Henry VI, he was a disgrace to Henry V and the Plantagenets as a whole
@edwardsofgaliciabracara25475 ай бұрын
Not that much of a "Worst Kid", but Pedro I of Portugal was likewise a destructive force against his father's legacy. He also had an illegal marriage and after assuming the throne dismantled the Afonsine faction of court and ruled as a despot.
@cartatowegs50805 ай бұрын
The son of Marcus Aurelius, Commodus
@A-The-Great5 ай бұрын
George is IV is history greatest kid in comparison to me
@BHuang925 ай бұрын
King Edward VIII who abdicated his throne in order to marry divorcée Wallis Simpson.
@3bostonboys5 ай бұрын
George IV later died from like 5 medical problems (that were almost all his fault) that came together to make the last few months of his life miserable. This became a trend in English royalty.
@beoweasel5 ай бұрын
It couldn't have been worse than Queen Caroline of Ansbach, given she...uh, exploded.
@shadiafifi545 ай бұрын
@@beoweasel I'M SORRY WHAT?! *googles* Ah okay, WOW, that was a horrible way to die.
@fr4rq2365 ай бұрын
@@shadiafifi54what happened?!
@andreitaker35275 ай бұрын
@beoweasel I search on what happen and all it give me is a new fear.
@Papahye5 ай бұрын
@@beoweaseldon’t google umbilical hernia rupture it’s disgusting 🤢 🤮
@TheCheck9995 ай бұрын
`Ever see a son destroy his father's legacy?' *cries in Emperor Commodus*
@Cloud_that_looks_like_a_cat5 ай бұрын
Karl den tolfte (Charles the twelfth) of sweden.
@Ghostkilla7735 ай бұрын
Idk why i immediately thought of Luke Skywalker.
@lss25815 ай бұрын
@@Ghostkilla773luke didnt destroy his fathers legacy, he rebuilt it
@teutonicsniper25025 ай бұрын
*laughs in Brutus*
@paevalilleke4 ай бұрын
i thought of Peter III, although he did produce an heir and the line continued on
@mrsnufflegums5 ай бұрын
i find this wild since George III was definitely known as the Mad King, but honestly George III probably did what he had to for the nation, he just really didnt realize how zealous the americans were until Versailles
@sethconklin36165 ай бұрын
He also quite literally went mad. He had a recurring physical and mental illness that became permanent in 1811 after the death of his daughter. He spent the last decade of his life locked in a room in Windsor.
@arthenmes3965 ай бұрын
You say.... the price of my love's not a price that you're ready to pay
@mitab15 ай бұрын
It's honestly sad to see people tarnish the name of some due to something they can't control, it's not George's fault that he became mentally ill after the death of his daughter, along with the actions of his son, He spent his last ten years of life locked up,
@IsaacAnvilreign5 ай бұрын
@@arthenmes396you cry, in your tea which you hurl in the sea when you see me go by!
@Ghostkilla7735 ай бұрын
He spent his entire reign dealing with the Americans and Napoleon. I'll go mad too.
@jowolf21875 ай бұрын
What's particularly sad about this one is that in his lucid periods, George III was described as brilliant, soft spoken, and a lover of philosophy and agriculture. To this day there's still debate over what exactly cause his illness - from porphyria to mercury poisoning to schizophrenia to some yet as unspecified genetic condition.
@LordDim15 ай бұрын
George III, while heir to the throne, actually wrote what is considered the until-then most radical anti-slavery essay written; Of laws relative to government in general. In it, he described slavery as “equally repugnant to the Civil Law as to the Law of Nature”
@jowolf21874 ай бұрын
@@LordDim1 I've actually read that. It's a little difficult to get through, but the language is essentially the same as what we speak (if a touch more eloquent). The Brits have had a couple of brilliant monarchs who wrote magnificent treatises on various subjects, unfortunately most of those same monarchs also had crippling injuries or illnesses that made them mentally unwell.
@generalhorse4934 ай бұрын
And of course his madness may have been deliberately misrepresented by those in Parliament who had vested interests in having George IV be and stay regent.
@doomsdayrabbit43984 ай бұрын
@@generalhorse493Parliament itself was indeed part of the problem. The united colonies' 1776 impeachment may have been directed at the King, but his Parliament as well, acting in his name, was accused even by that same document.
@Drekromancer2 ай бұрын
@@LordDim1 Damn, I never knew about this. It's a shame his legacy was tarnished. He sounds like a man with demons who tried his best.
