"...Think the only landlocked country in South America?" Bolivia who legit is right next to Paraguay: "It worked!!! Being a landlocked country with a Navy has tricked people into forgetting we're landlocked!!"
@madogthefirst4 жыл бұрын
In fairness they used to not be landlocked.
@Strodie5674 жыл бұрын
@@madogthefirst Yes, Bolivia has been landlocked only since 1883. I mean, how can you expect a history teacher to keep up with such last-minute events? ;-) Though to be really fair, that was _after_ the war that was being discussed (1864-1870), so at the time Paraguay was indeed the only landlocked country in South America.
@judasdechariot98434 жыл бұрын
Hahaha. You beat me to it!
@KristerAndersson-nc8zo4 жыл бұрын
Well they do have a navalstation at lake Titicaca. Why did he not mention the footballwar?
@lapisleafuli18175 жыл бұрын
Paraguay was actually going to be partitioned and wiped off the map completely until US president Rutherford B Heyes stepped in and saved the country. To this day Heyes is seen as a hero in Paraguay and even has a province named after him.
@ShahjahanMasood5 жыл бұрын
"Ratherfraud Heyes"
@Smogne5 жыл бұрын
Emperor Pedro II also was not keen on annexing everything
@cassianoneto15535 жыл бұрын
Paraguay was not going to be wiped out, it was in danger of needing to make even more territorial concessions to Argentina until the U.S. imtervened. Paraguay was never going to be annexed, because the agreement between Brazil and Argentina from the start of the war forbade the partition of Paraguay.
@abrahamperez16535 жыл бұрын
Cassiano Neto lets not forget the racial undertone to the war for all sides
@Smogne5 жыл бұрын
@@abrahamperez1653 what racial undertone?
@Xaiff5 жыл бұрын
Personally, I think this is easily one of the best "reaction" channel. Really glad that you always give your own take on the topics. I wish I had history teacher like you back then. Cheers.
@turbowolf3025 жыл бұрын
Mr. Terry: It had to be Texas, hadn't it? Me, a Texan: YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT!
@wisemankugelmemicus17015 жыл бұрын
Van Zandt is still technically independent
@ciaranvaille75315 жыл бұрын
I’m a Texan and this is exactly how I reacted. 😂
@turbowolf3025 жыл бұрын
@Jenn Massey [STARES IN TEXAN] ....alright, then.
@cn74495 жыл бұрын
Jenn Massey Seems safe. I’ll stick to living where everyone around isn’t carrying a killing machine.
@ciaranvaille75315 жыл бұрын
Cody Niles I haven’t ever seen anyone carrying a gun in public in Texas. Usually people keep them in their vehicles just in case they need to defend themselves. For example, when one man walked into a church in Texas with a machine gun, people in the church went out to their trucks to get their guns and shot at the criminal. Also, in the time that the number of firearms in the US has quadrupled, the number of murders has been halved.
@onorioneto37984 жыл бұрын
The Paraguay war is actually very known here in Brazil, we learn it in the school as the biggest war in south america
@hiplsnols43942 жыл бұрын
ofc its more known in the countries involved
@AliceObscura Жыл бұрын
That's so interesting. It's always interesting to see how different peoples learn about history and what they learn.
@abdelrahmanwael25515 жыл бұрын
If i hear about the emu war one more time...
@abdelrahmanwael25515 жыл бұрын
@Ron Lewenberg what's that?
@abdelrahmanwael25515 жыл бұрын
@Ron Lewenberg oh nice gimme some
@perjulianlundbergtande89565 жыл бұрын
Sign me up for 2 liters 💵
@JesusChrist420005 жыл бұрын
Australian version of snake oil
@csweezey185 жыл бұрын
Found the Australian.
@Crazael5 жыл бұрын
My favorite is Scilly vs the Netherlands. Mostly because the whole thing basically started on a whim of the Dutch, and then they forgot all about it for three and a half centuries.
@gabber12094 жыл бұрын
The fact that our fleet admiral was called Tromp can't be coincidence :o
@a.grimes42024 ай бұрын
The “War of the Bucket” is actually quite a misnomer for the one battle conflict. The Italian city-state of Modena defeated the fellow Italian city-state of Bologna at the Battle of Zappolino. The bucket may not even exist, as although some accounts say the Ghibellines defeat of the Guelphs caused them to take the _alleged_ bucket after Modena captured the Bolognese castle of Monteveglio, the rumor has never been substantiated after literally almost 700 years (the conflict began and ended in 1325).
@Schmidty15 жыл бұрын
Yes Transnistria is an independent country to this day but it is only recognized by Russia.
