A.I. Solves a 100 x 100 Rubik's Cube

Breaking World Records and destroying a massive 100 x 100 Rubik's cube
Check out my previous video explaining how I made the AI: • A.I. Solves a 55 x 55 ...
Also the Source Code is now up on my Github: github.com/Code-Bullet/Rubiks...
Twitter: / code_bullet
Patreon: / codebullet
Discord: / discord

[@unprankable666]

AI: *.000387 seconds* Code bullet: "It's not the best, but..."

[@giselehoang-migge1804]

Me solving my cube at 43 seconds

[@47KK]

Me taking 2 days to solve a 3x3

[@grayson9839]

Me taking 2 years and counting to solve a 3x3.

[@somenbwithabadhistoryteach5872]

@@47KK I, no shit, have not solved a cube that I have had for five years.

[@deleetiusproductions3497]

Me: *takes 69 years* Finally... a .000385-second solve.

[@theinvisiblegentleman1142]

Code bullet: "the AI didn't solve just one cube, it solved 10 thousand in 4 seconds." Me: Stop it! He's already dead!

[@unamed668]

Yes -lmao-

[@century5896]

Hahahaha

[@masonalbers6657]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/oGbEYZ2KmJ6GZ5I

[@griffindors1645]

OMG

[@pinguin472]

@@masonalbers6657 Come on! You just rick rolled me >:(

[@appy8808]

I just want to clarify for non-cubers that it is NOT solving side by side, it is simply forming centre pieces to finalise the edges with (yes those are centres). also the reason he couldn't do 100x100 is because even numbers require parity, which would most likely be much more difficult to code

[@rubikscubed3781]

Imagine the center bars being hell to make, then after all that u have to pair 200+ edges

[@Cubehapinness]

thats why he does 101 and not 100

[@teslacactus1135]

odd numbered cubes have parity too

[@Wither_Strike]

@@teslacactus1135 yes, but I believe it’s a different kind of parity. My understanding is that in a 5*5 you have to worry about edge parity, but in a 4*4 you have to also worry about center parity

[@r4yb0x39]

@@Wither_Strike what the hell is center parity? no its OLL and PLL parity, at least for CFOP

[@CreepySauc]

The AI doesn't look like it's solving it, it looks like it's just printing on it

[@lunima1701]

Yeah

[@AnubhabSandarva]

Be honest you haven't watched dbz and you don't have the reflex of ai so you cant see it. You can't even see your cat slap you in your face.

[@stud6097]

I imagine that Stephen is now drawing power from the speed force and is solving cubes so fast that he reversed time thus making it so he never solves it in the first place.

[@snap2cb777]

true

[@ChunkyHandCream]

Imagined. Not impressed i can do it faster

[@metactal]

@@ChunkyHandCream I can imagine the trolling you must do.

[@ChunkyHandCream]

@@metactal your mother! BAM!!!!!

[@metactal]

@@ChunkyHandCream haha

[@bubthemon8976]

When the cube was mixed it looked like my tv when I threw a shoe at it

[@20021redturle]

😂

[@triplef8021]

Hello

[@triplef8021]

My from is Argentina

[@triplef8021]

And speak inglish

[@PainX3]

@@triplef8021 very bad english, bro)

[@jacketylon]

I can see why you keep the numbers uneven, because then there'll be a middle piece which dictates a side's colour. Even numbered cubes don't have center pieces on each side, making them significantly harder to solve

[@the_undead]

It's entirely possible to make an AI that can deal with even number cubes easily but that is not the AI that Evan made

[@evan3305]

Well its not harder to solve odd nxns are easier to turn and have less parity than any even nxn

[@evan3305]

Even ones are just harder to code with all the parity

[@rahimzanidean8837]

Him: solves a litteral 100×100 also him: yeah guys i think thats all for today

[@Cain_Coal]

The ai solved it

[@mjellsworth8830]

@@Cain_Coal boohoo who cares stay mad cube boy

[@Cain_Coal]

@@mjellsworth8830 who's mad

[@PaperClipping7412]

@@mjellsworth8830 He wasn’t even mad

[@rowan2732]

Plot twist: Stephen was the A.I.

