A Crash Course In Human Evolution With Anthropologist Chris Stringer

[@OmgItsLeaa]

I’d actually love to get a longer video on this subject, Chris really made it so interesting.

[@HistoryHit]

Here you go! kzbin.info/www/bejne/o3iXn6ubnLiHeck

[@davidburroughs2244]

Thanks!

[@OmgItsLeaa]

@@HistoryHit thank you!

[@DaVultureTTG]

I'd really advise checking out North 02s channel, as good as these guys are, North puts them to shame with the amount of information involved. He has a whole series on different early hominids, really worth the watch 💯

[@rosiecarina1336]

Chris Stringer also recently did a talk for the Oxford Archaeological Society where he goes into new findings on the subject in greater detail 😊

[@billybobkingston5604]

I did social anthropology at Manchester Uni years ago (last year of the Hacienda), still have a love for it, I feel it is still very important

[@davidburroughs2244]

As a complete noob in this and having all of my ready information dating back to the 60s and 70s, I appreciate this and thank HH for bringing the good doctor in on this on our behalf.

[@Jess-bee]

More more more! 👏 so fascinating!

[@TheMoeP]

I'd love to have Chris Stringer as a professor, I would hear this man all day

[@jt2097]

That is confirmation bias. He is saying what you want to hear. Have you ever considered that even though we find fossils, some with similarities, it doesn't mean that one turned into the other. The evolving part is imagination, it is assumed and assuming Darwinian evolution or common descent prevents an objective analysis of the data.

[@Swade-kf5vw]

@@jt2097what is your explanation for the fossil record and its similarities?

[@jt2097]

@@Swade-kf5vw My explanation for the fossil record, millions of dead things being fossilised all over the world by layers of sedimental rock, the same sequence all across the USA, covering Iceland, parts of Europe and down to South Africa? I would say that was one big flood to cause that. The order of fossils are as you would expect, bottom dwellers in the lowest strata, fish etc. in the lower levels, amphibians in slightly higher levels. Land dwelling animals would be reached later and be in higher strata and intelligent animals who could escape by moving to higher ground would be at the top of the fossil record. They would drown last to be covered by silt and be fossilised.

[@Swade-kf5vw]

​@@jt2097 Ah, so you are a young earth creationist. Kinda makes it hypocritical to accuse someone of confirmation bias, don't you think? You believe in a theory that evidence directly refutes, and it just so happens to better match your religious beliefs. Coincidence? I think not. Funny you feel the need to project your own confirmation bias on anyone that disagrees with your religious views.

[@jt2097]

@@Swade-kf5vw confirmation bias is confirmation bias wherever it comes from. Finding fossils with similarities still doesn't mean that one turned into the other. That part is imagination, is it not possible for you to see that?

[@tinymotogarage]

Excellent content - Chris Stringer I could listen to all day. Off to check out your tv channel now - nice work everyone.

[@williamrobinson7435]

Very good! This is one to save for reference. 👍

[@matthewcourt3795]

I loved the information in this video, but found it frustrating that they had all these skulls, as visual representations in front of them, but didn’t show us them. The skulls are so key to showing the subtle evolution of our species and he was just talking about them, when showing the differences on the skulls would have been for more engaging.

[@cherylb2008]

Yea agree

[@jt2097]

The differences in the skulls don't prove that one evolved into the other, that is imagination, it is assumed. All the differences factually prove is that there were physical differences in the individuals.

[@WeighedWilson]

I agree. Why have visual aids and not showcase them?

[@ThatisnotHair]

@@jt2097 When they first appear gradually through geological strata. It does suggest they came from common ancestor. You don't see homo sapien fossil before homo eructus, you don't se homo eructus before australopethicus, you don't see australopethicus before ardipethicus. Same way you don't appear before your parent, your parents don't appear before your grandparents.

[@jt2097]

@@ThatisnotHair believing it proves common ancestry is confirmation bias. You have been told that is what it means so that is how you read it. Seeing the various skulls doesn't show that one evolved into the other whatever the location. Did you know that fossils are found in sedimentary rock? Sediment laid down by water. The only way fossils can be directly dated is by C14 which has a half life of 5730 years. Pay attention to that dating. Other methods of dating for a longer time period have to be done on metamorphic or igneous rocks found close to the fossils. The dating of the fossils is speculation and guesswork, they are confirming their beliefs by making the evidence fit what they believe to be true or what they have been taught. Check out what I say for yourself, they are facts, but of course if you ask an evolutionist they will tell you what you have been telling me, they will confirm your bias.