@nickvance74535 жыл бұрын
and a hell of a lot better place than that shithole of corruption called moldova
@RandomPL695 жыл бұрын
Welp Taiwan too its independent but only recognize as a part of China
@AikerAdvend5 жыл бұрын
@@nickvance7453 how so when they're equally terrible?
@TannerWeinberg5 жыл бұрын
@@RandomPL69 As far as I know most countries in the west view Taiwan as a recognized separate country.
@Walterwhiteskull5 жыл бұрын
Of course it is
@issackaiser5 жыл бұрын
14:00 His shocked reaction when the Swiss vs Swiss war came up drove me laughing to tear 🤣
@schwebor5 жыл бұрын
Me too. Im swiss and i wouldnt have expected to hear about the sonderbundskrieg in this video. 😅
@VictorSilva-qf2tu5 жыл бұрын
That last war you saw was the triple alliance war. If you wish to make a reaction video about it, I recommend you "battle of tuiuti" from kings and generals.
@Alex53Ace5 жыл бұрын
That'd be great because this video was really misleading.
@William_Bill_Overbeck5 жыл бұрын
O paraguai começo a guerra por causa do Uruguai se não me engano
@Nathalia_Martins4 жыл бұрын
They also forgot to mention that it wasn’t 90% of ALL population, but really the MALE population. Children and women didn’t fight the war, if I’m not mistaken.
@pensadorpensante13504 жыл бұрын
@@Nathalia_Martins Children and women fight in a battle when the dictator send them as a last resource while escaping, btw, sorry for bad english.
@leh0rla5 жыл бұрын
Not a war but the "friendly fight" over Hans Island between Canada and Denmark is pretty funny to look at. You have a great channel!
@ne51524 жыл бұрын
One of the few people who react to things and actually has new stuff to add and lets us learn from it. You rock!
@MrRuffleNeck5 жыл бұрын
I'm Canadian, I have a friend who's father was an rcmp officer deployed to Bosnia as a peacekeeper in the 90s. The pictures he has are very interesting to look at
@bsandey5 жыл бұрын
How about the "Toledo War" between the state of Ohio and (then) territory of Michigan? I have a friend that live in Ohio, and she jokes about it saying that Ohio claims they won that war because Ohio got Toledo, and Michigan claims they won the war because Ohio got Toledo.
@a.grimes42024 ай бұрын
As someone from Michigan, and this is not some state pride thing, our state is correct. Ohio got like 10 miles of land we got the eastern roughly ⅓ of the U.P., which Ohio thought was useless. Gotta be rather embarrassing for little old Toledo to only be known for producing glass when the eastern ⅓ or so of the U.P. (Sault Sainte Marie, for example) is known for producing a little mineral known as copper.
@Korpsman235 жыл бұрын
"I guess you're neutral in foreign wars but not on your own". 😂😂😂
@Galitwo4 жыл бұрын
And even then there were neutral Cantons. :P
@delta49005 жыл бұрын
Bolivia is also landlocked.
@organicsaturn48135 жыл бұрын
It's so weird hearing someone talk about the mountain meadow massacre other than my old history teacher. The Baker-Fancher train departed about 4 miles from my childhood home and I would always pass the historical marker on the way to town, it's such a weird part of history that my extended family was a part of, it's just odd that the Arkansas Ozarks are really linked to anything other than racism or meth.
@spathens82255 жыл бұрын
Incoming Texas memes Also, pls dumbest wars
@wilderwein14805 жыл бұрын
Spathens CRU3L Everyone?
@Raptor0525 жыл бұрын
#1 Football War.
@aggressivelymemeing4 жыл бұрын
The British-Zanzibar rule was not exclusively British Imperialism (though that was obviously part of it). The British did not approve of the new Sultan because he was pro-slavery and wanted to restart the slave trade in Zanzibar, which the British had abolished when they took over in the first place. The puppet the British tried to install was pro-British, but also anti-slavery.
@peacekeeper77785 жыл бұрын
Heya, Mr Terry. In case you haven't been told already, there's a couple vids from Extra Credits that may be up your alley covering the events leading up to World War 1. The series is called 'The Seminal Tragedy.' Oh, and you know how you briefly mentioned what if the bomb was dropped in Korea in Oversimplified's Cold War part 1 video? Alternate History Hub made a vid about that called "What if America Had Nuked China?" Anyway, I'm lovin' the content. It's always nice to get more exposition about certain parts of events.
@crsmith62264 жыл бұрын
the Seminal Tragedy series was the only one that made me tear up
@BrognusBelgen4 жыл бұрын
20:20 I only know about this because of the Teutonic Campaign for the expansion pack for Medieval 2: Total War. Livonian Auxiliaries and Teutonic Knights are great.
