A Calculated Roulette Strategy To Increase Your Bankroll

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Find your perfect casino ➡ casinomatchmaker.com/quiz/

[@37rainman24]

You are getting paid by the casino industry, perhaps?? But why would the casinos want to recruit people to play a winning strategy?/ Hmmmmm.......... Oh, perhaps because the strat doesn't work........

[@nordattack]

It works! I couldn't believe it honestly. My goal was $100 and my unit was $10 chips. I followed the pattern playing Red and Black. It took 26 spins and I was behind as much as minus -$110 at one point, but I came back and hit $100 and all my numbers were gone off my list. The formula worked.

[@koustavbhattacharjee4639]

what was your starting balance ?

[@nordattack]

@@koustavbhattacharjee4639 I always start all my tests with zero balance. I have a $1000 bankroll. But as I said, the most I was ever down was minus -$110 using $10 chips.

[@37rainman24]

yuh, that is gambling up, then down then etc etc. But in the end, this strat wont give you an overall win.

[@15markav15]

There is a 100% chance that if theres a 0.8% chance of losing then I will lose.

[@anuragjakhmola]

😂

[@hakersen298]

true 😊

[@pushpakumarasubasinghe6548]

😂

[@tigarNVTS]

happen to me with only 0.02% chance of losing yesterday so yeah..... i did my maths and everything was perfectly according to plan, and when i started playing, after 10 minutes i lost against 99.8% winrate

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

🤣

[@johnlaurencechan3035]

i never reach 16 straight losing streak. 8 is the most, but I was able to close it out and get my target profit

[@warreng440]

Hey I love these videos. my only problem with it is the length of time it would take to get enough winning coups to guarantee that you reach your target bet amount. Too much time at the casino is a recipe for disaster. I prefer your fibonacci dozens strategy, and I like waiting until there are five losses for a particular column or dozen before entering with a bet.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Hey Warren. Thanks for the feedback. I too love the Fibonacci Dozens. This one can take a while, but you get there more often than not

[@warreng440]

@@CasinoMatchmaker oh yea i have no doubt as to the efficacy of the strategy! In fact, I employ it during online blackjack sessions along with basic strategy to counter long losing streaks. this is a really great video. just wanted to let you know that since i watched your fibonacci dozens video, ive taken a $150 bankroll and im now up to a total if $550, which is a 266% increase. even if i lose a ten stage bet progression now, my bankroll is still safe. it really is a genius system.

[@Temenaattori1]

I got 30€ to 400€ in 2 days on roulette but now im only losing i feel like roulettes play against me now

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Are you using this strategy? It might just be a streak of bad luck

[@Temenaattori1]

@@CasinoMatchmaker i always bet 2nd 12 5€ so 3 tries to get profit i usually wait that big and small numbers come 3-5 times before i make bet thats how i made 30€ to 400€ but now i had bad losing streak and Lost almost every thing xd

[@Temenaattori1]

@@CasinoMatchmaker what u think about My strategy now im again at 200€ this time im gonna withdraw xd

[@37rainman24]

Love the "Calculated" part!!! If you could actually calculate, you would know that it cannot work. You have a big chance to win a small amount in one progression And a small chance to lose HUGE. And that losing progression will happen just like clockwork. But first you will need to actually try your strat Why haven't you'??

[@sawarnsingh1637]

Make a video on for this strategy

[@williamfoster7920]

There is a good book about a guy and his team that used the reverse Lebouchere system to beat the bank. The title is "Thirteen Against the Bank" by Norman Leigh. I think you will find it an interesting read.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I will have to check it out thanks for the heads up

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Reverse Labouchere system... That does have me intrigued

[@williamfoster7920]

@@CasinoMatchmaker .. Happy to help. ;-)

[@ecpoirier]

At 6m 55 seconds you mention that you will be trying this strategy LIVE. Is that video available yet? Losing 15x straight, followed by 15x wins is not realistic. I wanna see 5 loses followed by 2 wins, 3 losses, 3 wins, etc... I ask because I am weary about requiring such a large bankroll to increase your odds above 90%. When I attempted this strategy I found myself placing bets for 46 & 34 units.