@patriciabrizuela80745 ай бұрын
Can we please get a series on George III, he’s such an interesting character and much more than what media (especially American media) portrays him
@Nostripe3615 ай бұрын
From what I’ve seen he was even more sympathetic to the American grievances than American media likes to portray as well.
@Highice0075 ай бұрын
When Americans were burning Canadian farms, many of them owned by Irish Canadians, good King George sent more men and ships to protect the Canadian people. Many of the Irish in Canada who might have fought for the Americans, instead fought for the King, as for a change the British were protecting them.
@Nostripe3615 ай бұрын
@chinsaw2727 Yeah. Its interesting reading about the lead up to the American Revolution. there were a few times that a deal could have been made with the colonist to keep them from fully revolting. But a mix of slow communication and stubbornness on both sides lead to the war. It wasn't just the king who was sympathetic to the colonists' issues but also a couple of the generals who lead the British army also felt similar. I believe it was Cornwallis who tried to negotiate for the revolutionaries to stand down when he first arrived rather than just following orders and crushing the revolt.
@kingbillycokebottle54845 ай бұрын
@@Nostripe361what? Literally Georgie Boy started the french-indian war, the tax was to pay for that war. America got its start a debt weasel, got into debt to murder indian and the French to break all sorts of treaties, them cried that he had to pay for said war. America, a country founded on lies and rebellion still suffers from lies and rebellion, and always will, like some hilarious sorta cosmic justice.
@kinggeorge22845 ай бұрын
That's what I'm sayin!!!
@fletcherenfield94745 ай бұрын
Abusing your wife to get back at your dad is extra awful behaviour
@brianboru276212 күн бұрын
When they got hitched, George IV was still a young, fit, and EXTREMELY charming man. Charlotte apparently had only one volume setting LOUD, had zero tact, had spectacularly bad hygiene, teeth, and breath even for the time and was duller than dish water. So yeah at the time young George was forced to get married to a bridge troll. Charlotte had the last laugh because she stayed relatively the same, but George drove himself off a cliff so hard she looked regal and elegant by comparison in the end.
@danielsantiagourtado34305 ай бұрын
His daughter Charlotte has SO much promise 😢😢😢😢😢
@MandoCarlrisian5 ай бұрын
Context pls
@danielsantiagourtado34305 ай бұрын
@@MandoCarlrisian George IV had a daughter Charlotte hailed as the hope of the country but she died in childbirth along with her child
@laurabaugh92605 ай бұрын
RISE CIPHER CULT RISE
@danyelpeter13765 ай бұрын
*had
@GeorgeP10665 ай бұрын
@@MandoCarlrisianalso Charlotte's widower was later made king of Belgium, founding their royal family, indirectly leading to the Belgian Kongo.
@charliefarmer43655 ай бұрын
I’m currently imagining Napoleon, amused, munching on a croissant as he reads whatever shenanigans George Junior (x4) was up to last night.
@alicialexists5 ай бұрын
I think he'd be fairly entertained.
@shadiafifi545 ай бұрын
"Never interrupt an enemy when they are making a mistake." - Napoleon, watching George IV's shenannigans.
@calanon5344 ай бұрын
"HON-HON-HON!"
@matthewhelland92584 ай бұрын
When Napoleon died, one of George's advisors said to him, "Your bitterest enemy is dead, sir." The King replied, "Is she, by God!" thinking the advisor was referring to the queen.
@charliefarmer43654 ай бұрын
@@matthewhelland9258 Turns out Napoleon thought George was secretly sympathetic to him for a large part of his second exile.
@katem.36775 ай бұрын
George III was one of the only (maybe even the only) English kings to not take mistresses. Though after his mental health went into decline, he sometimes chased some women of the court and begged them for sex. The saddest thing is, he was aware he was losing his mind, even crying on his son' shoulder about it.
@ElizabethMcCormick-s2n4 ай бұрын
George VI didn't have any mistresses either!
@ElizabethMcCormick-s2n4 ай бұрын
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was the only woman for him, and he was the only man for her!
@CobytheBald1874 ай бұрын
I’m pretty sure Henry VII and George V never took any mistresses
@marloyorkrodriguez99754 ай бұрын
Even William I the Conqueror never took a mistress because he loved his Matilda so much.
@Kazako833 ай бұрын
That’s pretty awesome, although extremely depressing to see yourself fall to your vices yet be able to do nothing about it.
@jakifennfolf51755 ай бұрын
this is one of the horrible histories songs! "ACTRESSESS, DUCHESSESS THE GREAT LOVES OF MY LIIIIFE / I LOVED MORE GIRLS THAN I ATE PIES BUT I / COULDN'T STAND MY WIIIFE"
@joshcain10325 ай бұрын
"I HAD JUST TEN YEARS ON THE THRONE/DO YOU REMEMBER THAAAAT?"
