A viral "IQ" test| only a few persons could solve this|

It was claimed that only 1 out of 1000 could solve this. Which is the correct solution; 96 or 40? . #maths #mathiqtricks #mathcompetition #mathwonders

[@SAHIL_HUSSAIN_LUCK_7]

Taking the first no. as x and the second no. as y and the value of both as z so the equation that will satisfy all of the equation will be x(y+1) = z so for 8+11 it will be 8(11+1) = z, 8×12 will be 96

[@tuberroot1112]

But that is not what + means. If there were just three columns and you had to find an arbitrary way to combine them , that would work. But the puzzle specifies addition, not a random algebraic formula.

[@SAHIL_HUSSAIN_LUCK_7]

​@@tuberroot1112 i see it as just a puzzle not something that completely satisfies all mathematical rules also it does not have any rule like we can't use this pattern or any other way to get results

[@tuberroot1112]

@@SAHIL_HUSSAIN_LUCK_7 My criticism is the question not your answer. If it is not addition why is the plus sign there. If you have to create some random shit and insert before the = sign, you should be told that. It is NOT equal. This is not maths, it's BS.

[@devonwilson5776]

Greetings. The answer is absolutely 96. 8×11=88+8=96.

[@lawrencejelsma8118]

If you want to know more from practicing series in Calculus coursework is to see that it is easily a Gauss' Law sum total of the two columns of numbers and a constant difference relationship: Gauss' Law is the summation of numbers 1 to n equalling (n)(n+1)/2 for any summations of integer numbers. The Gauss's Law relationship of column 2 of numbers and adding Gauss' Law of column 1 - a special constant summation, line by line: The line by line results are subtracting the constant Gaussian Sum 1 to 3 or equalling 6) that won't change in each equation formula. The formula sum starts with: GaussS(4) + (GaussS(1) - 6) 10 + (1 - 6) = 5 Next line: GaussS(5) + (GaussS(2) - 6) 15 + (3 - 6) = 12 Next line: GaussS(6) + (GausS(3) - 6) 21 + (6 - 6) = 21 Shows the Gauss' additions of a Gauss' Sum to another three less Sum subtracting a constant Gauss' Sum of 3 that is 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. So now we can determine by Gaussian Sums formula calculations by the same rules for the line 8 and 11 is: GaussS(11) + (GaussS(8) - 6) with: GaussS(11) is (11)(12)/2 or 66 GaussS(8) is (8)(9)/2 or 36 Is 66 + (36 - 6) or 96 consistent with everybody's answers! 😊👍

[@lawrencejelsma8118]

NOTE: The additional Gauss' Law was a formula based off your second solution! From your first solution line by line you figured out the series Calculus formula as a better formula than one using the more advanced Gauss' Law additions. n(n + 3) + n or n^2 + 4n is a far better formula than cluttering with sums and sums a Gaussian solution presents.

[@dumitrudraghia5289]

a(k)=notation=k&(k+3) =def=kx(k+4), k=1, 2, 3, ... . a(8)=8&11 =8x(8+4) =8x12 =96. D. D. Drăghia

[@umarbashir1236]

Hello Madam! Please bring detailed vedios based on a particular topic and consequently proceed to another topic in an order. Thank you, for your awesome lectures.

[@JJONLINEMATHSCLASSchannel]

Sure I will but it's going to be based on subscription

[@tontonbeber4555]

Without reading the 2 proposals, I found 96 in about one and a half second. (It's ab+a or a(b+1) : 1x4+1=5, 2x5+2=12, ... 8x11+8=96) I don't know if there are other more complex possibilities, using polynomial regression, but 40 is certainly not a solution.

[@albireo9]

Determining the next number pattern OF THE GIVEN NUMBERS is not math. If additional goofy equations can be pulled from thin air, state that in the instructions. 1+4=5 2+5=12 wrong sums, so let's find a pattern ... 3+6=21 8+11=40 Pattern: 5+2+5=12 12+3+6=21 21+8+11=40

[@PREGO1966]

4+7 would be 32, 5+8 would be 45, 6+9 would be 60, 7+10 would be 77, ergo 8+11 would be 96. The pattern is easy. Keep adding 1 to each number you are adding and add the next consecutive odd number to the result. If you ask me, more than 1 out of 1000 will see that, contrary to the poster's opinion.

