A Redesigned Nightmare - 1 Undershaft

  Рет қаралды 1,960

Jack Perkins

Jack Perkins

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 25
@Willy_Wizz
@Willy_Wizz 10 ай бұрын
I completely agree jack. Its ridiculous that a building this significant looks this boring especially with a name such as wonder shaft. I much preferred the older design. There is also an even older design that makes it look like an extension to the cheese grater probably my preference.
@adamknight7041
@adamknight7041 10 ай бұрын
Should have kept the old design with the additional floor and height increase although would it be too much to ask to say make a tower officially taller then The Shard even if not by a huge amount say like 320m - 1050Ft with a more architecturally attractive design?
@Oddworld2024
@Oddworld2024 4 ай бұрын
Tall buildings should stand out like trophies. To show how far your cities have come. And where you’re hoping to lead. A representation of what it stands for.
@Oddworld2024
@Oddworld2024 4 ай бұрын
And respecting its history with blends of modern and detailed past.
@Oddworld2024
@Oddworld2024 4 ай бұрын
No one respects these developers who make these bland boring boxes or rectangular buildings. Cheaper ain’t ever better. Quality is what makes the name for a company not how many it sells. Right?
@Oddworld2024
@Oddworld2024 4 ай бұрын
When names on the line. How can one settle for $ over dignity and pride.
@Oddworld2024
@Oddworld2024 4 ай бұрын
B7 here we are. No conscience in “some” of them types.
@WILFREDRUSSELL-h8n
@WILFREDRUSSELL-h8n 4 ай бұрын
There’s a certain irony in a robot whinging about soulless corporate architecture. AI rules, OK?
@benwherlock9869
@benwherlock9869 4 ай бұрын
Something like New York's 432 Park Avenue would look amazing in that position.
@westy6214
@westy6214 8 ай бұрын
Lmao what a ghastly redesign. Really concerning nobody notices this monstrosity enough
@michaeldowson6988
@michaeldowson6988 Жыл бұрын
The corporation paying for it make the final design calls.
@benwherlock9869
@benwherlock9869 2 ай бұрын
At least from a distance you don't notice most of it. 😂
@neilgennery2871
@neilgennery2871 5 ай бұрын
London needs to go tall. It's the 21st century 😊😊
@archiemcerlean6688
@archiemcerlean6688 Ай бұрын
rahhhhhhhhh🇺🇸🦅
@FoxOnFilm2209
@FoxOnFilm2209 9 ай бұрын
I think it would be better if you made the video with ether your real voice or a better ai voice And yeah the new undershaft design looks like a 70s brutalist tower block
@Oddworld2024
@Oddworld2024 4 ай бұрын
Ya I like square boxes that have nice shape. But in amongst other shiny buildi g it won’t stand out the way it’s meant. Making it look cold with other cold buildings. But agree. Shape is as important as function. But going cheap for the sake of money isn’t an excuse. All larger Buildings that will be seen from most areas should always have some class to them. Artist expression that represents the current times And the history of who the people are a new age style that all can come to compromise on. We all have to look at them. But more over, the people living there or where ever they are built should have the final say of approval not some council.
@Jack_Perkins
@Jack_Perkins 9 күн бұрын
As much as I agree with your first point, I must add that the "NIMBY" attitude that some city residents have towards large scale urban developments such as this one are only going to cause more issues in terms of economic efficiency in the city and helping to create more jobs etc, than if the largest part of the responsibility for granting planning permissions remained in the power of local authorities.
@swallowspirit
@swallowspirit 6 ай бұрын
This building is pointless and will be a waste of taxpayer money. Also, it will be obstructed by other buildings around it.
@jettser17UK
@jettser17UK 6 ай бұрын
Dislike the revised design! Prefer the original design with its cross bracings. That was the most normal style within the cluster of weird and wacky! This new design is so dull and excessively overpriced for it's height!
@jettser17UK
@jettser17UK 6 ай бұрын
@@Jack_Perkins Exactly!
@WILFREDRUSSELL-h8n
@WILFREDRUSSELL-h8n 5 ай бұрын
Oh, the irony of a soulless AI voice mispronouncing its words while slagging off a City high rise 😂 The City is already a corporate jungle, so this proposed emblem of London’s financial superpower status won’t do any harm. The previous cross-brace design is just a cheap, unimaginative knock-off of Norman Foster’s inside-out concept structures, like the HSBC building in Hong Kong
@Jack_Perkins
@Jack_Perkins 9 күн бұрын
Firstly, I would like to apologize for waiting 4 months to reply to your comment. FYI, I only used a voice synthesizer in this video as I was recording late at night and didn't want to disturb the people around me, though I am sorry if some words were mispronounced in the video. secondly, although I very much appreciate the amount of new office space that this building will contribute to London's key financial hub, I still do believe that it could be done in a way which doesn't feel as sloppy and dare I say, rushed in the way that this newly proposed design appears to be. Nevertheless, it is still greatly needed so I am still very pleased to see projects like this happening.
Why No One Wants This London Skyscraper
14:44
The B1M
Рет қаралды 584 М.
How Upside-Down Models Revolutionized Architecture
14:45
Stewart Hicks
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
VIP ACCESS
00:47
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Tuna 🍣 ​⁠@patrickzeinali ​⁠@ChefRush
00:48
albert_cancook
Рет қаралды 104 МЛН
Video Game Cities Are Weird
22:49
Razbuten
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Moore's Law is Dead - Welcome to Light Speed Computers
20:27
Что случилось с GoPro?
15:27
Nebula
Рет қаралды 259 М.
Why We Should Build With STONE (Again)
16:08
The Aesthetic City
Рет қаралды 536 М.
We Asked AI to Design the City of the Future
8:14
BRIGHT SIDE
Рет қаралды 65 М.
Why Skyscrapers Are Losing Their Tops
13:57
Stewart Hicks
Рет қаралды 697 М.
Monaco's $2BN Expansion into the Sea
16:40
MegaBuilds
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
VIP ACCESS
00:47
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН