fam. I’m just too naive.

[@RazorBrain1]

In a country where we are supposed to be free and have the "right" to own and carry guns. You would think that you couldn't go to jail for mistakes or minor stuff. The fact that owning something you have a right to can cost you your freedom means you are not free. In a free society, if you made a mistake, you wouldn't be facing 10+ years in jail. The fact that anyone can say we are free is beyond delusional. It's like thanking your plantation Master for giving you a job. It just doesn't make sense. The Sons of Liberty would have been disgusted with us.

[@tjboylan20]

We aren’t free we have the illusion of freedom

[@Judicialmenace]

You should add that 10+ years in prison is cruel and unusual punishment and should be considered treason by itself on whoever imposed that law on us. Also the fine is purposeful to cause people to become destitute and purposefully broke which still amounts to a cruel and unusual punishment. Also, sending people to prison for not complying with their demands is an easy way for the Judicial system to garner some very serious enemies. These are facts, it is literally based in our Constitution but they don’t apply Constitutional standards when they violate the law to impose on people. They purposely ignore the Constitutional laws they are supposed to reference against their own Court dockets and that is the problem I am trying to bring awareness of.

[@warrenharrison9490]

We haven't operated under the constitution since the act of 1871.

[@POSSUM3K3]

Only free because they tell us so...

[@MasterWitchDoctor]

theyre meant to be because theyre scared of us

[@chexx5184]

Legal gun owners will always be under more scrutiny than a criminal, gotta love Weimerica

[@MrMrmetro]

For the record, there are now 27 States that legally allow permitless carry.

[@frankfields2071]

Awesome but commieforina is not one, where I'm stuck with age 78 and doctors in this democrap state

[@tangoseal1]

@@frankfields2071 Forget about gun laws, politics, and making California not communist. At your age you should be in prayer, asking Jesus Christ to take you away to His Kingdom before its too late.

[@kennykash6089]

29 now. (:

[@vincentkingsdale8334]

Doesnt matter. 2A trumps all state "laws",; 1A auditors do it all the time

[@victordalvarenga]

This video is very important. Every first gun owner should watch this video and be aware of one's state's law on firearms, even the small details. Thank you!

[@theblishknovk]

Know them, then ignore them.

[@dalepres1]

This video is very important and every gun owner should watch, that's for certain. Every gun owner should watch this and understand what a Fudd is, someone who defends the right to keep their bolt-action hunting rifle but, otherwise, doesn't give a rat's-tail about the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment's protection of the right to keep and bear arms.

[@MimicoBungalow]

how about enacting FEDERAL GUN LAWS - how many more innocent folks have to die because every yahoo is 'carrying a firearm' (second amendment says REGULATED MILITIA - not everyone each to his/her own - with guns aplenty...the gun lobby is twisting the constitution for their own sick purposes - grow up.

[@JohnLOdle]

I can tell you ,you don't have to do anything to be arrested because they can or will make up any law to arrest you ,if they wish.

[@Bristecom]

It has become the land of "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime."

[@a-station-]

America now goes after citizens before criminals. Anything to protect criminals...and the minimum for citizens, stance on justice is disgusting. All these anti-2nd politicians should just renounce their armed security. We damn sure shouldn't have to pay for it.

[@stevenwagner9912]

A-effingmen.

[@damondiehl5637]

That's funny, I thought the 2nd Amendment said "...the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." My bad.

[@JamesSmullins]

They seemed so happy that they could infringe on peoples rights for life. Maybe they should read the book three felonies a day before they start getting so excited, they aren't the law abiding citizens they think they are, they just haven't gotten caught yet.

[@boombox05]

1) a well regulated militia 2) being necessary for the security of a free State. Missed some big qualifiers there. The 2A isn’t 1) whatever guns you want 2) for your security.

[@JacobWilliams-vo6qy]

​@@boombox05learn to make a point.