[@vishalverma5280]

Missing visuals, but totally interesting. Evolution of mankind was exceptionally beautiful chapter , always underrated by geography and bio teachers. Congrats on a big effort.❤

[@BillySugger1965]

More from Chris please. Absolutely fascinating!

[@1stHuemanAmerican]

Albino u miss me

[@HighlyCompelling]

The godfather of paleo anthropology

[@DeElSendero]

Excellent interview of a great scientist Chris Stringer! Much appreciated!

[@canaanval]

I'm convinced that daliensis/longi is the same thing as denisovans, I'm happy to hear Chris say the same!

[@Khatoon170]

How are you doing sir iam new subscriber Arabic lady citizen since Christmas 2019 I began to subscribe to British and American KZbin channels we are as foreigners subscribers as overseas students want to increase our cultural level improve our English language as well thank you for your cultural documentary channel we appreciate your efforts . I gathered main information about topic you mentioned briefly here it’s the meaning of human evolution is lengthy process of Change by which people originated from ape like ancestors scientific evidence shows that physical behavioral trait shared by all people originated from ape like ancestors and evolved over period of approximately six milion years . First human evolved viewed zoologically we human are homosapiens . First evolution occurred in Africa about 3 155 00 years ago. Early human called homo habilis or handy man .about 24 milion to 104 million years ago in eastern and Southern Africa. Thank you for your giving us chance to read learn new information improve our English language as well iwish for your channel more success and progress stay safe blessed good luck to you your dearest ones .

[@SpindlyScoundrel]

Chris is great

[@scotthpsr]

So cool Chris Stringer is going on the Joe Rogan podcast next month. Can’t wait!

[@BezoomnyBratchny]

Shame. I'm allergic to that show so won't be watching.

[@Rico-Suave_]

Watched all of it, need to watch again

[@johnishikawa2200]

Darwin would have found the science of microbiology and DNA so gratifying, had he known about them. He (Darwin) did say that we were "created from animals".

[@TheMilkMan8008]

He would have loved to see all the transitional fossil he predicted too. It really is a shame he didn't get to see the things we can see today. It would have been so validating and intriguing

[@johnishikawa2200]

All of the modern breakthroughs and discoveries in anthropology, as well as in microbiology , in the century and a half since Darwin's life, dovetail beautifully with what he found. I suspect that if he could be allowed to look around just once, at how his work has been extended into our time, Darwin might say something like: " I knew that...".

[@johnishikawa2200]

@aaronsinger6363 : Those people - the Bible thumpers - are a cult , more or less . People are able to read these days , and education is weaning people away from superstition and religion , which is organized superstition . But the real world and cosmos is so interesting . Make believe , dogma , and the Bible are boring . At least , that has been my personal experience , ever since I was old enough to know that there is no such thing as Santa Clause .

[@hughoxford8735]

Chris is a nice man and once personally replied to an email I sent him. I still remain sceptical about the notion that we were a separate species to Neanderthals, given we could have fertile children together.

[@sleepyyam5391]

total layman here but there has been discussion that mixing with h. sapiens may have caused Neanderthal infant skulls to become dangerously large in comparison to the mothers' hip size (as I understand it due to Neanderthal birth canal shape infants couldn't rotate in the way infants do in the h. sapiens birth canal) may have been a factor in the more h.sapien hybrids surviving but more characteristic of Neanderthal hybrids dying out - could be comparable to hybridization in other species essentially winding up infertile in some cases and able to carry on in others (e.g female ligers being fertile, males not so)

[@benjamindover2601]

I think for the thought to even occur to our ancestors to procreate with neanderthals we must've been very similar. Although our skulls do appear to be slightly different so who knows.