[@ethanbyles7874]

I feel like this dude is using this channel to cover up the fact that he’s a master mind hacker

[@dexterhermans1251]

DONDONDON

[@louistaylor5917]

@Matthew Kang ai has evolved to write comments.

[@Wonder_kid967]

Rowvn killer queen

[@2350CST]

L T it was actually a cover up by the creator of Stephen

[@maksymciosek7728]

100:100 Was still faster than the Windows update.

[@charlesmurray9001]

The truth hurts

[@flarezzramp9749]

Maksym Ciosek lmao

[@netkv]

last year windows start updating now:44%

[@SudoWoofie]

Lol

[@doge_king9255]

101 by 101 btw

[@bb65ismyname73]

Congratulations! You have officially watched a Rubin cube be solved non stop for 9 whole minutes!

[@bird_animations]

Rubin cube? Its Rubik’s lolz

[@mechaminer2361]

@@bird_animations No. Rubin cube.

[@bird_animations]

@@mechaminer2361 Rubik’s * Go search it

[@mechaminer2361]

@@bird_animations ik its called rubiks, it was a joke. All hail Bird, ruiner of fun!

[@bird_animations]

@@mechaminer2361 dude there is like billions of ppl who actually call it robin cube How the heck was i supposed to know u were joking lol

[@jaxtonsimison648]

Unless your a cuber you will have no idea what im talking about I love how it just instintly solves parity

[@checkcommunity4moreinfo]

"idsa" "paridy"

[@retruecano]

@@checkcommunity4moreinfo that is literally me when the

[@Periwinkleaccount]

@@checkcommunity4moreinfo he edited it, but the spelling is still really bad.

[@rabidman3]

@@Periwinkleaccountlol

[@shinnyii]

The AI just takes the stickers off, and puts them back on.

[@visalsngg]

its a stickerless cube, but there is a chance the ai took it apart and back together solved

[@HaveltherockDS]

IPlay Games hi im a person who cant get a joke Gio films idiot voice: bt its a COMOUTER MADE CUBE THERES NO FECKING STICKERS

[@hipyo2372]

Lol

[@sergejradovanovic4271]

Cheater

[@Redd_Y]

Youre just jealous jsut cuz u cant code

[@variamorph5863]

3:38 The cube scrambled up looks like a tv when it breaks and goes all staticky

[@afjgaming1136]

Ikr

[@oxified4863]

Amogus

[@Yuma_Tsukumo]

Tbh there must be black in there

[@Yuma_Tsukumo]

@@oxified4863 Among us*

[@smthig]

It looks like how your foot feels when it falls asleep

[@TheKarishi]

I love the way that as it solves a side, the average "pixels" of the other sides change, becoming more red as green gets pulled out during the first side and so on.

[@jinwang7729]

This just looks like paralyzed dominoes, moving by itself

[@zaidenroces8884]

When unsolved, it looks like a glitched screen of a computer

[@barbecuesquirrel2324]

Maybe your screen is glitched

[@almiskar]

That’s a possibility.

[@abung7423]

i cant even spot white

[@jaguarr314]

it's looks like auction art

[@haiphucnguyen1355]

When it solved it looks like an 1x1

[@Rebecca-yf9ci]

Loved the whole intro roasting steven, you have actual conversations with your audience when you talk, instead of just info dumping at us. I like how you do things.