[@boombox05]

@@JacobWilliams-vo6qy learn to read

[@damondiehl5637]

@@boombox05 The hell it doesn't. John Adams was asked by a merchant whether he could put cannon on his ships to fight off pirates. Adams' reply was basically, "If you feel you need cannon on your ships, hell yes, put cannon on them."

[@BooDamnHoo]

Besides universal constitutional carry, ending the NFA are two key changes to make. No more registration and tax stamp for SBRs or silencers.

[@mhcaffey120]

We need to have firearm education in schools

[@looopamith9456]

​@frugalfamilyliving4266any idea the rifle the kids are using

[@heroinmom153]

We used to. Thank libs for taking that away.

[@_Delta_P_]

They change all the laws every 6 months. So it wouldn’t matter.

[@mhcaffey120]

@@_Delta_P_ I said gun education not gun law education. They are very different things

[@mhcaffey120]

And gun laws are unconstitutional so..

[@Funk8_4]

Guess who isnt worried about these "laws"?

[@daveberry3853]

Me😂

[@heroinmom153]

Blapeepo

[@rustysausage69]

criminals

[@Daily5280]

@@heroinmom153 and why wouldn’t we be worried about these laws..

[@zGoodMan187z]

The thugs n blue

[@bradisaacson4656]

An AR Pistol is a barrel length less than 16 inches not "16 inches or less", which is what you said.

[@kennykash6089]

Yeah, but you won't find many (if any) at 16" exactly. They're always made a fraction over for the obvious reason.

[@1acudoc]

@@kennykash6089 I noticed a few times that 16”or less was stated as illegal. I think the point is that 16” is legal. Less than 16” is illegal.

[@joseluisureno444]

@@kennykash6089 the point is that 16” barrels are legal and less than 16” are illegal, this guy keep saying that 16” or less are illegal and that’s Incorrect and misleading

[@justinjones9042]

Great information, appreciate the time and effort y'all take to keep us informed and knowledgeable.

[@theblishknovk]

If people really took being an American seriously they would not comply with any gun control laws whatsoever. When you understand how and why this nation was founded, it is rediculous that so many just drop to their knee's. I hope more people wake up and stop complying. There are millions of us. Dont forget that.

[@kellywalker8407]

You nailed it.

[@jeffhdpd782]

There has always been reasonable restrictions allowed. From the founding forward. Its not about bending knee and the inference is insulting,.

[@MrJSchiedel]

​, you're very wrong.

[@tjboylan20]

Not to out myself for anything but, I don’t know what gun laws are, I don’t follow them anyway

[@tjboylan20]

@@MrJSchiedelthe nation was founded by rebels fighting their government, they hated 3 things, Taxes, the King, and the government trying to take their guns

[@TYR_001]

the lack of due process for protective orders being able to strip your constitutional rights is absolutely outrageous. Also having suppressors are considered obligatory in many countries that are far more restrictive than the US as a courteous gesture to your neighbors as well as for your own hearing protection, it blows my mind that what is essentially a gun muffler is a restricted item.

[@JO-cr9gn]

Have you ever had a protective order against another person? It involves going to court and providing proof they are a danger to you. That's due process. I've had a stalker and was happy to hear their unstable a$5 couldn't legally aquire a gun.

[@lanceu9134]

Too much back the blue simping

[@troy3456789]

Steve Dettelbach, head of the BATF, has never personally owned and has never been issued a firearm. He considers himself an expert on firearms. He is anything but an expert based upon his statements. His actual expertise: Civil rights lawyer.

[@jemjones5675]

To be fair....I'm sure where he works has gun ranges and dept owned guns. Don't have to have one in your home to be trained and familiar.

[@AKAKiddo]

Another way to get in trouble worth mentioning is going onto the property of a federal post office while carrying. It's a felony.

[@lonniebeal6032]

@@mister_walter_sobchakAnd we know that envelope has to pay for the assault...

