Finland Post Welfare - with English subtitles

Finland Post Welfare - Suomi hyvinvoinnin jälkeen
1994-2008 were years of continuous economic growth in Finland. This growth was spurred by Nokia's success. However, we were not able to reduce our national debt during this period. Vice versa. 300,000 new jobs will need to be created within 10 years - just to curb the debt rate of the Finnish state.
March 21st, Finland Post Welfare will start a revolution in Finland. Worried about the gloomy future ahead of us, we the students and future architects of Finnish prosperity are taking matters into our own hands and addressing the elephant in the national living room. In fact, if something radical is not done fast, by 2038 we will all be working in the public sector.
To make this future crisis into a nation-wide hot topic, Aalto Entrepreneurship Society and its partners are gathering some of the most admired opinion leaders and iconic businessmen, as well as students, entrepreneurs and politicians, to Finlandia Hall for an evening of straight talk and honest concerns. These themes are especially important now with the upcoming parliamentary elections.
hyvinvoinninjal...

[@tonisaharinen2025]

Katsoin 9 vuotta jäljessä mutta silti erittäin mielenkiintoinen ja relevantti paneelikeskustelu.

[@hannu-oskarihietikko4470]

Wahlroos on yllättävän sympaattinen ja älykäs mies. Äänestäisin häntä presidentiksi

[@TuomoTamminen]

Älykäs ja sympaattinen mies tosiaan, mutta kenen hyväksi hän käyttää lahjojaan?

[@crabby112]

@@TuomoTamminen irrelevantti kysymys...

[@KaitsuMaitsu]

Mielenkiintoisia puheenvuoroja! Keskustelemassa Suomen Toivot. 👍👍

[@Lerppunen]

"Tarvitsemme Talvivaaran kaltaisia menestystarinoita." :D

[@TuomoTamminen]

Juu, tuollainen lause laittaa kaikki puheet sopivaan perspektiiviin.

[@KaitsuMaitsu]

😄😄

[@paha_arkkitehti]

O'boy, that didn't age well..😅

[@Nakkisampyla]

Nokia matkapuhelimet sössittiin täysin. Käsittämätöntä eri mallien kanssa hifistelyä ym.

[@PaveMentman]

Vaikka paneelista onkin vuosi aikaa, voin sanoa "kokeneena aloittelevana/"unelmoivana yrittäjänä todeta juteltujen asioiden pitävän edelleenkin paikkansa. ---------- In English: Even though this panel was held a year ago, I can still say as an "experienced starting"/hoping enterpreneur state that the discussed topics are still valid.

[@johnk.lindgren5940]

God content and translations, but the SUBTITLES are fantastic. Closed captions (CC) and subtitles, subtitles, subtitles. That's the future for global education.

[@mariakatariina8751]

39:47 Eli poistetaan kilpailu rahoittajien väliltä?

[@apexxxx10]

Vuorineuvos = Honorary Councillor. Where's the "mountain"?

[@silakanveli]

Nalle 6 - Muut 1

[@kallejunnila6118]

1:45 miki kuusi?

[@jormanordlin]

Riskienhallinnan näkökulmasta katsottuna yrityksen perustaminen yrittäjälle on suuri riski. Jos muistan prosenttiluvun oikein niin 50% perustetuista yrityksistä epäonnistuu. Ottaisitko noin suurella todennäköisyydellä riskin velkataakasta ja miettisit yrityksen perustamista? Ei tunnu järkevältä.

[@Maraxor]

try pressing the cc-button.

[@mariakatariina8751]

Eihän Suomen Valtio ole edes oikeusvaltio, niin miten ihmeessä voisi syntyä uusia yksityisen sektorin työpaikkojakaan? 😳🙄

[@pekkamh]

Yksi tärkeä poliittinen päätös joka pitäisi tehdä mahdollisimman nopeasti on pakkoruotsin poistaminen. Paitsi että se maksaa miljardeja vuodessa yhteiskunnalle, se syö Suomen kilpailuetua muihin maihin nähden. Suuria maailmankieliä ruotsin tillalle!

[@sininetulnukas]

I think that the panelists, who might consider themselves as liberals, at least from economic point of view, forget/ignore/miss a hard fact that "good" is a subjective term and depends on the person, who conducts the assessment. Business sucess loses its point, if business process prevents a person from achieving other, more important, goals. For example, advancement in technology, science, is only popular among geeks. (Comment continues at part 2)

[@sininetulnukas]

(Part 2 of the comment) Entrepreneurs, who only look at revenue, the "serial entrepreneurs", couldn't care less, because otherwise they would not be able to sell their business, "exit". Examples: the founders of Google and Intel were specialists, who mostly still work in those companies. They did not "exit". Neither did Bill Gates, who was not a "serial entrepreneurs", or Steve Jobs, for that matter.

[@nobodyyouknow9412]

Until I was ten

[@Lunaholic94]

yep, serious leak once again, yesterday xD

[@eristderbeste]

lon glive euroepean states...not an "united stae of europe" but an Europe of nations together!!!

[@kutunuikunikuni1301]

Wot Captions. ..

[@hobodevil]

A.I. and Androids must be hurried along. AI will make the decisions for the best way to invent, innovate, create the products and services humans need. Androids can do everything humans dont wish to do. The choices are not capitalist or socialist. The choices are how to go forward with society. The goal is to not have a job or a business. The goal is to be a god.

[@apexxxx10]

*Kiitos nasta video!* kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z6fWfpx8obN-bac