@jurgnobs13085 жыл бұрын
as swiss history teacher: the "Sonderbund" was not a country. it was just an alliance of tiny catholic states (switzerland, tiny as it is, is a union of states). but yes, it was the last active military engagement of switzerland. but is it really surprising? the swiss federal state was founded in 1848, that is 33 years AFTER it became neutral (or more strictly, after the helvetic union that later became switzerland became neutral) and small scale armed conflicts are pretty common when new countries are founded
@jurgnobs13085 жыл бұрын
also: whether it was religiously motivated or not is actually very disputed. the catholic cantons happened to be conservative and the protestant ones were liberal. the catholic ones wanted to keep the old order with the swiss pseudo nobility (we didnt have nobles for ages, but we had patrician families which basically comes to the same) while the protesant ones demanded democracy and citizens rights. so you can just as much see it as a conflict between the political sides.
@jurgnobs13085 жыл бұрын
"Sonderbund" means "special union" or "special treaty". and that is what it was. basically, the tiny states that made up todays switzerland had been allied through various contracts since medieval times (some starting in 1291, some joining later). and the Sonderbund was basically a union within that union. imagine you have 20ish states that have been allied for centuries and were thinking about forming a country together, but some of the states dont want that and instead form an alliance within the bigger alliance to try to stop these proceedings. that was the Sonderbund.
@douglasfelipebs5 жыл бұрын
In Brazil, we learn that being landlocked was the biggest reason why Paraguay started the war. They wanted to have Atlantic access by annexing the "Baía de la Plata" (bay of the silver), an area fill of rivers that would make it possible. As a Brazilian, forgive me if I wrote something wrong :)
@lindala26025 жыл бұрын
As a dane, we have not forgotten the crusade against the pegans. That was how we got our flag
@perjulianlundbergtande89565 жыл бұрын
Same! ^Norwegian
@formicidaeinc.80755 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure most people living in the countries where these wars actually took place remember them, but the rest of the world doesn't
@chrisholland73674 жыл бұрын
That's an interesting point because over a thousand years ago you were part of the great heathen army when you invaded England as the Vikings.
@annikamyren30264 жыл бұрын
Same , swedish
@byproductofcheese4 жыл бұрын
Another crusade!!
@lonelyheartproductions52374 жыл бұрын
As an Argentinian, we are taught about the Paraguayan war or The war of the triple alliance. It's the bloodiest conflict we have ever be involved in and one that left you feeling so hollow on the inside for how much blood was spilled
@burmy17745 жыл бұрын
The Paraguay War is a pretty big topic in history classes here in Brazil.
@camilox66664 жыл бұрын
I'm Uruguayan, and "Triple Alianza" war is still one of the biggest shames in the history of my country. First of all, there was lack of motivation on engaging war with Paraguay, we were inducted by Argentina to take a part in the war. Second main reason, it was a country wipe out without rhyme or reason, even when Paraguay's emperor was a potential risk for the rest o south america, their civilians did not have anything to do with that. Invading forces made sure that there weren't men available to fight in the whole country, that's why up to these days Paraguay has an increased rate of women over men. This is just a peak of what that war was, but you can almost call it genocide (Emphasis in almost). Thanks for this interesting video, and sorry for my english
@sterlingodeaghaidh50865 жыл бұрын
just gonna say it here, Try turning your desk around and use the bookshelf full of NES games as a backdrop. Then make the screen a little bit smaller and center it so that your giving your self a bit more room on the screen and the logo, try shrinking it and putting it in the top left or right corner. Might improve your video setup a bit.
@jazzthrowout2655 жыл бұрын
The Swiss Civil War of 1847 cost less than 150 lifes. The General commanding the Federal troops issued an order to all soldiers to spare the soldiers of the other side from unnecessary violence and he planned the campaign in a way, which would end the civil war in the shortest and most unbloody manner possible. So it was a very civil war.
@markusstudeli29973 жыл бұрын
Indeed, General Dufour was a genious in strategy and diplomacy. Mainly thanks to the quick and rather unbloody resolution of the conflict, Switzerland managed to install todays federal democracy in 1848.
@IffeOnline4 жыл бұрын
100 years from now a historian will talk about the great console wars.
@nsaspynetwork31963 жыл бұрын
There's a book that's worth reading
@BZFTech5 жыл бұрын
Bolivia is also land locked. They use have ports until the Saltpeter War in which Chile gave them to option to disband their navy but keep ports or keep their navy and lose their ports. Bolivia, being proud Bolivians picked to keep their navy, thus, they no long have access to the pacific ocean anymore.
@MTTT12345 жыл бұрын
'I think Paraguay is the only landlocked nation in South-America' - Bolivian sobbing in the background.