[@gusm2752]

Got my Utah non resident CCW here in California through Clark many years ago when he held the class at the Costa Mesa gun show. Great guy. 👍🇺🇸

[@DarcyS369]

Living in Canada should be on there

[@backfire]

Haha. So true.

[@jeffccr3620]

The way i view it is if the military has it you can have it god says so 😅

[@azccwonline]

Thanks for the information. Learning the laws and your rights is an essential part of being responsibly armed.

[@wowbagger3505]

The bump stock debacle was Trump taking lousy advice from Wayne LaPierre assuming he represented gun owners! I have ceased contributing to NRA until Wayne steps down!

[@kirkmooneyham]

Correct. Trump is a businessman and entertainer, NOT a "gun guy". So yes, he took bad advice on something he had little knowledge of and made a huge mistake. However, it was a mistake, and not part of a larger PLAN of hard-core gun control like Joe Biden has pushed for.

[@GuapCologist.]

Fine line between a defensive display and brandish. Saved me once, felt dumb doing it, still placing my gun on my seat stopped a bad situation.

[@marianmoses9604]

I agree. What is maddening is that in any fact situation where a “fine line” exists between a lawful / unlawful action, you can pretty much depend on some Democrat, Soros bought-and-paid-for, eager beaver prosecutor to opt to go for a full bore prosecution. They will ALWAYS go with the “interpretation” that is least advantageous for the hapless citizen. Also, their obedient lap dogs in the MSM will always broadcast the Leftist narrative (lie) to the public to paint you in the worst light possible and contaminate any potential jury pool of your “peers.”

[@heretic134]

So protective orders are unconstitutional by the fact of not having due process and we as a community need to fight back against it

[@JT-619]

Experiencing this situation first hand, I agree 100% law abiding citizen here with no criminal record, just a paranoid crazy ex.

[@joeoconnell732]

It is amazing to read these comments and see so many that have no clue what the 2nd is about. If you have never read it you might want to.

[@pilotlang1]

Why do we need all of these rules???????????????? What part of "...shall not be infringed..." confuses our government???

[@user-rf3cn2ou3x]

As long as you don't intend to commit crimes with a gun it should be perfectly legal to carry it. Just saying that the gun in ,and of itself shouldn't be a crime, committing a crime with a gun should be the illegal part.

[@sbfguy7793]

What if they make it illegal to own or obtain or carry said gun? Now your argument is invalid because simply owning the gun is committing a crime. You're bound to either become an unarmed boot licking law abiding citizen, or you're going to become a criminal by simply owning a firearm. Pick your poison.

[@afroghair6793]

LOL

[@Judicialmenace]

The problem is they use pre-crime laws involving our gun rights out of concern for others to impose on us. Let me give you some examples: -If you end up on probation for something minor you can’t own anything they say you can’t and they expect you to “transfer” or “sell” said property. -Any law they can impose on us even if we have absolutely no malicious intent whatsoever to misuse our property(guns), it’s all a control tactic is all it is based on mob rule by compliance squads that will kill you if you don’t comply. That is how I view much of these problems. They expect you to give up your right to self-defense if they demand you do even if your life could be at stake if you gave up your guns and they don’t care if you die because of them. That’s the problem.

[@judelarkin2883]

I’m always a big fan of educating people about the law. A person may not agree with the law but they should at least be aware of it.

[@stir_stick]

Cool post opened my eyes on a couple things even as someone pretty ‘plugged in’. Great guys, thanks for the voices and being active!

[@SAMSUN21]

Love your show, always informative.

[@johnneill5960]

I’d rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6. This philosophy has saved my ass more than once . Always look to deescalate , especially when carrying a gun , this has also saved me . Lastly don’t start any won’t be any , also has saved me . If you think you’re a tough guy cause you carry a gun maybe you shouldn’t.

[@rubixfilms687]

I really enjoyed this video it's a topic a lot of people don't talk about. I'm a jailer and you'll be surprised how often people accidentally come in jail because they didn't know guns and weed don't mix

[@sirstan262]

How long are they in for usually or do you know the sentencing

[@tedd8055]

Excellent, excellent video. Very educational. Thanks for doing this one. You guys rock!