@robbiemurray28955 ай бұрын
HE COULDN’T STAND HIS WIFE!!!
@isramubashar12275 ай бұрын
"Go away!" I only married Queen Caroline..! ...When my debts began to climb..
@jakifennfolf51755 ай бұрын
@@joshcain1032 “NO, ALL THAT YOU REMEMBER IIIISSSS… i was really faaaaaaat~”
@jakifennfolf51755 ай бұрын
@@robbiemurray2895 cue george III rolling in lmao 😭
@Wolfiyeethegranddukecerberus175 ай бұрын
He may have been a bad apple, but he had amazing fashion sense. Look at that hat 👁️
@LetterSUN5 ай бұрын
Real.. and those glasses..
@АртурОголенко-б7о5 ай бұрын
Touhou mentioned
@TippedScale4 ай бұрын
His style was quite immaculate indeed
@greatpower60634 ай бұрын
i mean being forced to represent a monarchy and live according to another person's dictated ideas about your personal expenses.....was no doubt pretty frustrating xD We should all applaud him for dealing with an overbearing parent and still having the pride in himself to take care of his appearance.
@LawrenceKoloamatangi-nf7rx2 ай бұрын
too focused on his fashion, that's probably why the country sucked when he ruled
@cici_tlb40095 ай бұрын
To explain the Catholic and Protestants at the time. George III was only two George’s and a Frederick away from Queen Anne whose half-brother was disinherited because he was born to a catholic mother and was a Catholic himself. Who disinherited you ask? Parliament. Not the royal family no, the government asked his Protestant sister married to a Protestant prince of orange to come take over. This was the issue which lead to the Jacobite risings which occured in 1745… George III was born 1738 so he has memories of the time Catholics backed another more senior line to take over. Hence him not wanting his son to be married to a Catholic cause if they were gonna start accepting Catholics all of a sudden, what the hells was the point of the fighting?
@Sorcerers_Apprentice5 ай бұрын
Could he have asked his son's wife to convert to Protestantism?
@leandraferesthogar72495 ай бұрын
@@Sorcerers_ApprenticeI doubt conversion back then was as easy and with how unstable Catholic and Anglican relationships werr politcally, it was safer to cur the middle man
@Luke_055 ай бұрын
@@Sorcerers_Apprentice Not likely, no. Plus, the woman he secretly married was a commoner and was his mistress, a big no no. Royal princes, especially heirs, were expected to marry a foreign princess to create an alliance with another European country or marry a noblewoman from a well respected family.
@cici_tlb40095 ай бұрын
@@Sorcerers_Apprentice No. conversion was almost sort of looked down upon worse than just being the opposite religion, they’d accuse her of faking it, being loyal to the pope, call her a spy for a Catholic country. The few times before the Jacobite risings where a Protestant king was married to a catholic queen the Queen was ostracized and used only for babies, and would even have her babies taken away from her to be raised by someone else (which although normal for the times, still anguished them as they literally had no one). So in a way it wasn’t just for the crown that George III was vehemently opposed, it was also sort of in a way so she wouldn’t face the wrath of a majority Protestant government and nation. Not to mention, people are less likely to give up the religion that they were raised with, especially if it was drilled into them that it could mean damnation for doing so.
@ElizabethMcCormick-s2n4 ай бұрын
Frederick was supposed to be the king, but he predeceased his father George II, who was actually glad about his son dying, long story!
@Unownshipper4 ай бұрын
Funny to thing George III was the one you associate with “madness” while junior here lived a hedonistic life of lunacy.
@comettamer5 ай бұрын
An interesting side of George III most never hear about.
@bennysdepartmentstore76645 ай бұрын
And as the ruler of our nation, I BANNED MY WIFE FROM MY CORONATION! And knowing now that I did hate her, She promptly died just three weeks later! But all those pies that I got through, Meant that ten years later I'D DIE TOO!!
