Noooo, it just needed the one liner func syntax with '=>' at the second line to be perfect 😢
@MilanJovanovicTech14 күн бұрын
Oh well...
@norlyssuarezvalderrama533015 күн бұрын
Great 👍
@MilanJovanovicTech14 күн бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@YehorBachurinDev15 күн бұрын
👍
@MilanJovanovicTech15 күн бұрын
👍
@mfsbo12 күн бұрын
Readability of code that human writes is far more important to converting it for machines. Thanks for sharing what is offered but its like spreading the butter with your folk lifter is not needed but can be done.
@MilanJovanovicTech11 күн бұрын
"spreading the butter with your folk lifter" 😂
@Claucker714 күн бұрын
not readable
@MilanJovanovicTech14 күн бұрын
Ok
@vijayarajan-bt5fk14 күн бұрын
Why _F only for f finally??
@MilanJovanovicTech14 күн бұрын
It's how you write the default case
@rikudouensof15 күн бұрын
I would not advice this. Codes should be readable for the future people
@JollyGiant1915 күн бұрын
But this is readable
@rikudouensof15 күн бұрын
@@JollyGiant19 my take is that code should be in a way that junior devs or intern devs can understand
@ryan-heath15 күн бұрын
Future people would thank you when you don’t use (then) outdated constructs. 😉
@WDGKuurama15 күн бұрын
Not using new syntax while lew devs will most likely use them because you think it wouldn't be readable sounds very wrong. Especially with such a simple and common pattern. It just looks that way on a lot of other languages, especially more on functional programming ones.
@rikudouensof15 күн бұрын
@@WDGKuurama it alswys starts with the simple patterns untill someone cooks technical dept