@unknowndane47545 жыл бұрын
Worst of all, they had a coast, then Chile stole it. They have had offers of remedy in recent history but doesn't seem like a deal was ever reached.
@bagybf19424 жыл бұрын
Swiss here: The "war" was from 3.11.1847 to 28.11.1847 (25 Days). I have other interesting facts: A hero in this civil war (I guess) was Gen. Henri Dufour. The first Swiss General (of two; Switzerland has no General in Peacetimes). He was a remarkable man. On the last battle against Lucerne he said (roughly translated), we shall not only be victorious, but winning with no accusations. What he ment was, that there should no unethical actions to be taken against his fellow countrymen. In his later life he would be one of the founding member of the IKRK (International Committee of the Red Cross). The Result of this war was the Federal Constitution of 1848. 26 Men died on the Sonderbungs side and 60 on the Swiss side. :)
@bishopthefool4 жыл бұрын
The Canadians were part of a UN peacekeeping mission (Blue Berets) in Bosnia, so it was really a UN-Croatia battle.
@BadAssRedneck655 жыл бұрын
You remind me alot of my teacher Mr. England. He did biology and something else I forgot. I see some similarities. I always thought he shouldve had a yt channel like this as well
@lordvader77235 жыл бұрын
Siege_Kilo Was he Irish or Scottish
@BadAssRedneck655 жыл бұрын
@@lordvader7723 he was an American?
@lordvader77235 жыл бұрын
Siege_Kilo I was making a joke based off the fact it would be ironic if he was Irish or Scottish because of the conflict between the 3 countries
@Futureal815 жыл бұрын
You missed bolivia with the whole landlocked comment, besides that, great video as always
@octopii7145 жыл бұрын
Another great video!! Just one thing I'd point out is turn the audio levels up on the video clips just a tad more. Otherwise great as always!!!
@artsysabs5 жыл бұрын
"But, like the Hemsworths" ... savage
@HardRockMark5 жыл бұрын
Paraguay is not the only landlocked country in South America. Bolivia is landlocked as well.
@illiteratethug33055 жыл бұрын
17:58 Bringham Young? Bringham Fucking Young?!! Not even trying to disguise it back then were they lol
@MrGrumblfix5 жыл бұрын
when you hear a history teacher say "never heard of this" you know its really Completely Forgotten :D
@Walesball12145 жыл бұрын
congrats on 130k
@gustavomariz77695 жыл бұрын
At brazil everyone study about the war against paraguay
@yoshiki22905 жыл бұрын
In Brazil *
@JackRabbitSlim5 жыл бұрын
@@yoshiki2290 On Brazil *
@RyanAcidhedzMurphy5 жыл бұрын
@@JackRabbitSlim ON Brazil would be everyone studying while somehow on the country, as in standing on a map of it or something. It is, IN Brazil. You are IN a country, not ON a country. You are IN a country, ON the planet Earth. If you were studying a country, it would be simply be studying the country. You would only say ON, if the sentence were something like "I have a test on Brazil" or "when is that essay on Brazil due?" In that context ON, is used as a substitution for ABOUT. You would only ever say AT Brazil, if Brazil were the name of a specific location people had been. Example: "Everyone was AT Brazil, it's a new South American themed restaurant." When speaking about a country, time and place are usually indicated using verbs like WENT followed by TO, or using IN. "We WENT TO Brazil." "Everyone is IN Brazil for Mardia Gra." "What are you doing for vacation? We're GOING TO Brazil." "Where have you been? Brazil. Why? Because I always wanted to GO TO Brazil!"
@JackRabbitSlim5 жыл бұрын
@@RyanAcidhedzMurphy Dude, I appreciate the linguistics lessons, but it was a joke...not a very good one, but I was just kidding. But I applaud the effort of everything you said and the fact that you typed it all out.
@MultiMariana555 жыл бұрын
Oversimplified regarding 'free and fair elections' with Stalin. *pointing to a map* "Communist, Communist, Communist, Communist, Communist, Communits. If that's not free and fair, I don't know what is"
@jonnyso15 жыл бұрын
I'm not really knowlegeable about the Paraguay war but i'm pretty sure there was more to it than Lopez being a wannabe Napoleon.
@rodrigomejia9535 жыл бұрын
Well, about the Paraguayan war what happened is that Uruguay was undergoing a civil war, Brazil was supporting one of the sides while Paraguay did the same with the other one, however this led to both countries going to war with each other, Solano wanted to cross Argentina to aid his Uruguayan allies, but the Argentine government did not allow it so Paraguay declared open war on Argentina and invaded it, of course Brazil allied Argentina and their supporters ended up winning the Uruguayan civil war, so Uruguay also declared war on Paraguay.