[@tonycatman]

Having fertile children isn't an on-off switch determinant for species - it is a compelling, continuous, blurry guideline. My guess is that when producing offspring who can themselves procreate, a coupling between two homo sapiens might have a 50% success rate, but a human-neanderthal coupling might have a 1% success rate. And the distinction between the 50% vs 1% might occur at various stages. Not just at the point where the egg admits the sperm, but during the pregnancy, and whether the offspring reaches sexual maturity (parental care vs rejection is important). And of course the offspring might be fertile or infertile, semi-randomly. Tigers and Lions are considered a separate species, but produce viable offspring. They aren't known to mate in the wild, but do when they are enclosed together. Horses and zebras also don't find each other sexually attractive in the wild, but will mate in captivity. Their offspring are usually, but not always, sterile. Humans are probably the ultimate test when it comes to inter-species viability though. Males will shag practically anything, any time, so the fertile offspring might be a vanishingly unlikely result from an enormous number of trials.

[@cindybogart6062]

I have recently heard a Dr. Speaking about Covid 19. He stated that the people who catch the sickness & have severe difficulty surviving from from it are humans that have Neanderthal cells in their bodies. I guess they are doing research on their DNA to find that information. Very interesting.

[@tonycatman]

@@cindybogart6062 Everyone has Neanderthal DNA with the exceptions of Sub-Saharan Africans.

[@arminiusfilms4963]

I really love the content you produce on this channel, it is very high quality and very interesting. I look forward to seeing more, especially on this subject!

[@willhorsley2105]

Yes, this is very good and accessible

[@CartoonHistory]

would like to see a longer version inc. how climate and earth's orbit (closer to sun/farther away over thousands yrs...etc. and corresponding climate changes) effected evolution

[@johnaugsburger6192]

Thanks

[@paulford9120]

Very informative for a quick overview. Thanks for posting!

[@thebenefactor6744]

Loved Lone Survivors. It explained so much so well.

[@stevenclements1090]

Best channel out by a long long way 🙌 👌

[@cyrusthegreat1893]

Such a fascinating documentary on human evolution! Thanks for that! Just wondering what exactly made human brain grow large throughout the evolutionary process?

[@deceptivepanther]

I don't think we know exactly, but it will have gone hand in hand with an increased ability to source high energy foods such as meat. Our human brains require huge energy input compared to the rest of our organs, something has to make that both possible and worthwhile. Possibly more intelligence allows for tool manufacture, and greater communal co-operation which in turn increases the ability to secure and process such foods. As a note, it isn't, strictly speaking, brain size that denotes intelligence but brain complexity, hence the unusual shape of our cerebral cortex. A blue whale has an enormous brain but that doesn't make them smarter than us (so far as we know).

[@MLeibs]

Mutated genes ?

[@deceptivepanther]

@Tom Morrison Oh, interesting. Yes, Stefan Milo's channel is great. Thank you.

[@cherylb2008]

Very good interview

[@markheithorn3905]

Thank you for the upload.

[@Jesse-cx4si]

HH has come out guns blazin’! Yet another good video! 👍 😎 It won’t be long before youtube bans History Hit for sharing facts!

[@perryedwards4746]

very very interesting..thx...

[@thorium222]

0:47 Sorry that is not how it works, chimpanzees are also derived and don't have to resemble our last comon ancestor more than we do.

[@falchion1966]

You don't really have to wonder about humanity's next evolutionary change. We are causing our own extinction.

[@texanfilms]

For the record, curiously they showed Australopithecines (Lucy) when discussing H. Erectus.

[@22SAMURAJ]

Thanks allot friends. 😁💯🙏

[@gardengnome2409]

Superb👌

[@ianrowley2323]

Very good. I remember seeing a TV programme from Alice Roberts, where it was claimed that the wrist bones of H Flores were the same as the Australopithecines; the contention being that Australopithecines migrated out of Africa. Any thoughts? I'd also like to see a comparison on the muscle insertion markers of Neanderthals and modern weight-lifters/bodybuilders to give a portrayal of their general morphology.

[@scottthomas5819]

Excellent

[@Jisamaniac]

I barely learned any of this from public HS and college biology. I actually saw a similar video to this from a Christian channel that actually explained in evolution detail pov.

[@axi271]

Science is not linear and neither is the history of mankind!

[@nedflanders5649]

How am I 42 years of age an just now learning this?