[@37rainman24]

you aren't quite getting it. The chance of winning ONE progression is over 90%. The chance of LOSING with this strat over the long term is 100%

[@roulettesoftwares]

A very interesting approach

[@tigarNVTS]

I wonder when will you tell us at what casino and what roulette are you playing?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I'll do a video on that later 🫡

[@37rainman24]

When he actually does began to play, he will eventually realize he is going to lose doing this. The game in the US has a 5.26 house edge. In Europe 2.7%. There is no betting strat that can diminish that house edge Casino pander to people who failed at maths and statistics

[@natural9743]

Here is the best system i know. Flat bet at baccarat either banker or player and leave when up 3-5 units or when losing 5 units

[@CasinoMatchmakerc]

afiliados.greenbets.io/visit/?bta=59413&brand=greenbetsio

[@37rainman24]

there will be more days when you are behind 5 bets, than up 5 bets. What then> There will be many days when you are never up. If a person has a strat that works, there would be no rational reason to ever leave. Running out of the casino on cue is not part of a winning strat.

[@benjiebarker]

i like this betting....i was going to use a martingale startegy...and to make $10 requires less than a martingale strategy. thanks man....just need paper and pencil...do baccarat at the casino allow the use of paper and pen while playing?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Hey there. Absolutely they allow pen and paper. If you like this system check this one out...kzbin.info/www/bejne/q5_VaJipg51ojZo

[@37rainman24]

What are you going to do with paper/pencil?? Every spin is a random event. It doesn't help anything to write down the results of random events. I used to see people recording things at the craps table. There is nothing one can do with that info to help in any way

[@magibachar2759]

Los Angeles California can you tell me if is on line casino?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I think this one accepts players from California. casinomatchmaker.com/betus/

[@giapponerosso]

Thanks for the super helpful videos you post!! You re amazing. Question: is it possible to know what the success rate would be for other targets? E g., if I want to get 5£ instead of 10£, with a bank of 50 units? Is there a calculation, or a website I can use to aid me in calculating this? Thx

[@financial3836]

You would multiply or divide the difference to scale up or down. The success rate would be the same since it's based on percentages rather than numbers. However, the maximum table bet would hinder the success rate.

[@h2t26]

Seems great for comps. Any system is probably better the no system. Any system that isn't martingale is better then martingale. Though risking 2.5k to win 10 bucks seems amost as bad as martingale. Almost.

[@vikbala9148]

Yea i tried the Fibonacci method .. trust me.. will lose all if u r in the house for a long time.. its a good method but to play this, you need to setup a profit u want

[@lukefranklin1766]

Yeah. One week I won 3k with Fibonacci, then next day I lost 4k with Fibonacci 😂

[@772777777777777]

You should to a video with two betting target 50 and 300 with same seq and show how large target can wipe you out

[@bullishbeartrader6121]

You can definitely get your self into a cycle where let say you start with a 2 dollar bet you lose a couple then you when one lose one for awhile. You are basically martingale. This really doesn't work especially if you run out of money before you can make it up.

[@GLsJAwtomatica]

this would be much better utilized for a game with better odds such blackjack or craps, no?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I do like this strategy on the Blackjack table

[@37rainman24]

@@CasinoMatchmaker It didn't work there either. The only thing that works there is counting cards. But I do detect that counting cards would be a bit beyond your abilities

[@santhoshkumar-zo8ru]

In a casino, I've seen 16 blacks in a row . And then 3 reds and followed by 0 , then 2 reds, 0 and 8 blacks. This system doesn't work if we keep on adding to our list(playing Reds continuously).

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

With results like this, yes the system has no chance of winning. But there isn't a system in the world that would do well against these sort of results

[@37rainman24]

@@CasinoMatchmaker youve finally hit the nail on the head. Anyone who understands basic math, statistics, and conceptual thinking, understands that no betting strat can possibly work on any game.