[@DFAULT-qn3px]

Couldn't agree more, very well put

[@UltraJackGaming]

I really want him to solve a 200X200 rubicks cube

[@user-ku6zw6jf5r]

omg this is the most beautiful thing i’ve ever seen in my life

[@Cooper2723BlackMidi]

the AI is SO fast when it turns the cube that you can’t even see the cube turn

[@tomasstejskal1284]

This video was violently attacking Stephen... and I enjoyed every single second of it

[@melindakubanyi624]

Me too

[@why_2453]

Me to

[@Homeandsomuchmore]

Me to

[@cuberbeychannel3696]

Me too

[@Rcapv223]

Tomáš Stejskal I thought you where Gonna say something good about him

[@bluecranberry9748]

My code: >do scramble >do scramble backwards

[@quarter-lifecrisis5127]

lmao XD

[@henrysanecdotes5323]

Lol but if you have a bunch of other code and do it the right way you could make that work

[@plixyplixy4813]

Big BRAIN

[@lucadris6428]

bruh non cuber

[@thefewer5139]

Big brain

[@V1RTU4L_R3AL1TY_0]

The anticipation when it's about to be solved is crazy

[@Someoneyeeted]

Im actually curious how fast can it solve it on full speed and without rendering

[@cyrill2357]

GG, Stephen.

[@platypuschallenger]

btfo

[@ofirrolev]

checkmate, gg no re

[@user-rz7wy9tj7n]

He watched this video and maybe not comment cuz he is a hater and thinks this is fake he just gonna get called out again because the ai can make 200 by 200

[@karinano1stan]

Yes I am thousandth like

[@pizza867]

Я не могу собрать обычный кубик рубрика а тут кубик рубик 100 х 100

[@Woe_YT]

once the green and blue faces are solved the other sides just look like a pizza.

[@castor9907]

You're right and I hate it

[@poodrofartman2802]

lmao

[@jameswills4793]

Well, imagine it as moldy pizza until you get there. 🤣👌

[@rndmstff1154]

True dat

[@dkschannel2370]

Yo it really looks like a pizza

[@CookieMonster-kn4nz]

AMAGINE how many combinations there are

[@kenjinks5465]

You could show each side of the cube as tho it were unfolded as a compass. Nice vids I luvs them. I need more.

[@electronicsandroboticsclub750]

When your rubik's cube has more pixels than minecraft's blocks

[@Cynadite]

If it was a 16x16 it would have the sane amount as a minecraft block

[@thischanneldiedlol2234]

If it’s a 1x1 it’s like Minecraft but with a resource pack

[@yusufdakoolkid]

But 33x33 rubix cube exists in real life

[@Cynadite]

@@yusufdakoolkid no one said it doesnt.

[@nichsa8984]

@@Cynadite 2x speed brain get damaged

[@janemoskalova5041]

alternate title: bullying a guy on the internet + extremely satisfying timelapse edit: oh my god I have started a war in the replies

[@dayhours]

Correction. Not bullying, proving a point.

[@thingytheretxrd]

@@dayhours r/wooosh

[@novaexplosion3273]

@UCn2QaRwsQrxNPXf6aA5QePw Fuck off redditor

[@thingytheretxrd]

@@novaexplosion3273 ok :)

[@thingytheretxrd]

@@novaexplosion3273 r/clownsontheinternet welcome to a subreddit that won't ever exist

[@Ghbh101speedrunning]

9:26 is the slowest 3x3 solve ever

[@Mocade333]

I like the fact that final part of the cube is the same as simple beginner's cube, it's almost poetical

[@rmxkiller3687]

"I've never been in a relationship" I liked just because I felt that

[@jrlopez1027.]

rmx killer it was probably a joke XD

[@rmxkiller3687]

@@jrlopez1027. No way! Thanks captain obvious!

[@sprx5506]

Imagine

[@hexithinkwedidaprettygoodj1187]

Can't relate BIIIIITTTCHCHHCHHHH

[@2350CST]

CinemaSinsSins _ LOOK GUYS! THIS GUY HAS THE SEX! LET’S ASK WHAT THE SEX IS LIKE! HEY SIR! WHAT IS THE SEX LIKE?!