@El_Procer_Artigas5 жыл бұрын
Te mamaste con la explicación
@ls2000765 жыл бұрын
very big brain war
@binaway5 жыл бұрын
The only Reason Bismark didn't annex Austria when he created modern German was Austria's involvement in the Balkans. The war of the triple alliance (Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay) is well known in South America. Bolivia is also landlocked after loss of territory during a war with Chile. Which is why the country still has a Navy, currently restricted to Lake Titicaca, waiting for the return it's coastal territories.
@1dontknowmyname7215 жыл бұрын
25:14 "I think Paraguay is the only landlocked nation in South America" Cries in bolivian.
@LusoOficial5 жыл бұрын
25:20 Bolivia is a landlock country now but in this time yes you are correct.
@chottomatekudasai-kun38874 жыл бұрын
Bolivia is also landlocked after they loose a war against Chile (giving up the only part of the country with south pacific access).
@way2sh0rt07grad4 жыл бұрын
Well dang it I keep getting these videos in my recommended and every one is more intriguing than the last. I would like to add the Toledo War 1835-1836 .Things got so heated between Michigan and Ohio that both governments sent militias to the border. No casualties were taken as the federal government got involved. This is supposedly the beginning of the rivalry between the colleges.
@cherrydragon31205 жыл бұрын
as a dutch person i never knew about this war of scilly XD i laughed so hard knowing we had histories longest yet most peacefull war in human history XD
@alexanderrobins74973 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of how the United States and North Korea are still technically at war.
@GreakFTW10 ай бұрын
21:06 This is still a popular jewerly in Scandinavia today. Called the torshammer, the hammer of Tor in the form of an upside down cross. Most often seen in the form of a necklace. It has kind of gone away from being a religious thing, and become more of a cultural piece. For us on the peninsula it has become more hammer looking. But reading about it, apparently it looks like a cross over on Island.
@moonkiitty3 жыл бұрын
"From avenging a pig to fighting over a bucket" Oh!!! I know those references because of oversimplified and this channel! 😂
@josephgoforth97225 жыл бұрын
the Mountain Meadows Massacre many families from where i grew up in Arkansas were part of. The older generation (born at the turn of the last century) still holds serious dislike of mormons due to that period. One thing to note about that attack, several children survived and were 'adopted' into mormon families and were unknown for some time to still be alive and took years to finally be returned to their families.
@rodneyreinhardt13125 жыл бұрын
And only one person was executed for the Massacre, John. D. Lee. The rest of the leaders were never brought to justice.
@shufflin3215 жыл бұрын
This is lit as f lol im glad I came across your channel! Defintely subbed UwU
@ice_springtrap82255 жыл бұрын
Bolivia is also a landlocked country making Paraguay and Bolivia the only 2 South American landlocked countries
@tacticalbacon85525 жыл бұрын
I love your channel you remind me of my old ap history teacher 😂
@Tulikkox5 жыл бұрын
Northern Crusades not only included the norse religions but also the Suomenusko of Finland and Estonia
@benbanta29135 жыл бұрын
In regards to “when is a nation independent” question an interesting one would of course be Taiwan who China very much says they control even though they don’t have any control of them.
@airglow46845 жыл бұрын
Man looks like a bigger, smarter version of Bobby Hill
@jyshot5 жыл бұрын
Airglow Bro That boy ain’t right
@donnatello39065 жыл бұрын
Bolivia is the only other landlocked nation in south America Mr Terry, you were one off!
@MadTheDJ5 жыл бұрын
Canadian here. Yeah, we knew about our peacekeeping forces being in Croatia at the time, but I'm not sure that "war" was publicized (I may be wrong, I was only 15 or 16 at the time). I knew there were conflicts and some engagements, those got reported, so maybe the entire incident was downplayed. It was also pre-internet days, so it was a bit easier to shift media focus (or outright ban the reporting). I want to look into this more, because outright media censorship isn't something we'd generally condone as a nation. In this case, our forces were there at the behest of the UN, the mission was to keep the peace and then they were attacked. We weren't there to conquer or overthrow a government. And yeah, our military maybe small compared to other nations, but it's modern and very well-trained. Even US military who have served along side our troops will vouch for that, you don't mess with the Canadians. Re: Declaring independence. That's basically what sovereign citizens do and every government ignores them until they break the law. Then hilarity ensues as they try to explain to arresting officers how the nation's laws don't apply to them. Needless to say, they are wrong.