[@cccccccssssss]

Education system

[@ryandaripper9937]

Same here bro

[@andrewfuller9337]

A very enjoyable watch and also very informative. So sorry to hear about the massive inconvenience caused by Brexit when filming in the EU. Having thought the whole thing was a huge scam I emigrated to the Netherlands in 2020. Wishing you continued success with the channel.

[@upscaspirant23]

In india,s toughest exams UPSC , we have too quote this man in our anthro optional paper

[@amandajstar]

What about the Schwartz idea that orangutans are closer to us than chimps?

[@franciscojose6496]

Let's go study information all the time tank you

[@stevenclements1090]

Awesome 👌

[@davmatt941]

I really wish the anthropologist would have corrected the interviewer with what he asks at 00:48 - “let’s see how it goes from this to that” pointing to the chimpanzee skull. It’s such an easily point to clarify and bugs me whenever I hear it ever since learning about evolution.

[@thorium222]

Yes, exactly.

[@quarkraven]

Such a rich story with so many unanswered questions. What was the last common ancestor of humans with the other great apes? What was the last common ancestor of modern homo sapiens with the neanderthals?

[@spatrk6634]

without DNA we cannot know for sure. common ancestor between homo sapien and neanderthals are probably homo erectus. but again, without DNA of homo erectus, we cannot know sure, we depend on morphology mostly and with other great apes we dont know. we probably didint find a fossil of common ancestors of all great apes

[@raysalmon6566]

man has no common ancestors

[@quarkraven]

@@raysalmon6566 that is demonstrably false. siblings have the same parents. by the same logic you can trace back our ancestry to parents common to all living people. This is shown conclusively with DNA and mitochondrial DNA, demonstrating the near mathematical certainty of a mitochondrial "Eve." From what I've seen, only fascists, religious lunatics, or people lacking mental capacity to process complex information (for example, infants) deny the overwhelming evidence for common ancestry of humans and all life.

[@quarkraven]

@@spatrk6634 yes I agree with you. I do hold out hope that as archeological finds increase and identification techniques advance, we can have a clearer picture in our lifetimes.

[@johnparra7208]

I did one of those DNA tests and it said I have more Neanderthal DNA then 94% of other people.

[@docshaayy8400]

No mention of Ardipithecus? Still an awesome video though!

[@Khatoon170]

Iam so sorry to be little long but reading and writing both are great ways to improve our English language as none native speakers.

[@pheart2381]

What age do we see the tear-the-hominid-of-any-nature-down?!

[@drbob212]

They are talking in a library??

[@raysalmon6566]

But he answered one of them, ‘I am not being unfair to you, friend. Didn’t you agree to work for a denarius? 14 Take your pay and go. I want to give the one who was hired last the same as I gave you. 15 Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?’ 16 “So the last will be first, and the first will be last.”Matthew 20

[@KingBasewyn]

Metal Gear!

[@akumar7366]

Have to say evolutionary theory challenges me , in that I have a faith, not rigid but rather more spiritual. I only became interested in life sciences at the beginning of Covid ( having a lucky survival after being very poorly ). I started watching literally hundreds of videos ( evolution and space/ time ) and have to say my mind has opened up to so many ideas. My favorite scientist is Sir Roger Penrose , whose CCC theory I find very appealing . This short video is amazing and explains so much .

[@jimbob8992]

There's a few people trolling this video, but it's refreshing to hear someone say they are both challenged yet deeply interested in science, I certainly don't think faith or spirituality should preclude anyone from science. And I sincerely hope you endeavour to carry on the discovery.

[@bohemianrhaposteve6402]

The young earth age suggested by the Bible and and the old earth age suggested by geologic time were at one time compatible. Theologians developed two hypotheses:1.) Gap-Ruin and Restoration and 2.) Day-Age. Two distinct creation events are depicted in Genesis. Each day day of creation may be a period of time represented by faunal succession and superposition. Geologic time (the different epochs) is used as a analogy for the six day creation event. Major Christian groups accepted evolution, but thats changed. The only recent discussion I've heard was when the pope came out and argued that Evolution and the Church do not contradict one another.

[@irvhh143]

The recent trend towards Christian academies , basically whites only, seems as if they are forting up. The west and it's colonial empires are in the end stages. No longer able to control the world, they must shrink the world, or at least their remaining part, to a tiny sphere which they can control.