[@NicSoong]

Totally don't understand. Pls show step by step

[@84paratize]

If I want to earn 100 dollars, how much would my bankroll need to be?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I would probably advise 10x so $1,000 to be on the safer side

[@tonkinesenchill4240]

Have to say I’m a bit lost, seems way to convoluted, I’m doing fine with the martingale system.

[@onedrop7967]

I would suffer ibs before getting $1000

[@ryanneal4]

I feel this lmao

[@jeunesseglobal2071]

If you give me chance I want work with you?

[@ericv5]

If I look at the probablity, there's no way to end up in profit in the long term. If you play this system 100 times with 50 units, you will win $795 and lose over $1000, with 100 units you'll win $880 and lose $1200 and so on ... If online casino's are honest, that is; otherwise you'll lose more. I was a programmer and know what's possible, and I have seen some weird sh*t with online casino's that makes me wonder ...

[@37rainman24]

What you are saying is not the issue. The issue is that you will bust just enough progressions to cover all the small gains you make on the winning progressions. Thus the strat cannot work. I think that you don't quite understand what he is doing

[@OliverLuxton-or1vj]

Is it just me not making sense of this strat BUT when you rebet... you would win DOUBLE that amount as its 1:1. So when you are showing a total of $145 dollars would that not be $290 as EVERY bet would win back double? You would bet $17 if you win that bet you would return +$34 not +$17??

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Yes you are right, I think I may have needed to be clearer between return and profit. You would return $34 but that would be $17 profit

[@stevem8762]

The small % that this will actually lose … it will always lose in the long run! With roulette the craziest pattern to lose will always show up against whatever u are betting Whatever pattern .. strategy ect u are doing. I have tried them all The long shot will always Show up and wipe u out. It’s so frustrating and annoying. Just keeping it real 💯

[@tonkinesenchill4240]

Easiest and least risk way is the good old martingale system. It’s exceptionally unlikely that a one colour streak will last more than 6-8 at a time. I personally haven’t seen it go beyond 8 ever. So always play a live table NEVER against the computer because they have algorithms that can cash you out with the streaks. But if you play live and start with around £500-£1000 (I know that’s a lot but it’s so low risk it’s worth it), being ruthlessly patient, betting 50p to start with and doubling the amount every loss, every time you win you’ll get back what you’ve put down plus 50p and with slow accumulation you can build your bank roll, with nearly zero chance of seeing a bank breaking streak 👍

[@tonkinesenchill4240]

Just to add, I make £15/20 a day doing this and per year (52 weeks) that’s over £5k which isn’t to be sniffed at and if you’ve built it up over the year and not spent any, you can then start betting say £10 at a time not 50p and exponentially speed up earnings, again with virtually zero chance of being streaked out.

[@37rainman24]

@@tonkinesenchill4240 If you actually do ever utilize the martingale it wont take real long to realize you are going to lose. Fact is, you can play the don't on craps which has only a 1.3636% house edge. 5 to 500 table. so make your bets 5, 7, 15, 30, 60, 125, 250, 500. Every time you win a progression you will make money. You have a 99.6% chance to succeed on each progression. Try it! You will relatively soon find that you are going to lose with this strat.. ONE CANNOT DEFEAT THE HOUSE EDGE ON THESE GAMES WITH ANY STRATEGY. You cannot even reduce the house edge. All these people yapping on utube really should just try their strats. The guy making the vids should also. He will find it wont work, which has been understood for many centuries. All he bases his strat upon in "incredulity" . He finds it incredible that you might lose 8 times in a row. So that means his strat "works". It doesn't work. Incredulity is nothing to base a gaming strat upon

[@37rainman24]

@@tonkinesenchill4240 To continue. He involves himself in another glaring fallacy. He says, "you are right". But then claims that the losing progression is of course, always in the distant future somewhere. Your next progression has exactly the same chance to bust as the progression 20 progressions in the future. And you are eventually going to experience that losing progression

[@Alex-bq2vs]

Henry Labouchere was an Englishman from a Huguenot background!