@robertadsett52735 жыл бұрын
MadTheDJ the military just didn’t publicize the full extent of the battles. No forbidding of coverage by the press as far as I know, they just didn’t tell them what they didn’t already know
@Saeiyu3 жыл бұрын
In response to your question about when to declare independence. At least in Latin America we celebrate the date the Spanish signed the independence treaty. Some might celebrate when the colony decided to become independent but at least Mexico and Central America celebrate the signing of the treaty. In my country we also celebrate when the signed documents arrived to the country since the signing was done somewhere else.
@beserkdonkey5 жыл бұрын
*heavy sigh* it had to be Texas
@Crazyasian1234565 жыл бұрын
Could be worse, ot could've been Florida man
@Longshot4415 жыл бұрын
@@Crazyasian123456 if it was florida no doubt it would have been worse.
@HDreamer5 жыл бұрын
This "we were technically at war for 300 years" thing is such a PR Gag to be honest. I know a lot of people see differently, but you don't need a formal peace treaty to end a war. If you haven't fought in 300 years, then you aren't in a state of war anymore.
@aidenbar5115 жыл бұрын
Agreed. If neither side is preparing for conflict or in a state of conflict that should not be counted as wartime.
@musicalnomad84 жыл бұрын
Canada: “I’m so sorry we won.” I guess we really do apologize a lot. 🙃🇨🇦
@callmeowen3 жыл бұрын
24:31 Great name for a TV show
@user-un-known4 жыл бұрын
Never heard about Utah war, but my friend got a gunshot wound in leg from the Moldovan one. I guess it depends on where you're from, whether you remember or even know a war or not.
@ServantofÄzrael5 жыл бұрын
"You dont see a lot of Canadian wars because..." You know he was going to say because Canadians are nice.
@IrishBiteGirl5 жыл бұрын
Because they like to appear nice. Canadians have been and and benefited from MANY wars, especially with the allies.
@acmaiden52364 жыл бұрын
@@IrishBiteGirl Benifited how? Enlighten us!
@felipeneves72604 жыл бұрын
So i'm not a historian, so take everything I say with a grain of salt since most of it is from memory from my high school days, but the Paraguay War wasn't nearly as ridiculous as the video made it out to be. The reason Paraguay declared war on Argentina and Brazil (Uruguay came later if i'm not mistaken) was to control the Delta of the Prata river, one of the biggest trade routes in south america, ensuring Paraguay had access to the sea and furthering Lopez's imperialistic plans. Also the Paraguayans had,at the time, one of the most well trained fighting forces in south america, outnumbering its tree adversary armies tree to one at the onset of the war, since surprisingly enough neither Brazil,Argentina or Uruguay had a developed formal army. Eventualy with the modernization of the Brazilian military and the heavy use of slave soldiers Paraguay was overwhelmed, but they were extremamely sucessful in the begining of the conflict. That being said the whole affair was a massive mistake on Paraguay's part, but the war was without a doubt one of the most pivital moments in South American history
@lucianograff65125 жыл бұрын
I'm from Argentina and did not know about that bizarre conflict, nowhere to be found in school books but hilarious
@kaizermierkrazy68865 жыл бұрын
Typical, most countries try to hide embassring things
@EzequielMinsburg5 жыл бұрын
I'm from Argentina too and we studied this war during the last year of high school.
@jonathanallard21285 жыл бұрын
90% of Paraguay dies in violence and it's hilarious?
@zapato60715 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanallard2128 that's a myth. It's not sure exactly the %. But they had enough men to populate Paraguay. I'm from Argentina and I never heard of it. I hear it only by my mom and later I research this.
@jonathanallard21285 жыл бұрын
@@zapato6071 What %age of population must be dead for you to consider the thing as hilarious?
@nickleister15724 жыл бұрын
8:38 who else knew it wasnt that war after reading the captions on the video
@sr.clumsy78025 жыл бұрын
There are a lot more wars for independence in mexican territory like: 1- "Yucatan War of Independence" 2- "Republic of Rio Grande War of Independence" 3- "1st Sonorian War of Independence" 4- "2nd Sonorian War of Independence" 5- "Tabasquian War of Independence" 6- "Mexican - Costa Rican War" (This is not a war of independence) 7- "Mexico - USCA War" (This is not a war of independence)
@DjKorppi5 жыл бұрын
About combining christian elements to original religions... In Finland you can still find old gravestones that have both the cross and a bird. Bird because in Suomenusko, you have a personal bird that brings you the first third of your soul, "henki", at the moment of your birth and the same bird takes it on the moment of your death and carries it to join the collective "henki" of your family. Even now, some people say "he lost his henki" instead of "he died", but they do not usually know what it means as "henki" can also be translated to "life" or "breath".
@hannesbaumann85095 жыл бұрын
Paraguay the only landlocked nation in South America - The Bolivians certainly wish so.