@offtheapex5 ай бұрын
Hello I’m a kangaroo ACTRESS DUCHESS the great loves of my I loved more girls then I ate pies but I couldn’t stand my WIFE I had just ten years on the throne do you remember that but all that you remember is …..I was really fat
@Bllue5 ай бұрын
10 years is a long time
@quacksayssquawk28994 ай бұрын
@@Bllue Its pretty short in the context of a British monarch's reign, especially when you remember that George III reigned for almost 60 years
@artfuldodgerrr4 ай бұрын
DAD'S DEAD DAD'S DEAD OH GOSH I'M KING
@danielsantiagourtado34305 ай бұрын
This Worst series is amazing guys! Thanks For this 😊😊😊😊😊
@collinkeyser68274 ай бұрын
Man Imagine How Cruel He Had To Have Been For Her To Get A Divorce Back Then
@jlo28135 ай бұрын
George IV got so overweight that at a point he started using underground tunnels in the Brighton Royal Pavilion rather than be seen in public
@noahbossier11314 ай бұрын
This is crazy
@cooperstephens1475 ай бұрын
“King George the fourth and known henceforth as angry fat and cross.” “Hang on!” “It’s true you beat Napoleon, but we’re mostly a dead loss.” “Bang on.”
@Kindercelery3 ай бұрын
HORRIBLE HISTORIES MENTIONNNN
@FadumaIbrahimismaciil5 ай бұрын
Can we get "worse siblings in history"? That'll be fun .You could make a compilation and call it "worse families in history!!"or "worst parents in history!!"
@GrantGraff5 ай бұрын
I would like to nominate my sister.
@wanna-be-thinker23775 ай бұрын
"Worse siblings in history," and "worse families in history" sounds great! Also "worse aunts/uncles in history" and "worse grandparents in history."
@pisces25695 ай бұрын
Followed by best siblings in history
@FadumaIbrahimismaciil5 ай бұрын
Yup, that'll be great👍
@lifeforever694 ай бұрын
@@GrantGraffr word yout sister
@zullyp62225 ай бұрын
WHY IS THE ANIMATION SO SMOOOTHH
@johndurham61725 ай бұрын
All because Blackadder stole all his socks.
@edwardphilibin31515 ай бұрын
I never quite knew that, of all the historical figures we see in the Blackadder series, George IV was actually LESS bad than pretty much everyone. Yes, he was a free-spending imbecile, but the show ignored everything else he did. 😳🙄
@Richard-dq6if5 ай бұрын
Yes, but later after the duel he becomes the new George IV.
@GameChangerIDK5 ай бұрын
Yeah that’s right!
@danielwolf38135 ай бұрын
Ahhh, finaly someone mentioned Blackadder! :D
@memeconsumer7734 ай бұрын
@@edwardphilibin3151 It would make sense that after blackadder steals his identity in the show, then comes the true decline
@5m4llP0X4 ай бұрын
Another terrible dad you should look into was John Lennon of the Beatles. He routinely called his son a mistake and physically abused him for his "bad table manners". On top of this, he abandoned him at the age of 5 and never paid child support.
@balabanasiretiАй бұрын
His son Sean said that once John screamed so loudly at him that he had to go to the hospital
@GiordanDiodato11 күн бұрын
how about Joe Jackson?
@angusyang59175 ай бұрын
When George IV was told in 1821 that his greatest enemy (Napoleon) died, he thought they were referring to his wife
@ElizabethMcCormick-s2n4 ай бұрын
But she died pretty soon afterwards!
@ATBZ5 ай бұрын
British history is literally Good king Bad king Good king Bad king ...
@mitab15 ай бұрын
Now, was the queen good or bad? (so we know what the current king will be)
@joshuahunt30325 ай бұрын
@@mitab1Depends, how was her predecessor?
@LordDim15 ай бұрын
@@joshuahunt3032 her father, George VI, is usually ranked among one of the UK’s best kings for his stoic and fearless leadership during the Second World War, alongside overcoming his deep social anxiety and stammer to become a real father of the nation
@GiordanDiodato11 күн бұрын
except during the tudors it was: Good King that became bad REALLY bad King (Henry VIII) ? King (Henry VIII's son) BAD QUEEN (Mary Tudor) Good (mostly) Queen (Elizabeth I)
@ostrowulf5 ай бұрын
LOL, get out of my truck from listening to a podcast episode talking about him. Walk in my house, first thing that pops up on KZbin having apparently been posted while I was doing errands. Nice when there is a theme to my day.
@MsZeeZed5 ай бұрын
Hmm and why did George III need to “rehabilitate” his family’s reputation?
@puchy1105 ай бұрын
In all fairness, it was Lord North who was mainly responsible for cocking up the crisis in Boston.
@baneofbanes5 ай бұрын
@@puchy110yah, thing is the colonists appealed directly to the King for him to intervene on their behalf with the olive branch petition. He never even read it and instead chose to support parliament.
@pesky_Kea5 ай бұрын
@@baneofbanes Which makes sense from a British perspective. He chose his reputation in the homeland over the colonies.