[@stephenhair5501]

Such great information and I learned a few things from this video. Thanks for sharing and stay safe.

[@twc9000]

Trump pushed through the bump stock ban (it was overturned by the 5th Circuit Court this Feb), and tried to push for a national red flag law and said he doesn't like suppressors and wants to ban them. DeSantis is the conservative candidate we wish Trump was.

[@Rhythmicons]

It's interesting to see people who advocate for their constitutional rights also support fascists.

[@Ruby_Sterling]

Freedom is a myth.

[@raystephens2078]

Jim, thanks for making this video. We all need to be reminded that knowledge is power and that it is our responsibility.

[@TuffEnuffIII]

Who knew that "shall not be infringed" could be so difficult for government to understand?

[@JamesSmullins]

And from watching this video gun owners as well. So long as the attitude exists that you can deny rights to a person forever because you think they're a bad person based on something they may or may not have done in their past there will always be opportunity for government to find new ways to make prohibited persons. That's what the gca was for, it was gun control and a easy way was create felons then disarm them it ranges from 10-24% of state populations with Florida and Texas being the highest as prohibited persons. With numbers that high if these people were dangerous we'd be war zones. At least Texas allows non violent felons to have firearms for self defense on their property five years after all time and probation is done. Feds can still charge them but state can't.

[@r.f.pennington746]

Great vid as usual. As gun carriers--and I hope all day, every day, 24/7--we've got to be a bit smarter than the average bear. Don't go out drinking even one drink while armed. Get a water. Drink at home and get as blitzed as you want. Don't mix rec pot with carrying. Don't get into a sit where you get a protective order thrown on you: if it's falling apart, let the other person go their way. Don't go to seedy parts of town (what's there, anyway!?!). Don't speed on the highway. Don't run stop signs. Don't fall prey to road rage--Jeepers, let the other guy get ahead and be the first one at the next red light! Don't show a firearm to try to de-escalate. Keep 'em away from kiddos. Be responsible and be an adult. I've used these rules every day since 1979 and it has worked for me so far. The gun, like the fire extinguisher, is a tool. We don't pull out our fire extinguishers willy-nilly just to show them off.

[@FuckGoogle502]

Clearly, you didn't grow up with a firefighter.

[@user-io2ym6gm8z]

I would add a few things: don't buy anything that might attract thieves and home invaders. For the same reason, keep you property looking dilapidated (better yet, don't own property, rent a small apartment instead). Ride a bus. Don't wear new or nice clothes. Never visit a restaurant, just buy groceries, lest somebody thinks you have extra money to steal. Don't get a well-paying job, because that money will attract robbers/thieves. Don't date women, they are the ones with protective orders. Always run away from conflicts, because standing up for yourself leads to "escalation". Yep, just be a compliant little mouse/pushover/doormat, and let everyone else run your life. 😂😂 One exception: you can absolutely, positively get angry over a KZbin comment. It's quite safe. Just don't express it as a threatening reply, or I might report you and you might get in trouble. Do you see what I'm getting at, wise one? While there is some wisdom in your words, some things you simply can't avoid or evade in this life. Your philosophy is that of complete compliance with the government. Well, might as well give up that gun, you'll never use it even if you have to, and it's not what the Second Amendment was for.

[@charlesdonahue3667]

@@user-io2ym6gm8z Now you're just being silly. The advice he gave is beneficial to most and will help keep people out of trouble. However this is social media and even a post expressing how beautiful and sunny the day is, will be met by someone with some silly negative commentary about it.