[@colpul2103]

Sigh, we did not evolved from Chimps. Chimps and humans had a common ancestor that both evolved from. That ancestor was no more 'chimp-like' than it was 'human-like'. Using a chimp skull as the starting point in human evolution is wrong and misleading. In fact, there's some speculation that our last common ancestor was bipedal and walk upright. This has to do with the difference in knuckle walking between chimps and gorillas and a few fossils from the time right before the chimps and humans split. Chimps may well have evolved knuckle walking since the split. Point being chimps did not stop evolving after the split and at the time of the split there were no more chimps than there was humans.

[@Mesozoic_mammal]

Still a chimp is a very good representative to show the plesiomorphic characters lin the skull like large canines, as they did here.

[@clusterfer]

I feel like he left out the word "living" when he says that. So, "closest 'living' relative" was what he meant.

[@flugschulerfluglehrer]

You are 100% correct. Such misleading comparisons are an invitation to creationism!

[@ivilivo]

Can't believe that they started with that

[@flugschulerfluglehrer]

@@ivilivo ???

[@papadwarf6762]

In future 2 types of humanoids will evolve . One living underground and the other living above ground which will be food for the other

[@TheMilkMan8008]

A lot left out here and some pretty bad misconceptions mentioned. I see a lot of people saying they'd want a longer video. If you're interested in this topic you can also check out Erika over at Gutsick Gibbon and Forrest at Forrest Valkai. Both of them are PhD candidate and student respectively in BioAnth like myself. Erika is more into primatology and almost all her content is human evolution related. Forrest doesn't have as many videos on the topic, but he still has a handful. Both are amazing science educators.

[@raysalmon6566]

Forrest Valkai is just recycling evolution dogma .... he acts like teenager who knows everything.... but is very illogical According to the paper, common descent cannot explain these “unexpectedly similar” systems, “suggesting independent evolutionary origins in plants and animals.” The paper is forced to conclude that such complex similarities make for a “compelling case for convergent evolution of innate immune pathways. *Casey Luskin* *The Top Ten Scientific Problems with Biological and Chemical Evolution

[@TheMilkMan8008]

@@raysalmon6566 he's reciting facts. Facts tend to remain the same until we get new information contradicting it or adding to it. Please, do list a few of those problems out for me. I guarantee I would be able to explain it to you. Instead of making an improper citation, you could explain your points better.

[@raysalmon6566]

@@TheMilkMan8008 interesting name 5 facts that he is presenting 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

[@TheMilkMan8008]

@@raysalmon6566 Humans have a common ancestor with all life on Earth, Human caused climate change is a critical issue, vaccines are safe and effective, Sex is extraordinarily complex, and a lot of people seem to think personal incredulity makes facts and reality wrong.

[@raysalmon6566]

Forrest Valkai despite his academic achievements is too easy to see through he is basically an dogma echo chamber most of what says isn't even possible

[@liammills6522]

Will we be the last?

[@1stHuemanAmerican]

Dragon man wow

[@johnrogers8836]

Did y’all see the straws drop past his hands?

[@thomass2881]

But Adam...Eve...Garden...Apple...Snake...Waaaaaaaahhhhh, booohooo.

[@tobyihli9470]

I wonder if genetically, brain size and/or upright walking are tied to smaller canines? Or, maybe a mutation for upright walking is slaved to bigger and bigger brains, because the the functionality for balancing a fatter skull improves the more upright one’s posture is. It’s amazing what is tied to what on a DNA level. I saw a show about minks, or sables, I forget, but a peculiar thing happened as they tamed the animals. The offspring of former feral animals all developed white spots, ruining the coat. And, I mean, they kept records that showed it happened without exception. Changing DNA, or genes, often comes with unintended consequences.

[@markupton3482]

Chris Stringers brain can be found in various parts of Africa.

[@rocketraccoon1976]

You left out the Black Monolith and the aliens. 👽🕋

[@crystalharris7394]

💗💗💗

[@Chipwipple]

Piltdown Man

[@spatrk6634]

its a scam which was debunked by scientist like 100 years ago why mention it?

[@DelroyHogan-s2i]

Eragaster is a better nome fr9m erectus

[@starcapture3040]

Tristan Hughes is hot!

