99% IDENTICAL TO APES? | Timothy Standish, Ph. D.

Рет қаралды 3,038

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер

@leecooper3852 2 күн бұрын

As an engineer, if I was mass producing equipment, I would look to see if i had already got something that i had already created that would do the job for the next product, And then modify everything around that to produce what I need. Millions of years of evolution is still keeping the necessary equipment to produce the next body plan for the a creature, or Is it more likely that a creature was created by something greater than themselves and within each body plan there's a massive amount of capacity for variation. Thus the creator is the perfect engineer and wastes nothing.

@NTPodcast7 2 күн бұрын

Interesting perspective. Thanks for the comment!

@medicalmisinformation Күн бұрын

Very good. "Creator" should be upper case, and the creature greater than himself, not "themselves."

@arifsaleem5467 Күн бұрын

Oh yeah? Congratulations, you just proved that your sky daddy is not omnipotent and omniscient. 😂

@leecooper3852 Күн бұрын

@@medicalmisinformation I'm renovating a property and listening as I'm working, I don't have the time to adjust auto correct nor do I have the interest, At least not in this instance.

@leecooper3852 Күн бұрын

@@arifsaleem5467 How does being economical with the material and smart with regards to Module application and their design prove that God does not exist (and please, sky daddy is not an accurate description, it's an ignorant one) It explains mathematics in nature when random selection of chaos could never accomplish it in a million Million years. If you have any evidence to support why you think I'm wrong, come forward with it, we can discuss it.

@LeChristEstRoi 3 күн бұрын

If I laced your food with only 1% of dog feces and said to you "Bro! It's 99% identical! Basically the same! Bon appetit!" Would you think it's the same?

@secretweapon8367 2 күн бұрын

food is a mixture of ingredients. adding a small amount of a contaminant directly affects the overall composition and taste. DNA, however, is a complex code, not a mixture of substances. the 1% difference in DNA doesn't mean 1% of our DNA is replaced with something foreign; it represents variations in the sequence of base pairs (A, T, C, and G). these variations can have significant effects, but they don't represent a direct contamination or adulteration.

@mikev4621 2 күн бұрын

If you had laced it with sawdust would your argument still hold?

@LeChristEstRoi 2 күн бұрын

@@mikev4621 My point is that a small amount of something doesn't necessarily mean that it's nothing, and in fact it can be huge!

@mikev4621 2 күн бұрын

@@LeChristEstRoi Yes, the nature of the impurity is critical. If the 1% different genes do the bulk of what makes us human, then the 99% is not important. Sadly the information on that isn't readily available

@gmseed 3 күн бұрын

Some people are more similar to Chimps than others. I tend to find all members of political parties have a high Chimp factor.

@richardlaiche8303 Күн бұрын

I did a quick search on the comparison of chimp and human dna similarities. The top five scientific websites that came up all agree that we share 98% of our dna with chimps. The only websites I found that disagree with this are creationist websites. Dr. Standish is a young earth creationist so his credibility in the realm of actual science is questionable at best.

@raygiordano1045 Күн бұрын

Skipping the 98% for now, that's very old data, the chimp Y chromosomes aren't anything like (20 to 30%) human Y chromosomes. If you know how Y chromosomes are passed down, that shouldn't be the case.

@JosephCymrank 2 күн бұрын

Bonoboes and chimps are still our closest cousins. The layers of defences to hybrid conception seems to indicate how different we are genetically. Many attempts to create a human chimp hybrid has been a total useless failure. This seperate speciation happens progressively. Chimps and early homo may have been able to conceive a hybrid with a lot of work but as the seperation increases over millions of years we are no longer chimps walking upright and the genetic changes of this. Could hybrid conception occur with a chimp and Lucy? Or even with a chimp and homo habilis? Possibly but the layers of biological refusal to conceive become more and more. Perhaps it starts between a body designed to live in trees against one living on the ground? Due to leg positions the penis and vagina may not fit so easily? Then certainly we know that chimp vagina fluid pH is resistant to human sperm, then there are added defences at the cervix and so on creating more and more barriers to conception as speciation occurs. However it seems that neanderthal, denisovan and sapiens could do it so at that point the differences were genetically slight.

@NTPodcast7 2 күн бұрын

Thank you very much for the comment, really..

