A. Shaikh Lecture 1/5: Foundations of Classical Keynesian Political Economy

[@souritdey9450]

This is just brilliant! Thank you UMass Econ department for uploading this for wider dissemination.

[@RushuFriends]

Thank god some new content

[@ekta9197]

May I ask the name of the book he mentioned?

[@01Tanthallas]

Kashif Khan Capitalism: competition, conflict, and crises

[@ekta9197]

Steve Marangos thnk u so much :)

[@orkeer]

Is he a post-keynesian? I have read a few papers by him, but I'm not sure where to put him, in what school of thought..

[@tibiasucks1]

I believe he considers himself a classical political economst (School of Smith, Ricardo and Marx). He criticises post-keynesians a lot, and argues that his concept of real competition to be the proper foundation to Keynes' ideas.

[@wiegraf9009]

He is a Sraffian and Marxist. Definitely not a Post-Keynesian.

[@01Tanthallas]

Classical political economist.

[@ben-dr3wf]

Shaikh's classification of Post Keynesians as dealing with imperfect competition, thereby subscribing to the category of 'perfect and imperfect' competitions advanced by neo-classical theories, is not not convincing. Keynes himsell does not make his theory based on perfect or imperfect competition.

[@nickolasrobert7340]

Classical/Neo-ricardian with a little bit of Marxism.

[@ben-dr3wf]

Shaikh's classification of Post Keynesians as dealing with imperfect competition, thereby subscribing to the category of 'perfect and imperfect' competitions advanced by neo-classical theories, is not not convincing. Keynes himself does not make his theory based on perfect or imperfect competition.

[@skeley1546]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iZmsmGBpg7eEoJYm45s

[@nickolasrobert7340]

Post Keynesian theory is not "pure Keynes"