[@dvision4203]

I’m just like the robot. I’m really good at doing the middle, it just takes me a really long time to finish the edges. Oh I’m working on a 3x3

[@hollieisonyt4459]

I can solve any cube with any any scramble, just not with speed *at all*

[@quieresfrijoles7299]

It's the reverse on puzzles with me

[@hexithinkwedidaprettygoodj1187]

I can solve a 3x3 in 45 seconds. That is my average speed. My best was 34 seconds

[@bstlybot]

CinemaSinsSins _ my best is like 1:30 and my average is 2:00 because I barely do anything

[@hexithinkwedidaprettygoodj1187]

@@bstlybot at least you can solve one😂

[@phongdien2442]

solving that entire cube is still 1000x faster then my internet;-;

[@williamhicks8490]

imagine FINALLY being done with the centers and edges and solving like a 3x3 only to the get the parity case at the end

[@foryx_]

the reason he couldn’t do 100 by 100 is because that would mean creating a centre, and making sure that there are no flipped sides, which is way more difficult. odd numbers are easier than even numbers.

[@toasty9747]

It's not much if any more difficult as a puzzle solver. Parity exists in odd numbered cubes (5x5+) as well. It is simply a matter of permuting the individual edge pieces correctly. Non-centric center production could result in a void cube parity, but that is easily detectable and correctable with an alg. However, scaling his odd-numbered solving method to an even-numbered cube would require more consideration, so it's probably that it was just easier not to consider the even layered cases. Even cubes do have physical centers - a 4x4 is just a 5x5 with the middle layer buried in the mechanics. The same goes for all large cubes. All I can think of is if this program refers to the "guaranteed" pieces, aka edges, 1x1 centers, and corners, for orientation. If that is the case, yes an even layered cube would need to be considered specially (though, it's totally doable assuming a fixed hidden center orientation and tracking rotations).

[@mrduckmilitarygaming7694]

Why you guys talk with math my brain hurts plus I hate math

[@veganmeatball5276]

But... its an ai, and it would be more impressive lol

[@jacktoons3105]

@@mrduckmilitarygaming7694 this is an AI there’s c]going to be people talking about how it works with math

[@billsgamingchannel3567]

@@mrduckmilitarygaming7694 it's not math though

[@justaditya6862]

When the cube solved, the rubiks cube looks like the biggest 1×1 ever 😂

[@niellity]

thats because it is a one by one. Only galaxy brain competitors can get even close to scrambling a single side

[@doodft5226]

Yes... just like every other cube

[@Rahulsharma-bh4do]

Yes

[@pomelidutta6520]

Yes😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@peachcobbler641]

Blender default cube be like

[@alexzuma2024.]

if you scramble a 100 x 100 rubik's cube, you get 100 pixels of random noise per face

[@nimetulaps]

the intro gained you a new subscribed

[@night4910]

When that was scrambled.... It looked like the error screen of terror

[@devs15]

BlueMozzarella SmokeBeefYT I have nightmares

[@night4910]

@@devs15 ???

[@RubyPiec]

Error of Terror

[@galaxy-chansgacha7655]

x3

[@elliesfarming7256]

That's the first thing I thought lmao

[@7ofspades7]

3:13 Loaded in 2160p, screenshotted, marked each square in bright yellow on MS Paint. Can confirm, 101 by 101.

[@happyanon]

Should of marked it in green first . One side done.

[@howardzealien2564]

Bo 28111 you are the chosen one, I was told that the chosen one takes hours to prove the memes

[@nicholasleclerc1583]

* 😱 Surprised Pikachu Face 😱 *

[@studentswag9747]

He said it is 101 you fuckin moron

[@dovahnok0957]

@@studentswag9747 r/whoosh

[@user-dn8wy6bj3l]

This is one of the best tutorials

[@Jayantshort20]

Finally bro you got it

[@Altazium]

But can it solve the: Im not a robot captcha? 🤔🤔🤔

[@Shavinderyt]

Falkor asking the real questions here

[@SirKerskii]

U rt

[@dylanb5996]

It can solve it in 46 nanoseconds

[@Crazygenius33]

it can, github.com/dessant/buster github.com/ecthros/uncaptcha2

[@PapiBoiGlyph]

Best question.