@R.P-e2z5 ай бұрын
@@pesky_Kea And look at how that worked out for him.
@puchy1105 ай бұрын
@@baneofbanes well I mean the monarchy couldn’t challenge parliament on financial affairs, not after Charles I tried dismissing parliament for refusing to back him financially. The most the king could do was symbolic support and even then, I doubt parliament would budge.
@DaughterofAthena10112 ай бұрын
Sent this to my parents with the caption “See? We weren’t THAT bad” lol
@eduardosousa92915 ай бұрын
Another kid who absolutely ruined his father's legacy was Filipe III of Spain and II of Portugal, his father, Filipe II of Spain and I of Portugal, achieved that title by winning the "war" after the Portuguese succession crisis that saw him being named it's king, and he was a great king, fair to both nations, he made many promises he kept surprisingly well and was on track to fully integrate Portugal into Spain, but after his death, his son absolutely destroyed his legacy by breaking every single promise made to the Portuguese by his father, taking Portuguese riches in an inhumane way and allowing Portuguese land to be seized by his enemies (some of which were formerly Portugal's allies btw) in order to (not even manage to) protect Spanish land, thus ruining any chance of a Spanish-Portuguese unification.
@ekamandalaputra55175 ай бұрын
Damn. So we almost got Iberian Union?
@eduardosousa92915 ай бұрын
@@ekamandalaputra5517 Yep, but Filipe III/II (as well as his son, Filipe IV/III) completely ruined that possibility.
@RLucas30004 ай бұрын
@@eduardosousa9291still possible, right? How did they both align in WW2?
@eduardosousa92914 ай бұрын
@@RLucas3000 They were both neutral, though through different means, and it's far from possible at this point
@ElizabethMcCormick-s2n4 ай бұрын
Carlos II wasn't much better!
@colleen64405 ай бұрын
"Actresses, duchesses, the great loves of my life! I loved more girls than I ate pies but I really hate my wife!"
@AYF65163 ай бұрын
"I had just 10 years on the throne, do you remember thaaaaat??"
@superluigi94905 ай бұрын
That last frame is killing me 😂
@zoecolquitt13555 ай бұрын
This is technically describing my cousin eric if he was a monarch and not finding himself on the wrong side of the law
@HalduBouyaNono25 ай бұрын
“I Can turn a blind eye on my son massively using the Crown and Parliament money on mistresses and beverages, but I draw the line at him marrying a woman from a Christian branch slightly different from mine." - George III, probably
@GrantGraff5 ай бұрын
How uncivilized
@isaiahacosta58705 ай бұрын
Protestant and the Roman catholic church had it bad at the time lol
@zarabada61255 ай бұрын
You need to consider the situation in the historical context. The Hanoverian dynasty came to the throne of the United Kingdom solely because they were the closest protestant relatives of Queen Anne of the Stuart dynasty. If the Prince of Wales (later George IV) had Roman Catholic children, it would cause a new succession crisis. George III likely remembered the Jacobite rising when he was a child; a bloody attempt to restore the catholic Stuart line to the throne. A new civil war must have been a real worry for him.
@SamtheMan30145 ай бұрын
@@zarabada6125there’s also the fact that at the time, marriage to a catholic barred someone from the line of succession. Since George IV was the heir, that would’ve caused a succession crisis
@FiendKing045 ай бұрын
This entire series of issues you guys just described is why monarchies are hella dumb. I get to be in charge because my version of the same god we believe in is the right one.
@ThatOneGammaRay5 ай бұрын
FINALLY! Some bad kids
@borisdanyukov82675 ай бұрын
He reminds me of Commodus, son of Marcus Aurelius. His father is often debated to be the best emperor rome ever had whilst his son is ranked among Caligula
@alexeskew83005 ай бұрын
I love how George iii when he found out his son had illegally married, has the same exact facial expression as George Washington from one of your other vids 😂😂😂
@almessasorrow49504 ай бұрын
I wouldn't call George the 4th the worst. The 3rd constantly did the exact same things in his youth and after he got sick acted worse than the 4th. The 4th did exactly what the 3rd did so it's likely his father set a bad example behind closed doors. When his son wanted to marry, his father forces him into a marriage with someone he literally doesn't care about at all, and at every turn the 4th tried getting rid of her. If anything this should have been a video about a abusive father who did good in society and a son who couldn't care less about his father's legacy.