[@whyitmatterstome]

If our society breaks down, and climate change or some other catastrophe alters our course, perhaps we could again live in isolated areas with some of us evolving traits that other groups do not. Or, we continue evolving information technologies and AI to the point our brains shrink dramatically (there is research that shows our brains have shrunk by 200 cc's in the last 6000-3000 years along with the rise of information/data storage). We could then become augmented with technology because our smaller brains cannot process such vast amounts of data, so AI enhancements become necessary for us to function. Or, Crispr tech (gene editing), will allow the richest in our society to evolve at an advanced rate.

[@GravelRat]

This crash course is hard to follow... models on the table that can't be seen clearly by the audience... references to branches that are not contextualised.. time frame references that aren't clear.. more work to make this presentation more useful

[@fmort210]

We have broken evolution as we know it. That's not a bad thing, but it makes it unpredictable. With the exception of terminal genetic diseases, we no longer follow the rule of what works best. The best guess we have is 'who is making the most babies?'.

[@walkergarya]

Bullshit.

[@janverboven]

Fascinating indeed. And looking a bit further I found that in the modern Humans species, there is no race, merely ethnicities (locally bound origins), so all 'racists' as we know them for the last few centuries (or longer perhaps) are all wrong. If you look at the timeline, it took quite a long time to have a 'result' we can call 'modern humans'. And exactly as pointed out, will or can our current species outlive our own stupidity (i.e. the lack of global understanding of the limits our home planet can offer) in the near future ?

[@Krankem697]

There are large differences between the skulls of the various races, and genetic differentiation between the races is so great that if we applied the same standards that we do for animals to humans, then we would be considered different sub-species from one another

[@leonardoferrari4852]

@@Krankem697 No, there is no genetic differentiation. DNA sequencing tells us that. Read this article "Nine things to remember about human genome diversity". The DNA of two scientist of european descent: Craig Venter and James Watson, was studied alongside the DNA of a korean scientist, Seong-Jin Kim. It was found that both Venter and Watson shared more alleles with Kim than with the scientist of their own "race".

[@Krankem697]

@@leonardoferrari4852 you truly believe that there is no genetic differences between the races, it is evident in their appearance

[@leonardoferrari4852]

@@Krankem697 given the fact that I showed you an article that proves that, yes I do. Phenotype is not that big a deal genetically speaking. Appearence is not an acceptable as proof of the existance of races. They tried to divide mankind in races back in the 19th century by using phemotypes, no one managed to find the exact number of "races", some said they were 3, others more than 100.

[@Krankem697]

@@leonardoferrari4852 what race are you?

[@Mark-zq1tj]

So if we don't destroy ourselves and can survive all the natural disasters and plagues..our brains will continue to grow, adapt, evolve for millions of years.. into what?? Alien?? 🤔😲😁🛸👽

[@djames693]

Question: "Who are we? How we get here?" Channel: "Evolution. From chimpanzee" Religion: "Adam and eve. Descended from heaven" 👽guys: "Hybrid. DNA edited by 👽" Me: "Alien descended from heaven, married with chimpanzee and gave birth so many humans. In other words, I don't know."

[@tommerphy1286]

At what species evolved the ability to speak language?

[@davidkeenan5642]

Spoken language evolved along side with physical abilities to to produce more complex sounds and mental abilities for abstract thought. There were no distinct species cut off points.

[@tommerphy1286]

@@davidkeenan5642 ok, but a species lasts a while. Yes? Speech vocal chords and related mechanism developed when? Obviously language was after . Is there a estemation for this? Because in my opinion that is when we became modern man . No?

[@spatrk6634]

​@@tommerphy1286 we cannot know for sure when spoken language first started. homo erectus wouild have ability to produce complex sounds. so if they had spoken language than its more than 2 million years old

[@lukesuarez4834]

🙄🙄

[@thomasdreyer2389]

If I'm a true history fan? I am that indeed. Which is why I find it much easier to read and believe biblical history which I find much more believable and in line with the science that confirms the biblical history revealed to us by the One who was there and knows the end from the beginniing. One race, the human race.

[@Eganja.]

So you’re telling me that magic sky daddy zapping a man and woman on the planet to have babies together, which first off is completely illogical because that would result in a massive incestuous melting pot of a species is more believable then animals adapting to their climate over thousands and thousands of years?