[@Spacey75257]

(Stephan will remember that)

[@nclsDesign]

Now I got Until Dawn flashbacks

[@Grant-bx5fv]

R.I.P Telltale

[@fishmr8885]

Fellout fur grate.

[@lightning_11]

Lol!

[@yujihussain1271]

fleeing the complex

[@DarrthFaderr]

Imagine doing one of those sorting sounds with this

[@unknowngamer-zg9dw]

go work code Bullet keep posting awsome content like this

[@unknowngamer-zg9dw]

i ment to type in good not go btw

[@HopelessGambler]

*dont you just LOVE IT when an AI can solve a 100x100 RUBIX Cube faster then you can solve your math homework?*

[@Iron-Jupiter]

Can the ai do my homework

[@edwardlew6547]

Rubik*

[@carlosahdez]

And it’s slowed down

[@sokratisiliadis7183]

I am good at math I solve them in 5 to 10 minutes

[@hanssenferdinand3467]

Ok,this hurt my feeling

[@agentarachnid2009]

Anyone else looking for Stephen's comment on this video?

[@loutreysot7505]

Me

[@voidseer2814]

Me too

[@wilfer4385]

Yes

[@PRGME7]

Agent Arachnid me

[@xgh0st3d88]

Yea

[@Simigema]

That’s faster than me solving a 2x2

[@bakedbeans3739]

Me: this’ll look so cool in the solve! Cube:*T V S T A T I C*

[@winsonxie3179]

Video compression makes this cube look like a 1 by 1. And I can solve a 1 by 1 in exactly 0.0 seconds. Beat that Steven.

[@nicklyford4742]

Bro, he would probably whip out a time of like 0.0000000 which you would see as the same but it is scientifically more accurate and therefore better.

[@bottlekruiser]

@Pyxlup Goheen yeah but how about a -ix-i cube?

[@jeblottes7838]

Stop lying. the 1x1 is impossible. you can't even scramble it how does one even solve it?

[@winsonxie3179]

Larry B we are assuming none tournament rules though. Still good point

[@winsonxie3179]

Jeb Lottes Swoosh? Also yea I guess but this is a joke

[@haloreaper1018]

Its been a while since i saw a youtuber roast someone alive

[@326inminecraft]

Haloreaper 101 but an a press is an a press -TJ “Henry” Yoshi

[@yoshi6236]

@@326inminecraft it cant be a half

[@ggtylerr]

@@yoshi6236 well TJ """""""""""""""""Henry""""""""""""""""" Yoshi,

[@47Times2]

Why do they roast dead people?

[@headedhornet30]

I'm worried.

[@robinlegere816]

Imagine a Conner twist on on it

[@stepehencortez4170]

for some weird reason im entertained by thisXD

[@wcg3928]

Oh my god *the 100×100 cube looks like a colored QR code when scrambled* LOL

[@Blubb5000]

Try scanning it. There might be a hidden message.

[@wcg3928]

@@Blubb5000 ok

[@wcg3928]

It says 110011010010011

[@ridhomblr]

Meh, it looks like tv static

[@shockershooky7729]

It looks like an error chunk to me

[@Kore_YT]

If you listen closely to the music during the 100x100 solve I swear it says "We're rubik's cube solvin'"

[@erm_5557]

I HEAR IT

[@TechSupportDave]

@@erm_5557 i dont even hear it with my high quallity headphones :v

[@helloiamenergyman]

@@erm_5557 I DON'T HEAR IT

[@seajay9606]

I hear it now that you’ve pointed it out

[@iloveg25]

Btw nice music, what artist?