@lapisleafuli18175 жыл бұрын
*cries in great Pacific war*
@drinks10194 жыл бұрын
Abe Lincoln: “There is only two kinds of people that I hate. People who judge others based on their culture. And the mormons.” Paraphrasing of course
@michaelgardosreid34585 жыл бұрын
Bolívia is land locked, but they do have that Great Lake.
@TyRuS1684 жыл бұрын
I've had the same conversation with teachers long ago about declaring independence. You kinda had there opinion but it lacks a key part. U said until the nation your declaring independence from acknowledges it... they had the thought of the rest of the world or at least other strongish nations accepted it. And I think that is more correct. Because the nation your declaring from would hold out the longest. Of course when they accept it then you are. But I believe it happens before that. If your not paying taxes and they are having trouble collecting with force and other nations treat you as indepent accepting loans and trading, accepting currency definitely.
@IrinaPrietoMaroa14 жыл бұрын
How can the Triple Alliance War be in the first place?
@danielrose75665 жыл бұрын
23:17 I remember bald and bankrupt went there
@WOLVESOFWARGAMING4 жыл бұрын
I think you are officially independent when you have your own government and economy that can sustain your nation.
@fanstalingibs55854 жыл бұрын
*Bolivia cries in lost land*
@Lorem_645 жыл бұрын
A good point about the whole Declaring your Independence thing is looking at the Belgians, It took 9 years for the Dutch to agree to Belgian independence. The Belgians view the moment of Independence to be after the Independence war (1830-31), when we got our first King, July 21, 1831, but the Dutch didn't accept it until 1839 .
@corvus13745 жыл бұрын
The Sherlock Holmes novel "A Study in Scarlet", is about vicious Mormons.
@4Astaroth5 жыл бұрын
Great book. I always thought that the Mormons were portrayed as pretty evil assholes.
@El_Procer_Artigas5 жыл бұрын
The Triple Alliance War (the last one) almost left Paraguay without a male population, even until this day they are still recovering, they were one of the strongest countries of the region in that time. I'm from Uruguay and I think if I remember correctly, that Uruguay was the only one that gave some payback to Paraguay for what happened on the war and at the begining we weren't going to enter the war
@sergioaccioly52194 жыл бұрын
About Russia x Japan: a friend of mine convinced me that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were more Truman putting Stalin on notice on the beginning of the atomic age. Thoughts?
@samuelthomson10045 жыл бұрын
This was my history teacher in the 11th grade.... Mr. Terry, I was the kid that never shut up about politics and then showed back up at your class on B day to bug my girlfriend. Hahah 🤙P.S. I failed out of high school lol but if it makes you feel better, when I got my GED I scored high enough to earn a couple college history credits 😬
@timflatus4 жыл бұрын
Linguistic diversity in the Balkans - Bulgarian is a different language and Albanian is so ancient that you'd hardly guess it was related. Most of the other differences are political and religious. The Croatian conflict was a particularly messy and politically awkward situation. It doesn't get talked about in the UK very much either. The situation is still unresolved.
@cheshireseabra79125 жыл бұрын
Hey, Brazilian fan here! It was strange to see that people outside South America don't know about the Paraguai x Uruguai, Brazil and Argentina war. It's a thing that we study, at least in Brazil - it's the biggest international armed conflict we have on South America history. It was right after the war between Brazil and Uruguay, when the Paraguayan dictator did not appreciate the brazilian invasion on Uruguay territory. They imprisoned the then president of the province of Mato Grosso, and the guy died in prison. Six weeks after, Paraguayan troops tried to invade Brazil. The conflict lasted for about almost six years, and it was bloody. Of course Paraguay was the most affected country, but Argentina and Uruguay also lost about 50% of their troops, and in the end about 40% of Paraguay's territory was divided between Brazil and Argentina. In total, it's estimated that almost half a million people died during this period, including military and a large number of civilians. And just after six years after the war ended that the nations signed peace, too. If I'm not mistaken, was the fourth war in that region in this time period. (Sorry for the broken English, it's obviously not my first language and I find it really hard to write in it)
@starrynight16573 жыл бұрын
I actually did read about that war, which is clearly important to Paraguay but most of the world doesn't know anything about there.
@fcardenas1845 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: the only South American nation to support Paraguay was Colombia, even writing a law in July of 1870 stating that if Paraguay were to disappear as a result of the war any Paraguayan that made to Colombian soil would recieve Colombian nationality. In november 15th 1980, more than a century later, this law was revamped and became a binational agreement that facilitates Colombians and Paraguayans to get the new nationality by simply asking for it. Nobody ever uses the treaty though. Fun fact #2: Paraguay was, for a little while, the first independent republic in the Americas.
