A Film Photographer Tries Dehancer

I've been shooting film for decades, so I have opinions about Dehancer. In this video, we will go over some comparisons between actual film shots I've taken vs the emulations. There were some areas where I was pleasantly surprised and other areas where I think there could be a little room for improvement.
For some reason my clumsy fingers caption "AFGFA" during the video. I meant to type "AGFA."
If you like Dehancer Pro for video, you can get it here
www.dehancer.c...
If you like Dehancer Film for stills, you can get it here
www.dehancer.c...
If you're interested in the iPhone version, check it out here
www.dehancer.c...

[@KevinDeal]

Are you a film photographer who has tried Dehancer? Do you shoot motion pictures and have experience shooting film? Tell me your thoughts on Dehancer vs film here.

[@Dehancer]

Kevin, thanks for your review! Beautiful results! We are happy to answer any questions 😃

[@KevinDeal]

Thank you for letting me check out such a cool program! I am planning on integrating it into my workflow moving forward.

[@andreposthumus2072]

Great review! The comparison shots were very valuable and amazing to look at. I've been trying Dehancer for a few weeks and I like the results a lot. It's just a bit slow and clunky at times. But to me it's also very educational. I don't know much about film and it's really interesting to play around with these and also the print profiles. By the way, my download came with a PDF with instructions on how to "reset" the (in my case) Lightroom file so Dehancer can most effectively apply the film profiles. So it's a good idea to read the manual first. 😁

[@KevinDeal]

Sounds advice on the manual.

[@Aiproductions713]

Thank you.

[@KevinDeal]

Youre welcome!

[@herobear]

Thank You 🙏🏼

[@KevinDeal]

You’re welcome 😊

[@herobear]

@@KevinDeal ❤️🙏🏼

[@thextopic]

interested

[@KevinDeal]

It's without a doubt the closest I've gotten to film without actually shooting film.