@Definitelyanormalhuman8632 ай бұрын
@@almessasorrow4950the problem was simply sectarianism, England, and the UK as a whole, has always had problems with religion. If the people took issue with the religion of the married in monarch, they would make it known and if anger was present enough would demand for her to be divorced. Especially with how ‘Bloody Mary’ would still be fresh in the minds of the public as a example of a Catholic woman in charge
@thomasmolloy54475 ай бұрын
Speaking as very patriotic yank, in spite what we said about him during the revolution, George III was as decent a man as any country could want for a king. We still had some important gripes, but the character of the king can't be said to be one of them.
@mitab15 ай бұрын
I hate when people call him a bad king, yeah he was "mad" because he became mentally ill after the death of his daughter along with his physical illness, he did things for the sake of Britain and at the end he spent the last ten years of his life locked up
@GiordanDiodato5 ай бұрын
well... at least till George III went off the deep end
@grantflippin78085 ай бұрын
The fundamental problem is that he failed to rein in parliament.
@LordDim15 ай бұрын
@@grantflippin7808 Problem was that by the time of George III most power had shifted from the Crown to parliament, and the idea of the King directly overruling parliament had become nigh-unthinkable. The English civil war had firmly established the doctrine of Parliamentary supremacy and sovereignty, and the reigns of George I and George II had seen most executive power in practice transferred from the King to the Prime Minister, who is responsible to parliament. George III intervening politically in direct contravention of parliament would have been a potentially cataclysmic constitutional event and would, in Britain, have been see as the absolute height of tyranny.
@bernd_das_brot69113 ай бұрын
This ain’t about you buddy 😭😭
@archiestanfield97335 ай бұрын
You should do best kids in history sometime
@loop16544 ай бұрын
bro fumbled the bag really hard 😂😂😂
@mishwinslow38105 ай бұрын
"Eventually, daddy caved in and, paid his depts." GOT ME ROLIN ON THE FLORR😂💀💀
@Thestupidsiamese4 ай бұрын
I remember when my history teacher in 7 grade made a joke about his son. That memory lives rent free in my head
@christopherwojtan7505 ай бұрын
He was a very profound builder though. He had a hand in every building including Buckinham. Really had an eye for architectural beauty.
@generalhorse4934 ай бұрын
Yeah George IV seems to have had talents and dreams that didn't fit neatly into the ultra-conformist, perfectionist posh image of British Royalty.
@KokkiHours4 ай бұрын
Please make best pranks in history, my history class presentation will definitely need more than a bottle.
@matrixiekitty21275 ай бұрын
He literally ordered that the doors to his coronation be locked in his wife’s face he hated her that much! He also made it harder for their daughter Charlotte to see her.
@Dave-lx3vt5 ай бұрын
You guys really have the loop from the end back into the beginning down!
@benstrong44975 ай бұрын
At one point during a banquet, George III was struck by a bout of his illness and tried to smash his son's head into a wall.
@Anna-c4d3x3 ай бұрын
Well...... Dang
@seashoreshipsАй бұрын
I feel so informed thank you so much for this information I love your videos never stop posting 😂❤
@rinylvinyl4 ай бұрын
Ever see anyone ruin their own life? His poor wife...
@WAFFL0._.0.o4 ай бұрын
[Sad music kicks in] I saved every letter you wrote me... From the moment I read them I knew you were mine, you said you were mine... I thought you were... Mine...
@ECVoice4 ай бұрын
Seeing the Pavilion from my home town in one of your videos is awesome! 😊
@GetSmartish5 ай бұрын
He destroyed it faster than he could say "disestablishmentarianism."
@MartmeisterPaladinHaven12 күн бұрын
ANTI-disestablishmentarianism.
@GetSmartish12 күн бұрын
@@MartmeisterPaladinHaven What I meant to say was: "Anti distinctly minty monetarism" I stand corrected sir.
@infinessia40194 ай бұрын
I’m honestly surprised they didn’t just replace him for being so much trouble, it’s not like George lacked for spares 😂
@GamerGrovyle4 ай бұрын
Heard of a Merchant Town in Japan where the motto was "You can't choose your kids but you can choose your heir." the families there would often if their kids were found lacking in brains, morals or charisma give them a stipend to go do art stuff and get drunk outside the family name and then marry their daughter or niece off to someone with the traits they wanted and make him the heir. Some of those families businesses went on to last for several centuries because they never let family ties get in the way of work.
@TheGabagool75 ай бұрын
Bro is Joffery Baratheon 💀💀💀
@d.a.jnation10044 ай бұрын
more like aegon the unworthy
@TheGabagool74 ай бұрын
@@d.a.jnation1004yeah
@florenceadeoya70545 ай бұрын
Why did they make him so cutie patootie 💀
@m7dasplatoon53920 күн бұрын
The only symphaty I have for George IV is that he really was devasted over the death of his only child
@casekocsk4 ай бұрын
Q: ever see a son destroy his father's legacy? A: oh, i have, too many times...