@DesolatedChild0185 жыл бұрын
This is a really simplistic view on the Triple Alliance War, while Solano did had his “Napoleon” complex, he didn’t just started a war just to show he could be a conqueror and impress his “celebrity crush” (Napoleon was already long gone by the time, like, wtf). Basically, years after there was a civil war in Uruguay, Solano supported one side from a distance, because in return he was promised access to the sea - yes, Paraguay is a landlocked nation and, as one knows, that’s not a favorable position to be - through free passage by the Plate River, but Brazil intervened in the war, in favor of the other side. He then decided to just get access to the ocean himself, and crossed Argentina to attack Uruguay, in order to gain control of the River Plate Basin, and attacked Brazil as what he saw it was a preemptive strike, since he thought Brazil was going to attack him anyway. While to tackle the biggest 3 nations of South America while you are one of the smallest might sound as a dumb thing, I should remind that it was not a war of conquest over those nations, it was about gain strategic control over the Plate River to get access to the sea; ALSO, in the beginning of the war Paraguay had the largest and best equipped army of the war - Solano did was a fan of Napoleon after all and so invested massively into the militarization of the country - and really didn’t expect the war to gain such scale, he thought the 3 countries would let it slide after a few battles, and again, Paraguay did won the first battles of that war. He didn’t count that specifically Brazil would get so quickly prepared with a massive conscription campaign. In the end, it was only Brazil and Paraguay, with Argentina dropping soon after Lopez was repealed back into his borders, and Uruguay soon after. Brazil however wouldn’t settle for anything but Solano Lopez resignation, and hunted him down into the country. Was Brazilian Emperor Pedro II to hold the blame for causing the massacre of Paraguayan population with his unwieldy obsession? Or was Solano Lopez to blame, for putting his power over his own people and refusing to surrender? That’s a question for discussion. But it’s important to notice that hindsight is 20/20 (oh, look, a New Years Eve reference). Nothing is that simple.
@annieable46495 жыл бұрын
a little late, 21:00 but I´ve been told blacksmiths made the cruifix/mjølnir so they could sell them to people of both religions, also that the god Balder was added much later than the other gods to be a sort of jesus figure.
@kokofan505 жыл бұрын
It wasn’t blacksmiths. Blacksmiths work in iron and steel.
@ArchDuke3584 жыл бұрын
Around 11:18 talking about the Russian invasion of China in ww2, it was just Manchuria they were driven out of, not all of China.
@cvatoslav5 жыл бұрын
I would really love if you react to some video about the history of the Balkans! It is one of the regions with the richest history (and drama) in the world.
@jeffzaun18415 жыл бұрын
I didn't realize the Canadian prime minister had the power to silence reporting on anything, much less on a battle. He can really do that?
@t3k75 жыл бұрын
Yes he can, living in canada since birth one thing ive learned is that in our Canadian Right and Freedoms we have Freedom of Expression, BUT, our Freedom of Expression can be alterd or Supressed, how i do not know (im assuming it has to go through legeslation etc) but yes, it is possible
@schwebor5 жыл бұрын
To be honest, when i read the titel of the video i was like: will the mention the sonderbundskrieg (nr. 5 switzerland vs switzerland)? And i was pretty sure they wouldnt because noone outside switzerland knows about it. First things first, this war wasnt about confessions but about the form of government. It was the radical-liberals against the conservatives (most conservativ governed cantons were catholica and most liberals were protestant, but thats aminor detail). The main point of the war was the question: do we wana be a federal state (liberal oppinion) or do we wana be a confederation of souverain states. And mr Terry: switzerland was home for 2 protestantic reformers, calvin in geneva and Huldrich Zwingli in Zurich. But there is 1 truly outstanding story. The general of the swiss troops, Guillaume henry Dufour (later he was the 1st president of the international red cross, and cofounder of it) made his first move against the city of Fribourg (sonderbund) instead of fighting a huge battle and creating a bloodbath he sourrounded the city and wrote a letter to the government of the city, telling them how many cannons and troops he had stationed arround the city, ordering them to capitulate or to force him into atrocitys. 2 days later fribourg was conquered withoud 1 official fired shot. Thanks to doufur this war endet with about 93 soldiers who died and 510 soldiers the were wounded (source: historisches lexikon der schweiz).
@amandaguenascimento4 жыл бұрын
Weird how Paraguay War is such a huge deal in Brazil but not known at all outside here
@riksnoek60685 жыл бұрын
I think recognition of an independence used to be signed by treatys. The Netherlands were declared independent through Spanish eyes after the treaty of Westphalia after 80 years of war. But the Dutch already had signed the Plakkaat van Verlaetinge (the Dutch declaration of independence) in the 16th century.