[@zaffirashamoon6844]

'the second big mistake was pissing me off. you mess with the cp' *continues to have a voice crack*

[@thereaper1276]

4:22 it just looks like that old A tv Edit: keep it up my man love your vids

[@niellity]

*”wHy DoNt YoU jUsT tAkE tHe StIcKeRs OfF.”*

[@aqzp.]

ai will crash from a mental burnout

[@jonahnotarianni2511]

Stickerless

[@Enzi_Meteori_902]

@SC - 03LS 864505 Mount Royal PS *rubik's*

[@davidbanan.]

i mean if i do that i just beat it before doing anything

[@scottbaker8556]

That would be removing 60,000 stickers. And putting 60,000 stickers back on.

[@tryagain3975]

Lol love how he just repeatedly roasts Steven.

[@practicallyagenius2016]

Yes

[@privatizitat815]

Stephen deserved it

[@colinboi1210]

What, the fuck?

[@PixelionRules]

LOL

[@jihadalbaghdadi5703]

😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮

[@insertusernamehere8575]

Stephen been real quiet since this dropped

[@AgentV2_]

Now Felix Zemdegs is going to get a world record on 100 x 100 just wait

[@LilTrari]

This looks like my Grandma’s TV when someone touches the antenna

[@sketchercomics6953]

Lol same

[@RaiderBros69]

Omg

[@sussybaka5207]

hhhaahhahahahahahahahaahhahahahahahahaha lolololololololooololollllllllllllooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllll

[@Nightwinger5100]

Looks like code bullet when you try to fix his bent antenna

[@user-eg7dz5ov1w]

cold

[@savitakumar9040]

imagine trying to find the centre pieces of each sides

[@totallynate1408]

lol ikr

[@geemailman3716]

There is a center piece, but you make a bigger one by basically combining all the pieces except for the corners and top layer, then solve like 3x3

[@theactualfetus5025]

there is a center piece because its 101 by 101

[@geemailman3716]

@@theactualfetus5025yes there is but you wouldn't use it to solve I'm pretty sure

[@raunak1147]

The entire 99x99 middle portion is considered a centre piece in this algorithm

[@Peteb804]

And here I was feeling good about just solving the white side of a 3 by 3

[@lemonbus.aep10]

“I just peel off the stickers.”

[@carter6319]

I feel like the ai struggles more with keeping the rendering up than it does with solving it

[@victoriaptak3958]

so true

[@Average_Everyday_Guy]

To think the ai could probably go faster

[@zachshows2597]

Actually Opposite

[@user-cr1bs4lm9j]

what if the ai does the atlasminx aka the minx of madness

[@RefoProduction]

@@zachshows2597, actually not, for example, it solved the 3*3*3 in fractions of a second, and in the first vid cb showed that the rendering of a 100*100*100 is very slow

[@CyberWolf89]

Plot twist: The AI created an AI to solve it for him.

[@henrygal9627]

Chess bot that can beat best chess player makes bot that can beat himself

[@DanielLimJJ]

He used the AI to destroy the AI!

[@privateeditz_]

Plot twist: that ai that the ai created ANOTHER ai to beat the Rubik’s cube. The sequel plot twist: then the newest ai created another as that other ai made two more and both of the other ais worked together to make a smarter ai and that ai made a human out of holograms.

[@rudrabeniwal8924]

😂😂

[@mha-_-lover6510]

What if that AI made ANOTHER AI to solve it for them

[@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer]

Solving the green face first? Even monsters have fear of that

[@KyleHottel]

I know it's not the point of the channel, but I really enjoy all of the musical bangers in all your videos

[@bearitbbh]

3:50 *When you're downloading a game and the progress bar finally moves*

[@greatmali6113]

that's firefox

[@garconvoute3024]

Thats fo76

[@devenlakso7079]

69 likes lol

[@doggobound3707]

4:26 WHY IS THERE GREEN I THOUGHT IT WAS SOLVED

[@bruhmomentum1524]

@@doggobound3707 those are the edge pieces, we have two types of pieces, center and edge pieces

[@phantomderp834]

Do AI plays space invaders next

[@matthewplizga1920]

Yes

[@Tboyansell0908]

Hell yes

[@viabea7472]

Yeah more arcade games

[@foxwhite25]

HELL YA

[@PigL0rd]

this needs to happen!!!!