@Raine_ischaotic4 ай бұрын
Bro was basically eric cartman but real 😭😭
@amyartlover5 ай бұрын
Karma got him, though. He was only on the throne for 10 years and died due to his weight and other health issues
@thecutecat25615 ай бұрын
He was only on the throne as King for 10 years, he served as reagent for his father from the beginning of his last bought of mental illness until he died. So he was effectively acting as king longer than 10 years. Which was lucky for his sisters because it effectively gave him the power to allow them to finally marry and leave the isolation that had been forced on all but the princess royal. She did grow up in isolation but was eventually allowed to marry with the King's permission. The youngest one of them was 35 at this time, she didn't marry however, the older ones did as soon as they had the chance despite their mother being against it still. The youngest daughter died at 27 before he took over for his father so she never had the chance. He had promised his sister's he would free them as soon as he had the power too, and he kept his word on that at least. So I give him points for that.
@ElizabethMcCormick-s2n4 ай бұрын
@@thecutecat2561 He weighed a grand total of 280 pounds!
@jaconbran23672 ай бұрын
His wife died a few days after the coronation that she was banned from some historians speculated she might’ve been murdered
@MetallicBascinet4 ай бұрын
That must suck trying to build a reputation for something great and then having a child that destroys it all haha
@juneblassingame23414 ай бұрын
I love how the wife isn't even mad she just looks done
@mehmetsahsert32845 ай бұрын
It baffles me how european monarchs just straight up make their eldest child the heir to throne rather than picking the heir amongts their children purely based on merit and favouritism.
@siimplykittxie84694 ай бұрын
The Ottoman Empire did something similar to what you suggested, where all of the Ottoman princes had an equal chance of becoming sultan: the only thing that mattered was who got to the throne first. And look at how _that_ turned out.
@ThomasstevenSlater4 ай бұрын
If you don't have it completely and utterly clear who is king (or queen) next then you have various factions all supporting different true heirs. Then they all start gathering armies and the other great powers also have heirs they support and start gathering armies too. Often it becomes a huge mess. My then the UK Parliament was thoroughly in charge of that, swapping in the dutch king in 1688 and going way down the list the find all those georges back in the George 1st's time.
@WSPGUYS3055 ай бұрын
My favorite KZbinr :)
@dalekinthewater47085 ай бұрын
Yeah maybe Blackadder didn't exaggerate how ridiculous Prince George really was
@maxwellquipey14 ай бұрын
Fate itself did everything to hammer down as many nails on the monarchy's coffin 💀💀
@animationlover2194 ай бұрын
As a small correction, there was actually no law against the heir marrying a Catholic at the time. George III put in a law after the marriage invalidating heirs to the throne’s marriages without the king’s consent, and then claimed that it applied retroactively to the existing marriage, forcibly separating them. I sometimes wonder if George IV would have been quite so dissolute afterward if he had not been forced through that.
@omnicupid66944 ай бұрын
I remember reading about him and his wife. While she wasn't perceived well in the eyes of the royal courts, she still had the support of the public and was more liked than her husband.
@ericthegreat70605 ай бұрын
I bet she didn't want to go anyway, she probably felt as if she dodged a bullet.
@susanlund61945 ай бұрын
She showed up, and they wouldn't let her in. 😣
@LogBarc5 ай бұрын
She showed up in full regalia and banged on the doors for half the ceremony, before running home where she died of cancer (probably exacerbated by stress caused by George as he was simultaneously lying about her to get a divorce) 3 weeks later 😔
@Therizzlersigmadrew4 ай бұрын
This video came out on my birthday 😅
@DachiJordanson5 ай бұрын
Now we’ve moved on to kids
@Justsomeoneyoucouldhaveknown2 ай бұрын
"Ever see a son destroy his father's Legacy?" Every Canadian watch that happen 🤣
@rosefromtitanic22645 ай бұрын
“SORROWS PRAYERS, yet I still don’t have an heir to the throne”
@jayathakur86435 ай бұрын
Exactly what I was thinking...
@chibiprussia55744 ай бұрын
Don't forget, he started the War of 1812 and got his ass kicked
@FantasmagoriaAhoy5 ай бұрын
George IV is literally the reason why pawn shops were invented. He couldn't stop gambling when he ran out of cash late one night.... It's a real story. Look it up! I'm sure someone has told the story well somewhere.