[@user-io2ym6gm8z]

@@charlesdonahue3667 I'm not being silly. I'm being sarcastic. I'm highlighting what his way of thinking amounts to. "A firearm is a government-licensed toy that I'm lucky to hold in my hand". Instead of, you know, CONSTITUTIONAL right. And it's always hard to deal with partial-truth comments. But I think I said "there is some wisdom in your words", a point that you missed, obviously. I'm only really against "don't get into a sit where you get a protective order" and "don't show firearm to de-escalate". The first one is dumb and completely unconstitutional, a random angry chick should be able to take away your rights, and the second one is just plain dumb. In the first one, "don't get into a sit" advice tells you not get into something you have no control over getting into. With the other one, What am I going to wait until he actually attacks me so that I'm forced to kill him in self-defense? And then have to go through the legal and financial nightmare of proving my innocence? Instead of simply showing the gun as a warning and getting him to back off?

[@charlesdonahue3667]

​@@user-io2ym6gm8z Anyone reading your commentary understood it was sarcasm, they also understood it was silly. Someone posted a video offering practical advice on how to avoid legal trouble relative to EDC and you viewed it as an opportunity to joke. The First Amendment protects your right to do so. Your decision to hyperbolize the video's message to make a rant about constitutionality reveals your temperament. It's up to readers to decide if they choose to be influenced by such commentary in matters concerning their legal rights and safety.

[@TimothyOBrien1958]

All federal gun laws should be abolished.

[@galactic_ape1929]

No federal laws should exist. It should merely protect citizens' constitutional rights from state laws.

[@TimothyOBrien1958]

@@mister_walter_sobchak Ask the live kids who are alive because a private citizen protected them with a firearm. Democults are not forward-thinking

[@DivvyDeluxe]

Pretty cool seeing the acknowledgement of the less biased parts of politics behind these things. Good content.

[@Saltwaterpractical]

The fact that there is even a video titled like this is a clear indicator as to how much out rights are being violated...

[@K_a_Z010]

Compliance is Participation. These laws are unjust and ridiculous, meaning if you comply, you’re unjust and ridiculous yourself. -Me, Nov 2023

[@malcolmgraves2428]

Quoting yourself is the most cringe shit Ive ever seen

[@mikeoxmaul5465]

Abolish the AFT

[@johnnyadams1755]

Great content, I know a lot of people need this information. 👌

[@alanmccurdy5400]

Thanks, very good and informative.

[@ThoseOneGuysInc]

SBR rule is especially important if you live in a place like Kansas City which has the Missouri/Kansas border splitting it down the middle. Have to be careful where you drive and shoot.

[@quintonhays371]

I live here and when I got my suppressor which doesn't follow the same rules as sbrs. They told me of a guy who broke up with his gf and he went across state lines with both and she called the ATF. He's a felon and serving like 10 years bc he didn't tell them of the sbr.

[@lukelee8934]

So the atf are making good people into felons while doing nothing to stop real criminal threats

[@Judicialmenace]

@@quintonhays371 That’s why it’s important to get petitions and flyers of said petitions to end these illegal infringements of our Rights. What they are doing to our gun rights is illegal. The Constitution forbids these Unconstitutional rules from being enforced, the Constitution is for the Courts to look at to make sure they are not violating any Constitutional laws or the Bill of Rights. They are purposely avoiding using Constitutional references in Court because these Federal Judges know they will lose. I say this because Constitution.US explains that the Constitution is there to tell them what they are allowed to do and what is not allowed.

[@Dj1DurBreD]

No reason to ever go into KCK 😂

[@blackseabrew]

Finally a great analysis with some humor injected that helps keeps viewers interested and paying attention to how easy it is to end up in prison regarding weapons.

[@jcjustice3786]

Thank you young man👌👍👍 Once a soldier Always a soldier

[@kimyoung1239]

This is my first time watching I found it informative. Keep it up! I also liked and subscribed: look forward to more!

[@haydendenard2693]

As a friend of mine once said nobody should see that thing before they hear it sing

[@Minuteman75]

This is why you need great lawyers who like suing the establishment.