[@michaelavishay8172]

(4+1)X1 (5+1)X2 .......(11+1)X8=96

[@BN-hy1nd]

Ah but you missed out the 4,5,6 and 7. From what you have on the board, that could be a code for someone. If you forget the left-hand side and work with what we have on the right there is a simple sequence of 7, 9, 11 using subtraction'. One could argue that the LHS is irrelevant. Having said that, you are a brilliant teacher of Maths.

[@bennygaweseb]

8×12 =96

[@olebluemoon958]

Just add 1 to the second number in the sum the multiply. I.E. 2 +5 becomes 2 x (5+1), 2 x 6 = 12 and so on.

[@JJONLINEMATHSCLASSchannel]

Wow! 🤝🤝🤝

[@dumitrudraghia5289]

8x11+8=96 or 8x(8+4)=96. a(k)=kx(k+3)+k or a(k)=k(k+4), k=1, 2, 3, ....

[@mdzamiruddin9560]

Excellent Mam

[@israteeg752]

96 going once, twice, sold.

[@ccook3659]

40

[@nasrullahhusnan2289]

11×8+8=96

[@hikmahandi719]

8 x 11 + 8 = 96

[@youngdkout]

Good day my darling teacher

[@manuelquitevis6794]

8 + 11 = 92 ( following the pattern of the examples is 8 x11 = 88 + 4 = 92)

[@JJONLINEMATHSCLASSchannel]

I think you made a mistake. Check

[@user-ce8ey1gj9m]

21+8+11=40

[@robertomacchioni3877]

52 44+8

[@gunasekarandakshinamoorthy2924]

And 40 is it correct

[@shairali2962]

It is 40 dear ...

[@johnbrennan3372]

4+7by4=32. 5+8by5=45. 6+9by6=60. 7+10 by7=77. 8+11by8=96

[@berndkru]

If 2+5=12 then every result for 8 + 11 is possible. Proof: 2+5=12 -> 7=12 -> 0=5 -> 0=1. For all integers a,b is a-b = a*1-b*1=a*0-b*0=0 -> a=b. So all integers are equal, all integers are equal to 0.

[@dumitrudraghia5289]

1&4=5, 2&5=12, 3&6=21 etc. & NOT +

[@user-uz3vq1kd5x]

11x8=88+8=96

[@Extratremendouszeus]

96 for 8x11

[@sohailanjum2094]

96

[@Eastatoeeboy]

94

[@SolomonYimam-x2n]

40 sir

[@leondupreez1123]

🎉96 8x11=88 plus 8= 96

[@PaidHypeMan17]

1+4=(5) Add 5 to next problem 2+5=7+(5)=12; Add 12 to the next problem 3+6=9+(12)=21 Now add 21 to the next problem 4+7=11+(21)=32 Add 32 to the next problem 5+8=13+(32)=45 Add 45 to the next problem 6+9=15+(45)=60 Add 60 to the next problem 7+10=17+(60)=77 Add 77 to the next problem 8+11=19+(77)=96 96 is the answer.

[@dumitrudraghia5289]

ERROR!

[@mohamadabukela1837]

96 is the answer

[@jemonobalacia3775]

11*8+8=96

[@michaelwelession6924]

The answer is 96. Answer gotten within 2 seconds.

[@JJONLINEMATHSCLASSchannel]

👏👏👏

[@CAustin582]

a*b+a

[@tuberroot1112]

Vignette says "90% can't solve this". Description says "only 1 out of 1000 could solve this." IQ test ? I doubt it.

[@girmawedajeneh9939]

40

[@user-uz3vq1kd5x]

Ninety six

[@user-iq3iu3ii4d]

The answer is 96

[@user-uh2ri2lt8s]

7+10=77 8+11=77+19=96

[@minhhainguyen2671]

❤❤❤❤❤.