@shadiafifi545 ай бұрын
Seems like a lot of stuff gets invented when gambling is on the line. I mean, that's how we got the sandwich.
@citinox17785 ай бұрын
I looked it up and I did not find any evidence to suggest that. Apparently, pawning is a practice that has been around since ancient times.
@captnaberystwyth28795 ай бұрын
his butler was entertaining tho.😂
@lillimay985 ай бұрын
He didn't just not invite his wife to the coronation, he ordered the doors closed in her face when she showed up. She died 3 weeks later
@almessasorrow49504 ай бұрын
Honestly he had reason to do so. The 3rd constantly did the exact same things as the 4th in his youth and after he got sick acted worse than the 4th. The 4th did exactly what the 3rd did so it's likely his father set a bad example behind closed doors. When his son wanted to marry, his father forces him into a marriage with someone he literally doesn't care about at all,or cuts him off entirely and at every turn the 4th tried getting rid of her. If anything this should have been a video about a abusive father who did good in society and a son who couldn't care less about his father's legacy because his father was a snake.
@andreww.37574 ай бұрын
“Well, you’re about to.” ☠️
@MJ_2Day5 ай бұрын
Surprised my youngest sister isn’t on this list yet
@X-zag4 ай бұрын
Bro would definitely be that one kid in the class who makes everyone have to stay silent for the rest of the period because he’s yelling.
@juanmanuelpenaloza92645 ай бұрын
🇺🇸America: Boy, we sure did dodge a bullet, didn't we...
@Anna-c4d3x3 ай бұрын
Me: Yeah, we did👌😅👍
@neaneaallen36165 ай бұрын
Love your videos! Would love to see the history of other cultures as well 🤗
@josgibbons67775 ай бұрын
For more information, see Blackadder III.
@LillyP-xs5qe4 ай бұрын
Ok, now Hugh Laurie betrayal of prince regent in blackadder the 3rd makes way more sense...
@tomthecarrot7265 ай бұрын
You should make a series called "Worst DEATHS in history!" where you go over the most gruesome and interesting deaths ever recorded.
@TylerMcCaughey4 ай бұрын
George was a legend.
@Mr_zombb3 ай бұрын
“Worst kids in history!!!” “Bella the wolf”
@Inkan19694 ай бұрын
Blackadder's portrayal of George IV was dead on.
@ski3934 ай бұрын
George 3rd: Yo, how tf did u lose to mf rebels? George 4th: Just happens man
@napoleonibonaparte71984 ай бұрын
William IV, on the other hand, changed when he realised he could ascend as King after the death of the last heir, and lived long enough to spite Victoria's mother and prevent another regency.
@TheYigafooWisperer5 ай бұрын
Wikipedia listed one of his titles as King of Hanover. More like King of Hangover
@t750444 ай бұрын
I remember reading somewhere that the Duke of Wellington when he was Prime Minister said he got more work done in one morning in his first meeting with William IV than he ever did in the entire reign of George IV
@CookiehsAndDreams4 ай бұрын
A fun fact for fans of Jane Austen, but the Regent George actually forced her to dedicate her novel “Emma” to him. You can still find her dedication in modern copies and it says something like “from his humble servant, the author.” Pretty sure she even named her character Mr. George Knightley after him too.
@Zak103tv4 ай бұрын
Bro thought he was all that
@toodreammy5 ай бұрын
He made is seem like marrying a catholic woman was bad
@GrantGraff5 ай бұрын
Well he was Anglican
@thebestteammate65285 ай бұрын
And was the inheritor of the Anglican Church it’s like somebody who would have been pope marrying a Muslim
@LogBarc5 ай бұрын
Rebellions to place a Catholic on the throne we’re still in living memory and George’s family only got the throne as they were the closest Protestant relatives of Queen Anne so having Catholic heirs would have caused a crisis. Also George wouldn’t have been allowed to succeed if he had married a catholic
@chtey12344 ай бұрын
Napoleon be like : easiest fight ever cuz their ship is just gonna sink with a caseoh in it
@AtlasBlizzard4 ай бұрын
Anyone who's seen Blackadder knows that George IV was the worst, but it's fascinating to learn that the real-life version was even worse.
@Serameow014 күн бұрын
Hes the definition of "YOLO"
@donyab.e47674 ай бұрын
As far as I've read, this kid didn't have the best father, either. In fact, his father had ordered teachers to use physical punishment to force him into studying harder. It was like pressing a spring just too much not realizing that it will bounce back harder when they release it.
@acheronvictor735 ай бұрын
This is literally the 18th century version of 50 Cent and his son