[@colemanjf1]

the a i peels off the stickers and puts them back on LOL 🤣

[@yowen2327]

We need a mega minx solving ai

[@_froggyman]

Probably Stephen when seeing his comment on screen: *Why do I hear boss music?*

[@spamatron6471]

I want to like but I can’t cause it’s at 69 so just know I think this comment is pure gold

[@mystifoxtech]

Hmm

[@nichsa8984]

@@mystifoxtech need a 1000 x 1000 solve

[@Wyti]

Who is Stephen?

[@BiassedYT]

Now we got to see which one is faster: Evan when he hears an ice-cream truck, or an A.I.

[@ZombossLordOfDoom]

It's actually estimated that when an ice cream truck passes by Evan's house he travels at 3.456E122 times the speed of light, arriving in approximately 1.47127E-127 milliseconds after travelling 50 feet from his couch to the truck.

[@wolx7981]

evan is somehow faster than the ai, and usain bolt, breaking UB"s record by 471 mph.

[@4Bakers]

AI when it hears an ice cream truck

[@Daaning.]

Or when your mom gets food

[@DakotaSsssssims]

@@4Bakers that is 1 plank time to get there

[@kapi394]

I can almost put big cubes together because of this video 😊

[@poopydiaper5288]

I remember someone made a video like this saying they as a human could solve this, although they weren’t using any normal method except for undoing the scramble

[@joannabush2772]

Code bullet: Beats Stephen Stephen: Deletes channel, deletes email and deletes any trace on the internet

[@stephensmith5945]

False. But he did get my ass

[@zane1623]

@@stephensmith5945 well hello there mr stephen. pls make another comment so he can make another video-

[@stephensmith5945]

Zen-ju no thanks

[@zane1623]

@@stephensmith5945 ;-;

[@Zanbatoss]

@@stephensmith5945 stephen smith, give me a sign

[@craighalpin1917]

It would be cool if you were to include a move counter.

[@pasilaitonen7254]

Y e s

[@KattoCattoKf]

Y E S

[@therobuxman]

There were 91664028 moves.

[@moodlethenoodle]

@@therobuxman No I counted there were 13,776,855,290 moves.

[@therobuxman]

@@moodlethenoodle Certainly incorrect. I even counted 69 times to make sure i wasn't wrong.

[@thatrandomkid8950]

Teacher: The test isn’t that hard The test: solve this 100 x 100

[@animator12376]

Beautiful

[@rockyreyes9320]

Make an AI that can beat getting over it by Bennett foddy

[@marvinfung2050]

Rocky Reyes I recommend you search up getting over it tasbot

[@snow8624]

@@marvinfung2050 thank you for telling me this is a thing. Time to go watch this. Edit: 1 minute later, I'm back. That was cool

[@RWhite_]

@@marvinfung2050 Not quite the same thing since TASBOT is not an AI.

[@scyllasemusic2254]

I’m sure CB won’t try to replicate every single detail in getting over it

[@marlilizard6682]

Ok! Code Bullet, go spend the next 3 years in 2D box like you did last time!

[@balegdah33]

“Solve like a 3x3” *except it’s a 101x101x101*

[@Delzaleon]

Skele Bone it’s 101x101x101 or it would be 2D

[@arsenic1987]

@@apoiadordelobos7887 Think it's because you kinda need another algorithm for solving even numbered cubes, as their faces are movable in relation to each other (you can't change the center of a odd numbered cubes faces relative to one another). And the faces needs to be correctly ordered, otherwise the corners won't fit.

[@khytron06]

@@Delzaleon Omg 🤣

[@arsenic1987]

@@mateohassan3460 you know this A.I. IS based on algorithms, and not machine learning? :P It's going through the same algorithms humans solve it. Solve centers, then sides, then as 3x3x3. The even numbered cubes requires one additional "understanding" added to the AI. Like CB said in the last video where he created this A.I; It's built on the mentioned "algorithms" or "steps" if you will. Edit: just took a look at the source for fun :) And yes, this A.I. cannot solve an even numbered cube.