[@JJONLINEMATHSCLASSchannel]

❤️

[@tunguyenthi1097]

1+4=5 2+5=5 +7=12 3+6=12 +9 =21 4 +7.=21 +11=32 5+8=32+13=45 6+9=45+15=60 7+10=60+17=77 8+11=77+19=96 Đáp án 8+11=96

[@nicatare2257]

8+11=19 19+21=40 40

[@tontonbeber4555]

This does not work because the 4 lines are not in direct progression ...we only have 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 8th lines of the series, missing 4 lines Using your approach, we should then write 1+4 = 5 2+5 = 7+5 = 12 3+6 = 9+12 = 21 4+7 = 11+21 = 32 5+8 = 13+32 = 45 6+9 = 15+45 = 60 7+10 = 17+60 = 77 8+11 = 19+77 = 96 So 96 if the only valid solution. And there is much more simple (without necessity of recurrence) : 1+4 = 1+1*4 = 5 2+5 = 2+2*5 = 12 3+6 = 3+3*6 = 21 4+7 = 4+4*7 = 32 5+8 = 5+5*8 = 45 6+9 = 6+6*9 = 60 7+10 = 7+7*10 = 77 8+11 = 8+8*11 = 96

[@christianwossogo5526]

4x1 +1 :5 2x5+ 2: 12 3x6+ 3: 18 8x11+ 8: 96 Too easy 😂😂😂😂 Found the solution in less than 5 minutes

[@JJONLINEMATHSCLASSchannel]

🤝🤝🤝

[@PaidHypeMan17]

Nice!!!!!

[@dumitrudraghia5289]

: equal = ?

[@bellowaziri2322]

3×6+3=21 not 18

[@christianwossogo5526]

@@bellowaziri2322 yes Indeed but you know what I meant👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿😂😂😂

[@chrishabgood8900]

So just put numbers in to fit., wtf

[@sagara31122006]

52

[@tuberroot1112]

6

[@enriqueiii9209]

The problem is not asking to add 4 + 7 ... only numbers that you see. so the answer is 40

[@ritapong-gy4dz]

8 + 11 = 96. 8 × 11 + 8 = 96.

[@JJONLINEMATHSCLASSchannel]

👏👏👏

[@user-dq3uh6ee5w]

96.

[@tuberroot1112]

12

[@user-dq3uh6ee5w]

@@tuberroot1112 Why 12?

[@yorobihans4063]

The result is 40 We do 21+11=32+8=40

[@mithleshazad4653]

Answer is 40

[@tuberroot1112]

No, the answer is 42.

[@tuberroot1112]

So JJ fails the IQ test. All these silly schemes redefine what + means so are invalid. The answer is 201. That is NOT two hundred and one, it is 19 in base 3. The first line answer is in base 6 , the second is in base 5, 3rd line in base4, so the last line answer is to be written in base 3. No need to pretend there 7 other steps in your sequence you forgot to tell us about.

[@MikeBTek]

Great answer, not bad, but the first three equations do establish a recognizable pattern. Next lines would have been base10(4+7) = base3(102), base10(5+8)=base2(1101). Unfortunately by the time you get to base10(8,11) you would expect an answer in base negative 1, whatever that means. In additions if they are going to upset a recognizable pattern they could have said the conversions were from base12 rather than base10, that is base12(1+4)=base6(5), base12(2+5)=base5(12), ultimately ending up with base12(8+11)=base3(210). Problem with IQ test questions is that sometimes there is more than one answer because restraints are too loose to provide an unique answer. If you can logically show how you got your answer, they should give you the credit, and in your more observant answer even more credit. Now that we all know the answer(s) can a similar question on another test really measure IQ nature, or is it measuring nurture from exposure?

[@JJONLINEMATHSCLASSchannel]

I don't think so❤️, though a nice approach .

[@Extratremendouszeus]

But darling you are a liar

[@PaidHypeMan17]

??????

[@tuberroot1112]

Agreed, the supposed "right answer" is BS. What is all this random adding in of other stuff? The equality is not an equality at all. A sequence where the forth line is in fact not the forth in the series but the eighth. Just calling this an IQ test does not allow you break all the rules and do random shit.

[@jeankungfu465]

8 x 11 = 88 + 8 = 96 Heel gemakkelijk.

[@user-xz9sl9ny4j]

96

[@a.chsatyam7335]

40

[@ShimelesTeacher]

96

[@ShivShankarSharma-j8w]

96

[@abde8262]

96

[@user-uz3vq1kd5x]

96

[@rajeshvyas934]

96

[@kingB72]

40

[@tinabranch9774]

40

[@esfandiarkiany1363]

40

[@EddieFreitas-m7m]

40

[@leaffyTrees]

40

[@johnnydavis5923]

40

[@stevenbrown9212]

40

[@esfandiarkiany1363]

96

[@gloriasummer2734]

40

[@JJONLINEMATHSCLASSchannel]

No. Watch and see

[@andrewsniimensaamoo253]

40