It stands to reason that there is commonality between biblical and quranic accounts of prophets because they are talking about the same people. However there are some important differences especially in the story of Issa (Jesus) with respect to crucifixion. Also the ruler of Egypt at the time of Joseph is referred to in the Bible as pharaoh whereas the Qur'an refers to him as a king, which is historically more accurate. Both books refer to pharaoh at the time of Moses, which is correct.
@edwinbartolome75293 ай бұрын
Church not a building but the people congregations that build the Church
@BibleQuran3 ай бұрын
yes, true. This topic will be covered in Episodes 24-26. Be sure to subscribe to get them!
@DoyanCekOt4 ай бұрын
if you read the bible with arab language, GOD is writen in Allah
@badonlikoy55714 ай бұрын
Yes that is true. But Allah of Arab Christians called their Allah (Baba) the Father. While Allah of Muhammad is NOT called the Father to anyone (read Surah 19:88-93). So, that is totally a contradiction with each other. So not a similarities but a contradictions.
@BibleQuran3 ай бұрын
yes, absolutely (and in all translations from Codex Leydensis until today).
@muzaffarshaheen14734 ай бұрын
Jesus had no church to worship him.
@BibleQuran3 ай бұрын
Yes, this is true. I will cover this topic in Episodes 24-26. Be sure to subscribe to get them!
@Pasham384 ай бұрын
You can’t change special names in another language. Arabic language is not similar like in the Bible, you are just seeing special names similar. That’s it
@acesin-et7pp4 ай бұрын
That is because Jesus did not speak Greek or latin, these names in current bible are latinized/Greek. Jesus did not call Jacob as jacob but called him yousuf (which is same as in Arabic) in Aramaic, which he spoke.
@cheikhsalek76953 ай бұрын
@@acesin-et7pp Assalaamu aleikum, You mean (Jacob = Ya'qub), not Yusuf. Barak Allahu fiik.
@BibleQuran3 ай бұрын
Partly true. However, the tradition of Ishmael as the spiritual ancestor of Muslims should logically have an Arabic name (if Arabic is the original language of humanity, which, by the way, Tabari denies)) and not a Hebrew name (Jews come much later into the picture).
@cheikhsalek76953 ай бұрын
@@BibleQuran Ismail (Ismael) is not a Hebrew name nor is Ibrahim (Abraham). These are Aramaic names. Even, classifying ancient speech forms as languages/dialects/varieties i.e, Aramaic, Syriac, Hebrew, etc is not reliable. The Bible tells as sometimes that two brothers speak different languages!!! So, stop classifying names as being Hebrew or Aramaic, etc. Because you just don't know.
@shadaliabdullahi59964 ай бұрын
Why dont Muslim say ISM ALLAH . BECAUSE OF THIS YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CHANGE SOMEBODY HIS NAME..
@alexvonanders27274 ай бұрын
Please don't shout
@shadaliabdullahi59963 ай бұрын
@alexvonanders2727 No, I'm not. How do you know it?
@BibleQuran3 ай бұрын
Partly true. However, the tradition of Ishmael as the spiritual ancestor of Muslims should logically have an Arabic name (if Arabic is the original language of humanity, which, by the way, Tabari denies)) and not a Hebrew name (Jews come much later into the picture).