@JosephCymrank 2 күн бұрын

Yes, I do understand this 99% repeating obsessive theme even communicated by biologists and scientists. Some things become like assumptions or catch phrases in many areas of life,even by experts. E. G. It's a fact in cardiology that heart attack survival rate is higher from those who are slightly overweight and less survival in those who are the ideal healthy weight. The best scientists and heart specialists still don't know why. I think genetics has an excuse that our knowledge and reliable analysis of DNA has been very recent. That which was estimated 20 years ago may now be known as untrue. When I was a child in the 1950s it was assumed that there were only us and neanderthals and that homo sapiens evolved from the more primitive and older neanderthals (which is now known to be untrue. On the other hand when I tasked ho6w life first began I was told by my biology teacher in 1959 the exact same theories that exist and are communicated now, so some things we get right and others are way off the mark. I moved away from the 99% theory only because of so much utter failure to produce a hybrid chimp human. And The discovery of more and more barriers to conception in chimp vs. Human bodies. Still our closest relatives but a lot less than 99%. @@NTPodcast7

@ikengaspirit3063 2 күн бұрын

Most definately not with Habilis but maybe with Austrolapiticus

@courag1 Күн бұрын

From the wolf, we have gotten many, many breeds of dogs, but it is a loss of information, we can’t work the selecting process the other way. We have such tiny dogs now, if a wolf mated with one of these ultra small dogs, the act would kill the mini dog, and if it didn’t the developing pups would exploded the uterus of the poor mini dog. If the dog managed to deliver, it would bleed to death. What is the percentage of difference between the wolf and a teacup poodle? 1%?

@leecooper3852 2 күн бұрын

You are 60% banana..did you know that, 25% lettuce.

@NTPodcast7 2 күн бұрын

That's really cool

@Riff-b7b 8 сағат бұрын

Primates, including humans, share a lot of genetic similarity with rodents. In fact it's been reported that, in a comparison with all other mammals, primates and rodents have the closest genetic relationship.

@BIBLIJA_na_dlanu 2 күн бұрын

Great job!! You got new sub!

@NTPodcast7 2 күн бұрын

Thanks Dario!

@djwoodgate 2 күн бұрын

The devil, as they say, is in the detail.

@NTPodcast7 2 күн бұрын

Haha, yeah, agree.

@Lehmin_oma_kanava Күн бұрын

We are 98% apes and 2% neanderdal. We are not homo sapiens. We are neanderapes. 🤷‍♂️

@RemoTschopp 9 сағат бұрын

Bs!

@Lehmin_oma_kanava 8 сағат бұрын

@RemoTschopp 😂

@Savant218 Күн бұрын

Wow, vid cover pic looks just like Obama !

@normbograham3 3 күн бұрын

Thank you. People are lying with facts. Nothing new. Two ways of stating facts, of 3 billion data points, most are similar, OR, one has 3.8 billion data points, so, they are not similar. chose your adjenda, then use the facts to support your viewpoint.

@carthkaras6449 2 күн бұрын

this guy is misleading, it's a strawman. Countless studies show that chimpazee share 98% of their genes with us, they may have more but 98% of our genes are in the ADN of Chimpazee. And there is more to the story; 99,4% of our "working" genes, those responsible for the functionning of proteins, the usefull ones, those who make us who we are as a living being, are the same with chimpazee. Also, when you work in science, you don't find facts base on your ideology, you find facts and you can build a vision of the world based on those facts, it's the opposite of religions.

@cuzz63 2 күн бұрын

At the genetic level chimpanzees are almost indistinguishable from humans. Humans have 46 chromosomes, whereas chimpanzee, gorilla, and orangutan have 48. This chromosome fusion is where we became incompatible.

@ronsirman6867 2 күн бұрын

A gorilla and a chimpanzee are incompatible

@all41tja 2 күн бұрын

@@ronsirman6867 Different species will do that for ya.

@ronsirman6867 2 күн бұрын

@all41tja I know the main comment is just so far out there. Humans are far away from all other primates. Chimps literally have 250 million different genes. These scientist fill everyone's mind with bs

@graemeross6970 2 күн бұрын

So do genetic similarities, irrespective of % difference/similarity show common ancestry or common design? On the face of it an interesting question. If you assume (correctly IMHO) that speciation through evolution has taken place over millions of years, then you would expect to see traceable changes in DNA sequences, and you do. However to assume a common designer, you would have to have a creator intervening throughout the entire process, which to me seems less likely. Also if this creator had omnipotent power would it need the lazy resort of using bits and bobs of DNA from other species, including the redundant bits. In the human this results in so called design faults, including but not extensively, a poor spine for bipedality, a laryngeal nerve that splits round the aorta.(good for fish but not giraffes), vestigal components, too many teeth, exposed testicles, backward retina, a female pelvis causing one in ten mothers to die in childbirth without intervention, a trachea and esophagus sharing the same opening causing numerous deaths from choking on food (mostly children). These are all the consequences of evolution or a rubbish designer. You chose!

@twelvestories3330 2 күн бұрын

The eating of the fruit of right and wrong, good and evil describes the evolution of language. Eve’s painful child birth curse is the result of the larger human heads needed for language. Getting kicked out of the garden represents the loss of instincts as a result of evolving language. Adam’s nakedness is describing the loss of his monkey fur. Adam wasn’t one person, he represents all men and Eve represents all women. That is evolution. The evolution of language and our body form. The loss of fur and development of language allowed for the development of agriculture. Actually read the story of Adam and Eve for yourself and forget what the brain washing commentaries say. The lost tribes of Israel were groups like the Neanderthals that went extinct. A biblical day is a fraction of the total time of creation and not a twenty four hour day.