[@amandajstar]

On what basis does lovely Dr Stringer (and I'm a fan) state at the end that the world will change more in the next few hundred years than it has changed before? In what ways? On what basis does he make that (to some) alarming claim? If he's talking about climate, I'm not at all sure I agree. And if he's talking about climate, why doesn't he say so? If he's talking about politics and war, why not say so? It just seems simultaneously baffling and alarming, but without evidence.

[@thetruthaboutscienceandgod6921]

Please share with other people my two brief videos. Thank you!

[@Striperbass2]

gee, but this just doesn't jive w/ the bible....lol...thanks for the vid...fascinating!!

[@cccccccssssss]

Alot of things don't jive with the Bible

[@hammalammadingdong6244]

Reality doesn’t need the Bible.

[@Striperbass2]

@@hammalammadingdong6244 We know that, but, unfortunately, millions n millions tailor their lives around it. I love what George Carlin said...something like "god is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent....but.... HE NEEDS MONEY!! Lol.....😁

[@johnrogers8836]

Clearly aliens getting shipwrecked on our shores, and intermingling with the locals

[@vesuvandoppelganger]

Will Chris figure out that humans were created before he dies?

[@AMC2283]

why don't you ask your all knowing god and find out the future?

[@saltycreole2673]

Next Up: Was Jesus a Neanderthal/Cro-Magnon Hybrid?

[@jonathansiegel3140]

Cro-magnom were homo sapiens. And no.

[@daveansell6212]

Still pushing the 'story' 😂🤣

[@barabbasrosebud9282]

Monkeys went bald.

[@davidkeenan5642]

Not bald, naked. We have as many follicles as other apes, we just produce hair rather than fur. Fine hair allows sweating which meant that we could function better at times when prey species would overheat. Our early ancestors exhausted their prey by chasing them to a standstill, some Africa people do the same today.

[@brucepeek3923]

More than a little bit of interbreeding -- Modern humans with their smaller brains were the mate of choice for discerning Neanderthal women because they stood a much better chance of surviving child birth if they had kids with smaller brains.. best Bruce Peek

[@ivilivo]

An even faster crash course .. Some billions of years ago there where cells. Now there's humans and other species

[@patttrick]

I want ALIENS! and Adam and Eve pls

[@benjaminfalzon4622]

I take it that none of this stuff is made up, it's all based on the origins, right?!💆‍♂💆‍♀🚶🚶‍♂🚶‍♀

[@Tool683]

Both of these videos with Chris make some fairly serious editing mistakes that are very misleading. Using a male gorilla skeleton to demonstrate the light build of H. sapiens relative to other Homo, using an Australopithecine reconstruction when talking about erectus etc. Really amateur stuff

[@njgrplr2007]

We have fossils from 5,000,000 to 50,000 years ago, and still no missing link. I wish I had a nickel for every time I've heard an Anthropologist say, "we actually don't know" in my lifetime.

[@patttrick]

algorithm

[@petermillist3779]

Human evolution is a theory.

[@vanenmar7491]

Wrong. It's a scientific theory, learn the difference

[@kye4216]

So is gravity dude

[@Si-kr2zp]

I agree. Also Macro Evolution (e.g. fish to amphibian to land animal ) between species is just a theory, and in no way an indisputable irrefutable fact. But it is often presented as if it were fact.

[@vanenmar7491]

@@Si-kr2zp Looks like you don't know the difference between 'theory' and 'scientific theory' either!

[@Si-kr2zp]

@@vanenmar7491 looks like you wish to believe "scientific theory" is fact as well. It is still theory

[@irallan]

I know it's fanciful but I wonder if Neanderthals didn't start as Albinos of the different subspecies of sapiens existing in Africa some 300,000 years ago. Given that Albinos generally have immunity issues and gene testing of Neanderthals show susceptibility to immunity issues, I feel it's worth a thought. Documentaries have shown gorrilas and chimpanzees fearing albino offspring and banishing them. If the albino sapien somehow survived birth and was tolerated by the group I believe his condition would drive him North to find cooler weather.perhaps driving them into the glacial areas. If all the different sapien Albinos congregated in the North and interbreed eventually the typical Neanderthal evolved.