[@damonharrington2948]

AR with a barrel 16” or less is an SBR now? 🤔 16” is legal along with any pin & welded muzzle device creating a 16” overall barrel length (13.7-14.5 depending on muzzle device length)!

[@perrywinkleelliott5131]

I LOVE THE TWO COPS YOU INTERVIEWED there awesome and super informed and truly good American's

[@MowersNBlowers]

I don’t think they’re cops! Those aren’t badges on their shirts

[@defomatt2684]

I have always said the GUN FREE zones are the most dangerous place to be. Law abiding citizens, will comply, but what about the criminal? You stand no chance at those places.

[@JacobWilliams-vo6qy]

I carry into the dmv, I "illegally" concealed for years in cali. I don't abide by unconstitutional laws😊.

[@rabidrabbit6863]

Check local laws to a lot of times the sign carries no legal ramifications. Just means you can’t open carry. In my state if you’re caught concealed carrying in a “gun free zone” the most that can be done is you are asked to leave the private property.

[@TS-wq6qb]

Being one of these so called law abiding citizens would mean you follow only the supreme law of the land right. I know how to read and my reading comprehension has been scaled very high on tests, so carry what you want, when you want, how you want. Enough said

[@jamesjohnson7981]

give non violent convictions their 2nd back after their sentence has been served.

[@eugenedeckard8714]

If they don't regain their rights, then how is their debt paid? How can they be considered free from discrimination? How can they ever feel fully accepted as a free American citizen? Why should they have any less of a right to protect themselves or their family? Why shouldn't they have a voice in the voting process?

[@trentme09]

Great video! Really starting to get into the channel more

[@Greg_M308]

Excellent video. Thanks.

[@sethwallace4878]

There should be legal repercussions for establishments that disarm their patrons and don’t provide for their security. If they can sue a manufacturer of the firearm then this seems like a very small logical step in comparison

[@AlexHernandez-ee5hd]

You technically could sue them, it just hasn't been done before. You would have a case technically, you are being disarmed, thus the establishment is directly liable for anything that happens to you if they don't have security to protect you. But you would have to probably have such an event occur for a court to listen, because you would clearly have standing then. Otherwise, most courts won't listen to hypotheticals, but the law as written states that standing is gained either a) by an event occurring, or b) by the potential of an event occurring to you. Such as a law being passed, like the Trans laws in Tennessee for example. The laws would make being Trans in public illegal, so a) would effect anyone that is arrested for breaking the new law, but b) applies to all Trans people in the state, because there is the "potential" for them to be arrested. Try to file a lawsuit, see what happens, I would honestly be very interested to see, because I do honestly agree with you.

[@dirtbeard108]

people that shouldn't have guns should NOT be out of prison. The 2nd doesn't say only certain people can own firearms.

[@danielmatthews3420]

Great video! Thanks for the info!

[@malcolmlagares8245]

Excellent video. : ) Thank you.

[@sumoneelse6881]

Make sure the statement about AR-15 pistols is "LESS THAN 16 inches", not or less.

[@benlastname6667]

Its not 16 inches or shorter. Its under 16 inches. You should know this..

[@jimyeats]

He had the correct information on the screen. Its a raw video, misspeaks are going to happen occasionally. Stop being that person.

[@benlastname6667]

@jimyeats you're under the assumption I watched the screen while listening. So your idea of occasionally happens to be repeatedly in one video...yeah, don't tell me what I should and shouldn't do.

[@jimyeats]

@@benlastname6667 Yes, I am, because its a video, and because you came and felt the need to type a comment out.

[@benlastname6667]

@@jimyeats you also felt the need to type yours. You live in a glass house. Kick rocks.

[@jimyeats]

@@benlastname6667 My point noting your comment is that you would had to have been looking at your screen, thus seeing the fact that they are putting information and corrections on the screen.

[@tockero4277]

Good information. If you have time, it would be great if you could cover the basics of concealed carry rules. Related to this is the transport to and from the gun range, storage requirements in transport, and tansport across state lines for hunting et al.