[@mohammadraihaan472]

I think sports betting is better to make money with a strategy anyone can predict and win

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

You make a good point. This strategy is popular with sports bettors

[@thomascourtney-fo2re]

Playing strait numbers your going to lose your bank roll😊

[@pjrebelsgaming9457]

How to play like this?😮❤

[@kylekoch8656]

Every single even money system is just better played at a baccarat table. Preferably on an EZ or non-commission game

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

What does EZ stand for? I can't find any non commision games. Otherwise I would agree, the house edge on both the player and banker is smaller than roulette

[@kylekoch8656]

EZ Baccarat is a non-commission variant of baccarat. Instead of taking commission on banker wins, the house instead pushes the banker bet entirely if banker beats player with a 3 card total of 7. While the house still holds an edge, EZ baccarats banker bet edge is slightly lower than on standard games.@@CasinoMatchmaker

[@Abellar0731]

This is nice, but you can profit long play...

[@JoshTolbert]

Down $135 chasing a $10 profit…

[@thomascourtney-fo2re]

Columns

[@shadanraza7842]

It becomes very risky at last.

[@marcgarza7252]

just a martingale.....you could hit 14 number losses and wipe out your bankroll..so you play to max table ?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

That's right play to max table, but it will take you many more loses to hit table max

[@marcgarza7252]

@@CasinoMatchmaker cant wait for your version when you do it...

[@smfvmd]

Henry Labouchère was an Englishman.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

The English are always trailblazers

[@hendropriyono4304]

I dont no...

[@hctan221]

you cannot win strike, only lose strike. because it human selection betting. Human always choose/make the wrong bet decision for every round. Loose strike 98.73%, win strike 0.07%, luck strike 1.2%.

[@fortunatusnine2012]

🤔👍

[@coreyrich420]

hella funny how you try to sound smart🐒

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

🥲

[@mariojahn8219]

You will leave the casino empty handed. Terrible strategy.

[@thomascourtney-fo2re]

Here is my beating strategy..... My buy-in amount is $1000 I only play the 1st, 2nd, 3rd -12 Beating $75 on one of the 3 -12s and $50 on one of the other , And I play 2 of the 3 rows at the bottom of the table beating the same bet of $75 and $50 on 2 of the 3 rows And $25 on 0 and $50 on 00 Total bet is $350 And $25.00 on the last 12 and last row. The last number that won is where you place that $25 bet on the 1st, 2nd or 3rd 12 and same on the bottom row , so if 17 was the last hit number you play the $25 bet on 2nd 12 and the middle Row at the bottom of the table Total bet it $400 - YOUR WANTING THE 00 OR 0 TO HIT NOT THE OTHER BETS Reason This makes you win every spin , however the payout in the long run is higher then your bet . Hit 00 pays $1750 = +$1350.00 Hit 0 pays $875 = +$475 Hit a $75 and a $75 pays $450 = +50 Say you hit a $75.00 bet and a $50.00 Payout is $375 = - 25.00 Hit a 50 and 50 bet pays you $300 = - $100 Hit a $25 and $25 pays $150 = - $250 Do not place your bet before the dealer spins the ball , make sure the table has not hit the zeros on the list of numbers hit within last 20 numbers If you plays this properly you will leave the up a large amount over your buy in amount...... Rule to never break , your winning NEVER go back into play . . So and over and above the $400 bet that profit amount goes into a pocket and stays in it. The changes of losing your $1000 within 5 spins is 16% in 10 spins is 8% and within 20 spins 3% I've never walked out of the casino losing my total buy in .......... don't win 100 of the time but 80% of the time I win on average of $800 to $1500 within 30-40 min MEANING if you make it past 5 spins the

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I'm going to give this a go and review. Perhaps a video about it some day. Does it have a name?

[@thomascourtney-fo2re]

@@CasinoMatchmaker I call it the tommypay system

[@thomascourtney-fo2re]

How can I post a picture... I played my strategy and in 22 spins with 2500 buy in I won 7500

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

@@thomascourtney-fo2re Love the name. Love the payout. Send more details to [e-mail] you have me intrigued

[@wsceric1]

Can show pic how you bet?