[@Decki777]

We are all humans but we are not equal each Race has their own advantages and disadvantages

[@walkergarya]

The biggest differences between the races is cultural, not biological.

[@adith9327]

Race is a social construct to opress people because they look different In reality people are the product of the environment Their accent their personality etc etc

[@69eddieD]

Take the sheet off yo face boy.

[@MCTMD1]

We are actually a lot less likely to experience climate change the likes of the younger dryas cataclysm, about 12k years ago.

[@peterkavanagh64]

Try speak with early evolution as been a part of. The voice seems to dissacoiate from humans. Trying to identify as modern, latest human is a mistake . Be able to find femine in the internal mind. Try to meet many femine . By walking and resettleting or travelling. To move as best if not achieve a physce that has a many femine therefore normals amind is to keep walking and or traveling while seasons allow. The removal if the male certainty internal is important to find a self. The voices in this video are trying but the voice a survival is in need of Ballance. By sight touch hearing colds . Ballance the senxes and repkamce the survival in that

[@AlbertaGeek]

You were going for...English?

[@Krankem697]

Femine ballance

[@kimshaw-williams]

Goes wrong at 2:31....the Australopiths were just habitually bipedal wading, sedge-munching cousins or ancestors to Gorilla lineage...our ancestors turned into obligate bipeds and were good at foraging underwater by 6.05Ma (look up all research since 2017 on the Trachilos footprints)..on what is now the island of Crete but between 7and 6 million yrs ago (=Ma) was a peninsula of Greece, then spent their time during the first half of the Pliocene living on the seacoast of East Africa, and did not colonize inland savannahs until about 3.7Ma...as the laetoli footprints and the first 3.3 Ma Lomekwi stone tools prove....then he just gets more lost, trying to support this mistake, until he reaches Erectus. Chris is still spouting tired old stuff that is fifty years old, from the 1970's, I'm sorry to say...such a nice guy...easy to listen to....

[@fortminor679]

It is not just the number of changes required to change a single-celled organism into a human that is mind boggling but the order in which these changes have to happen. It does not aid an organism to have a leg until there is a nervous system to control the leg. An eye is useless until the brain has developed the ability to collect and interpret information from the eye. So why develop the ability until the eye exists? Even if only 1000 beneficial mutations are needed to change one creature into a slightly more advanced creature, the mutaion would still have to occur IN THE RIGHT ORDER. The odds of this happening are like flipping a coin and getting heads 1000 times in a row. This would happen once in 10 ^301 attempts. Even if every subatomic particle in the entire known universe(10^80 particles) mutated at the fastest possible rate (plank time= once every 10 ^-42 seconds) and had done so for 15 billion years, there would only be 10^139 mutational possibilities. There's simply nowhere near enough mutations or time available to explain the transformation of one form of life into another. And this is a mere 1000 changes!!. The transformation from amoeba to man would require millions of changes-all in the right order. Based on what we know of time ,space,matter and probability, EVOLUTION IS AN ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBILITY!! SO STOP THE BULLSHIT

[@TmanRock9]

You didn’t demonstrate evolution to be improbable you just explained that certain evolutionary paths are improbable which is pretty meaningless because a path no matter what will be taken. It’s unlikely that you would be born and yet we can’t use that as an argument that you weren’t born. Improbability are pretty irrelevant when you know children are born each day or that animals constantly change no matter what. Evolution is a demonstrated fact, fossils, genetics, shared anatomy, and observed evolution all support this.

[@gregoryt8792]

@@TmanRock9 The odds of just one of the criteria for life forming by chance, a protein 150 molecules long, are 10^164th. There are many criteria. The odds of hemoglobin forming by chance are 10^190th. There are estimated to be 10^60th atoms in the universe. If Darwin was alive today he would not have even proposed such a ridiculous theory. Watch - The evolution theory disproved - evolution vs creation. Or just remain poorly educated.

[@TmanRock9]

@@gregoryt8792 evolution is about the diversity of life not how life started , this isn’t an argument it’s a logical fallacy try again. Your trying to tell me you believe in magic and yet I’m poorly educated? Cute

[@mauricedavis1740]

perfect example of dunning Kruger right here..

[@69eddieD]

" The odds of this happening are like flipping a coin and getting heads 1000 times in a row. " Show your math Liar for Jesus.