[@omarsharieff7859]

This video is gold…thank you…

[@LordRahl11]

You keep saying 16" or shorter for an SBR. It's only on rifles with barrels shorter than 16". You can have a barrel that is 16" and a stock on it and you will only have a rifle, not a Short Barreled Rifle. And a vertical grip also. But just anything with a barrel shorter than 16" cannot have a stock or a vertical grip without an SBR tax stamp.

[@dalepres1]

They're Fudds. Obey beyond the law. Surrender more rights than otherwise forced. Next the might be asking to just turn in those nasty fully semi-automatic weapons.

[@Judicialmenace]

I am pretty sure that illegal/Unconstitutional law was struck down in Court.

[@jiggidyjam]

My ar pistol came with a stabilizing brace and thank the Lord I was able to put it back on the other day

[@Upinarmstactical]

U took it off 😂? U must like the way leather taste.

[@takoshotdat7888]

Thank you guys for these TIPS

[@NickGrubich-je9xk]

Amazing courage and nerves.

[@THall-vi8cp]

You might want to clarify exactly who classifies as a prohibited person. Your description was simply someone who cannot buy a gun from an FFL, but it's a little more nuanced. For example, in some states 18- 20-year-olds cannot purchase a handgun from an FFL but they can via private party transaction. They aren't prohibited persons.

[@POSSUM3K3]

The 18-20yr olds not able to purchase handguns just got shutdown by a judge ruling it unconstitutional. Now the ATF will appeal of course as always but they arent going to win due to Bruen. Now NICS will needs to be changed to allow the purchase, but currently they can now legally purchase handguns.

[@Vooz_WoW]

You should mention that only vertical foregrips are illegal on AR pistols. Angled foregrips will not make you a felon if you put one on an AR pistol. This is for owners using a brace who have not paid a tax stamp for a SBR.

[@waldgeist3234]

Fun fact: We have one of the most restrictive weapon laws in the world here in Germany. However, foregrips on ARs are legal for everyone and if you have a hunting license, you can go to the store and buy as many suppressors as you want without any issue. 😅

[@johncamp7679]

When I got my carry permit years ago, I had or got to go through training and the guy that trained us told us all about the how, and when. My Wife got hers several years ago and she didn’t have to do anything. Not only did I have a several day class but had to qualify as well. I was so surprised no one in Georgia at least has to do anything other than apply.

[@geraldgonzalez5360]

Great Video thanks for posting.

[@scottdavis681]

"Shall Not Be Infringed" "We The People" Those 2 alone say enough.

[@aolvaar8792]

SCOTUS 1876, shall not be infringed by Congress. The 2A does not give you gun rights, It prevents Congress from making laws that take away rights you were BORN with.

[@micwell2247]

All that was heard here was how the gov wants you the law abiding firearm owner jailed. While nothing happens to the criminal ...it's only and always about taking constitutional rights away

[@Truth-Freedom-Justice]

Shall not be infringed! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 ATF is unconditional!

[@ispeedalot]

This happened to me in Pennsylvania 😂. Courts dropped the charges thanks to the lawyer I had thanks to having a clean record. I got hit with disorderly conduct and aggravated assault in a 4v1 situation with my first gun. When I look back I’m glad it played out how it did because after I started paying attention to laws. I’m not a fan of sitting in a small room with a bunch of funky dudes 24/7. No fresh air 🥶

[@JD-qh3sd]

The discussion about protective orders failed to distinguish between ex parte orders (prior to any contested hearing) and protective orders entered AFTER a contested hearing in which due process is observed. The ex parte orders do not have the same legal effect on the right to possess a gun as the order that is entered by the court only after an adversarial hearing in which both parties are heard. Not all protective orders actually fit into the definition of the type of protective order that triggers the federal prohibition on firearm possession.

[@boldie24]

You can sell to someone out of state if a rifle/shotgun and let them leave with it. You can also sell a handgun to someone out of state but they can't take it as it has to be shipped to their home state to an FFL.