[@shir9918]

@@mateohassan3460 he shutted ya mouth bro

[@walidraws4469]

I will be scard for life after seeing the scrambled 100x100

[@certifiedchillkill]

Stephen Smith watching this in despair:

[@pepperthedemon884]

My boy sonic, *me when I hear an ice cream truck,* And a computer.

[@chubsdubs8395]

DragonFireGaming ur profile pic us what my face was like when i heard him say that

[@bilbop4962]

@@chubsdubs8395 r/youngpeopleyoutube

[@ddwz950]

You will never know why this comment have so many likes 🤣

[@omit4727]

I can do 2x2 in 10 minutes That means that i am 4 times smarter than you 😉

[@riemamn3149]

@@omit4727 I can solve a 3x3 in 2 minutes. Doesn't mean anything.

[@omit4727]

@@riemamn3149 that means you are smarter than me

[@riemamn3149]

@@omit4727 No, it doesn't. Rubik cube makes a person look smart, but it doesn't make him smart. That doesn't mean I am smart, but that I persisted on learning it and perfecting it. Magnus carlsen said he is not a genius, but he just practices a lot. Richard Feynman was not a genius either. Same thing goes for you and me (and mainly everyone) .

[@omit4727]

@@riemamn3149 you have my respect for your humbleness

[@ciprianmustata5733]

i love how theres just 8 corners still.

[@netrapalsingh4532]

I was dead after seeing that 100x100 scrambled 😂😂

[@windinglion3364]

And here I am not even being able to solve a 3x3 Rubik’s cube.

[@sovietsloth5395]

Pathetic... I can’t even solve a 2x2 without help

[@aurasky518]

@@sovietsloth5395 ahah i Can loser

[@sovietsloth5395]

@@aurasky518 ok

[@waldendoom3783]

@@sovietsloth5395 1 can’t solve a 1x1

[@SuperDominicS]

I can't solve a -1x-1

[@amber8284]

100x100 scrambles looks like the back of a bus seat

[@finndahuman57]

Your wrong its a 101x101

[@ashtonkisch9647]

What kind of bus are you riding

[@stellariaonline6743]

the vicious attack on the city of auspicious utopia yo who hurt you

[@kylestokes1074]

It looks like fruit pebbles

[@manuelvanturnhout5664]

It does

[@tan.kai.000]

Who agrees with me?- The 101x101 looks like a giant 1x1

[@Diplomat440]

3D Defragmenter. I love it

[@lawfulpotato]

Code Bullet: Omae wa mou shindeiru Stephen: *NANI*

[@Vivi-yw1eu]

@@witchofengineering first time seeing a meme?

[@NicoNikoNick]

@@witchofengineering How is simply speaking Japanese considered "being a weeb" now? If that's so, then I'm definitely a mega weeb because I've been learning for over a year now and know a lot more than this little joke meme.

[@JorgetePanete]

NANI?*

[@walletherobot4424]

*earrape*

[@shoda9939]

Idk what’s it’s translate but when I translated it it said I AM DED (how is this a meme?🧐(in my country it’s just sound funny(my friend said it ALL the time(sorry for making this long))))

[@anythingatall1471]

I love how at the very very end when the bottom part of the cube is being spun, the AI decided to spin the cube right 3 times instead just left once.

[@-Fluffy-]

I'm the 69th like ..nice

[@The_True_Mx_Pink]

As per tradition.

[@paulolsen2197]

Smart

[@yairsense]

Beginner mistake he will understand once he watches a J perm tutorial

[@alanpedro1448]

@@-Fluffy- impressive

[@malikahashami]

Solving the white side is just like cleaning the dust out of it

[@HXC_Riftyz]

Scrambling this cube is hard enough, I don’t think I want to solve it

[@jyln20]

LMAOOOO😂