[@brianhess226]

Eh, maybe you should do some more research on the rifle/shotgun situation. The GCA pretty much says Licensees (FFLs) at their premises may sell/transfer long guns to out of state residents, non-licensees must transfer them through a licensee. Each sate also has their specifics on importing/transferring firearms to their residents. USCCA, and a few others have good articles on it.

[@boldie24]

@@brianhess226 Sorry, I should have been clearer. I am speaking as a Type 07 Class 02 FFL/SOT here in NC.

[@POSSUM3K3]

I always reccomend any gun owners or people that carry watch Massad Ayoob's video on the "Judicious Use Of Force" he dives into great detail on alot of subjects that many people do not think of. Its an older video but most still stands true today. Give it a watch its worth it!

[@emovato]

I appreciate that you guys were factual regarding the ATF's actions during certain presidential tenures

[@t.c.robinson6608]

Push 2 pins and separate the upper from the lower, and you no longer have an SBR in your position. No matter if it is a pistol brace, or just a rifle lower. Anything other than a registered SBR lower. If you travel with it separate it. Now you are only carrying parts..

[@evanwells6284]

The lower is legally always an SBR once registered. Doesn't matter what upper (even no upper) you put on

[@dalepres1]

Constructive possession. If you have a short-barreled upper you better have first built or bought a pistol lower.

[@Judicialmenace]

⁠@@evanwells6284 Do you know what doesn’t make sense about the ATF’s dumb law about SBR’s? If you register a lower as an SBR it still doesn’t make it an SBR but they have it as such if you registered it. You could have a SBR lower for the purpose of building a perfectly legal ar platform pistol which is not considered a SBR by the ATF’s definition. You could even categorize gun parts by category and that doesn’t mean you have any intent to make an SBR, but they still think they have the power to manufacture people into criminals for intent based on parts alone even if you wanted to build an ar platform pistol not a SBR. You see the flaws in these dumb laws are what I call obvious infringements for example you could have stocks for the sole purpose of building 16” rifles in a pile of parts in one category and ar platform pistol parts in another categorized pile, so do they just get to misconstrue criminal charges based on their own decision of parts and what they think a person wants to use it for? I call complete bs on ATF’s logic on this one.

[@Judicialmenace]

⁠@@dalepres1 Constructive possession is bs. Intent to manufacture what they deem as illegal is more what they define constructive possession as.

[@t.c.robinson6608]

@@evanwells6284 Do not register it ….

[@jackbarnes5589]

Explain to me how an alcoholic can have a 50 cal. but a person who is perscribed medical cannabis can't even have a .22lr pistol. Stoners have rights too. Hell, Oxycodone blows marijuana out of the water and that is fine to have and own guns.

[@Jonathan-iq7lc]

I'm anti marijuana. But a stoner should 100% be able to own any gun they'd like.

[@andyleotell]

Freedom! Should not matter what one chooses to put in their body…. Shall not be infringed!

[@humphreywinnebago756]

Hey Jim JSYK, when SBR owners apply for interstate travel, they can specify up to a 1-year period. Then, they can carry their NFA item across state lines without fear. Of course, remembering to renew every year is the new issue...

[@XxRaWtAwDxX]

We had a gym teacher get fired for bringing his 45 to his property where the football team had a campout. He knew there were wolves and it never left the holster, i couldn't believe it

[@Rhythmicons]

Plot twist: Wolves was the name of the team.

[@dans364]

The amount of incorrect info in this vid is amazing.

[@dalepres1]

As I said, Utahans deserve a better class of gun-rights advocates than these bozos.

[@US2A]

​@@dalepres1we do what we want here

[@j.Mayer3148]

9 ways our own government uses to incriminate otherwise law abiding citizens, who’ve conveniently forgotten the definition of infringed.

[@ferebeefamily]

Thank you for the video.

[@5N3K93]

Not a single one of these gun laws saved any lives.